Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake
Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
-
- Senior
- Posts: 685
- And1: 746
- Joined: Jan 01, 2019
-
Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
It's evident as I am getting older that the NBA is strictly a business. Majority of NBA owners would rather have a large profit than win an actual championship. I feel like some owners cater to their fan base by doing bare minimum to get fans on board but in terms of actually competing and having to pay luxury tax, they simply bow out. It kinda turned me off as a fan and I'm sure it sucks to hear this but a lot of the bad owners in sports (not just nba) ruin the fan culture in general. Here is my list of NBA teams who will never win a championship IN FUTURE due to bad ownership:
1.) NY Knicks - Dolan
2.) OKC Thunder - market and ownership doing bare minimum
3.) Orlando Magic - ownership never keeps stars (Shaq, Penny, Dwight)
4.) Houston Rockets - Fertitta
5.) Sacramento Kings - Vivek
6.) Indiana Pacers - market and ownership not caring about winning
7.) Charlotte Hornets - market and never keeping stars/young talent
8.) San Antonio Spurs - ownership situation and market attractability
1.) NY Knicks - Dolan
2.) OKC Thunder - market and ownership doing bare minimum
3.) Orlando Magic - ownership never keeps stars (Shaq, Penny, Dwight)
4.) Houston Rockets - Fertitta
5.) Sacramento Kings - Vivek
6.) Indiana Pacers - market and ownership not caring about winning
7.) Charlotte Hornets - market and never keeping stars/young talent
8.) San Antonio Spurs - ownership situation and market attractability
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 143
- And1: 486
- Joined: Jul 02, 2020
-
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
- cupcakesnake
- Senior Mod- WNBA
- Posts: 15,463
- And1: 31,817
- Joined: Jul 21, 2016
-
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
Can't really get behind this list.
- OKC is in great shape in terms of building a future contender.
- Houston looked doomed but quickly restocked the cupboard and repaired their draft equity. They now have a very exciting young core.
- If Paolo is as advertised, the Magic are in the best shape they've been in since Dwight.
- The Pacers have very consistently built very good teams. Reggie Miller era into the JO/Artest team that ended with Malice at the Palace, then they quickly built that Paul George/Hibbert team. Even the recent iteration with Sabonis/Brogdon/Turner might have been a strong playoff team had it not been for career-altering injuries to Oladipo and Warren.
- The Spurs won a championship in 2014 and have only now gone full tilt on their rebuild.
New York, Sacramento, and Charlotte are the only teams that feel perpetually stuck in the mud. Charlotte I was ready to take off this list with their exciting core around Lamelo, but then the Miles Bridges incident happened and now we need to see how they rebound from that. I actually have hope for Sacramento for the first time in a while. Mostly because I'm an outlier Keegan Murray fan, but also because I think this roster makes sense for the first time in years. They're going to start 2x 2-way wings with a passing big man and a speedy point guard. They have Holmes off the bench. They have a good offensive guard (Huerter) and defensive guard (Davion). I'm buying Sactown stock this summer.
(sorry New York, I couldn't think of anything nice to say. I hate basically everything the Knicks have done in the Thibs era. I love RJ and Mitchell Robinson but feel they're stunted by the constant shuffle of ill-fitting veterans. Brunson is a nice player.)
- OKC is in great shape in terms of building a future contender.
- Houston looked doomed but quickly restocked the cupboard and repaired their draft equity. They now have a very exciting young core.
- If Paolo is as advertised, the Magic are in the best shape they've been in since Dwight.
- The Pacers have very consistently built very good teams. Reggie Miller era into the JO/Artest team that ended with Malice at the Palace, then they quickly built that Paul George/Hibbert team. Even the recent iteration with Sabonis/Brogdon/Turner might have been a strong playoff team had it not been for career-altering injuries to Oladipo and Warren.
- The Spurs won a championship in 2014 and have only now gone full tilt on their rebuild.
New York, Sacramento, and Charlotte are the only teams that feel perpetually stuck in the mud. Charlotte I was ready to take off this list with their exciting core around Lamelo, but then the Miles Bridges incident happened and now we need to see how they rebound from that. I actually have hope for Sacramento for the first time in a while. Mostly because I'm an outlier Keegan Murray fan, but also because I think this roster makes sense for the first time in years. They're going to start 2x 2-way wings with a passing big man and a speedy point guard. They have Holmes off the bench. They have a good offensive guard (Huerter) and defensive guard (Davion). I'm buying Sactown stock this summer.
(sorry New York, I couldn't think of anything nice to say. I hate basically everything the Knicks have done in the Thibs era. I love RJ and Mitchell Robinson but feel they're stunted by the constant shuffle of ill-fitting veterans. Brunson is a nice player.)
"Being in my home. I was watching pokemon for 5 hours."
Co-hosting with Harry Garris at The Underhand Freethrow Podcast
Co-hosting with Harry Garris at The Underhand Freethrow Podcast
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,155
- And1: 19,110
- Joined: Jul 02, 2015
-
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
Imagine if Sac had Luka and Giannis lol
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,919
- And1: 3,547
- Joined: Jul 05, 2018
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
HeatIn5 wrote:Imagine if Sac had Luka and Giannis lol
They wouldnt.
Giannis would have left and Luka would be on his way out.
