Better Player Right Now: Stephen Curry or Jokic

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Better Player Right Now: Stephen Curry or Jokic

Stephen Curry
135
40%
Nikola Jokic
201
60%
 
Total votes: 336

The Rebel
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,186
And1: 11,359
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
 

Re: Better Player Right Now: Stephen Curry or Jokic 

Post#101 » by The Rebel » Tue Jun 28, 2022 2:07 pm

iLLmatic860 wrote:
dautjazz wrote:
iLLmatic860 wrote:i'll take the player that can lead me to a championship over the player who puts up cute numbers any day
So you're saying that Jokic has had a championship supporting cast? Come on dude, Curry couldn't even make the playoffs last season without Klay, but he still had Wiggins, Green, Poole, Oubre, etc. In other words, if Curry couldn't make the playoffs last with that roster, how can you expect Jokic to win the title without his best two teammates.

Its not a knock against Jokic. Hes just no Curry

Are you implying Nuggets wouldve won it all if Murray and Mpj were healthy?


You do realize the Nuggets were missing 5 rotation guys in the playoffs last year all of whom they lost to injury last year don't you? The last time the Nuggets were only missing 1 starter they were in the Western Conference finals, so are you trying to argue they didn't have a very good chance?
User avatar
iLLmatic860
General Manager
Posts: 9,896
And1: 16,387
Joined: Jan 23, 2013
Location: Tampa
     

Re: Better Player Right Now: Stephen Curry or Jokic 

Post#102 » by iLLmatic860 » Tue Jun 28, 2022 2:10 pm

The Rebel wrote:
iLLmatic860 wrote:
dautjazz wrote:So you're saying that Jokic has had a championship supporting cast? Come on dude, Curry couldn't even make the playoffs last season without Klay, but he still had Wiggins, Green, Poole, Oubre, etc. In other words, if Curry couldn't make the playoffs last with that roster, how can you expect Jokic to win the title without his best two teammates.

Its not a knock against Jokic. Hes just no Curry

Are you implying Nuggets wouldve won it all if Murray and Mpj were healthy?


You do realize the Nuggets were missing 5 rotation guys in the playoffs last year all of whom they lost to injury last year don't you? The last time the Nuggets were only missing 1 starter they were in the Western Conference finals, so are you trying to argue they didn't have a very good chance?

I'm not trying to argue anything. lol I wasn't sure if that is what he was suggesting
The Rebel
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,186
And1: 11,359
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
 

Re: Better Player Right Now: Stephen Curry or Jokic 

Post#103 » by The Rebel » Tue Jun 28, 2022 2:23 pm

iLLmatic860 wrote:
The Rebel wrote:
iLLmatic860 wrote:Its not a knock against Jokic. Hes just no Curry

Are you implying Nuggets wouldve won it all if Murray and Mpj were healthy?


You do realize the Nuggets were missing 5 rotation guys in the playoffs last year all of whom they lost to injury last year don't you? The last time the Nuggets were only missing 1 starter they were in the Western Conference finals, so are you trying to argue they didn't have a very good chance?

I'm not trying to argue anything. lol I wasn't sure if that is what he was suggesting


So when is the last time Curry carried his team to the playoffs missing 5 rotation players? When is the last time the Warriors made the conference finals missing a player? You say you are not trying to argue, but you also say that Jokic is no Curry, and I say you are right Jokic is better.
jokeboy86
RealGM
Posts: 10,317
And1: 7,321
Joined: May 08, 2007

Re: Better Player Right Now: Stephen Curry or Jokic 

Post#104 » by jokeboy86 » Tue Jun 28, 2022 2:24 pm

WarriorGM wrote:
JN61 wrote:
WarriorGM wrote:I remember in 2017 right after LeBron eeked out that victory against the Warriors. People were proclaiming him the best player in the world.

Jump to now and people still insisting Jokic is the guy. Did Jokic dominate anything close to the way Steph did in 2016? Didn't Steph beat Jokic's Nuggets on the way to a title without any series going to 7 games?

If Jokic is the guy today. Curry was the guy in 2017.

It was clear LeBron was better than curry in 2017. Only absurd levels of fan bias would think otherwise. Only Durant was in the conversation with LeBron back in 2017. Curry has never been in the conversation as the best player in the league when LeBron was still in his prime.


I wonder how many other best players had another player win a unanimous MVP in a year they were in their prime? More likely your best player wasn't the best player.


I believe Curry won it unanimously because they were trending toward winning 70+ games the whole year and threatening to break the record which are strong media narratives but if we're being honest he's not the only player in league history who should've won the MVP unanimously he just was fortunate that there weren't any voters who were being contrarian just for the sake of being contrarian like there had been in every case for the past 75 years.
NBA4Lyfe
Analyst
Posts: 3,408
And1: 1,989
Joined: Mar 23, 2022
       

Re: Better Player Right Now: Stephen Curry or Jokic 

Post#105 » by NBA4Lyfe » Tue Jun 28, 2022 2:29 pm

Curry in 20 years won’t be seen as a top 10-15 player ever, he has only 4 all nba first team selections and trails other guards from his era in vorp, bpm and win shares
ty 4191
Veteran
Posts: 2,598
And1: 2,017
Joined: Feb 18, 2021
   

Re: Better Player Right Now: Stephen Curry or Jokic 

Post#106 » by ty 4191 » Tue Jun 28, 2022 3:39 pm

Sgt Major wrote:Jokic never had an All-Star teammate even close to his prime. Give him at least one of those and see what happens.


This is pretty simple. Look at their numbers the last two seasons, including the playoffs:

Would people take the 28/6/5 guy or the 27/12/8 guy?

This is a beatdown. It's Jokic, easily.
ShootersShoot
Veteran
Posts: 2,713
And1: 1,872
Joined: Aug 30, 2021

Re: Better Player Right Now: Stephen Curry or Jokic 

Post#107 » by ShootersShoot » Tue Jun 28, 2022 5:45 pm

RTG HD wrote:
ShootersShoot wrote:Ben wallace/billups won a chip in 04 as the best players on the pistons. Does that mean I would take either over KG who was then 27 years old but hasnt won anything? Not quite. Not comparing any of those players to each other but I'm just saying that it can be logical to take a player who "hasnt won anything" to another player who has won it all previously. If we swap jokic with steph on their respective teams, the warriors could still possibly contend. Steph is still a superstar and its very reasonable to choose him as well. Your points are definitely valid and logical.


I think there are limits of course when you doubt that Wallace or Billups is more likely to bring a championship in the next year than KG.

ShootersShoot wrote:Whenever I watch steph play, I am just in awe at how good he is.


Agreed, he is amazing in ways that the stat sheet does not even show.

ShootersShoot wrote:I also feel the same way when I watch Jokic play, dude is a generational level player in his own right.


I think he is great but but I might not go as far as you given how many great players the NBA has. I think it is fair to say that the NBA has more than 5 people who seem deserving of being called a top 5 player. Is Embiid top 5, seems like he should be. Giannis, he must be right? Curry, KD, LeBron, Booker, Trae Young, Luka Dončić, Ja Morant? Someone out there would argue any one of them is top 5 but they can''t all be. Personally I focus on winning a championship because that is the end goal. Jokic will absolutely be competing for that goal along with every other player I mentioned. I believe Curry even at his age gives me the highest odds of a championship. If Jokic starts winning championships, as John Maynard Keynes said; "When the data changes, I change my mind."


Jokic averages 27ppg, 13rpg, and 8apg on like 65-66% TS, with 100% of the defense keying in on him. Its very obvious those are generational center numbers. One doesnt have to win a championship for people to be able to see that. And yes, he is easily better than booker/Ja/Trae cmon now. Looking at Jokic's skillset, is he any less skilled than say, Dirk, whom I would consider a generational player?

Even if you don't consider him generational, Jokic is easily giving superstar impact.
Frozzy
Starter
Posts: 2,456
And1: 2,026
Joined: Apr 23, 2014
Location: Skyline Blvd
 

Re: Better Player Right Now: Stephen Curry or Jokic 

Post#108 » by Frozzy » Tue Jun 28, 2022 6:01 pm

ty 4191 wrote:
Sgt Major wrote:Jokic never had an All-Star teammate even close to his prime. Give him at least one of those and see what happens.


