ImageImageImage

100 Pages & Running: The FA/Trade Thread.

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: 100 Pages & Running: The FA/Trade Thread. 

Post#901 » by Andrew McCeltic » Fri Jul 1, 2022 4:21 pm

playa-hater wrote:
poopship wrote:
playa-hater wrote:Still much rather Warren over Bryant if possible.

**side note, If Galo gets reasonable amount of minutes, it spells a much less impact for Grant Williams. Neiter are a center or SF and there are only so many backup minutes at PF.

just a thought.


MLE went to Gallo. So I don't think Warren is possible. It'd have to be on the minimum which is not realistic.


then how is it possible to sign Bryant??


Because he doesn't have a market. Coming off injury, actually played for Washington last year (I didn't know that) and was mediocre, his three point shot abandoned him after the layoff (shot 28 percent).
poopship
Junior
Posts: 470
And1: 611
Joined: Jul 08, 2017
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
   

Re: 100 Pages & Running: The FA/Trade Thread. 

Post#902 » by poopship » Fri Jul 1, 2022 4:22 pm

playa-hater wrote:
poopship wrote:
playa-hater wrote:Still much rather Warren over Bryant if possible.

**side note, If Galo gets reasonable amount of minutes, it spells a much less impact for Grant Williams. Neiter are a center or SF and there are only so many backup minutes at PF.

just a thought.


MLE went to Gallo. So I don't think Warren is possible. It'd have to be on the minimum which is not realistic.


then how is it possible to sign Bryant??


Bryant is not close to being a TP-MLE type player IMO. I assume people think he might be gettable on the minimum.
Hal14
RealGM
Posts: 22,100
And1: 20,897
Joined: Apr 05, 2019

Re: 100 Pages & Running: The FA/Trade Thread. 

Post#903 » by Hal14 » Fri Jul 1, 2022 4:24 pm

To anyone saying Gallo is a defensive liability.....

We had 6 dudes on our team last year who got votes for all-defense. No other team in the league had more than 2.

Grant williams was not one of them and he absolutely performed at a borderline all-defense level in the playoffs.

In other words we have SEVEN dudes on this team who are all-defense caliber players.

We can afford to have a guy who is not so great on D but who is really good on offense, who is 6'10" and only making $6 mil a year.
Nothing wrong with having a different opinion - as long as it's done respectfully. It'd be lame if we all agreed on everything :)
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,364
And1: 70,066
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: 100 Pages & Running: The FA/Trade Thread. 

Post#904 » by Celts17Pride » Fri Jul 1, 2022 4:24 pm

Read on Twitter
User avatar
zoyathedestroya
RealGM
Posts: 41,123
And1: 98,272
Joined: Nov 05, 2017

Re: 100 Pages & Running: The FA/Trade Thread. 

Post#905 » by zoyathedestroya » Fri Jul 1, 2022 4:26 pm

Read on Twitter

Learned nothing new here. How about salary-matching?
hugepatsfan
General Manager
Posts: 8,879
And1: 9,346
Joined: May 28, 2020
       

Re: 100 Pages & Running: The FA/Trade Thread. 

Post#906 » by hugepatsfan » Fri Jul 1, 2022 4:26 pm

playa-hater wrote:
hugepatsfan wrote:Wouldn't be a TPE deal, but I'd love Theis/Nesmith/Pritchard/Morgan/2023 1st to BRK for Joe Harris if they start selling pieces.

Smart / White
Brown / Harris
Tatum
Horford / GWilliams / Gallo
R Williams

Sign me up with that as a playoff rotation. Gallo and Harris would be HUGE as floor spacers. Sign Thomas Bryant as a backup center for regular season minutes and try to find decent vet min backups at PG and on the wing too.


2 young players Nee and PP AND a first?? Hell no.. take away the first then..


Nesmith has no trade value because he arguably isn't even good enough to be on a roster. PP is a marginal rotation player without much/any trade value. Theis is a bit overpaid on a 2 year term. The 1st is definitely needed here.

I think you could maybe negotiate Pritchard out of the deal with some nothing filler like Stauskas instead. He's of such marginal value to BRK that it likely doesn't move the needle much to them, but for us we could still use that marginal value he brings.
hugepatsfan
General Manager
Posts: 8,879
And1: 9,346
Joined: May 28, 2020
       

Re: 100 Pages & Running: The FA/Trade Thread. 

