Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #12 - 2003-04 Kevin Garnett

Moderators: penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063

User avatar
LA Bird
Analyst
Posts: 3,592
And1: 3,327
Joined: Feb 16, 2015

Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #12 - 2003-04 Kevin Garnett 

Post#1 » by LA Bird » Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:17 am

RealGM Greatest Peaks List (2022)
1. 1990-91 Michael Jordan
2. 2012-13 LeBron James
3. 1999-00 Shaquille O'Neal
4. 1976-77 Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
5. 1966-67 Wilt Chamberlain
6. 2002-03 Tim Duncan
7. 1993-94 Hakeem Olajuwon
8. 1963-64 Bill Russell
9. 1985-86 Larry Bird
10. 1986-87 Magic Johnson
11. 2016-17 Stephen Curry
12. ?

Spoiler:
Please vote for your 3 highest player peaks and at least one line of reasoning for each of them.

Vote example 1
1. 1991 Jordan: Explanation
2. 2013 LeBron: Explanation
3. 2000 Shaq: Explanation

In addition, you can also list other peak season candidates from those three players. This extra step is entirely optional

Vote example 2
1. 1991 Jordan: Explanation
(1990 Jordan)
2. 2013 LeBron: Explanation
(2012 LeBron)
(2009 LeBron)
3. 2000 Shaq: Explanation

You can visit the project thread for further information on why this makes a difference and how the votes will be counted at the end of the round.

Voting for this round will close on Tuesday July 26, 9am ET.
User avatar
CharityStripe34
General Manager
Posts: 9,425
And1: 6,352
Joined: Dec 01, 2014
     

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #12 

Post#2 » by CharityStripe34 » Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:20 am

1. Giannis Antetokounmpo (2021): Had another awesome season with 1st Team All-Defense and historic levels of efficiency offensively, only this was the season he made the mini-leap in the playoffs to put it all together with a phenomenal post-season run, capping it with one of the most dominant Finals series ever. Morphed his style of play in the middle of the playoffs from "Point-SF" to "PF/C-Point".

Honorable mention: Giannis Antetokounmpo (2020, 2022)

2. Bob Pettit (1959) : A man much forgotten in the annals of NBA lore, but who's entire career was almost one extended peak. He had an awesome season the year before, even leading the Hawks to their lone title over the vaunted Russell/Cousy Celtics. But his following year was his second MVP season with ridiculous averages of 29-16-4. He's the guy who essentially created/defined the PF position once he bulked up and added a long-distance jumpshot when mostly everyone was shooting hook-shots and set shots. 1959 he also led the league with 14.8 WS.

Honorable mention: (1958, 1962)

3. Oscar Robertson (1964): Basically averaged a triple-double (31-11-9.9) and the Royals had their best season with 55 wins and went toe-to-toe with Russell's Celtics in the second round. Was basically the league's greatest PG in its first 35 years, leading the league in assists as well as FT%. Was efficient from the field for a G (48%) and won the league MVP award in the middle of Wilt and Russell's primes, which is no easy feat.

Honorable mention: (1962, 1965)


Copy and pasted from the previous peaks thread.
"Wes, Hill, Ibaka, Allen, Nwora, Brook, Pat, Ingles, Khris are all slow-mo, injury prone ... a sandcastle waiting for playoff wave to get wrecked. A castle with no long-range archers... is destined to fall. That is all I have to say."-- FOTIS
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,029
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #12 

Post#3 » by MyUniBroDavis » Sat Jul 23, 2022 1:50 pm

2021 Giannis
- DPOY + Strong offense, already made my case but mostly based on his D
AD 2020
Yeah I’ve changed my mind on this, honestly might have AD higher.

I’ve been pretty consistent with my playoffs > RS take, for AD it’s been more so his RS is so pedestrian that I don’t think him having a playoffs that’s only debatably on the same level as a top 10 peak is enough for me to vote for him

However I was thinking of ADs playoff run as a whole again and I’m starting to realize, at least in my opinion it was actually kind of absurd? Even in a vacuum, and contextually the idea that

“Oh but you see *sips tea* he had lebron james”

Is just a really broad and naive way of looking at it lol.