This is pretty simple. Look at their numbers the last two seasons, including the playoffs:

Would people take the 28/6/5 guy or the 27/12/8 guy?

This is a beatdown. It's Jokic, easily.

You do realize the Warriors offense moves the ball around a lot more than Denver does right? Of course Jokic is gonna put up some gaudy assist numbers when everything goes through him.

The real beatdown was Steph's Warriors gentleman sweeping the Nuggets
Image
RTG HD
Rookie
Posts: 1,249
And1: 743
Joined: Jul 01, 2010
   

Re: Better Player Right Now: Stephen Curry or Jokic 

Post#109 » by RTG HD » Tue Jun 28, 2022 6:10 pm

ShootersShoot wrote:
RTG HD wrote:
ShootersShoot wrote:Ben wallace/billups won a chip in 04 as the best players on the pistons. Does that mean I would take either over KG who was then 27 years old but hasnt won anything? Not quite. Not comparing any of those players to each other but I'm just saying that it can be logical to take a player who "hasnt won anything" to another player who has won it all previously. If we swap jokic with steph on their respective teams, the warriors could still possibly contend. Steph is still a superstar and its very reasonable to choose him as well. Your points are definitely valid and logical.


I think there are limits of course when you doubt that Wallace or Billups is more likely to bring a championship in the next year than KG.

ShootersShoot wrote:Whenever I watch steph play, I am just in awe at how good he is.


Agreed, he is amazing in ways that the stat sheet does not even show.

ShootersShoot wrote:I also feel the same way when I watch Jokic play, dude is a generational level player in his own right.


I think he is great but but I might not go as far as you given how many great players the NBA has. I think it is fair to say that the NBA has more than 5 people who seem deserving of being called a top 5 player. Is Embiid top 5, seems like he should be. Giannis, he must be right? Curry, KD, LeBron, Booker, Trae Young, Luka Dončić, Ja Morant? Someone out there would argue any one of them is top 5 but they can''t all be. Personally I focus on winning a championship because that is the end goal. Jokic will absolutely be competing for that goal along with every other player I mentioned. I believe Curry even at his age gives me the highest odds of a championship. If Jokic starts winning championships, as John Maynard Keynes said; "When the data changes, I change my mind."


Jokic averages 27ppg, 13rpg, and 8apg on like 65-66% TS, with 100% of the defense keying in on him. Its very obvious those are generational center numbers. One doesnt have to win a championship for people to be able to see that. And yes, he is easily better than booker/Ja/Trae cmon now. Looking at Jokic's skillset, is he any less skilled than say, Dirk, whom I would consider a generational player?

Even if you don't consider him generational, Jokic is easily giving superstar impact.


My goal is still to win championships. When Jokic shows he can do that I will change my mind. Until then I still pick Curry who has repeatedly proven that he can be the leader of a championship team.
ShootersShoot
Veteran
Posts: 2,713
And1: 1,872
Joined: Aug 30, 2021

Re: Better Player Right Now: Stephen Curry or Jokic 

Post#110 » by ShootersShoot » Tue Jun 28, 2022 6:16 pm

RTG HD wrote:
ShootersShoot wrote:
RTG HD wrote:
I think there are limits of course when you doubt that Wallace or Billups is more likely to bring a championship in the next year than KG.



Agreed, he is amazing in ways that the stat sheet does not even show.



I think he is great but but I might not go as far as you given how many great players the NBA has. I think it is fair to say that the NBA has more than 5 people who seem deserving of being called a top 5 player. Is Embiid top 5, seems like he should be. Giannis, he must be right? Curry, KD, LeBron, Booker, Trae Young, Luka Dončić, Ja Morant? Someone out there would argue any one of them is top 5 but they can''t all be. Personally I focus on winning a championship because that is the end goal. Jokic will absolutely be competing for that goal along with every other player I mentioned. I believe Curry even at his age gives me the highest odds of a championship. If Jokic starts winning championships, as John Maynard Keynes said; "When the data changes, I change my mind."


