mjkvol wrote:76ciology wrote:mjkvol wrote:
I respect most of his opinions, but his lust to dump Maxey to bring in players impossible to root for and much more likely to create an implosion here than a championship is disturbing.
Im not trading him for Joe Harris.
Im trading him for Kevin Durant.
I think Maxey is a good player and has a pretty high value.
I like guards. I like shooting. I like offense.
But this is just between us.. Maxey only has average at best shot creation skills in ISO or PnR, very low volume of iso possessions and almost no PnR in the playoffs. Most of his offense is off the gravity of Biid or Harden, closeouts, transitions and spot ups.
…which makes him a good fit for Harden or Embiid
Just right now when I was looking at his PnR and ISO numbers, a guy who is similarly as good is Bones Hyland.
How good do you guys project Maxey to be? Thats also what I want to know. As good as Donovan Mitchell? Malcolm Brogdon? I see him more having a career like Jeff Teague. Or Jrue or Tony Parker without the championship ring value bump
Would I trade Tony Parker or Jrue Holiday for Durant? Yes. Specially considering the limited window I have with Harden and Embiid
He's 21 yrs. old. He's coming off his first full year as a starter. I'm not going to place a ceiling on a kid with his ability and work ethic, but you go right ahead. I'm sure you would have been ready to dump Steph Curry early on for some disgruntled superstar du jour as well.
I guess fans today are so conditioned to fantasy and NBA 2K (I think that's the name I've seen) that they aren't really fans of a team and establish any kind of connection to certain players any more. Just different times.
Yes. Thats how it is nowadays.
I believe the best way to win nowadays is to have a program should be in short cycles.
Why? Because of player empowerment leading to a high variance in player movement.
At some point you have to shift your team into a win now mode. And in this “win now” mode where you need to bundle the superheroes into an avengers type team.
Last season, Harden asks for a trade. And we became a superteam.
This offseason, KD asks for a trade. And some team would be a superteam.
Wolves trades 5 picks for Gobert, they now leap frogged all other teams who didn’t made an “all in” move.
Next week, maybe Pels trades all 5 draft picks for Bradley Beal then the power rankings will change again.
Look at OKC, Rox, Jazz and Pels and how many draft picks they are stashing. They can leap frog over us any day.
Raptors and Heat are rumored to be on the KD sweepstakes. If they land KD, your chance to win a championship closes a little or completely, depending on how much they’ll give up.
Then eventually when the sun sets, you be like the Rox, Jazz and the Nets, trading Embiid and Harden for picks to help you rebuild.
This is what the league wants. Every season, big player movements that makes every season more entertaining. Players and agents also gets to paid more and run the league.
Lastly, teams like the Rockets has outsource their tanking because they already traded their pick so in the grand scheme of things, there will be less tanking.
I dont like how things are going on right now, but we have to adjust.
Our team is always late on the trend. Whether its to going big when everyone is going small then now going small when everyone is slowly trying to go big or when we try to be like the Spurs (a long running contender) that made us not want to trade Ben for a year’s rental of Kawhi, when teams like the Raps and Bucks leaps ahead of us in winning a championship because they went into “win now” mode. Look how that “Spurs” mindset made the Jazz obsolete. They should have traded Gobert years ago.
The trend now is no player connection, unless maybe you have an ATG player like Giannis or LeBron. More of a stoic approach to things. You compete, accumulate assets on the side. And when opportunity opens up, you pounce with all the assets you have saved.
And lastly.. you have Embiid. He isnt an ironman like Giannis, LeBron or Duncan. Your time horizon to compete is very small, thinking otherwise would be a mistake.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.