The points against ADs playoffs are essentially the competition was fairly weak, and he had lebron. To me this is a broad statement saying they were far superior to everyone else.

So ADs regular season was relatively unimpressive, although I do think his lack of impact is understandable. Defensively the Lakers play drop coverage for the most part untill the playoffs happen where they gamelan much more aggressively (which is how AD shines), so with there always being either a Dwight or Javale on the floor, both of whom are fantastic at drop coverage, it’s unsuprising that his impact wasn’t that integral, and offensively it is that effect of taking away form lebron possessions, the Lakers being a pretty bad team process wise from the post, etc etc.

But For me, on title contending teams, and especially in a season where home court advantage obviously didn’t matter whatsoever, I’m pretty content with AD here.

Mainly, even if his RS wasn’t really up to standard, thinking it over his Playoffs were completely insane.

I think without applying context, in a vacuum ADs 2020 playoff run is up there with the best playoff runs ever.

I think as a whole, AD was an ATG scorer, near 2017 Durant in volume and effeciency, while also being a strong DPOY type player

I think high effeciency and volume volume scoring has been a bit underrated at times, true there are factors such as if they are a ball stopper and ruin the offense, if they only get easy buckets, but AD really doesn’t do any of these things

Beyond that, there’s a bit of a thing where everyone’s like “oh but numbers are inflated now.”

Yes, that is true in the sense that we have some REALLY heliocentric offenses now built around players to optimize them better than before, mainly 5 out offenses that you give it one guy and they do every possession. That’s not really what AD does at all though.

Spacing is what makes effeciency rise in general for sure, but this Lakers team is hardly made for spacing. The Lakers had 4 main rotation guys who were threats from three outside of AD, who were Lebron, Green, KCP, Kieff (rondo shot well, they were still sagging off of him to help, they weren’t closing out hard or sticking to him). And green went cold anyways, although they still probably closed out on him I’d assume.

Everyone else is pretty much a “lol shoot bruh ” situation, so I don’t see how spacing helps him all too much, especially relative to his peers

I’ll get to the lebron thing later but

I don’t see his numbers being inflated much by the era at all, not to say that they should be compared equally, but at the end of the day, in a non heliocentric offense, he hit, per 75 possessions (shoutout to draymondgold for per 75 poss lol)

Comparing his scoring numbers to some other ATG title big men scorers (and 1977 Kareem since he was the peak picked even though he didn’t win a title that year, but added 1980 Kareem for another title year)

Bubble AD
27.9/9.8/3.5 on +10.1 rts and 2.6 turnovers a game

2000 Shaq
28.5/13.1/3.7 on +3.3 rts and 2.7 turnovers a game

2003 Duncan
22.7/14.3/3.9 on +5.8 rts and 2.9 turnovers a game

1977 Kareem
28.4/14.6/3.4 on +13.5 rts (3 turnovers would be his average for the next few years per 75 afterwards)

1980 Kareem
27.3/10.4/2.6 on +8.0 rts and 3 turnovers

1994 Hakeem
25.3/11/3.3 on +4.0 rts and 3.1 turnovers

1995 Hakeem
26.9/10.4/3.5 on +1.7 rts and 3.2 turnovers

2011 Dirk
29.3/11.5/2.7 on +6.8 rts and 3.3 turnovers

2017 Durant
28.8/8/4.3 on +13.1 rts and 2.5 turnovers

2021 Giannis
30/11.8/6.2 on +2.7 rts and 3.6 turnovers


In terms of volume and effeciency, he’s averaging absurd numbers

Ironically Amare averaged similar numbers in his 2008 RS, although obviously more limited than AD was and without the three point spacing part (the previous and following year were high efficiency as well but only 23.4 and 21.8 ppg per 75 respectively) and much worse as a passer (1.7 assists per 75, 2.4 turnovers).

His NPI offensive RAPM that year was +3.6… good for third in the nba behind two all time great offensive players in cp3 and Nash that year (cp3 at +3.85 and Nash at 4.87)

We have a situation where his raw effeciency and volume is just crazy to the point where even a guy who does have certain issues that tends to lower the impact of high effeciency high volume scoring (low playmaking, and mostly finishing easy opportunities) he still has fantastic impact

If we are evaluating his “goodness” offensively I think it’s fair to call that an absolute lower end.