Jokic averages 27ppg, 13rpg, and 8apg on like 65-66% TS, with 100% of the defense keying in on him. Its very obvious those are generational center numbers. One doesnt have to win a championship for people to be able to see that. And yes, he is easily better than booker/Ja/Trae cmon now. Looking at Jokic's skillset, is he any less skilled than say, Dirk, whom I would consider a generational player?

Even if you don't consider him generational, Jokic is easily giving superstar impact.


My goal is still to win championships. When Jokic shows he can do that I will change my mind. Until then I still pick Curry who has repeatedly proven that he can be the leader of a championship team.


Yea, that's fair.
User avatar
Sgt Major
Head Coach
Posts: 6,630
And1: 16,302
Joined: Nov 09, 2018
   

Re: Better Player Right Now: Stephen Curry or Jokic 

Post#111 » by Sgt Major » Tue Jun 28, 2022 6:27 pm

Frozzy wrote:
ty 4191 wrote:
Sgt Major wrote:Jokic never had an All-Star teammate even close to his prime. Give him at least one of those and see what happens.


This is pretty simple. Look at their numbers the last two seasons, including the playoffs:

Would people take the 28/6/5 guy or the 27/12/8 guy?

This is a beatdown. It's Jokic, easily.

You do realize the Warriors offense moves the ball around a lot more than Denver does right? Of course Jokic is gonna put up some gaudy assist numbers when everything goes through him.

The real beatdown was Steph's Warriors gentleman sweeping the Nuggets


GS starting lineup - 4 recent All-Stars
DN starting linuep - 1 All-Star, 4 guys who will never be even close to an All-Star selection
Det. Frank Pembleton: You know, sometimes you're funny. Then there's now.
hardenASG13
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,251
And1: 1,889
Joined: Mar 03, 2012

Re: Better Player Right Now: Stephen Curry or Jokic 

Post#112 » by hardenASG13 » Tue Jun 28, 2022 6:52 pm

Sgt Major wrote:
Frozzy wrote:
ty 4191 wrote:
This is pretty simple. Look at their numbers the last two seasons, including the playoffs:

Would people take the 28/6/5 guy or the 27/12/8 guy?

This is a beatdown. It's Jokic, easily.

You do realize the Warriors offense moves the ball around a lot more than Denver does right? Of course Jokic is gonna put up some gaudy assist numbers when everything goes through him.

The real beatdown was Steph's Warriors gentleman sweeping the Nuggets


GS starting lineup - 4 recent All-Stars
DN starting linuep - 1 All-Star, 4 guys who will never be even close to an All-Star selection


Hear this all the time from Jokic fans on here (same ones that say he is a generational talent based on making a bubble wcf due to Murray averaging 26ppg and then getting rolled by LAL. Jokic has averaged over 20ppg only 3 times and is 27). Yet alot of these people, and people in general, say Westbrooks MVP when he averaged 31/10/10 was a farce because of inflated stats as the only option on his team. Russ is the best rebounding guard in the history of the league but people wont acknowledge it because the rebounds and assists were "stat padding" somehow (I could be wrong, but I think rebounds and assists are productive plays). Its just crazy how much this board props up Jokic because of his TS%. One could even say his assists are manufactured because they are nothing more than high post dribble handoffs that lead to jumpshots. Such a double standard for the Joker on here.
Kobe187
Starter
Posts: 2,484
And1: 2,190
Joined: Jun 08, 2019

Re: Better Player Right Now: Stephen Curry or Jokic 

Post#113 » by Kobe187 » Tue Jun 28, 2022 7:31 pm

1. Giannis
2A. Curry
2B. Jokic
Kobe187
Starter
Posts: 2,484
And1: 2,190
Joined: Jun 08, 2019

Re: Better Player Right Now: Stephen Curry or Jokic 

Post#114 » by Kobe187 » Tue Jun 28, 2022 7:37 pm

Frozzy wrote:
ty 4191 wrote:
Sgt Major wrote:Jokic never had an All-Star teammate even close to his prime. Give him at least one of those and see what happens.


