ImageImageImage

Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

younggunsmn
Head Coach
Posts: 6,849
And1: 2,679
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Hiding from the thought police.

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#141 » by younggunsmn » Mon Jul 4, 2022 11:03 am

winforlose wrote:If the big market effect is a force field keeping out the best FA (especially on discount deals,) then the Gollum effect is a magnet pulling them in. Whichever force wins will decide our future.


I like this term "Gollum effect". It could be something we will need to count on 2-3 years down the road when we have 3 players making 95% of the cap. We need to win to reap the benefits though, looking good on paper isn't enough.
I think that means at least one finals trip, or ANT blowing up into a full fledged superstar.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,813
And1: 5,300
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#142 » by minimus » Mon Jul 4, 2022 1:50 pm

Cant stop thinking that Tyus Jones on full MLE would be awesome PG for this roster... It would give stability in execution plus just enough shooting/scoring from PG position. For sure better defense than DLo, and better durability. Also might encourage Edwards to play more PnR with Gobert...

Another one is Brogdon...

I might be completely wrong though...
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#143 » by moss_is_1 » Mon Jul 4, 2022 2:22 pm

shrink wrote:
Buying a pick doesn’t count against the cap, or count against the $5.785. It probably should.

So the amount of cash isn't affected by buying picks? Only in other deals? Or as long as it's just a straight up purchase of a pick it doesn't affect it?
User avatar
D1SGRUNTL3D
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,104
And1: 2,080
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Location: Minnesota
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#144 » by D1SGRUNTL3D » Mon Jul 4, 2022 3:21 pm

Brogdon was had for cheap because he might net you 60 games next year.

Assuming DLo is gone next year, we’ll have to look into the Brogdon/Brunson route at the draft. Get any 4 year starting PG in the second round and cross our fingers he catches on quickly.

But I don’t know what we’re going to be looking at this time next year
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,813
And1: 5,300
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#145 » by minimus » Mon Jul 4, 2022 3:38 pm

Lakers bought 35 pick this year for cash. I hope we will be able to buy 2nd round pick every year.
mthead2121
Sophomore
Posts: 184
And1: 63
Joined: Dec 24, 2013

Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#146 » by mthead2121 » Mon Jul 4, 2022 4:05 pm

Was thinking with all the guards the Bulls now have and now reports Wolves may be targeting Cousins or Dieng - I think a swap or Naz Reid for Ayo Dosunmu makes a lot of sense. We need more backup pg depth. We know Dlo will miss his usual 20 games. Having just little Mac as back up pg isn’t going to cut it. Seems like a perfect swap.
fattymcgee
Senior
Posts: 558
And1: 301
Joined: Apr 03, 2008

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#147 » by fattymcgee » Mon Jul 4, 2022 4:47 pm

minimus wrote:Cant stop thinking that Tyus Jones on full MLE would be awesome PG for this roster... It would give stability in execution plus just enough shooting/scoring from PG position. For sure better defense than DLo, and better durability. Also might encourage Edwards to play more PnR with Gobert...

Another one is Brogdon...

I might be completely wrong though...


Tyus got $15M/yr to stay in Memphis, the MLE is only $10M.
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#148 » by moss_is_1 » Mon Jul 4, 2022 4:52 pm

mthead2121 wrote:Was thinking with all the guards the Bulls now have and now reports Wolves may be targeting Cousins or Dieng - I think a swap or Naz Reid for Ayo Dosunmu makes a lot of sense. We need more backup pg depth. We know Dlo will miss his usual 20 games. Having just little Mac as back up pg isn’t going to cut it. Seems like a perfect swap.

Chicago isn't gonna trade Ayo, especially for Naz. He's a hometown guy and played well for them as a rookie.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,813
And1: 5,300
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#149 » by minimus » Mon Jul 4, 2022 5:28 pm

fattymcgee wrote:
minimus wrote:Cant stop thinking that Tyus Jones on full MLE would be awesome PG for this roster... It would give stability in execution plus just enough shooting/scoring from PG position. For sure better defense than DLo, and better durability. Also might encourage Edwards to play more PnR with Gobert...

Another one is Brogdon...

I might be completely wrong though...


Tyus got $15M/yr to stay in Memphis, the MLE is only $10M.

Exactly. 15 but only for two years. Full MLE is around 44 / 4. Also it was mentioned that he wanted starting role.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,639
And1: 19,739
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#150 » by shrink » Tue Jul 5, 2022 12:19 am

moss_is_1 wrote:
shrink wrote:Buying a pick doesn’t count against the cap, or count against the $5.785. It probably should.

So the amount of cash isn't affected by buying picks? Only in other deals? Or as long as it's just a straight up purchase of a pick it doesn't affect it?

I thought I heard this years ago, but I just tried to double-check it, and I can’t find anything, one way or another.

I don’t want to give you bad information, so I recant. Maybe?
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#151 » by moss_is_1 » Tue Jul 5, 2022 12:22 am

shrink wrote:
moss_is_1 wrote:
shrink wrote:Buying a pick doesn’t count against the cap, or count against the $5.785. It probably should.