Realistically I do think you can view, in a vacuum, 2020 AD as a playoffs 2017 KD type guy in terms of his offensive impact.

Extremely high effeciency and high volume scoring in a vacuum is extremely impactful, and with that he coupled it with an ability to stretch the floor and an ability to score both as a 1 on 1 player and off ball.

It’s worth mentioning the teams offensive rtg with him on the court was 117.4 (third on the team, behind green at 120.9 and rondo and 117.9) while the teams offensive rtg with him off the court was 106.2 (worst on the team) (nba.com)

It’s honestly really odd to me that his offense doesn’t seem to get rated higher, it’s not as if he was scoring off ball exclusively, 57.7% of his 2 point shots were asssisted which isn’t that much more than guys like Duncan (low 50s) or Garnett (high 50s), or by any amount that it isn’t explained by ADs superior off ball game.

AD was arguably the second best offensive player of the playoffs and was the best defensive player of the playoffs

this absurd combination of defense and offense here really can’t be understated. Calling him DPOY KD is obviously a bit of an overstatement, but not really by all that much in a super simplified sense

His effeciency is arguably understated by his raw averages as well. He was absurdly consistent,his 4th worst shooting performance was 59.4TS (the game winner vs the nuggets), 3rd worst 55.8TS (a game where lebron took over so AD only took 9 shots), his first gane vs Portland, and the final game vs the heat, where most of his misses were during a the second half lap where they were up 30 points.

Outside of that he never shot below 60TS, which is kind of absurd, his consistency was absolutely insane, and it’s a situation where two very poor games being down his shooting averages, one where it was his first playoff game in the bubble, another where he was missing shots in garbage time

On the DPOY KD take, to be clear he wasn’t quite that, his 1v1 scoring was good, 1.09ppp, and his post scoring was 0.97ppp, 90th and 65th percentile respectively, great but not 2017 KD level (upon further inspection this is perfectly in line with his RS lol)

At the same time he of course made it up in other ways with his off ball scoring (and many of his cuts were essentially post ups just him acting so quickly it looks like a cut, you see it a lot vs the nuggets) and superior offensive rebounding (outside of the nuggets series where he fully played like a wing, his offensive rebound rate was around 9.8%, which is great for a team with a lot of size in general).

I do think the thing with his offense is, when evaluating it we have a pretty high floor, and a really high ceiling.

The floor would be a supercharged version of the high volume scoring amare seasons, with better offensive rebounding when considering cast, substantially better passing, the ability to stretch the floor from three, better movement off ball in general and ability to create own shot, etc etc.

That sounds kind of low… untill you realize 2005 Amare and 2008 Amare rank 6th and 3rd (if I’m looking at it right) on offense respectively (and giving him DPOY tier defense puts him at first both years)

Then of course you could say hes 2017 Durant with DPOY defense which ranks even higher

In any case, I think this level of two way impact is really only seen in the top 5 peaks, even vs the top 5-10 peaks I feel the you normally get high tier offense and DPOY defense.

The main argument against AD is his supporting cast featured a guy better than him in Lebron.

Lebrons playoffs ranks ahead for me, mostly because he had one of the greatest finals in nba history, while AD simply had an ATG one (while hurt)

Before that, I would say AD probably was better from rounds 1-3, so ADs main problem being that he was good enough that the guy that had been pretty much the undisputed best player in the playoffs when healthy for 7 playoff runs in a row seems a bit odd to me.

Beyond that though, there’s this idea that Lebron commanding defensive attention means AD got easy shots, or that playing with a lebron automatically means AD only scores open layups because playmaKING!

That’s not really how it works, and this is why more so I’m pretty set on AD here versus before when thinking about it

AD had a tier 1 playoff run utilizing his secondary skillset as his primary skillset

Posted this earlier on the 2020 AD thread

I really do wonder how many people actually watched the Lakers during the bubble vs just making the assumption that lebron playmaking + AD good off ball = perfect combination

Bubble AD and 2020 playoff Lebron fit well in the sense that they were an elite two way duo and the best players of the nba bubble.

