ViperGTS wrote:Oh and right now. Straight up.
Tatum for Simmons. Yea or nay?
I do that trade, even with Kyrie here.
I'm going to wake up to a bunch of notifications
Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman
ViperGTS wrote:Oh and right now. Straight up.
Tatum for Simmons. Yea or nay?
CavemanDoctor wrote:esad247 wrote:CavemanDoctor wrote:
I understand the frustration. Basketball is a game of inches, though. It's too simplistic to look at it and just say "bad offense, good defense." The game is more subtle than that. There's a reason why when he is on the floor, the team overall seems to do better. A game here and there, you can say it's a small sample size. But when it happens time and time again, you have to ask yourself why and maybe admit that your eyes are deceiving you.
It's easy to understand why our eyes can deceive us because offense is inherently a more visible endeavor than defense, especially to more casual fans (no disrespect, speaking generally here). A missed 25-footer catches the eye a lot more than denying the deep position on a guard who is about to post up but doesn't because Smart's tank frame is there in the way. The latter you probably don't even notice because nothing really comes to fruition, but it is invaluable. Take that idea, multiply it by the countless number of times he does little things like that per game, and you understand why Brad "wunderkind" Stevens somehow has faith in him. We all agree Brad knows what he's doing right? Why all of a sudden doubt that's the case here?
With all that said, Smart is obviously not a perfect player, no one is. If he reduced his FGA by about 25%, he'd be even better.
So let me ask you this. How much do you believe Smart is worth, and if you could trade him for one player in the league that you think another team would actually go for, who would your choice be?
He's worth more to us than he would fetch in a trade so the latter question is irrelevant, imo.
As for the former, 4/55 and I'm happy. He'll probably end up getting more.
truth18 wrote:ViperGTS wrote:Oh and right now. Straight up.
Tatum for Simmons. Yea or nay?
I do that trade.
I'm going to wake up to a bunch of notifications.
PierceFan4ever wrote:
I don't think I've ever seen someone score that much on that kind of efficiency on that many shots. I heard Shaq was the last to shoot and score this efficiently? There's nothing like this guy when he's on fire.
PierceFan4ever wrote:
I don't think I've ever seen someone score that much on that kind of efficiency on that many shots. I heard Shaq was the last to shoot and score this efficiently? There's nothing like this guy when he's on fire.
fallguy wrote:Anyone miss Thomas at this point? Or are folks finally ready to tip their caps to Danny for that deal?
PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
radcot wrote:Kyrie "Lord have mercy" Irving.
claycarver wrote:esad247 wrote: I just can't help but feel like his terrible offense vs his amazing defense often times cancel each other out.
Did you feel the same about IT? Because I'd understand that. You want to have players that are well rounded.
I think Brad prefers players that are extremes. I'm sure he'd love a Kawhi to work with, but he doesn't seem to need that kind of player. He game plans around individual strengths, and if he has amazing/unique strengths to work with (like Smart), he gets to be creative.
Captain_Caveman wrote:GoGreen wrote:31to6 wrote:
I'm glad he made huge plays down the stretch without which we wouldn't win the game.
As I and countless others pointed out, he helped shoot us out of a big lead.
Plenty to deal with on both 'sides' instead of acting like this is one of those clear-cut things, like how Jaylen Brown isn't good at basketball.
It seems only with Marcus where his key plays somehow matter more than other players key plays. I don't get it. He is the most polarizing Celtic in years.
If the season ended today, he is probably the DPOY.
Anyone care to refute that?
OK THEN!
ViperGTS wrote:31to6 wrote:ViperGTS wrote:
Sigh. Legit star? Anyone who can’t shoot the basketball isn’t a star. He’s good. Until he can find a shot he’s just that. Then is Marcus a star? He can’t shoot either.
Look you can keep saying Simmons and Giannis aren't good but no one's really going to bother talking to you about it.
Didn’t say they weren’t good. You said star. See above? I said good.
Keep trying.
truth18 wrote:Clicked on the GB for the first time in months, saw a Bertrob post, and immediately left.
mzepol wrote:truth18 wrote:Clicked on the GB for the first time in months, saw a Bertrob post, and immediately left.
Wasn't Bertrob a Celtics fan in the past? I seem to recall him being here during the KG era. Or am I thinking about a different poster?
PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.