Jimmit79 wrote:If Ainge trades spida to Miami out of spite wouldn't he get ridiculed for getting less then what he got for gobert..
He wants draft picks not spite, the Knicks are the only team that can provide that.
Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi
Jimmit79 wrote:If Ainge trades spida to Miami out of spite wouldn't he get ridiculed for getting less then what he got for gobert..
N Y K wrote:Ok, ok. Hear me out... lol
Is there a scenario that helps Miami get Mitchell, but brings us something back while also unloading Fournier?
I wonder if something weird like that could ever make sense. Retain draft capital, shed Fournier, stay younger, and continue to get better.
I guess if we didn't sign Mitch and sign Hartenstien, something for Bam would have made sense... would we even want Herro or Robinson on this team?
3toheadmelo wrote:Donovan Mitchell can be the worst defender of all time and I’ll still want the Knicks to get him
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
whocares1 wrote:snadler wrote:nykballa2k4 wrote:
I don't think it matters anyhow because Ainge is going to hold until he gets the farm and Knicks hopefully will not crack as they always do. Ainge has nothing to lose.
Ainge has a lot to lose, he knows Mitchell can’t be on the roster opening night, remember his goal, picks and assure top 3 pick
Also..no one besides OKC has as much assets as the Knicks. He can wait a year and the playoff teams that want Mitchell still wouldn’t be able to match Knicks’ current offer. It’s funny tho to watch people sweat and saying how we should just give Danny everything bc it shows how weak minded most people are.
Meat wrote:whocares1 wrote:snadler wrote:
Ainge has a lot to lose, he knows Mitchell can’t be on the roster opening night, remember his goal, picks and assure top 3 pick
Also..no one besides OKC has as much assets as the Knicks. He can wait a year and the playoff teams that want Mitchell still wouldn’t be able to match Knicks’ current offer. It’s funny tho to watch people sweat and saying how we should just give Danny everything bc it shows how weak minded most people are.
He can’t wait a year lol, the point is a generation talent maybe 2 is in the next draft. The difference between lebron and Dwight is an ocean. That’s the difference in waiting a year
snadler wrote:nykballa2k4 wrote:Knox wrote:
My fault I missed it, I am upset down on my hours and feel like a zombie. Thanks for the great info
I don't think it matters anyhow because Ainge is going to hold until he gets the farm and Knicks hopefully will not crack as they always do. Ainge has nothing to lose.
Ainge has a lot to lose, he knows Mitchell can’t be on the roster opening night, remember his goal, picks and assure top 3 pick
you rang?NoDopeOnSundays wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
Mitchell can play off the ball, he's been developed as a SG after all, that type of backcourt can work because you put Murray on whoever is the more dominant scorer in the backcourt and let Mitchell get the weaker of the two, or hide him on a 3 & D small forward. What you have with Brunson and Mitchell is nowhere to hide one of them, one of them is always going to be in an unfavorable matchup, and we can't realistically ask RJ to guard PGs for 82 games.
You're only thinking about the offense, and not the defense.
I'm thinking of both sides.
Both Mitchell-Brunson and Mitchell-Murray are flawed backcourts. I get your point.
But all things considered, I much prefer a Mitchell-Brunson backcourt. Much smarter on offense, more dynamic, with better shooting all around the court.
Yes it would be open to post-ups on the other end, but it's easier to adjust to post-ups (still the most inefficient play in basketball outside of a few match-ups) by crowding the post for instance, or baiting poor post scorers, than it is to run an efficient offense with a ball-dominant 33% 3-point shooter who can't play off the ball.
One of Mitchell's strengths is his pick-and-roll play and Murray would severely hurt our spacing, let alone with some of the other players we have, as teams already aren't afraid to play zone against us even with a combination of Fournier and Kemba/Burks in the backcourt.
You and I agree on the big guard thing, we disagree on Murray, we're going to find out because Trae is a horrific defender, and has to this point in his career had the ball in his hands more than Brunson or Mitchell.
We agree that Mitchell + Big guard would have been more ideal.
Zenzibar wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:Zenzibar wrote:
Reggie Bullock was a below league average defensive rating (110%) for most of his career but flouirshed under Thibs.
In comparison, Donovan Mitchell DRTG was 111.4 and Reggie 111.8 in 2022.
Chanerd time:
Defensive rating is not a stat that measures individual defense, because it's too dependent on the 4 other players on the floor.
Here are Bullock's last 7 seasons according to Defensive RAPM:
2015-16 -1.02
2016-17 +0.66
2017-18 +0.01
2018-19 -0.8
2019-20 +0.16
2020-21 +0.97
2021-22 +1.21
So by that metric, he did have his best defensive seasons under Thibs and then Kidd.
Mitchell's defense has fallen off a cliff through the years. Is it a sign of his declining commitment and motivation to play in Utah, or of the league changing and further exposing his lack of size? I don't know. To your point, it seems that he has the ability, but not necessarily the willingness to defend.
2017-18 +1.68
2018-19 +1.45
2019-20 -0.62
2020-21 -0.34
2021-22 -0.84
Super interesting pairing Donovan with Thibs' defensive schemes.
KnicksGod wrote:I feel like the only reason we are doing this now is because we just want a "star." And we feel burnt by Frank, Knox. But Grimes, Obi, Jericho are not the same. Different.
F N 11 wrote:
Not the Jazz news I wanted to see.
KnicksGod wrote:I feel like the only reason we are doing this now is because we just want a "star." And we feel burnt by Frank, Knox. But Grimes, Obi, Jericho are not the same. Different.
snadler wrote:Summer league is meaningless but after watching this first half, Grimes is definitely no deal breaker..lol