How Lebron helped AD is basically off of drive and kicks, which I don’t see as anything crazy since spacing 5 gets three point opportunities, and that he and rondo could find AD when he was moving off ball.

That’s pretty much it.

I’ll write down factors going against them, but people REALLY overestimate the significance of the second part of that.

AD was assisted in 57.8% of his 2 point shots in the 2020 RS, the lowest of his career up until that point. For reference, the lowest before that was 61.8% of his 2 point shots assisted, and his more off ball season which was his peak RS impact over the whole year was 71.5%

In the playoffs, this number was 57.7%.

For reference, 2003 Duncan was assisted on 47.5% of his shots in the RS, 51.4% in the playoffs.
2004 KG at 66.3% in the RS, 54% in the playoffs
2011 Dirk at 59% in the RS, 48.5% in the playoffs
2000 Shaq at 60.1% in the RS and 62.8% in the playoffs

In terms of high leverage opportunities, he averaged 2.2 cut scoring possessions a game, and 2.2 roll man possessions a game (9.6% of his possessions for both).

For reference, 12% of Duncan’s were roll man possessions in 07 (data goes from 05 onwards) and 8.6% were cuts

People assume AD spends way more off ball than he is because of his 2015 season where 24% of his possessions were as the roll man. He honestly should be off ball far more, but he isn’t.

28.4% of his shots were within 3 feet, his career average is 34.7%

So did lebron lead to him getting super easy shots or anything like that or “playing it in easy mode?” No, not particularly.

Obviously, having Lebron is better than not having Lebron, it’s silly to say otherwise, but the idea that AD had some sort of unprecedented level of openness he never experienced before is just not true.

Regular season
Lebron on
32.3/12.4/4.5 on 3.1 turnovers a game and 59.3 TS
Lebron off
40.6/12.6/4.0 on 3.8 turnovers a game and 64.0 TS

Playoffs
Lebron on
34.4/12.4/4.4 on 3.2 turnovers a game and 65.5 TS
Lebron off
43.2/14.2/5.2 on 3.8 turnovers a game and 68.7 TS

Lost most of my post after this cuz the page reloaded, so gonna be pretty brief here

This isn’t to say Lebron doesn’t help AD, lebron there is better than lebron not there of course

But it’s ridiculously overstated. Yes, a lot of ADs assists are from lebron, since lebron is quite literally the only playmaker other than rondo on that team. Unless the idea is Lebron makes it so that off ball movement is a million times easier because everyone is watching lebron, which I just feel isn’t a statement I have to respond to because that’s just kinda wild lol (most of those assists were Lebron watching and waiting vs doing something and AD doing something in secondary weakside action)

I think the idea is either because of how nba defenses set up vs slashers, (shell defense), or because opponents ran zone a few times and it looks like they’re loading up on bron (and to be clear AD then broke the zone because bigs that can shoot from the nail kill the zone). If it’s because teams didn’t instantly double AD like they did in the 2000s that’s just not understanding how modern defenses and offenses interact lol. Sometimes the gameplan is hard doubles but it’s hardly the norm, it’s not as if defenses didn’t pack the paint or send help against AD either, but he acts really fast especially if he has a step, but most people confuse post doubles with them deciding to double when someone cuts from the wing or something and the defender that was stunting high messed up and has to kind of make up for it, or run back.

But it’s like, yeah if lebrons attacking you can just help off of one of the Lakers many inconsistent shooters than isn’t AD, and if AD is attacking you can help off of one of the many inconsistent shooters that isn’t Lebron, and we kind of did see the paint get completely packed in the Nuggets series especially at times (Houston too early on, idr the blazers or the heat)

It’s like the Lebron and AD pick and roll is this unstoppable beast that they just don’t run, in reality teams have just switched it and found decent success, which is why they don’t run it much. At the very least if they switch that helps Lebron far more and hes the one attacking, the guys that guard Lebron are usually the ones that guard AD, since you want more mobile bigs or strong tall wings guarding AD vs plodding bigs who he killed

You could also drop too, which is okay, brons a decent three point shooter though so it’s not ideal, and in the bubble AD was going crazy from three. To be clear the majority of the time they dropped AD ended up going for long twos, they went in though.

Rondo is a non scoring threat and despite his percentages they let him shoot, so you just focus on stopping AD.

Essentially most of the positives form the pick and roll game come from the fact that if they mess up the coverage it works out, but there are definately better pick and roll partners in the nba solely for ADs efficiency

ADs pretty much never had an “ideal” pick and roll partner his entire career anyways, so he could be unlocked hella if he had that

Beyond that, ADs skillset in my opinion offensicely goes
off-ball scoring/P and R rolling and cutting > posting up > face up game.

Vogel is a pretty horrible offensive coach, I think most laker fans would attest to that, and they don’t have a guy that requires you to stay on the level of the ball handler in p and r like a Kyrie/lillard/Murray/Curry/Trae, so I don’t think his off ball scoring is particularly maximized, evidenced by his relatively suprising lack of cuts and roll possessions anyway.

The Lakers have pretty trash spacing relative to the nba, especially in the bubble, Pretty much everyone who followed them knows the defense just packed into the paint and chilled there. I mean the Lakers were 21st in three point shooting and volume with lebron and AD, I think that says it all lol.

Bubble wise, rondos numbers were a result of them letting him take open shots, and I don’t think they were particularly scared of green whose shot died in the playoffs, so the Lakers 3 reliable rotation three point shooters other than AD were lebron/KCP/kieff

Also the Lakers don’t know how to run a basic post possession if the defense helps at literal incompetent levels lmao

‪https://www.bball-index.com/the-lakers-have-a-post-problem/‬

So AD was in easy mode in the sense that he and Lebron both had incredible ATG postseasons on the same team and killed everyone else

AD being in easy mode in terms of his scoring despite having the largest on ball role in his career, a relatively low percentage of his shots as the typical high value off ball shots, especially considering he’s primary skill is off ball, on a team with pretty horrendous spacing relative to the rest of the nba, on a team with poor offensive coaching that also particularly struggles at coaching a post offense.

It was easy mode in terms of the wins being easy, but that’s about it, people handwave and say “Lebron” without explaining what that actually means, when you look into his actual offensive situation that’s not a situation conducive to historic effeciency high volume scoring as a big

I guess the one thing is lebron ran the offense for the most part? The only series where lebron was super clearly running the show in comparison was the heat series where AD was hurt anyway (and still hit 25ppg on 67TS with DPOY defense). I don’t think ball dominance is necessary for high impact anyways


ADs impact when he went from his primary skillset in 2015 as a roll and cutting big, to his secondary one as a post scorer because of gentry, pretty much since then massively decreased, in his playoff run he wasn’t back to that, he was still using his secondary skillset, and was Atg in that regard

It’s hard to say how good optimized AD would be, in an ideal offense with ideal players to maximize his impact. Maybe if we get Kyrie we’ll find out :D (until ham tries to get AD to play like giannis lol)

I will say that especially modern day optimization is SUPER important, we see a lot of high impact players drop a lot in impact with poor coaching or poor roster construction or both (bron in 2021 and 2022 vs 2020 for example).

So AD having a tier one playoff run I think is very impressive all things considered, with so many things working against him in terms of maximizing his box score and impact.

I wanted to look at his scoring again and see just how effecient he was historically

Regular seasons with players +10.0 or more rts, and >25ppg per 75 poss (per backpacks)

2016 Curry (31.9 +12.8rts)
1988 Barkley (26.8 +12.7rts)
2018 Curry (29.9 +11.9 rts)
2008 Amare (27.7 +11.6 rts)
2013 KD (28.2 +11.2 rts)
1984 Dantley (27.8 +10.9 rts)
2014 Lebron (28.4 +10.8 rts)
2013 Lebron (28.1 +10.1 rts)
1991 Barkley (27.8 +10.1 rts)

Obviously quite good company to be in.

I don’t think a lack of playmaking is all that damning as long as he’s not a turnover machine or anything like that, which he wasn’t and historically hasn’t been. He’ll pass it to the open guy, I wouldn’t say passing is a weakness for AD as much as it’s just not really a strength compared to his other qualities, he got better at passing out of doubles and making reads, but when he posts up the Lakers don’t create reads to be made if that makes sense, it’s rather stagnant or they do the wrong thing like cutting from the wing when they send help baseline and making it even worse and stuff like that

In any case, off ball scoring, strong offensive rebounding (outside of the Nuggets series where he was fully a wing), decent passing and not being a black hole, good turnover economy, and especially being a stretch 5 and a great roll man that enabled a lot of things with his shooting, etc etc, mean that I doubt his non scoring impact.