So the amount of cash isn't affected by buying picks? Only in other deals? Or as long as it's just a straight up purchase of a pick it doesn't affect it?

I thought I heard this years ago, but I just tried to double-check it, and I can’t find anything, one way or another.

I don’t want to give you bad information, so I recant. Maybe?

I thought it was weird there was a deal during the draft with $6m in cash, IIRC. So you might be right.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,468
And1: 5,992
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#152 » by winforlose » Tue Jul 5, 2022 12:26 am

A buddy suggested this trade to me (he doesn’t like big ball.) I personally would pass on it, but I have to admit it intrigued me enough to share.

Wolves out: KAT, Dlo
Wolves in: Fred VanVleet, Pascal Siakam, Gary Trent Jr, and maybe some picks

We didn’t narrow down the picks. I argued that if the market for Gobert is 4+ then KAT is worth at least 2 on top of the talent in the trade. He countered that we gave up less valuable players than Toronto. I will let you guys decide.

The idea was KAT is worth 2 of the guys and VanVleet is an upgrade over Dlo.

Starting lineup VanVleet, Trent, Ant, Siakam, Gobert.

Not sure either team makes this deal, again I wouldn’t, but it was a good enough idea that I thought I would bring it here.

Edit to include: I just looked at the contracts, and I am now even more against the idea. FVV and Trent are both player option next year.
Chello1
Junior
Posts: 476
And1: 114
Joined: Jun 05, 2014
       

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#153 » by Chello1 » Tue Jul 5, 2022 5:49 pm

younggunsmn wrote:
winforlose wrote:If the big market effect is a force field keeping out the best FA (especially on discount deals,) then the Gollum effect is a magnet pulling them in. Whichever force wins will decide our future.


I like this term "Gollum effect". It could be something we will need to count on 2-3 years down the road when we have 3 players making 95% of the cap. We need to win to reap the benefits though, looking good on paper isn't enough.
I think that means at least one finals trip, or ANT blowing up into a full fledged superstar.


The cap will be 50-60 million more by then if you look at most estimates.... Great trade!
https://basketball.realgm.com/nba/info/salary_cap
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,468
And1: 5,992
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#154 » by winforlose » Tue Jul 5, 2022 6:00 pm

Chello1 wrote:
younggunsmn wrote:
winforlose wrote:If the big market effect is a force field keeping out the best FA (especially on discount deals,) then the Gollum effect is a magnet pulling them in. Whichever force wins will decide our future.


I like this term "Gollum effect". It could be something we will need to count on 2-3 years down the road when we have 3 players making 95% of the cap. We need to win to reap the benefits though, looking good on paper isn't enough.
I think that means at least one finals trip, or ANT blowing up into a full fledged superstar.


The cap will be 50-60 million more by then if you look at most estimates.... Great trade!
https://basketball.realgm.com/nba/info/salary_cap


I agree from the money side. The Dlo situation troubles me a little. I wish we had agreed to overpay before the trade. Dlo has SOO much leverage now. We cannot easily replace him and we cannot afford to lose him. Granted the market will take care of some of this problem, but I fear teams with cap space might decide to steal him. I think he is worth 22-25, but I would gladly pay him 30 to keep him happy and locked up. Of course this opinion is a direct result of going all in on Gobert.
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,831
And1: 18,346
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#155 » by babyjax13 » Tue Jul 5, 2022 6:36 pm

winforlose wrote:
Chello1 wrote:
younggunsmn wrote:
I like this term "Gollum effect". It could be something we will need to count on 2-3 years down the road when we have 3 players making 95% of the cap. We need to win to reap the benefits though, looking good on paper isn't enough.
I think that means at least one finals trip, or ANT blowing up into a full fledged superstar.


The cap will be 50-60 million more by then if you look at most estimates.... Great trade!
https://basketball.realgm.com/nba/info/salary_cap


I agree from the money side. The Dlo situation troubles me a little. I wish we had agreed to overpay before the trade. Dlo has SOO much leverage now. We cannot easily replace him and we cannot afford to lose him. Granted the market will take care of some of this problem, but I fear teams with cap space might decide to steal him. I think he is worth 22-25, but I would gladly pay him 30 to keep him happy and locked up. Of course this opinion is a direct result of going all in on Gobert.


I think D'Lo is a great fit on a team with Gobert, but he can definitely be replaced. There is always a starting caliber point guard available for cheap.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,468
And1: 5,992
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#156 » by winforlose » Tue Jul 5, 2022 6:42 pm

babyjax13 wrote:
winforlose wrote:
Chello1 wrote:
The cap will be 50-60 million more by then if you look at most estimates.... Great trade!
https://basketball.realgm.com/nba/info/salary_cap


I agree from the money side. The Dlo situation troubles me a little. I wish we had agreed to overpay before the trade. Dlo has SOO much leverage now. We cannot easily replace him and we cannot afford to lose him. Granted the market will take care of some of this problem, but I fear teams with cap space might decide to steal him. I think he is worth 22-25, but I would gladly pay him 30 to keep him happy and locked up. Of course this opinion is a direct result of going all in on Gobert.


