Why BALL HOGS never win a chamionchip?

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

User avatar
Meat
Head Coach
Posts: 7,306
And1: 5,081
Joined: Jun 30, 2013
     

Re: Why BALL HOGS never win a chamionchip? 

Post#81 » by Meat » Sun Jul 10, 2022 9:19 pm

Counter point, every championship team has at least one ball hog, more often than not 2
raleigh
Head Coach
Posts: 6,308
And1: 623
Joined: Oct 23, 2004

Re: Why BALL HOGS never win a chamionchip? 

Post#82 » by raleigh » Sun Jul 10, 2022 9:37 pm

If this thread was a subtle Big3 advertisement, I congratulate the OP.
User avatar
Lalouie
RealGM
Posts: 23,394
And1: 12,472
Joined: May 12, 2017

Re: Why BALL HOGS never win a chamionchip? 

Post#83 » by Lalouie » Sun Jul 10, 2022 9:39 pm

x
formula 400
Pro Prospect
Posts: 943
And1: 621
Joined: Sep 28, 2021
Location: Chi
   

Re: Why BALL HOGS never win a chamionchip? 

Post#84 » by formula 400 » Sun Jul 10, 2022 9:59 pm

GiannisAnte34 wrote:Kobe won 5 of them as a ball hog. He was an elite passer when he wanted to be or an elite ISO scorer when he wanted to be, but rarely ever balanced both



uh kobe won 5. only handful of players have 5+ rings. kobe did what he did to win. stop hating it seeping through your pores
Silvie Lysandra
Starter
Posts: 2,193
And1: 463
Joined: May 22, 2007
   

Re: Why BALL HOGS never win a chamionchip? 

Post#85 » by Silvie Lysandra » Sun Jul 10, 2022 10:58 pm

All time leaders in career usage:
1: Michael Jordan
3: Kobe Bryant
5: LeBron James

Of the 73 NBA championships, these 3 players have won 15 of them. Number 6, Dwayne Wade, won 2, one independently of LeBron. Weird thread.
Ein Sof
Pro Prospect
Posts: 950
And1: 798
Joined: Jun 11, 2021

Re: Why BALL HOGS never win a chamionchip? 

Post#86 » by Ein Sof » Mon Jul 11, 2022 1:09 am

Meat wrote:Counter point, every championship team has at least one ball hog, more often than not 2

Are you claiming ballhogging is a good thing...?
Archx
RealGM
Posts: 12,438
And1: 10,178
Joined: Feb 09, 2018
 

Re: Why BALL HOGS never win a chamionchip? 

Post#87 » by Archx » Mon Jul 11, 2022 1:21 am

Forbes wrote:
SpreeS wrote:I leave here % of FG Ast'd per PO career for TOP perimeter players. You can draw your own conclusions.

1. Paul .135
2. Doncic .135
3. Nash .204
4. Westbrook .213
5. Harden .229

6. Wade .291
7. Lebron .326
8. Kobe .349
9. Curry .409
10. Kidd .447


So as a Mavs fan, seeing Luka dominate the ball definitely kills me because I have been screaming about these other guy not playing championship ball for years. I’m just hoping in Lukas case he gets another star and becomes less dominant. Clearly we’ll only find out if the Mavs actually do get another star.


Weird that you're bringing up Mavs offense because them not getting in to the finals had nothing to do with their offense. Defense killed them and no rim presence. What they were doing on offense worked.

They had 114 ORTG compared to Boston 106 vs GSW. But like i said, defense was the issue.
User avatar
Beethoven
General Manager
Posts: 7,720
And1: 4,674
Joined: May 03, 2012
Location: Utopian Dystopia
 

Re: Why BALL HOGS never win a chamionchip? 

Post#88 » by Beethoven » Mon Jul 11, 2022 1:23 am

Kobe was a freakin black hole
Kobe Bryant forever
GO LAKERS
8-)
I've heard it through the grapevine..NBA gods have already designated Los Angeles LAKERS as NBA Champions in near future. The destiny is real. TRUST ME.
User avatar
Optms
RealGM
Posts: 23,766
And1: 20,202
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
 

Re: Why BALL HOGS never win a chamionchip? 

Post#89 » by Optms » Mon Jul 11, 2022 1:26 am

GiannisAnte34 wrote:Kobe won 5 of them as a ball hog. He was an elite passer when he wanted to be or an elite ISO scorer when he wanted to be, but rarely ever balanced both


Goes to show you didn't watch a single series of the Lakers playoffs between 2007-2010.
User avatar
SecondTake
Veteran
Posts: 2,671
And1: 1,493
Joined: Jun 03, 2017

Re: Why BALL HOGS never win a chamionchip? 

Post#90 » by SecondTake » Mon Jul 11, 2022 2:00 am

LakersLegacy wrote:
Pennebaker wrote:
SpreeS wrote:I leave here % of FG Ast'd per PO career for TOP perimeter players. You can draw your own conclusions.

1. Paul .135
2. Doncic .135
3. Nash .204
4. Westbrook .213
5. Harden .229

6. Wade .291
7. Lebron .326
8. Kobe .349
9. Curry .409
10. Kidd .447


What is this saying again? Kobe is the biggest ball hog on the list and he won multiple champion shops.


Kobe lead the Lakers in assists for many seasons even though he was the shooting guard not the point guard
That just proves that he was a ball hog. everything had to go through him to the point he even minimized his PG

Sent from my SM-S908W using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
ken6199
Forum Mod - Rockets
Forum Mod - Rockets
Posts: 13,435
And1: 18,740
Joined: Jan 05, 2015
Location: Bill O'Brien is GOAT
     

Re: Why BALL HOGS never win a chamionchip? 

Post#91 » by ken6199 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 4:06 am

BallerTalk wrote:
SpreeS wrote:I leave here % of FG Ast'd per PO career for TOP perimeter players. You can draw your own conclusions.

1. Paul .135
2. Doncic .135
3. Nash .204
4. Westbrook .213
5. Harden .229

6. Wade .291
7. Lebron .326
8. Kobe .349
9. Curry .409
10. Kidd .447

Another grand example of how stats without context are completely worthless.

Exactly. It only takes Kidd NOT going to Dallas, or Terry being 15% less hot to completely invalidate OP's hypothesis.

What's even crazier? OP listed Doncic, a 23 year old, in a "never win a championship" thread.

We all know it, he just wanted to put Curry in there.
RealGM loves you, Melissa.
SpreeS
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,777
And1: 4,139
Joined: Jul 26, 2012
 

Re: Why BALL HOGS never win a chamionchip? 

Post#92 » by SpreeS » Mon Jul 11, 2022 4:26 am

ken6199 wrote:
BallerTalk wrote:
SpreeS wrote:I leave here % of FG Ast'd per PO career for TOP perimeter players. You can draw your own conclusions.

1. Paul .135
2. Doncic .135
3. Nash .204
4. Westbrook .213
5. Harden .229

6. Wade .291
7. Lebron .326
8. Kobe .349
9. Curry .409
10. Kidd .447

Another grand example of how stats without context are completely worthless.

Exactly. It only takes Kidd NOT going to Dallas, or Terry being 15% less hot to completely invalidate OP's hypothesis.

What's even crazier? OP listed Doncic, a 23 year old, in a "never win a championship" thread.

We all know it, he just wanted to put Curry in there.


I want to show, especially for Doncic fan, Harden/Westbrook playing style won’t win you champ’s. Doncic holds time with ball per poss record (8.3s). I do everything for everyone with ball, stand on offence w/o ball and rest on defence - it leads nowhere.
DoItALL9
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,935
And1: 1,345
Joined: Oct 08, 2016
       

Re: Why BALL HOGS never win a chamionchip? 

Post#93 » by DoItALL9 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 4:34 am

SpreeS wrote:I leave here % of FG Ast'd per PO career for TOP perimeter players. You can draw your own conclusions.

1. Paul .135
2. Doncic .135
3. Nash .204
4. Westbrook .213
5. Harden .229

6. Wade .291
7. Lebron .326
8. Kobe .349
9. Curry .409
10. Kidd .447
What's per PO?

Sent from my LM-G710 using RealGM mobile app
atlantabbq99
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,181
And1: 1,758
Joined: Mar 28, 2013

Re: Why BALL HOGS never win a chamionchip? 

Post#94 » by atlantabbq99 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:11 am

GiannisAnte34 wrote:Kobe won 5 of them as a ball hog. He was an elite passer when he wanted to be or an elite ISO scorer when he wanted to be, but rarely ever balanced both


Kobe only won 2 rings. He was a bus rider for the first 3.
User avatar
ken6199
Forum Mod - Rockets
Forum Mod - Rockets
Posts: 13,435
And1: 18,740
Joined: Jan 05, 2015
Location: Bill O'Brien is GOAT
     

Re: Why BALL HOGS never win a chamionchip? 

Post#95 » by ken6199 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:34 am

SpreeS wrote:
ken6199 wrote:
BallerTalk wrote:Another grand example of how stats without context are completely worthless.

Exactly. It only takes Kidd NOT going to Dallas, or Terry being 15% less hot to completely invalidate OP's hypothesis.

What's even crazier? OP listed Doncic, a 23 year old, in a "never win a championship" thread.

We all know it, he just wanted to put Curry in there.


I want to show, especially for Doncic fan, Harden/Westbrook playing style won’t win you champ’s. Doncic holds time with ball per poss record (8.3s). I do everything for everyone with ball, stand on offence w/o ball and rest on defence - it leads nowhere.


Harden monopolizing the ball was a few bounces/hamstring away from taking down the death lineup with inferior talent. They played against that team better than anyone else in the league, and proved that type of basketball can be useful. You cannot ignore all the facts and only focus on the result then work backwards to validate your hypothesis. Other posters called you out with stats. Please read their posts.

And if you categorize Harden and Westbook into a same style to try to prove some point? Then I don't know what to say here.
RealGM loves you, Melissa.
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 92,448
And1: 32,010
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Why BALL HOGS never win a chamionchip? 

Post#96 » by tsherkin » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:42 am

atlantabbq99 wrote:Kobe only won 2 rings. He was a bus rider for the first 3.


That's not really a good characterization at all. Kobe was a high-end star player during the three-peat. He was more efficient on high volume than Shaq against the Kings in 2000, struggled versus Phoenix, then played very well versus Portland before having a rough one versus Indiana. He outperformed Shaq in the Blazers series in 2001, then kicked in Sacramento's teeth, and obliterated San Antonio before struggling against Philly. Struggled vs Portland in 2002, was about on par with Shaq versus the Spurs, struggled versus the Kings and then smashed New Jersey. All in all, he did very well during the three-peat. He was very much not a "bus rider," that's some serious haterade to actually believe that.
atlantabbq99
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,181
And1: 1,758
Joined: Mar 28, 2013

Re: Why BALL HOGS never win a chamionchip? 

Post#97 » by atlantabbq99 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:55 am

tsherkin wrote:
atlantabbq99 wrote:Kobe only won 2 rings. He was a bus rider for the first 3.


That's not really a good characterization at all. Kobe was a high-end star player during the three-peat. He was more efficient on high volume than Shaq against the Kings in 2000, struggled versus Phoenix, then played very well versus Portland before having a rough one versus Indiana. He outperformed Shaq in the Blazers series in 2001, then kicked in Sacramento's teeth, and obliterated San Antonio before struggling against Philly. Struggled vs Portland in 2002, was about on par with Shaq versus the Spurs, struggled versus the Kings and then smashed New Jersey. All in all, he did very well during the three-peat. He was very much not a "bus rider," that's some serious haterade to actually believe that.


Kobe was trash in the Shaq era. He was horrible against the Sixers, Pacers, and Detroit. His only decent series was against New Jersey.

3 out of the 4 finals he was hurting the team and a liability on offense and defense, and Shaq had to drag him into a championship. Combined against the sixers, pacers and pistons Kobe only averaged 18ppg and shot 39FG% and he allowed guys he was guarding, Iverson, Miller, and Rip to shoot over there averages, about 47FG%.

Nets was the only series where Kobe was able to shoot over 40% and out play his opponent.
rand
Analyst
Posts: 3,073
And1: 4,027
Joined: Jun 28, 2013

Re: Why BALL HOGS never win a chamionchip? 

Post#98 » by rand » Mon Jul 11, 2022 8:13 am

Ein Sof wrote:
rand wrote:
Ein Sof wrote:Again, do you think MJ or Curry (back when he was nearly leading the league in FGs) were ballhogs?

If no, then there's clearly something more to it.

Imagine a pickup game where you have these two teammates:

Spencer, who takes 1/5 of your team's shots but when he does shoot it's usually off his own creation.

Michael, who takes 2/5 of your team's shots. Michael's scores come off passes twice as often as Spencer's but passing to him isn't optional since he's the best player and dictates when and where he wants the ball.

This is Spencer Dinwiddie and Michael Jordan.

2022 Dinwiddie was only assisted on 32.6% of his FGAs, but he only shot 18.5 FGAs per 100 possessions.

1998 Jordan was assisted on 59.6% of his FGAs, but he took 32.1 FGAs per 100 possessions.

Are you telling me that 2022 Dinwiddie was really the bigger ballhog over 1998 Jordan?

lol

Yeah man. That's exactly how it works.

MJ was such a cancerous ballhog, unlike Dimwiddie. And so was 2016 Curry:

28.6 FGA/100 :noway:
46.9% assisted rate

In fact, every first option in NBA history was a ballhog.

Who says words have to mean things?

I didn't say MJ was a cancerous ballhog. I said he's a bigger ballhog than Spencer Dinwiddie while demonstrating why using % of FGM assisted is a highly flawed way of measuring ballhogging. Your argument is so weak that you have to beat up on straw men rather than addressing what I actually say.

Here's a few more examples to demonstrate how absurd your position is:

Career % of FGs Assisted (career FGA in parentheses)
Tony Parker: 30.5% (12.6)
Andre Miller: 31.1% (10.0)
Rajon Rondo: 31.7% (8.9)
TJ McConnell: 33.0% (6.1)
Jrue Holiday: 33.4% (13.9)
Jameer Nelson: 34.4% (9.9)

Allen Iverson: 36.4% (21.8)
LeBron James: 36.9% (19.6)
Kobe Bryant: 40.6% (19.5)
Tracy McGrady: 44.5% (16.4)
Carmelo Anthony: 50.0% (18.0)
Bradley Beal: 53.4% (17.6)

So Tony Parker, Andre Miller, Rajon Rondo, TJ McConnell, Jrue Holiday and Jameer Nelson are bigger "ballhogs" than Allen Iverson, LeBron James, Kobe Bryant, Tracy McGrady, Carmelo Anthony and Bradley Beal? Yeah man, that's exactly how it works :noway:

In fact, every PG who doesn't shoot a high proportion of 3PAs is a "ballhog" (according to your astoundingly bad logic).

But yeah, who says words have to mean things?

P.S. Jordan is a bigger ballhog than Spencer Dinwiddie but that doesn't make him a cancer. Jordan is one of the best scorers of all-time so if he's on my team then I'd like him to hog the ball a fair amount. This shouldn't be hard to understand.
JN61
RealGM
Posts: 11,748
And1: 9,260
Joined: Jan 07, 2018
 

Re: Why BALL HOGS never win a chamionchip? 

Post#99 » by JN61 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 8:54 am

ken6199 wrote:
BallerTalk wrote:
SpreeS wrote:I leave here % of FG Ast'd per PO career for TOP perimeter players. You can draw your own conclusions.

1. Paul .135
2. Doncic .135
3. Nash .204
4. Westbrook .213
5. Harden .229

6. Wade .291
7. Lebron .326
8. Kobe .349
9. Curry .409
10. Kidd .447

Another grand example of how stats without context are completely worthless.

Exactly. It only takes Kidd NOT going to Dallas, or Terry being 15% less hot to completely invalidate OP's hypothesis.

What's even crazier? OP listed Doncic, a 23 year old, in a "never win a championship" thread.

We all know it, he just wanted to put Curry in there.

That is usually agendas of these type of poorly thought out threads.
Pennebaker wrote:And Bird did it while being a defensive liability. But he also made All-Defensive teams, which was another controversial issue regarding Bird and votes.
JN61
RealGM
Posts: 11,748
And1: 9,260
Joined: Jan 07, 2018
 

Re: Why BALL HOGS never win a chamionchip? 

Post#100 » by JN61 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 8:57 am

ken6199 wrote:
SpreeS wrote:
ken6199 wrote:Exactly. It only takes Kidd NOT going to Dallas, or Terry being 15% less hot to completely invalidate OP's hypothesis.

What's even crazier? OP listed Doncic, a 23 year old, in a "never win a championship" thread.

We all know it, he just wanted to put Curry in there.


I want to show, especially for Doncic fan, Harden/Westbrook playing style won’t win you champ’s. Doncic holds time with ball per poss record (8.3s). I do everything for everyone with ball, stand on offence w/o ball and rest on defence - it leads nowhere.


Harden monopolizing the ball was a few bounces/hamstring away from taking down the death lineup with inferior talent. They played against that team better than anyone else in the league, and proved that type of basketball can be useful. You cannot ignore all the facts and only focus on the result then work backwards to validate your hypothesis. Other posters called you out with stats. Please read their posts.

And if you categorize Harden and Westbook into a same style to try to prove some point? Then I don't know what to say here.

Yes. Harden is significantly more ball hogging and dribble happy. Not even a contest there. Harden dribbles air out of basketball on half court. Westbrook tries to kick it out to easy simple basket as fast as possible in first 10 seconds.
Pennebaker wrote:And Bird did it while being a defensive liability. But he also made All-Defensive teams, which was another controversial issue regarding Bird and votes.

Return to The General Board