Defensively, I don’t have him quite as good as peak playoff Dray or peak giannis, but I take bubble AD over Gobert. I think AD was a clear cut versatile DPOY type player.

In the end, an elite offense + DPOY is usually a combination for a very elite peak. It’s hard to gauge how impactful ADs offense was specifically in the bubble (on off/106.2 without, 117.4 with, which was better than brons, the offense didn’t drop off too much with AD and without bron either, whereas the reverse wasn’t true, but at the same time it’s hard to see that trend being constant).

Volume scoring tends to get underrated, because other factors can bring it down, but if those factors don’t exist (and AD probably has decently positive non scoring impact, even if he’s not a playmaker like that) it’s usually a good sign, that AD had an absolutely historically effecient high volume scoring run (and increased his effeciency and volume in non lebron minutes) to me is enough for him to be a high tier offensive guy.

I would have him higher, but while I normally excuse stars for coasting in the RS especially if their team is playing well and there’s no reason for them to go all out I’m not sure how much AD was coasting vs it just being a bad situation for him.

If ADs effeciency isn’t because of really good circumstances allowing that relative to the rest of the league (in reality for him specifically it’s probably closer to the opposite, high effeciency in spite of sub optimal conditions for that) then that’s a big deal

Theres a tendancy to argue that his scoring numbers aren’t enough to prove his impact or ability in the bubble (and his impact numbers ofc), but I think the onus is on others to show why one of the most effecient high scoring championship runs of all time is overrated on offense lol


The argument that he had lebron is about as silly to me as saying Duncan had Pop. Lebron helped him in the sense that he was really good, but he’s not the guy that you pair with AD if you wanna maximize his effeciency, but they both are just so good that their combination is still probably a clear lock for top 3 playoff duo (only 2017 Curry and KD + 2001 Shaq and Kobe are realistically in that discussion with them)

For me there are 3 things holding him back

-1. His regular season, the biggest thing by far for me
-2. How dominant they were (which is hard to blame them for)
-3. Him not getting a chance to be optimized, and it being a bit harder to get to those circumstances (although nothing crazy or unrealistic).

Overall though, AD had a arguably top 5 level playoff run
using his secondary skillset in circumstances that relative to the league are pretty horrible in terms of maximizing his impact. I genuinely think Bubble AD with a team well suited and built to increase his level of play prolly ends up as a generation defining level run


2004 KG
- Flip flopping between him and AD. I prefer Playoff AD to him (playoff AD I have as a top 5 material to be clear) but KG having a goat level regular season and a great playoffs does definately move me
DraymondGold
Senior
Posts: 587
And1: 748
Joined: May 19, 2022

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #12 

Post#4 » by DraymondGold » Sat Jul 23, 2022 3:32 pm

Glad Curry's finally voted in (so I don't have to repeat myself anymore :lol: ). I seriously think he had a case to be voted much higher (also Bird), but C'est la vie. Like people were saying in the last thread, it's hard to have a project like this where someone doesn't seem under appreciated / underrated.

Regardless, I'd be interested in in doing two reviews after we finish this project:
1) We could discuss grouping players into tiers or adding uncertainty ranges. Players do seem to go in groups (e.g. MJ and LeBron were pretty clearly in a Tier mostly of their own). I wonder where the divides would be if we did tiers. Or, if we're adding uncertainty, I wonder who the more controversial players were. The "upper bound" of uncertainty seems easy to check: we'd just look for players players who got votes a lot earlier than when they got voted in. The "lower bound" of uncertainty would be harder to check systematically... for people who didn't vote for a player when the player got voted in, we'll never know how much lower those people had those players.

2) Looking for trends in this project /compared to previous projects. One example might be seeing if there's any patterns in what defines the tiers (e.g. Tier 2 seems pretty clearly to be 6 big men), looking if there's patterns in player-archetypes that get voted in higher or lower, or looking at changes vs previous projects (Dr MJ noted Duncan rose slightly). LaBird, thanks for organizing! :D Might it be possible to add an official "review/discussion" thread at the end?

_____

I also thought I'd re-post my tiers according to the data. Of course, there's more to do than just look at the data (e.g. film analysis, skill comparisons, philosophical discussions, etc.), but it might help people start to group players or form arguments. Without further ado, Here's the Stat Box for the next tier: Garnett, Robinson > Giannis, Jokic, Durant, Kobe > Oscar, Walton, West, Wade > Moses, Erving:
Spoiler:
Qualifier: I was a bit looser with rankings this time... if A had a slightly better 1-year peak than B but a slightly worse 2-year peak, I said they're about equal using a ~ symbol. Parenthetical comments are given for players who are about equal to explain whether they have better 1 year or better 2 year. Maybe if I have time I can order each of the tier rankings. Wade, Moses, Erving are added at the bottom of this post.
Ai. AuPM: Jokic (best in 22, near-worst in 21) / KG / Robinson (better in 94 lower in 95) > KD / Giannis (better 22, lower 21) > Kobe
Aii. PS AuPM: Robinson (99) > KG (04) > Jokic (highest in 22 in this tier, lowest 2/3-year avg in this tier) ~ Kobe (lowest 08, highest 2 year avg) ~ KD (near highest 1 year avg, great warriors years, worst non-warriors) / Giannis (highest 1 year avg, drop other years)

Bi. RAPM: KG > Robinson > Kobe > Jokic > Giannis > KD
Bii. RS/PS PIPM: KG ~ Robinson (best in 94, worse after) > Giannis ish ~ KD > Walton > Kobe > Jokic
D. WOWY: Robinson > Oscar > West > Kobe > KG > KD
E. ESPN’s RPM: Jokic > Giannis > KG > KD ~ Kobe (KD lower peak, higher other years)
F. CORP: KG > Robinson ~ Kobe ~ KD (Kobe > KD > Robinson after greatest peaks series, reverse before) > West > Oscar

Gi. BPM: 22 Jokic > 17 KD > Robinson (better 94, 95/96 worse) ~ Giannis (best non peak 19/20, tie 21 with 95/96) ~ KG (best peak year) > Kobe > Oscar > Walton > West
Gii. PS BPM: 17 KD > Kobe ~ Jokic ~ Giannis > Robinson ~ KG > Walton > Oscar > West
Ballpark Rank according to the data:
Tier 1 (good in almost all stats, better in more-trusted stats): KG ~ Robinson
Tier 2 (good in most stats, better in less-trusted stats): Giannis ~ Jokic >~ KD ~ Kobe
Tier 3 (incomplete data, less good in stats we have): Oscar ~ Walton ~ West [Wade's around here if we take larger samples seriously]
Tier 4 (pretty poor in the data): Moses > Erving (see below)

Tier 1: KG/Robinson. Like I mentioned before, KG and Robinson are tied in stats they win. Both do better in the stats based on real plus minus data, which we tend to trust more as measuring real value. I think film analysis / context would be needed to argue which is better.

Tier 2: Giannis/Jokic/KD/Kobe.
-I've talked a lot about Giannis' stats, so I won't repeat here too much. He tends to do better in regular-season-only and box-score based stats compared to true plus/minus stars in the tiers above.
-Jokic in 2022 looks like he might be in Tier 1 or 2. Jokic before looks like he could be near the bottom of the group. I will say it's slightly concerning that, like Giannis, he tends to do better in box-score stats (BPM especially, and AuPM has box-inputs) compared to the real plus minus data (RAPM, PIPM). We'll see if he keeps this up in 2023 -- I wouldn't be shocked if he got ranked higher with more hindsight.
-KD, like y'all suggest, does much better in the Warriors years, particularly in box stats (BPM). His lower "true" plus minus ranking make me question whether he's benefiting more from Curry's playmaking than vice-versa. His stats are also a bit more inconsistent with what his peak year is; in some stats, 17 is a clear outlier; while in others, 16 or 14 peak ahead. His low RAPM (together without a high PIPM or WOWY) are concerning. Still, where KD gains is in portability and resilience (when paired with another playmaker / person to attract the defense).
-Kobe's interesting. I'm actually a bit surprised that the data has him lower. In general, KD clearly does better in his Warrior years and in the box stats. Kobe does a hair better than KD's non-Warriors years. For both BPM and AuPM, KD's ahead in both Warrior and non-Warrior years in the regular season, but KD's only ahead in the Warriors years in the playoffs. KD's also ahead in RS/PS PIPM in both Warrior and non-Warrior years. Kobe pulls ahead in RAPM and WOWY. KD's clearly ahead, but the question becomes how much did KD benefit from a better fit (I think the Warriors' playmaking helped KD more than vice versa). I see Kobe as more resilient (I think KD's resilience comes from playing with MVP playmakers), while KD's more scalable.
Casual "eye-test" fans tend to overrate Kobe. Casual "analytics" fans tend to underrate Kobe. More experienced fans probably find a compromise, but it'll be interesting to see his arguments vs KD, because KD does have the statistical advantage.

