michaelm wrote:ShootersShoot wrote:hardenASG13 wrote:
Hear this all the time from Jokic fans on here (same ones that say he is a generational talent based on making a bubble wcf due to Murray averaging 26ppg and then getting rolled by LAL. Jokic has averaged over 20ppg only 3 times and is 27). Yet alot of these people, and people in general, say Westbrooks MVP when he averaged 31/10/10 was a farce because of inflated stats as the only option on his team. Russ is the best rebounding guard in the history of the league but people wont acknowledge it because the rebounds and assists were "stat padding" somehow (I could be wrong, but I think rebounds and assists are productive plays). Its just crazy how much this board props up Jokic because of his TS%. One could even say his assists are manufactured because they are nothing more than high post dribble handoffs that lead to jumpshots. Such a double standard for the Joker on here.
You do not see why Jokic, averaging 65% TS is propped up over wbrook averaging 55% TS? If westbrook averaged 65% TS, he would be steph curry. There is a significant discrepancy in both efficiency and turnovers no matter how you spin it.
Disclaimer: I thought wbrook deserved the mvp and that particular year was a historically great year for him.
I am no Westbrook fan but agree about his MVP year. He dragged a team further than it had any right to go, his statistics including triple doubles correlated with his team winning, and he outperformed his main rival for the MVP award whom I actually favoured at the time in the games at the end of the regular season.
Leonard who I now hate should have won it, but Westbrook was a legit choice too...