Spree2Houston wrote:It's a joke that Knick mgmt structured the Brunson contract in such a way that they can't even S&T Fournier out
Of course you have no clue this is true until July 6th
Moderators: dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85, Deeeez Knicks
Spree2Houston wrote:It's a joke that Knick mgmt structured the Brunson contract in such a way that they can't even S&T Fournier out
snadler wrote:Spree2Houston wrote:It's a joke that Knick mgmt structured the Brunson contract in such a way that they can't even S&T Fournier out
Of course you have no clue this is true until July 6th
Spree2Houston wrote:It's a joke that Knick mgmt structured the Brunson contract in such a way that they can't even S&T Fournier out
KnixinSix wrote:snadler wrote:Spree2Houston wrote:It's a joke that Knick mgmt structured the Brunson contract in such a way that they can't even S&T Fournier out
Of course you have no clue this is true until July 6th
Why? Thats when the contracts become official ?
KnixinSix wrote:Trade suggestion I saw
From Knicks
Randle ( 3 years, $25mm per) + Reddish (1 year, $6mm)
From Charlotte
Hayward (2 years, $30mm) + PJ Washington (1 year, $5mm)
Why for NYK:
-Frees up Obi
-fully gives "keys to the car" to Brunson, RJB without the potentially disruptive Randle making offense more clunky like last year
- Higher efficiency player in Hayward?
Why for Charlotte:
-Randle gives them a front court scorer, something they don't have with Bridges career now in jeopardy
Main concern is is Heyward at 30 starting to become injury prone?
snadler wrote:?s=21&t=ku8i1UL3XuqR2XUIhvlKiw
snadler wrote:?s=21&t=ku8i1UL3XuqR2XUIhvlKiw
Are We Ther Yet wrote:We need someone to clear up the cap implications for these moves. I'm getting confused with TPEs and cap rules etc.
I was under the impression we could only offer Mitch 4/54. Now he's getting 4/60. I thought we needed to S&T for Brunson or we wouldn't be able to make any other moves except for Mitch and the exception. We signed Hartenstein for 8mil per. How?
We need answers.
Are We Ther Yet wrote:We need someone to clear up the cap implications for these moves. I'm getting confused with TPEs and cap rules etc.
I was under the impression we could only offer Mitch 4/54. Now he's getting 4/60. I thought we needed to S&T for Brunson or we wouldn't be able to make any other moves except for Mitch and the exception. We signed Hartenstein for 8mil per. How?
We need answers.
ag3 wrote:Are We Ther Yet wrote:We need someone to clear up the cap implications for these moves. I'm getting confused with TPEs and cap rules etc.
I was under the impression we could only offer Mitch 4/54. Now he's getting 4/60. I thought we needed to S&T for Brunson or we wouldn't be able to make any other moves except for Mitch and the exception. We signed Hartenstein for 8mil per. How?
We need answers.
Nothing is official until July 6th and all these deals can be maneuvered to the way we need them, if something comes up.
Are We Ther Yet wrote:ag3 wrote:Are We Ther Yet wrote:We need someone to clear up the cap implications for these moves. I'm getting confused with TPEs and cap rules etc.
I was under the impression we could only offer Mitch 4/54. Now he's getting 4/60. I thought we needed to S&T for Brunson or we wouldn't be able to make any other moves except for Mitch and the exception. We signed Hartenstein for 8mil per. How?
We need answers.
Nothing is official until July 6th and all these deals can be maneuvered to the way we need them, if something comes up.
Yeah...that doesn't answer any questions I posted though. I know nothing is official but, how can they make sense if we needed to clear cap space just to afford Brunson and now we are paying Mitch more than we were supposed to be allowed? Plus the Hartenstein deal.
Fury wrote:Spree2Houston wrote:It's a joke that Knick mgmt structured the Brunson contract in such a way that they can't even S&T Fournier ou
Mavs prob told them to **** off
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid