Celts17Pride wrote:
Seems like the Celtics could beat that if they wanted to beat it.
Seems like anyone could beat it, that's "all out"?
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts
Celts17Pride wrote:
Seems like the Celtics could beat that if they wanted to beat it.
Andrew McCeltic wrote:Celts17Pride wrote:
Seems like the Celtics could beat that if they wanted to beat it.
Seems like anyone could beat it, that's "all out"?

GoCeltics123 wrote:Mavs fans have to be fuming that J Rich has been this good for us, he **** sucked there lol
BleedGreen1989 wrote:Andrew McCeltic wrote:Celts17Pride wrote:
Seems like the Celtics could beat that if they wanted to beat it.
Seems like anyone could beat it, that's "all out"?
I'm sure there is draft capital involved.
BleedGreen1989 wrote:Andrew McCeltic wrote:Celts17Pride wrote:
Seems like the Celtics could beat that if they wanted to beat it.
Seems like anyone could beat it, that's "all out"?
I'm sure there is draft capital involved.
Celts17Pride wrote:
Seems like the Celtics could beat that if they wanted to beat it.
GoCeltics123 wrote:
Celts17Pride wrote:BleedGreen1989 wrote:Andrew McCeltic wrote:
Seems like anyone could beat it, that's "all out"?
I'm sure there is draft capital involved.
Jazz don't have any draft capital
BleedGreen1989 wrote:Celts17Pride wrote:BleedGreen1989 wrote:
I'm sure there is draft capital involved.
Jazz don't have any draft capital
Depends how far into the future they want to go, but of course they do.
Larry_Russell wrote:Horford and Schroeder to Utah
Clarkson, Romeo, Brown Jr to Sacramento along with Utah and Boston 2nds
Schroder to Chicago
Ingles and Barnes to Boston
(can swap Ingles and Clarkson destinations and still works)
That seems good for everyone right?
RickyDizzle wrote:Larry_Russell wrote:Horford and Schroeder to Utah
Clarkson, Romeo, Brown Jr to Sacramento along with Utah and Boston 2nds
Schroder to Chicago
Ingles and Barnes to Boston
(can swap Ingles and Clarkson destinations and still works)
That seems good for everyone right?
Schroeder / Schroder in there twice...
... separately, I can't see Sacramento taking less than a 1st for Barnes. Isnt a generic 1st better than every asset they get in this trade? Also with Barnes trades (a 3/4) there best players are essentially Mitchell, Haliburton, Hield, and Fox... all 1's/2's so not sure where Clarkson fits in there. I suppose a separate Buddy deal would create a spot for Clarkson.
Larry_Russell wrote:RickyDizzle wrote:Larry_Russell wrote:Horford and Schroeder to Utah
Clarkson, Romeo, Brown Jr to Sacramento along with Utah and Boston 2nds
Schroder to Chicago
Ingles and Barnes to Boston
(can swap Ingles and Clarkson destinations and still works)
That seems good for everyone right?
Schroeder / Schroder in there twice...
... separately, I can't see Sacramento taking less than a 1st for Barnes. Isnt a generic 1st better than every asset they get in this trade? Also with Barnes trades (a 3/4) there best players are essentially Mitchell, Haliburton, Hield, and Fox... all 1's/2's so not sure where Clarkson fits in there. I suppose a separate Buddy deal would create a spot for Clarkson.
lol, oops.
Horford to Utah
Ingles, Romeo and Brown Jr and Boston 1st to Sacramento
Clarkson, Barnes to Boston
I do that. Clarkson can be flipped or used in offseason for trade balast


jeremym480 wrote:Larry_Russell wrote:RickyDizzle wrote:
Schroeder / Schroder in there twice...
... separately, I can't see Sacramento taking less than a 1st for Barnes. Isnt a generic 1st better than every asset they get in this trade? Also with Barnes trades (a 3/4) there best players are essentially Mitchell, Haliburton, Hield, and Fox... all 1's/2's so not sure where Clarkson fits in there. I suppose a separate Buddy deal would create a spot for Clarkson.
lol, oops.
Horford to Utah
Ingles, Romeo and Brown Jr and Boston 1st to Sacramento
Clarkson, Barnes to Boston
I do that. Clarkson can be flipped or used in offseason for trade balast