Post#907 » by hugepatsfan » Fri Jul 1, 2022 4:27 pm

Hal14 wrote:To anyone saying Gallo is a defensive liability.....

We had 6 dudes on our team last year who got votes for all-defense. No other team in the league had more than 2.

Grant williams was not one of them and he absolutely performed at a borderline all-defense level in the playoffs.

In other words we have SEVEN dudes on this team who are all-defense caliber players.

We can afford to have a guy who is not so great on D but who is really good on offense, who is 6'10" and only making $6 mil a year.


We should sticky this at the top of the thread lol
GotDaSauce
RealGM
Posts: 12,088
And1: 10,082
Joined: Mar 08, 2018

Re: 100 Pages & Running: The FA/Trade Thread. 

Post#908 » by GotDaSauce » Fri Jul 1, 2022 4:27 pm

zoyathedestroya wrote:
Read on Twitter

Learned nothing new here. How about salary-matching?

Such a waste of a tweet! No **** it would require a bunch of 1st round picks! :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
zoyathedestroya
RealGM
Posts: 41,123
And1: 98,272
Joined: Nov 05, 2017

Re: 100 Pages & Running: The FA/Trade Thread. 

Post#909 » by zoyathedestroya » Fri Jul 1, 2022 4:28 pm

Shamrock
Head Coach
Posts: 7,240
And1: 5,173
Joined: Nov 02, 2010
   

Re: 100 Pages & Running: The FA/Trade Thread. 

Post#910 » by Shamrock » Fri Jul 1, 2022 4:29 pm

Don’t really care for Bryant tbh. Would be ecstatic if we can add another shooter to this team. On the Durant front, JB is realistically the best piece the Nets could get on a team where Durant will actually be okay with playing on
cl2117
General Manager
Posts: 9,007
And1: 7,634
Joined: Jun 14, 2013
 

Re: 100 Pages & Running: The FA/Trade Thread. 

Post#911 » by cl2117 » Fri Jul 1, 2022 4:29 pm

Celts17Pride wrote:
Read on Twitter

One thing to note with betting lines on things like this is that you've got to factor into the figures the sportsbooks balancing their position. It can actually shift things pretty significantly as they can't be overexposed, especially on things that are even more subjective than normal, and it usually can account for the differences across books in terms of odds.

I used to work for a sports data/trading company and you've got an entire division dedicated to "risk services" that help put their thumb on the scale to avoid massive losses if things swing an unexpected way.

So unless he is dealt to PHX very shortly, that's what this is.
UHar_Vinnie wrote:If you don't lean forward while hugging a dude, you are gonna have a wiener touching incident. You know this.
Hal14
RealGM
Posts: 22,100
And1: 20,897
Joined: Apr 05, 2019

Re: 100 Pages & Running: The FA/Trade Thread. 

Post#912 » by Hal14 » Fri Jul 1, 2022 4:30 pm

hugepatsfan wrote:
Hal14 wrote:To anyone saying Gallo is a defensive liability.....

We had 6 dudes on our team last year who got votes for all-defense. No other team in the league had more than 2.

Grant williams was not one of them and he absolutely performed at a borderline all-defense level in the playoffs.

In other words we have SEVEN dudes on this team who are all-defense caliber players.

We can afford to have a guy who is not so great on D but who is really good on offense, who is 6'10" and only making $6 mil a year.


We should sticky this at the top of the thread lol

haha thanks man
Nothing wrong with having a different opinion - as long as it's done respectfully. It'd be lame if we all agreed on everything :)
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,364
And1: 70,066
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: 100 Pages & Running: The FA/Trade Thread. 

Post#913 » by Celts17Pride » Fri Jul 1, 2022 4:32 pm

cl2117 wrote:
Celts17Pride wrote:
Read on Twitter

One thing to note with betting lines on things like this is that you've got to factor into the figures the sportsbooks balancing their position. It can actually shift things pretty significantly as they can't be overexposed, especially on things that are even more subjective than normal, and it usually can account for the differences across books in terms of odds.

I used to work for a sports data/trading company and you've got an entire division dedicated to "risk services" that help put their thumb on the scale to avoid massive losses if things swing an unexpected way.

So unless he is dealt to PHX very shortly, that's what this is.

