Why is this so hard for us to do? We should have Ivey & Duren

Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23

whocares1 wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:Fury wrote:This is reminding me of the melo trade NEGOTIATIONS, relax. There was a lot of going back and forth. Eventually we just gave up everything but I don’t think that will be the case here because unless the Jazz plan on moving their team to Las Vegas, no one wants to play there and their best shot at turning it around is being Wack for Wembanyama. Keeping Mitchell will **** up their tank.
Nah, it's not that similar. That was a drama that was drawn out during the better part of a regular season which was completely disruptive. This is a normal off-season. We just happen to be in the mix for a change, but it's not like this has been going on indefinitely. It just feels that way because Buzz has posted 150 pages all by themself
Also the Knicks had competition for Melo. And also that competition was our crosstown rivals. Not to mention there was going to be a lock out at the end of the season and Melo wanted the full max before the lock out happened so whoever got him was keeping him long term.
Fury wrote:This is reminding me of the melo trade NEGOTIATIONS, relax. There was a lot of going back and forth. Eventually we just gave up everything but I don’t think that will be the case here because unless the Jazz plan on moving their team to Las Vegas, no one wants to play there and their best shot at turning it around is being Wack for Wembanyama. Keeping Mitchell will **** up their tank.
Fat Kat wrote:Fury wrote:This is reminding me of the melo trade NEGOTIATIONS, relax. There was a lot of going back and forth. Eventually we just gave up everything but I don’t think that will be the case here because unless the Jazz plan on moving their team to Las Vegas, no one wants to play there and their best shot at turning it around is being Wack for Wembanyama. Keeping Mitchell will **** up their tank.
Who was Melo’s agent during those negotiations?
spree8 wrote:I’m just jealous of Detroit. Here we are talking about giving up our youth plus damn near all of our future picks for a non-superstar player, while Detroit did it right and has all their picks plus Cade, Ivey, Duren, and Bey.
Why is this so hard for us to do? We should have Ivey & Duren
Fat Kat wrote:Fury wrote:This is reminding me of the melo trade NEGOTIATIONS, relax. There was a lot of going back and forth. Eventually we just gave up everything but I don’t think that will be the case here because unless the Jazz plan on moving their team to Las Vegas, no one wants to play there and their best shot at turning it around is being Wack for Wembanyama. Keeping Mitchell will **** up their tank.
Who was Melo’s agent during those negotiations?

spree8 wrote:I’m just jealous of Detroit. Here we are talking about giving up our youth plus damn near all of our future picks for a non-superstar player, while Detroit did it right and has all their picks plus Cade, Ivey, Duren, and Bey.
Why is this so hard for us to do? We should have Ivey & Duren

spree8 wrote:I’m just jealous of Detroit. Here we are talking about giving up our youth plus damn near all of our future picks for a non-superstar player, while Detroit did it right and has all their picks plus Cade, Ivey, Duren, and Bey.
Why is this so hard for us to do? We should have Ivey & Duren
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:spree8 wrote:I’m just jealous of Detroit. Here we are talking about giving up our youth plus damn near all of our future picks for a non-superstar player, while Detroit did it right and has all their picks plus Cade, Ivey, Duren, and Bey.
Why is this so hard for us to do? We should have Ivey & Duren
Smaller markets have figured out the draft is their salvation, and to keep your star you make sure you suck for a few years so they have the pieces around them.
The Jazz did the opposite too, they got their star and then made trades to compete right away. Now, they're going to use the Ainge method, and it'll lead to a better team in the long run.
We should have tanked RJ's rookie season without any remorse and used the off-season to be a salary dumping ground with picks attached, we'd be much better off right now.
whocares1 wrote:spree8 wrote:I’m just jealous of Detroit. Here we are talking about giving up our youth plus damn near all of our future picks for a non-superstar player, while Detroit did it right and has all their picks plus Cade, Ivey, Duren, and Bey.
Why is this so hard for us to do? We should have Ivey & Duren
Bc Knicks fans said we tanked twice in the last 25 years so after all this losing and ruining draft positions at the end of every season, they are now convinced that tanking doesn’t work.
SelbyCobra wrote:It's actually really prudent to acquire Mitchell now, and then have 2 years to work him and Brunson in together, find out if Julius is redeemable/tradeable, see what RJ becomes, and determine if Mitch can be relied on before the cap explosion.
Getting Mitchell now gives the FO a chance to sort through it all for 2 years, and then be in prime position to add a max cat in the right role/position to become a legit contender.
snadler wrote:Basically Begley says be weary of Miami
Fury wrote:whocares1 wrote:spree8 wrote:I’m just jealous of Detroit. Here we are talking about giving up our youth plus damn near all of our future picks for a non-superstar player, while Detroit did it right and has all their picks plus Cade, Ivey, Duren, and Bey.
Why is this so hard for us to do? We should have Ivey & Duren
Bc Knicks fans said we tanked twice in the last 25 years so after all this losing and ruining draft positions at the end of every season, they are now convinced that tanking doesn’t work.
Tbf, which tanking teams have won titles? Duncan Spurs?
SelbyCobra wrote:It's actually really prudent to acquire Mitchell now, and then have 2 years to work him and Brunson in together, find out if Julius is redeemable/tradeable, see what RJ becomes, and determine if Mitch can be relied on before the cap explosion.
Getting Mitchell now gives the FO a chance to sort through it all for 2 years, and then be in prime position to add a max cat in the right role/position to become a legit contender.
whocares1 wrote:Fury wrote:whocares1 wrote:
Bc Knicks fans said we tanked twice in the last 25 years so after all this losing and ruining draft positions at the end of every season, they are now convinced that tanking doesn’t work.
Tbf, which tanking teams have won titles? Duncan Spurs?
Which team has won a title without drafting a superstar first?
SelbyCobra wrote:It's actually really prudent to acquire Mitchell now, and then have 2 years to work him and Brunson in together, find out if Julius is redeemable/tradeable, see what RJ becomes, and determine if Mitch can be relied on before the cap explosion.
Getting Mitchell now gives the FO a chance to sort through it all for 2 years, and then be in prime position to add a max cat in the right role/position to become a legit contender.