Bob Ross wrote:FrozenEnvelope wrote:Bob Ross wrote:
Who they also can't get without moving Simmons. Pelicans wouldn't do that anyway, Durant is on the wrong side of 34 and becoming injury prone
It's crazy to me how KD's age and torn achilles injury isn't talked about. I know he's fully recovered but that was a major injury and it's likely father time will catch up to him sooner. There is just no chance KD is the KD of today at age 38.
I wouldn't touch him. First signs of inconvenience he'll ask to be traded again.
Strong agree. For what it's worth, I think his play after returning from the Achilles is basically unprecedented so far. But he's definitely not someone I would target
It obviously also depends on what teams have to give up. But if you are a team that is a legit top 3 team in the league after a KD trade you almost have to do it. Despite his age and everything he will give you another 3 years of elite production, especially considering his style of play.
I do however agree that against Boston he had likely one , if not the worst playoff series of his career so yes, age will definitely catch up to him as well. I would however say that as training science, nutrition, medical science etc. has advanced vastly---34 today is more like 31/32 in 2005. If you have the type of dedication that KD has you can play at a high level till like 37/38.