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
- MoneyTalks41890
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 32,775
- And1: 25,036
- Joined: Oct 13, 2009
-
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,892
- And1: 13,688
- Joined: Jan 20, 2007
-
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:Gotta love the strong takes from the casuals
https://www.google.com/amp/s/syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/2784460-thunder-to-become-1st-team-in-nba-history-to-top-300m-in-salary-and-luxury-tax.amp.html
Imagine if he was willing to spend that to keep Harden in 2012. OKC would have been the GSW of the teens
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
- JayMKE
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,315
- And1: 17,173
- Joined: Jun 21, 2010
- Location: LA
-
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
Dolan is the worst really, he don't GAF at all and is fine cashing in off MSG. Vivek I feel like has had some near swings and misses, things are looking a lot different if they had Luka obviously but I don't think they're bad from lack of caring. Ted Leonsis and Wizards seems to fly under the radar, don't seem to care much about competing while raking in cash in one of the biggest richest metros. There's a ton of "bad" owners in the league honestly and they do occasionally walk ass backward into contention like Sarver did in Phoenix, there's just another level of bad that's fine with whatever as long as brings back a profit and being personally sh*tty people too.
FREE GIANNIS
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
- iLLmatic860
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,896
- And1: 16,387
- Joined: Jan 23, 2013
- Location: Tampa
-
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
Why aren’t Suns on list?
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,444
- And1: 3,571
- Joined: Feb 13, 2014
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
The Knicks have the worst FO/Ownership probably in all of professional sports followed closely by the Kings.
76ciology wrote:Wouldn't Edey have a better chance of winning the scoring battle against Tatum in the post after a switch than Tatum shooting over Edey's 9'6" standing reach?





Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,952
- And1: 4,338
- Joined: May 24, 2014
-
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
Knicks have been pretty solid
Gained multiple picks
Drafted many young players
Have cap flexibility
Gained multiple picks
Drafted many young players
Have cap flexibility
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,714
- And1: 4,859
- Joined: Jun 07, 2018
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,083
- And1: 14,454
- Joined: Jul 01, 2008
-
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
JayMKE wrote:Dolan is the worst really, he don't GAF at all and is fine cashing in off MSG. Vivek I feel like has had some near swings and misses, things are looking a lot different if they had Luka obviously but I don't think they're bad from lack of caring. Ted Leonsis and Wizards seems to fly under the radar, don't seem to care much about competing while raking in cash in one of the biggest richest metros. There's a ton of "bad" owners in the league honestly and they do occasionally walk ass backward into contention like Sarver did in Phoenix, there's just another level of bad that's fine with whatever as long as brings back a profit and being personally sh*tty people too.
FWIW I prefer "leaving it to the basketball people" Dolan to "hands on" Dolan.
*sigh*
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,083
- And1: 14,454
- Joined: Jul 01, 2008
-
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
DrCoach wrote:Knicks have been pretty solid
Gained multiple picks
Drafted many young players
Have cap flexibility
This new FO has done fine so far, it's just hard to have a lot of faith because trying to do the Toronto/Miami thing of going from bad to solid to good to genuinely contending is harder & takes more patience than the 'tank for a superstar' to 'team on the rise' to 'geniune contender' path. So they have to keep doing good work consistently for a longer time.
...and the whole thing could be wasted if they blow their wad on the wrong #1 option. If they mess that up RJ could turn into a Pippen level #2 while Brunson turned into peak Kyle Lowry, and we still wouldn't have a chance at a title.
But yeah, so far they've done a good job of building up the stockpile of futures to use as trade capital or to bolster their own core, bringing in young NBA talent to start populating that core, and creating an environment where they can develop without being overwhelmed or buried.
It's just hard not to be scared that this has all just been leading to another Melo trade where we blow all of that ammo on the wrong #1 option and then can't build a contender around him.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,814
- And1: 22,399
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
Feels nice to take a break from being on this list!
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,625
- And1: 8,757
- Joined: May 26, 2020
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
OKC can't keep stars in that city, nor do they want to pay them, so them.
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
- Vampirate
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,627
- And1: 4,478
- Joined: Dec 04, 2016
-
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
The only team I feel belongs on this list at this time are the Wizards, every other team has some array of hope.
And yes i'm saying the Wizards are in worse shape going forwards than the Knicks and Kings.
I guess you can put the Blazers on this list but there's a possibility Dame captures some of his Superstar clutch self.
And yes i'm saying the Wizards are in worse shape going forwards than the Knicks and Kings.
I guess you can put the Blazers on this list but there's a possibility Dame captures some of his Superstar clutch self.

Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 36,447
- And1: 67,127
- Joined: Jun 16, 2015
-
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
I would say none. I mean just a few years ago I think with Sarver many wouldve had them at or near the top of their list. They were just in the Finals a couple years ago.
Honestly all it takes is one or two lucky moves and your entire franchise is turned around.
Honestly all it takes is one or two lucky moves and your entire franchise is turned around.
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,920
- And1: 3,764
- Joined: May 25, 2019
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
Duke4life831 wrote:I would say none. I mean just a few years ago I think with Sarver many wouldve had them at or near the top of their list. They were just in the Finals a couple years ago.
Honestly all it takes is one or two lucky moves and your entire franchise is turned around.
As we’ve seen though, if you have a crappy ownership, they will find a way to screw things up in short order, even if they get lucky the way you described.
See: the example you pointed out. Sarver.
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,083
- And1: 14,454
- Joined: Jul 01, 2008
-
Re: Teams that have ZERO chance to compete in future because of ownership/front office
cupcakesnake wrote:[snip]
(sorry New York, I couldn't think of anything nice to say. I hate basically everything the Knicks have done in the Thibs era. I love RJ and Mitchell Robinson but feel they're stunted by the constant shuffle of ill-fitting veterans. Brunson is a nice player.)
FWIW there aren't many vets left. At this point, it's just Brunson, Randle, Fournier & Rose who are more than 24yo...and Fournier only has one more year after this one, his final season is a team option; so even if he isn't moved soon, he's not likely to be in NY past this season.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!