Betting lines change all the time. This is what it is right now.
hugepatsfan
General Manager
Posts: 8,879
And1: 9,346
Joined: May 28, 2020
       

Re: 100 Pages & Running: The FA/Trade Thread. 

Post#914 » by hugepatsfan » Fri Jul 1, 2022 4:34 pm

Andrew McCeltic wrote:
playa-hater wrote:
poopship wrote:
MLE went to Gallo. So I don't think Warren is possible. It'd have to be on the minimum which is not realistic.


then how is it possible to sign Bryant??


Because he doesn't have a market. Coming off injury, actually played for Washington last year (I didn't know that) and was mediocre, his three point shot abandoned him after the layoff (shot 28 percent).


I don't think his shot abandoned him. He only took 42 3 pointers the whole season. It's just a sample size issue. He was 12-42, if he goes 15-42 then he's right back at 36%. On that limited volume, the shooting percentage is so flaky and easily swung.

That being said, low volume is part of the package with him as a "shooter". Over his last 4 seasons he's attempted 1.6 threes per game and made 0.6. He's really not a "shooter" or a "floor spacer". Defenses aren't going to respect his shot. They leave him open and a couple of times a game he pulls the triggers. And every other game he actually makes one. It's a nice percentage to see on paper, but it really isn't that impactful or meaningful as things stand right now.

The encouraging part though is that it shows potential for growth. If he can start shooting them at a higher volume and maintain good percentage, then it becomes something that helps you.
playa-hater
RealGM
Posts: 22,389
And1: 24,062
Joined: Aug 29, 2020
 

Re: 100 Pages & Running: The FA/Trade Thread. 

Post#915 » by playa-hater » Fri Jul 1, 2022 4:34 pm

hugepatsfan wrote:
playa-hater wrote:
hugepatsfan wrote:Wouldn't be a TPE deal, but I'd love Theis/Nesmith/Pritchard/Morgan/2023 1st to BRK for Joe Harris if they start selling pieces.

Smart / White
Brown / Harris
Tatum
Horford / GWilliams / Gallo
R Williams

Sign me up with that as a playoff rotation. Gallo and Harris would be HUGE as floor spacers. Sign Thomas Bryant as a backup center for regular season minutes and try to find decent vet min backups at PG and on the wing too.


2 young players Nee and PP AND a first?? Hell no.. take away the first then..


Nesmith has no trade value because he arguably isn't even good enough to be on a roster. PP is a marginal rotation player without much/any trade value. Theis is a bit overpaid on a 2 year term. The 1st is definitely needed here.

I think you could maybe negotiate Pritchard out of the deal with some nothing filler like Stauskas instead. He's of such marginal value to BRK that it likely doesn't move the needle much to them, but for us we could still use that marginal value he brings.


OK Nee having "no trade value" Right now, is reasonable. But not being good enough for this Roster is a stretch.. considering who we have behind him. Nee Or PP not both.. and I would rather use our 1st next year on someone else TBH.

I'll give names later.. I am running out the door.
2 things need to go.. my lack of spell check and Joe.. :nod:
hugepatsfan
General Manager
Posts: 8,879
And1: 9,346
Joined: May 28, 2020
       

Re: 100 Pages & Running: The FA/Trade Thread. 

Post#916 » by hugepatsfan » Fri Jul 1, 2022 4:37 pm

playa-hater wrote:
hugepatsfan wrote:
playa-hater wrote:
2 young players Nee and PP AND a first?? Hell no.. take away the first then..


Nesmith has no trade value because he arguably isn't even good enough to be on a roster. PP is a marginal rotation player without much/any trade value. Theis is a bit overpaid on a 2 year term. The 1st is definitely needed here.

I think you could maybe negotiate Pritchard out of the deal with some nothing filler like Stauskas instead. He's of such marginal value to BRK that it likely doesn't move the needle much to them, but for us we could still use that marginal value he brings.


OK Nee having "no trade value" Right now, is reasonable. But not being good enough for this Roster is a stretch.. considering who we have behind him. Nee Or PP not both.. and I would rather use our 1st next year on someone else TBH.

I'll give names later.. I am running out the door.


Our roster is a bad example to use. We punted on our last 4 roster spots last year with G-League caliber players on pro rated vet minimum deals so we could duck the tax.

