falcolombardi wrote:Doctor MJ wrote:falcolombardi wrote:
Was jeter not just a very good player in a stacked team and a-rod a legitimate all time great?
Are we sure it was not because alex rodriguez was a dominican and jeter an american?
Short answer: Yes and yes.
Now, Jeter was an excellent baseball player to be clear, but he wasn't an MVP level guy. He would not have become anything like the icon he was had he not been on an absolute outlier of a modern baseball dynasty on the biggest sports franchise in American sports history. Among the core group of players there for that whole run, Jeter was the strongest of the field players, good looking, hard working, and seemed to have a clear sense of what not to say in order to be revered rather than judged.
ARod on the other hand had the misfortune of starting with a weak organization, and then being judged for leaving them to go somewhere better, which put two strikes against him...while also developing a Bonds-like reputation for arrogance and selfishness and then testing positive for steroids at a time where the knives were out for all those who dared to try to keep up with what the MLB was letting others do.
If you want to argue that cultural background went into how ARod's personality was perceived compared to Jeter's, I'll certainly listen, but other than that, yeah, you're talking about a textbook case of the worse player landing in the better spot, and that having a profound impact on how the two players would later be perceived.
The racial thingg was my wild guess, i just heard from my dad once (a big yankees fan in mexico where everyone are dodgers fans but that is a different story) that A-rod was a lot better and thar was odd to me since jeter seems to have been the "jordan" of baseball as far as being the face of tge league
I thought the race thinfg may have been a explanation for it
googled up jeter vs a rod and there was some stufd about advanced stats saying jetwr is the most overated fielder ever and that a-rod was put out of the more inportant fielding position to have jeter there
I will freely admit i have all my baseball knowlesge by pure osmosis, dont know nuch about it outside the basics and some big namea
Jeter being seen as the Jordan of his sport in his era is one of the more bizarre things I've ever seen in a team sport. A lot of factors involved in this:
1. As mentioned, Jeter was really lucky.
2. Baseball is a game driven by luck more so than the talent of individuals, so "lucky" here exists on a scale far beyond what we should see as possible in sports like basketball, hockey, or gridiron football (though wouldn't say the same about soccer).
3. Steroids basically killed off most of the top tier baseball talent from being seen as icon-worthy. Back in the late '90s, when the Yankees had their actual dynastic run, the biggest names in baseball were McGwire & Sosa (and it would be Bonds after that), not anyone on the Yankees. But those Yankees, and Jeter & Rivera in particular, were in the process of building a legacy that would last rather than be punctured by needles.
(Shout out to Ken Griffey Jr. who was the guy who had the career arc of best-in-era before the steroids wave really hit and people, so far as I know, have always believed to be clean. The irony is that Griffey's arc gets smashed by injuries right at the time the steroid users take over the sport - ironic because one of the things they always warned us about was that steroids would cause you to be injury prone, yet this was the opposite of how it seemed to play out in baseball in this period.)