This is pretty simple. Look at their numbers the last two seasons, including the playoffs:

Would people take the 28/6/5 guy or the 27/12/8 guy?

This is a beatdown. It's Jokic, easily.

You do realize the Warriors offense moves the ball around a lot more than Denver does right? Of course Jokic is gonna put up some gaudy assist numbers when everything goes through him.

The real beatdown was Steph's Warriors gentleman sweeping the Nuggets


Curry was the NBA leader in both the playoffs and regular season in secondary assists.

Secondary assist: A player is awarded a secondary assist if they passed the ball to a player who recorded an assist within 1 second and without dribbling.

Curry creates so many options and open space for his teammates that doesn’t always show up on the stat sheet.
ShootersShoot
Veteran
Posts: 2,713
And1: 1,872
Joined: Aug 30, 2021

Re: Better Player Right Now: Stephen Curry or Jokic 

Post#115 » by ShootersShoot » Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:27 pm

hardenASG13 wrote:
Sgt Major wrote:
Frozzy wrote:You do realize the Warriors offense moves the ball around a lot more than Denver does right? Of course Jokic is gonna put up some gaudy assist numbers when everything goes through him.

The real beatdown was Steph's Warriors gentleman sweeping the Nuggets


GS starting lineup - 4 recent All-Stars
DN starting linuep - 1 All-Star, 4 guys who will never be even close to an All-Star selection


Hear this all the time from Jokic fans on here (same ones that say he is a generational talent based on making a bubble wcf due to Murray averaging 26ppg and then getting rolled by LAL. Jokic has averaged over 20ppg only 3 times and is 27). Yet alot of these people, and people in general, say Westbrooks MVP when he averaged 31/10/10 was a farce because of inflated stats as the only option on his team. Russ is the best rebounding guard in the history of the league but people wont acknowledge it because the rebounds and assists were "stat padding" somehow (I could be wrong, but I think rebounds and assists are productive plays). Its just crazy how much this board props up Jokic because of his TS%. One could even say his assists are manufactured because they are nothing more than high post dribble handoffs that lead to jumpshots. Such a double standard for the Joker on here.


You do not see why Jokic, averaging 65% TS is propped up over wbrook averaging 55% TS? If westbrook averaged 65% TS, he would be steph curry. There is a significant discrepancy in both efficiency and turnovers no matter how you spin it.

Disclaimer: I thought wbrook deserved the mvp and that particular year was a historically great year for him.
michaelm
RealGM
Posts: 12,167
And1: 5,218
Joined: Apr 06, 2010
 

Re: Better Player Right Now: Stephen Curry or Jokic 

Post#116 » by michaelm » Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:52 pm

ShootersShoot wrote:
hardenASG13 wrote:
Sgt Major wrote:
GS starting lineup - 4 recent All-Stars
DN starting linuep - 1 All-Star, 4 guys who will never be even close to an All-Star selection


Hear this all the time from Jokic fans on here (same ones that say he is a generational talent based on making a bubble wcf due to Murray averaging 26ppg and then getting rolled by LAL. Jokic has averaged over 20ppg only 3 times and is 27). Yet alot of these people, and people in general, say Westbrooks MVP when he averaged 31/10/10 was a farce because of inflated stats as the only option on his team. Russ is the best rebounding guard in the history of the league but people wont acknowledge it because the rebounds and assists were "stat padding" somehow (I could be wrong, but I think rebounds and assists are productive plays). Its just crazy how much this board props up Jokic because of his TS%. One could even say his assists are manufactured because they are nothing more than high post dribble handoffs that lead to jumpshots. Such a double standard for the Joker on here.


You do not see why Jokic, averaging 65% TS is propped up over wbrook averaging 55% TS? If westbrook averaged 65% TS, he would be steph curry. There is a significant discrepancy in both efficiency and turnovers no matter how you spin it.

Disclaimer: I thought wbrook deserved the mvp and that particular year was a historically great year for him.

I am no Westbrook fan but agree about his MVP year. He dragged a team further than it had any right to go, his statistics including triple doubles correlated with his team winning, and he outperformed his main rival for the MVP award whom I actually favoured at the time in the games at the end of the regular season.
hardenASG13
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,251
And1: 1,889
Joined: Mar 03, 2012

Re: Better Player Right Now: Stephen Curry or Jokic 

Post#117 » by hardenASG13 » Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:57 pm

ShootersShoot wrote:
hardenASG13 wrote:
Sgt Major wrote:
GS starting lineup - 4 recent All-Stars
DN starting linuep - 1 All-Star, 4 guys who will never be even close to an All-Star selection


Hear this all the time from Jokic fans on here (same ones that say he is a generational talent based on making a bubble wcf due to Murray averaging 26ppg and then getting rolled by LAL. Jokic has averaged over 20ppg only 3 times and is 27). Yet alot of these people, and people in general, say Westbrooks MVP when he averaged 31/10/10 was a farce because of inflated stats as the only option on his team. Russ is the best rebounding guard in the history of the league but people wont acknowledge it because the rebounds and assists were "stat padding" somehow (I could be wrong, but I think rebounds and assists are productive plays). Its just crazy how much this board props up Jokic because of his TS%. One could even say his assists are manufactured because they are nothing more than high post dribble handoffs that lead to jumpshots. Such a double standard for the Joker on here.


You do not see why Jokic, averaging 65% TS is propped up over wbrook averaging 55% TS? If westbrook averaged 65% TS, he would be steph curry. There is a significant discrepancy in both efficiency and turnovers no matter how you spin it.

Disclaimer: I thought wbrook deserved the mvp and that particular year was a historically great year for him.


I was replying to the guy who said Jokics 27/14/8 made him better than curry. Then you have to consider things like how often OKC scored on putbacks on his misses, etc when their only option was him attacking the rim alot of times. The percentages can be misleading as far as impact. Turnovers are/have always been a problem for Russ, true. He did average 31/10/10 which most people seem to go out of their way to discredit, while Jokic is hailed as a GOAT on here.

Ive never seen a player accomplish so little (again he is 27 and has averaged over 20ppg 3 times) yet be propped up so much as Jokic. He certainly has time to build on that, but man if he loses any mobility around age 30 at his size/weight, it may not be as much time as people think. There are alot of studs coming up right now and always.
ShootersShoot
Veteran
Posts: 2,713
And1: 1,872
Joined: Aug 30, 2021

Re: Better Player Right Now: Stephen Curry or Jokic 

Post#118 » by ShootersShoot » Tue Jun 28, 2022 9:25 pm

hardenASG13 wrote:
ShootersShoot wrote:
hardenASG13 wrote:
Hear this all the time from Jokic fans on here (same ones that say he is a generational talent based on making a bubble wcf due to Murray averaging 26ppg and then getting rolled by LAL. Jokic has averaged over 20ppg only 3 times and is 27). Yet alot of these people, and people in general, say Westbrooks MVP when he averaged 31/10/10 was a farce because of inflated stats as the only option on his team. Russ is the best rebounding guard in the history of the league but people wont acknowledge it because the rebounds and assists were "stat padding" somehow (I could be wrong, but I think rebounds and assists are productive plays). Its just crazy how much this board props up Jokic because of his TS%. One could even say his assists are manufactured because they are nothing more than high post dribble handoffs that lead to jumpshots. Such a double standard for the Joker on here.


You do not see why Jokic, averaging 65% TS is propped up over wbrook averaging 55% TS? If westbrook averaged 65% TS, he would be steph curry. There is a significant discrepancy in both efficiency and turnovers no matter how you spin it.

Disclaimer: I thought wbrook deserved the mvp and that particular year was a historically great year for him.


I was replying to the guy who said Jokics 27/14/8 made him better than curry. Then you have to consider things like how often OKC scored on putbacks on his misses, etc when their only option was him attacking the rim alot of times. The percentages can be misleading as far as impact. Turnovers are/have always been a problem for Russ, true. He did average 31/10/10 which most people seem to go out of their way to discredit, while Jokic is hailed as a GOAT on here.

