clyde21 wrote:Duke4life831 wrote:Big J wrote:
The OP didn’t say anything about this needing to be right before the draft though.
I dont want to speak for AzCat, but Im pretty sure it was assumed that the discussion was generational prospects come draft time. Because whenever that discussion is had, that is usually the discussion. Its about who was viewed as a generational prospect by the time the draft came around.
The discussion becomes far more muddled when you expand it to anytime. Because again we would bring in guys like Barnes, Wiggins, Bates, Giles, and so on. Then you can have a discussion on how someone was viewed as a Soph, Junior and so on in high school. Its just a cleaner and better discussion to compare who were viewed as the generational prospects by the time they were going to get drafted.
it also doesn't make any sense to include anyone that wasn't viewed generational come draft time. again, a guy like Emoni Bates two years ago was talked about like Wiggins was talked about in HS. does that mean we should include him on this list?
Wiggins was not generational, that much was clear the minute he got to Kansas.
Ya thats the thing. Why include guys like Giles, Barnes, Bates in the discussion. Just because at a time in high school they were ranked #1 and you had some calling them generational, doesnt mean anything because by draft time they definitely werent viewed that way and werent even viewed as top 5 picks (wont be with Bates).