peachbucket wrote:return2glory wrote:BakersDozen wrote:Well it is 4/20....
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
I don't do drugs.
Your never to old to start...
I'm young. This board is something else.
Drugs are not my thing.
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts
peachbucket wrote:return2glory wrote:BakersDozen wrote:Well it is 4/20....
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
I don't do drugs.
Your never to old to start...
soxfan2003 wrote:return2glory wrote:Andrew McCeltic wrote:Lots of do-everything college scorers struggle with the transition to the pros- Adam Morrison is one. No one has convinced me yet that Hield is in the Lillard/Curry mold..
I'm one of the few people that said Morrison would be a bust. Hield is no Adam Morrison.
Morrison was perhaps one of the easiest players ever for me to spot as a bust. He wasn't athletic enough given his other attributes and he didn't even shoot that well in college for a player who was supposed to be a shooter. Played 3 years of college bball and never shot above 77.2% from the free throw line. Only once shot above 40% from 3. He also had type 1 diabetes which makes it tougher.
Kolkmania wrote:greenroom31 wrote:Kolkmania wrote:They tried Murray at the 1 at the beginning of the season, but he was horrible with the ball in his hands. With Ulis' playmaking Murray was free to run beautifully around the picks and flourished. It depends how you categorize athleticism, Murray is a decent leaper, but his lateral quickness is poor. However, with this roster every player that is able to hit a three is welcome.
Thanks for the info on Murray -- I watched him in maybe 3 games all year (I'm in NC so college ball is 99% ACC here) but it seemed like Ulis was dominating the ball most of the time. Didn't realize he had a chance to run PG at the start of the season.
No problem. It were only a couple of games, they handed the keys to Ulis early if I remember correctly. This draft has a clear top 2 (Ingram, Simmons), after these players I can't see that much difference in terms of talent between #3 and #20. Agree with your opinion of Valentine, he does not excel at one thing, but does everything well. I really appreciate good decision makers and he definitely is one.
threrf23 wrote:soxfan2003 wrote:return2glory wrote:
I'm one of the few people that said Morrison would be a bust. Hield is no Adam Morrison.
Morrison was perhaps one of the easiest players ever for me to spot as a bust. He wasn't athletic enough given his other attributes and he didn't even shoot that well in college for a player who was supposed to be a shooter. Played 3 years of college bball and never shot above 77.2% from the free throw line. Only once shot above 40% from 3. He also had type 1 diabetes which makes it tougher.
Adam Morrison wasn't really a good outside shooter until after he turned 21. Hield's overall career curve is more linear than Morrison's and if nothing else he would appear to be a better shooter than Morrison ever was. He is also a fierce competitor whose demeanor seems comparable to Paul Pierce's at quick glance, whereas Morrison lied down at center court and cried for his mommy after getting eliminated from the NCAA tourney.
I don't see Lillard/Curry but Michael Redd makes a good comp on paper.
Murta wrote:Kolkmania wrote:greenroom31 wrote:
Thanks for the info on Murray -- I watched him in maybe 3 games all year (I'm in NC so college ball is 99% ACC here) but it seemed like Ulis was dominating the ball most of the time. Didn't realize he had a chance to run PG at the start of the season.
No problem. It were only a couple of games, they handed the keys to Ulis early if I remember correctly. This draft has a clear top 2 (Ingram, Simmons), after these players I can't see that much difference in terms of talent between #3 and #20. Agree with your opinion of Valentine, he does not excel at one thing, but does everything well. I really appreciate good decision makers and he definitely is one.
Lemme join the Murray lovefest. At the start of the season, UK did look horrible with him as PG. I remember someone on Twitter mentioning that UK is going to regret not having Harrison brothers anymore, which tells you how bad it had been. Since moving him off the ball, Murray has been terrific.
Murray is a guy who can shoot it really well, has the size and athleticism to guard any SG, can move off the ball as good as anybody and can do some things with the ball in his hands. His defense leaves a lot to be desired at this point, but there's enough potential for him to be a good defender, not the All-defense type of player, but also not the guy who will be exploited in any way.
When I think of what type of player he can be, Reggie Miller's career averages of 18-3-3 on 47% FG% and 39% from 3 seem like a realistic expectation for what he can do in his best seasons. Their style of play is very similar.
I don't expect him to be a 20+ point scorer (it's not out of reach, but it's tough to expect) that Miller was in his best years, but that's OK.
You can also compare him to JJ Redick who will play better defense than JJ and thus be able to play more and score more. Although it's tough to say he'll be as efficient from 3 as Redick was this season because this was historic.
All in all, I like what Murray can do and I have him as clear-cut #4 on my board. To my mind, he's probably closer to Bender at #3 than the group of players after him.
Misko4Raznatovic @MiskoRaznatovic
Ante Toni Zizic and Cibona agreed terms of NBA buy out for this summer. Annex of the agreement s already signed! #BeoBasket
David Pick @IAmDPick
I'm told first-round prospect Ante Zizic, a monster center out of Croatia, open to NBA draft-and-stash route.
NBADraftProspects @draftprosnba
There are many NBA prospects who could really impact an NBA team right away when they come over. Really like 6-11 Ante Zizic from Croatia.
Andrew McCeltic wrote:http://archive.boston.com/sports/basketball/celtics/2016/03/10/danny-ainge-says-top-the-nba-draft-little-bit-cloudy/eVr083RaA5kFiaZtSgNBKO/story.html
Don't know if anyone posted this, but it's the first comment I've seen from Danny on this year's draft: "cloudy" even at the top.
Last draft I remember like that was 2013, when Bennett went first and the three guys rumored as the 1- Oladipo, Noel, Mclemore- went 2, 6 and 7. The 2016 crop at least looks much better..
Andrew McCeltic wrote:Zizic has come on everyone's radar, the question is how high he'll get in the draft once he does workouts.. The success of Denver's guys (Nurkic and Jokic) helps him.. Remember Porzingis was linked to OKC the year before last at 16, but ended up not staying in the draft (unless I'm mis-remembering)- a year later, he went 4th.
Very very ok with him at 23, if we keep that pick. Probably the best-case scenario if we keep it, actually.