Ive never seen a player accomplish so little (again he is 27 and has averaged over 20ppg 3 times) yet be propped up so much as Jokic. He certainly has time to build on that, but man if he loses any mobility around age 30 at his size/weight, it may not be as much time as people think. There are alot of studs coming up right now and always.


I think he had the same issues as steph, and by that I mean kind of a late bloomer so people are not sure how sustainable those gaudy stats may be.

The thing about Jokic is, he has led his team to the WCF the last time he played with murray... He has not had murray in the past two playoffs. The reason why people tout Jokic so highly is because they are able to look past the holes in his roster with the current injuries and judge him based on his skills alone. How far exactly do you expect Jokic to go without murray and MPJ? Do you expect him to get to the wcf without them?

KG was considered a superstar even though he never led his team past the first round until his eighth season. Sometimes, you have to look past the lack of perceived team accomplishment and see a player for what he really is. At least to me, its very evident Jokic is one of the 10 best players in the nba.
runtmc
Sophomore
Posts: 219
And1: 338
Joined: Dec 31, 2018

Re: Better Player Right Now: Stephen Curry or Jokic 

Post#119 » by runtmc » Tue Jun 28, 2022 9:34 pm

hardenASG13 wrote:
Sgt Major wrote:
Frozzy wrote:You do realize the Warriors offense moves the ball around a lot more than Denver does right? Of course Jokic is gonna put up some gaudy assist numbers when everything goes through him.

The real beatdown was Steph's Warriors gentleman sweeping the Nuggets


GS starting lineup - 4 recent All-Stars
DN starting linuep - 1 All-Star, 4 guys who will never be even close to an All-Star selection


Hear this all the time from Jokic fans on here (same ones that say he is a generational talent based on making a bubble wcf due to Murray averaging 26ppg and then getting rolled by LAL. Jokic has averaged over 20ppg only 3 times and is 27). Yet alot of these people, and people in general, say Westbrooks MVP when he averaged 31/10/10 was a farce because of inflated stats as the only option on his team. Russ is the best rebounding guard in the history of the league but people wont acknowledge it because the rebounds and assists were "stat padding" somehow (I could be wrong, but I think rebounds and assists are productive plays). Its just crazy how much this board props up Jokic because of his TS%. One could even say his assists are manufactured because they are nothing more than high post dribble handoffs that lead to jumpshots. Such a double standard for the Joker on here.


That is not why people say Westbrooks MVP/triple double years were a farce. It was a farce because, well, it was a farce. Let's be clear, Westbrook is a very good rebounding guard, but it's also clear that things were manipulated so that he could average a triple double, and his 10+ rpg are a sham (frankly so are his assists, but its easier to show his rebounding were a literal sham). First, lets start by saying defensive rebounds have been shown repeatedly to have little impact, particularly compared to offensive rebounding. Westbrook for his career has averaged 1.7 off rpg -- a good number for a guard by the way.

But when you look over his career rebounding numbers, something funny jumps out. His offensive rebounding has stayed *remarkably* consistent (between 1.2-1.9 per game every season but his rookie year), but his defensive rebounding shot up on two occasions -- first in 2015, coming off an injury the year before and missing the ASG for the first time in a few years. But most importantly, KD was out most of the year, and his defensive rebounding numbers, which had mostly been sitting around 3-4 per game for most of his career up to that point suddenly jump up to 5.5 a game, and Russ basically takes the opportunity to completely dominate/take over the team. Aside from his defensive rebounding numbers, his usage skyrockets to almost 40%, which is absurd, his assists go up, scoring, fga, etc, while his turnovers jump over 4 a game and his percentages plummet. The next year, KD comes back from injury, and most of his stats return to normal, but his defensive rebounding numbers stay inflated.

Then again, in 2017, after KD leaves, Russ fully takes over the team. His usage skyrockets to 42%, which again, is literally absurd, his assists go through the roof since the ball is always in his hands (his turnovers also jump to 5.5 a game -- which is unfathomable), scoring, fga, and of course, his defensive rebounds jump up now to 9 a game, even though again, his off rpg stay in that same consistent range.

And lets be clear, its not good basketball at all to have someone with a bad efficiency to have a usage rate of 42% and 5.5 turnovers a game, but hey, Russ got his stats. In fact, if you watch games from that era, its clear Russ forced OKC to let him do whatever he wanted so he could get his stats. Russ would be the only one under the basket getting defensive rebounds, while their centers would box out for him or start heading down the court, it was literally ridiculous.

To that point, Russ had a 29% defensive rebounding percentage in 2017 (the season after KD left that summer), while their actual center, Steven Adams, was at 15%. And it's not because Adams was a bad rebounder -- Adams the last 3 years for example has had defensive rebounding % of 20-24% and has lead the league in offensive rebounding once, but those 3 post-KD years while he played with Russ? 15.4/13.9/14.8 -- that's good rebounding guard territory. The season after Russ left OKC? Adams jumped from 14.8 to 24%.

Both times Russ's defensive rebounding numbers jumped were when KD was out for the year with an injury, and then again after KD left the team completely, and clearly Russ used those opportunities to cement his control over the team. Also, note that when Russ changed teams to Houston, which was a good team with a good coach, his defensive rebounding numbers dropped dramatically, then he gets moved to Washington, a bad team, they skyrocket again, then to the Lakers, and they plummet again. His defensive rebounds per game went from 6 per game before KD left, 9 while he was in control in OKC for 3 years, back to 6 his 1 year in Houston, up to 10 his one year in Washington, then back to 6 on the Lakers. If his rebounding was legit, it wouldn't ping pong between 6 and 9-10 year to year depending on whether he was on a team where he could do whatever he wanted or not. And again, the entire time, his offensive rebounding stayed consistent while his defensive rebounding jumped up and down wildly, which again wouldn't make any sense if his rebounding numbers were legit.

Basically, Russ wasn't adding value to the team by getting extra rebounds, he was just stealing rebounds from his centers. When you have a 40%+ usage rate and average 5+ turnovers a game, and literally nobody but you brings the ball up/starts the offense etc., avging 10+ assists isnt impressive. Those things are not him being a great player, it's him being selfish so he could inflate his stats. That's why everyone calls what Russ did a farce. When you warp the whole team around you getting stats, it's not winning basketball.

And just to be clear, that isn't what Jokic is doing. That's why Jokic gets props and Westbrook is looked at as a joke.
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 50,446
And1: 27,245
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: Better Player Right Now: Stephen Curry or Jokic 

Post#120 » by dhsilv2 » Tue Jun 28, 2022 9:34 pm

RTG HD wrote:
ShootersShoot wrote:
RTG HD wrote:
I think there are limits of course when you doubt that Wallace or Billups is more likely to bring a championship in the next year than KG.



Agreed, he is amazing in ways that the stat sheet does not even show.



I think he is great but but I might not go as far as you given how many great players the NBA has. I think it is fair to say that the NBA has more than 5 people who seem deserving of being called a top 5 player. Is Embiid top 5, seems like he should be. Giannis, he must be right? Curry, KD, LeBron, Booker, Trae Young, Luka Dončić, Ja Morant? Someone out there would argue any one of them is top 5 but they can''t all be. Personally I focus on winning a championship because that is the end goal. Jokic will absolutely be competing for that goal along with every other player I mentioned. I believe Curry even at his age gives me the highest odds of a championship. If Jokic starts winning championships, as John Maynard Keynes said; "When the data changes, I change my mind."


Jokic averages 27ppg, 13rpg, and 8apg on like 65-66% TS, with 100% of the defense keying in on him. Its very obvious those are generational center numbers. One doesnt have to win a championship for people to be able to see that. And yes, he is easily better than booker/Ja/Trae cmon now. Looking at Jokic's skillset, is he any less skilled than say, Dirk, whom I would consider a generational player?

Even if you don't consider him generational, Jokic is easily giving superstar impact.


My goal is still to win championships. When Jokic shows he can do that I will change my mind. Until then I still pick Curry who has repeatedly proven that he can be the leader of a championship team.


Do you think Michael Jordan is better than jokic too?

Return to The General Board