If you ignore where Nesmith was drafted and his contract status and strictly judge him on his merits so far in the NBA, he's a training camp invite caliber of player that you bring to camp and let compete for a 13th-15th man spot on a roster. That's why I say arguably off an NBA roster.
sam_I_am
RealGM
Posts: 16,725
And1: 9,513
Joined: Jul 10, 2004

Re: 100 Pages & Running: The FA/Trade Thread. 

Post#917 » by sam_I_am » Fri Jul 1, 2022 4:38 pm

playa-hater wrote:
hugepatsfan wrote:
playa-hater wrote:
2 young players Nee and PP AND a first?? Hell no.. take away the first then..


Nesmith has no trade value because he arguably isn't even good enough to be on a roster. PP is a marginal rotation player without much/any trade value. Theis is a bit overpaid on a 2 year term. The 1st is definitely needed here.

I think you could maybe negotiate Pritchard out of the deal with some nothing filler like Stauskas instead. He's of such marginal value to BRK that it likely doesn't move the needle much to them, but for us we could still use that marginal value he brings.


OK Nee having "no trade value" Right now, is reasonable. But not being good enough for this Roster is a stretch.. considering who we have behind him. Nee Or PP not both.. and I would rather use our 1st next year on someone else TBH.

I'll give names later.. I am running out the door.


Nesmith being asked to play on SL roster year 3 is akin to team admitting he is in James Young, Yabs territory ie. in danger of not getting second NBA contract. I still see unique talent - a 3 pt specialist with plus rebounding and defensive/athletic ability. I have no doubt that some day he will be a useful NBA player but he might still be a few years away. Malik Monk is a guy that comes to mind as having that kind of career path.
"I think the criticism's stupid," Stevens said. "So I don't care. I'm with Jaylen (Brown) on that. Those two had achieved more than most 25 and 26 year olds ever had. I'd rather be in the mix and have my guts ripped out than suck."
Scoonie
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,510
And1: 1,801
Joined: Aug 28, 2004
Location: New Hampshire
   

Re: 100 Pages & Running: The FA/Trade Thread. 

Post#918 » by Scoonie » Fri Jul 1, 2022 4:38 pm

Really surprising that Jalen Smith is still available.
Dogen wrote:Celtics win despite Smart having -1 points for the game.
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: 100 Pages & Running: The FA/Trade Thread. 

Post#919 » by Andrew McCeltic » Fri Jul 1, 2022 4:39 pm

hugepatsfan wrote:
Andrew McCeltic wrote:
playa-hater wrote:
then how is it possible to sign Bryant??


Because he doesn't have a market. Coming off injury, actually played for Washington last year (I didn't know that) and was mediocre, his three point shot abandoned him after the layoff (shot 28 percent).


I don't think his shot abandoned him. He only took 42 3 pointers the whole season. It's just a sample size issue. He was 12-42, if he goes 15-42 then he's right back at 36%. On that limited volume, the shooting percentage is so flaky and easily swung.

That being said, low volume is part of the package with him as a "shooter". Over his last 4 seasons he's attempted 1.6 threes per game and made 0.6. He's really not a "shooter" or a "floor spacer". Defenses aren't going to respect his shot. They leave him open and a couple of times a game he pulls the triggers. And every other game he actually makes one. It's a nice percentage to see on paper, but it really isn't that impactful or meaningful as things stand right now.

The encouraging part though is that it shows potential for growth. If he can start shooting them at a higher volume and maintain good percentage, then it becomes something that helps you.


What do you make of his defense?
flintsky21
Starter
Posts: 2,148
And1: 3,254
Joined: Oct 21, 2010
 

Re: 100 Pages & Running: The FA/Trade Thread. 

Post#920 » by flintsky21 » Fri Jul 1, 2022 4:39 pm

playa-hater wrote:Still much rather Warren over Bryant if possible.

**side note, If Galo gets reasonable amount of minutes, it spells a much less impact for Grant Williams. Neiter are a center or SF and there are only so many backup minutes at PF.

just a thought.

Yeah, interesting how they go about that. Grant at the 3 isn't ideal, but he can probably keep up with defending most perimeter wings, and at this point, even that may be a better option over playing Nesmith and all these 2-way and G-league guys at the 3.

Return to Boston Celtics