Hobo4President wrote:Big J wrote:ty 4191 wrote:
I'd rather take the guy who puts up wins in the playoffs. Curry doesn't care about stats.
This is why the winning argument is so bad. You're basically admitting if Jokic had a better team you'd rate him higher and if Curry had a worse team you'd rate him lower. Unless, of course, you're working backwards from a conclusion (which I'm convinced most people who make this point are)
Exactly Hobo4President!!
I've posted this before, but maybe people haven't read it. So, the Curry "RANGGZZ" people need to see and process it again:
Michael Jordan through age 27, Playoffs, before they built a Dynasty around him:
-Playoffs (53 games)
-Team Record: 24-29
-Team Series Record: 5-6
-3 first round exits, including 2 first round sweeps
-Two ECF
Jordan's line: 36.2/6.9/6.7 on +4.7% rTS. Led all players those years in all advanced and traditional metrics in the playoffs.
Nikola Jokic through age 26, Playoffs:
-Playoffs: (48 games)
-Team Record: 21-27
-Team Series Record: 4-4
-1 first round exit
-1 WCF
Jokic's line: 26.4/11.5/6.4 on +4.1 rTS%. Top 3 player in all advanced and traditional metrics in the playoffs.
Wilt Chamberlain through age 28, Playoffs:
-Playoffs: (47 games)
-Team Record: 21-26
-Team Series Record: 4-5
-Much shorter playoffs structure, so they're incompatible. Still:
Wilt's line: 33.4/26.0/3.2 on +4.7 tTS%. Clearly the MVP in the playoffs in all advanced and traditional metrics.
What did Michael Jordan win before they built a Superteam around him, while also bringing in the greatest coach of all time?
What did Wilt win, while he had coaches (that got fired or let go every year or so) 1960-1965? What did he win before he got great coaches, teammates, ownership, management around him?
Or maybe, just maybe, it's not how great YOU are, but how great your teammates, coaches, management, ownership are?