I think D'Lo is a great fit on a team with Gobert, but he can definitely be replaced. There is always a starting caliber point guard available for cheap.


Please name 3 that we can sign for the MLE next year?
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,831
And1: 18,346
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#157 » by babyjax13 » Tue Jul 5, 2022 6:47 pm

winforlose wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:
winforlose wrote:
I agree from the money side. The Dlo situation troubles me a little. I wish we had agreed to overpay before the trade. Dlo has SOO much leverage now. We cannot easily replace him and we cannot afford to lose him. Granted the market will take care of some of this problem, but I fear teams with cap space might decide to steal him. I think he is worth 22-25, but I would gladly pay him 30 to keep him happy and locked up. Of course this opinion is a direct result of going all in on Gobert.


I think D'Lo is a great fit on a team with Gobert, but he can definitely be replaced. There is always a starting caliber point guard available for cheap.


Please name 3 that we can sign for the MLE next year?


Patrick Beverley, Reggie Jackson, Dennis Schroeder, maybe Austin Reaves/Coby White if they improve --- then whatever team ends up drafting a point guard in the lottery. Plus guys like Markelle Fultz, Ricky Rubio, Mike Conley, etc. who would probably be available for a reasonable price in a trade. None of them are better than D'Lo, but if he tries to extract too much there are options.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,468
And1: 5,992
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#158 » by winforlose » Tue Jul 5, 2022 6:51 pm

babyjax13 wrote:
winforlose wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:
I think D'Lo is a great fit on a team with Gobert, but he can definitely be replaced. There is always a starting caliber point guard available for cheap.


Please name 3 that we can sign for the MLE next year?


Patrick Beverley, Reggie Jackson, Dennis Schroeder, maybe Austin Reaves/Coby White if they improve --- then whatever team ends up drafting a point guard in the lottery. Plus guys like Markelle Fultz, Ricky Rubio, Mike Conley, etc. who would probably be available for a reasonable price in a trade. None of them are better than D'Lo, but if he tries to extract too much there are options.


Getting worse when you have a contending window is never a viable option. You yourself admit every name is worse than Dlo. I rest my case.
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,831
And1: 18,346
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#159 » by babyjax13 » Tue Jul 5, 2022 6:56 pm

winforlose wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:
winforlose wrote:
Please name 3 that we can sign for the MLE next year?


Patrick Beverley, Reggie Jackson, Dennis Schroeder, maybe Austin Reaves/Coby White if they improve --- then whatever team ends up drafting a point guard in the lottery. Plus guys like Markelle Fultz, Ricky Rubio, Mike Conley, etc. who would probably be available for a reasonable price in a trade. None of them are better than D'Lo, but if he tries to extract too much there are options.


Getting worse when you have a contending window is never a viable option. You yourself admit every name is worse than Dlo. I rest my case.


Getting worse depends on the periphery moves, too. For example...let's say D'Lo goes but you can swap Anderson for one of these guys, then use your full MLE on another player INSTEAD of resigning D'Lo and having only the taxpayer MLE. I think it would be pretty easy to turn Russell leaving into something lateral instead of getting worse, with an outlier possibility of getting better depending on what MLE deals are out there.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,468
And1: 5,992
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Re: Trade Talk (Part Eleven): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#160 » by winforlose » Tue Jul 5, 2022 7:17 pm

babyjax13 wrote:
winforlose wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:
Patrick Beverley, Reggie Jackson, Dennis Schroeder, maybe Austin Reaves/Coby White if they improve --- then whatever team ends up drafting a point guard in the lottery. Plus guys like Markelle Fultz, Ricky Rubio, Mike Conley, etc. who would probably be available for a reasonable price in a trade. None of them are better than D'Lo, but if he tries to extract too much there are options.


Getting worse when you have a contending window is never a viable option. You yourself admit every name is worse than Dlo. I rest my case.


Getting worse depends on the periphery moves, too. For example...let's say D'Lo goes but you can swap Anderson for one of these guys, then use your full MLE on another player INSTEAD of resigning D'Lo and having only the taxpayer MLE. I think it would be pretty easy to turn Russell leaving into something lateral instead of getting worse, with an outlier possibility of getting better depending on what MLE deals are out there.


1. Continuity matters. The more players you replace in a given year the more time it takes to rebuild it.

2. We don’t have a ton of trade assets to work with. Moving Anderson to get a PG around 10 mil now creates a need of another PF using the MLE and the guys available for 10 are probably not as good. Dlo is also relatively young with the possibility of improvement. Some of the guys on your list are older and more prone to serious injury. But, even accepting your premise we now need to use the MLE to replace Anderson, lost Dlo for nothing, and had the opportunity cost of not being able to keep Dlo and Anderson and use the MLE on someone new.

3. I am not 100% sure Dlo on a 30 mil puts us in the tax before we use the MLE. I cannot find good number about our current salary this year and next year after all our recent moves are factored in.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves