Chanel Bomber wrote:dakomish23 wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:No, you started it by throwing a subliminal shot at me and the "RJ haters". Nothing's weaker than a subliminal. Again, self-projection.
I asked the question because I wasn't sure. That's why question marks exist.
I do remember you moaning and complaining about the "lack of patience" for Knox. Same as you did for Frank. So don't tell me you weren't wrong about Knox. In the end, those who called him a bust early were right. You were not.
"Frank
Dotson
Knox
Zion
KP
Rejoice!"
Jesus Christ
I changed my mind about RJ. I liked him as a prospect, but admitted I was wrong and changed my mind once I accepted the overwhelming statistical evidence that he sucks.
Randle had a bad year, a good year, and a horrible year. My assessment of his game reflects that. Still, I wanted him traded after the 2020-21 season, because he was not as impactful as his numbers and his perception suggested. I didn't think he was worthy of All-NBA. But still he played well, and as a fan I enjoyed that. Sue me.
See, I can admit I'm wrong. I do change my mind, that doesn't make me a "prisoner of the moment". Only fools never change their mind. You never admit you were wrong, despite time and time again seeing your takes turn into absolute sheet, since nothing you predict actually materializes, outside of a thing here and there. Instead, you just deflect blame, and vaguely bring up "context" as a way to explain why things didn't happen as you predicted, instead of being a grown-up and admitting you were wrong.
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=2071142&p=90142433&hilit=Chanel+Bomber+RJ#p90142064
Chanel Bomber wrote:This has been my opinion since before the draft.
I see RJ making incremental improvements and steadily trending upwards year after year, while Ja slowly but surely trends downwards as time goes by, or just stalls.
I just think RJ is more substance than flash than Ja is, if we viewed it as a spectrum. Some of it is about physical attributes, some of it is about mental make-up. I just trust RJ's approach to the game more than I do Ja's.
RJ is quieter, very composed and very serious about the game. I'm not implying that Ja has a negative personality, or that he isn't committed to the game of basketball, but he's more of a loudmouth and we saw him at Murray State not even bothering on the defensive end because of the load he had to carry offensively, which was perhaps self-inflicted to some degree. I guess I just prefer RJ's character traits. The hopes regarding his potential as a draft prospect rested a lot on his intangibles, to be fair.
I also think with his defense and shooting percentages, it's hard to see how Ja can contribute if he's not your featured guy, whereas RJ can be more versatile in terms of roles.
Sure buddy. Sure buddy.
Exactly my point.
I was wrong, I admitted I was wrong, and changed my opinion.
Only fools don't change their mind.
Those like you who don't even comprehend the concept, belong to an entirely different category.
You don't learn from your mistakes, because you're too narcissistic to see them or to admit that you were wrong, and that's why all these years later you think the same way, you still write like a teenager, and your takes are still trash.
Nah you pathetic dimwit. It proved my point.
At that time, RJ was doing well and b/c you’re a prisoner of the moment, you were praising RJ. And the second he isn’t, you write paragraph after mind numbing paragraph jumping to irrational conclusions. Again.
Casual fans like you love to yap and pretend they know what they're talking about. They cling to the stats they see basketball heads bring up and ignore context. They jump all over the map on a player based on the current event.
Then when their foolishness is shown, they have to lie about what others have said b/c they never fostered them ability to have an original basketball thought. Forever unarmed in a battle of wits.
You said I said I wouldn’t trade Frank and Knox for AD. I called you out on your lie and you pretended it was a question not an accusation.
As always with casuals, it was projection.
Chanel Bomber wrote:clyde21 wrote:KhalilS wrote:Reminds me of Celtics fans saying they aren't giving Marcus Smart for Harden.
lol seriously...people get wayyyyyyy too attached to their young prospects...go to the Dubs boards ask them to see if they want to trade Wiseman...it's like pulling teeth.
but yea, if you can get Dame you do it, and this is coming from an RJ fan (IQ/Obi are very tradeable let's not get crazy here)
I usually agree with you but I have to disagree with you here.
Personally I don't trade RJ for Dame.It's highly unlikely RJ ever reaches Dame's level as a basketball player. I'm fully aware of that.
But there's something to be said for building with a homegrown player who plays hard, who values hard work and who's improving exponentially as a 20 year-old. RJ is a culture changer and he's been a major contributor in turning the Knicks franchise around (alongside Rose, Thibs and Randle). There's no doubt in my mind that RJ will not stop grinding until he becomes an All-Star.
RJ is a full decade younger than Dame. You trade for Dame and what do you get? A four year window of something that's not guaranteed at all? He has some decent teammates in Portland and outside of that 2018-19 season he hasn't exactly carried them very far. I love Lillard, but he's in the latter years of his prime, and he's not guaranteeing you anything. I'm not trading a future All-Star who's 10 years younger than him for this level of uncertainty.
Wiseman is completely different imo. He has sunk the Warriors whenever he was on the floor this year, and his skill set can be more easily replaced as a big man than a switchable wing who can defend, rebound, pass and score, although RJ still needs to improve his scoring efficiency. But his upside is significantly higher than Wiseman's in today's NBA, as is his floor, considering Wiseman is having trouble defending at the position that most requires defense.
If the Knicks trade RJ for a 30-year-old star, I bet they'll regret it for the next decade.
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=2077172&p=90555275&hilit=Chanel+RJ#p90555164