Post#764 » by Andrew McCeltic » Thu Jun 20, 2019 8:20 pm
That's true, too - the TV and web media coverage of the draft - and sports generally - isn't good. Givony was bought out, most of the conversation is superficial, and the commentary is full of former players and attractive women. But the Woj/Shams draft shows were boring as hell, a bunch of dry nerds bringing up stats.. Nobody wants to have PBS Newshour cover the draft, reciting analytics..
All the good information is mostly paywalled or pro-walled - Synergy doesn't have a cheap option for fans anymore.. and reading some of the scouting at The Stepien where it's breaking down wrist angles and imbalanced spin moves, there's a behind the scenes layer of sophistication that's a cut above what fans have..
Draymond Green had a lot of fans, I remember, supposedly he was high on the board of most of the teams who passed on him, but just not quite high enough.
It's also fair to notice there's a basketball nerd contingent who can overthink things, or focus on undervalued players who turn out to have been correctly valued. Like, some of the names like Grant Williams, Okeke, Schofield, Edwards, Jerome, Horton-Tucker.. do we think all six of them are going to be NBA starters? Probably not - but all it takes is one - and we can crow about how ESPN sucks, but not notice that the rest washed out. The whole draft process is about educated guesses.