Tier 3 Oscar/Walton/West. Here, we're limited by a lack of data. The 3 older players are at the bottom in Backpicks BPM and Postseason BPM. In WS/48, they're all below Curry/Robinson/KD/Jokic/Giannis, though West beats Kobe/Walton and Oscar also beats KG. The two guards beat Kobe/KG/KD in WOWY. Within this tier: Oscar clearly wins over West in the stats, though the gap becomes less clear in the playoffs and West has the scalability/defense advantage that might be lost in the box-stats. Walton seems closer to West than Oscar by the stats. Of course, Walton also has the scalability/defensive advantage, so it's possible more wholistic stats (like RAPM/PIPM) would have shown Walton/West rising higher by capturing defense the box score just misses.


Comment on years:
-Robinson: According to the stats, 94 Robinson > 95 Robinson. Do we trust this? He didn't have a great postseason, so I imagine 95 proponents are making a resilience argument. Do we see playoff improvement from 94 to 95 to make it be worth taking over 94's regular season?
-KD: 14 doesn't look clearly best. 16 looks just as good as 14, and 17 is clearly the best (if we ignore context)
-Kobe: 08 is probably best. It wins in regular season BPM, RAPM, RS/PS PIPM. Still, 09 gets close in postseason BPM/AuPM, and i'd sooner take 09 than 06.
-West: 66 is probably best considering health, but I'd be open to taking other years (e.g. 68-70)

Erving: Dr. J is last in almost every stat we have. I'm not sure if he has an argument yet:
Spoiler:
Ai. he's last in Augmented Plus Minus (better in 80s)
Bii. Last in RS/PS PIPM (better in 80s)
D. Additional Stats: WOWY 3rd to last (only over KD/moses)
F. Additional Stats: CORP: 2nd to last over Moses

Gi. Last in Backpicks BPM
Gii. Last in PS Backpicks BPM
Hi. Last in BR’s BPM (with a -6 BPM drop! from 76 to 77-79)
Hii. BR’s PS BPM: haven’t checked yet.
Moses Malone: he's near the bottom in every stats we have. Not sure what his argument wold be either.
Spoiler:
Ai. AuPM: 2nd to last, only over Erving
Bi. Historical RAPM: 4th in limited sample behind KG/Curry/Robinson/Kobe (in 1985, but only 35 game sample)
Bii. Goldstein Composite RS/PS PIPM: 7th (after Curry, KG, Robinson, KD, Giannis, Walton) (would drop to be tied with Kobe in longer sample)
Additional plus minus stats: D. WOWY: Dead last by a lot, at only +3
Additional plus minus stats: F. Backpicks’ CORP evaluation: Last

Box score-based data
Gi. Backpicks BPM: 11th, just over Erving
Gii. Postseason Backpicks BPM: tied 8th with Walton (behind Curry, KD, Jokic, Giannis, Kobe, Robinson, KG). In a 2-year sample, he’s 2nd to last just above Jerry West
Dwyane Wade: He actually has more of an argument. He has great stats in 1-year samples in 06 and 09, but he has much worse 2/3-year samples. Not sure where to place him:
Spoiler:
Ai. AuPM: 7th (after Jokic, Curry, KG, Robinson, KD, Giannis)
Aii. Postseason AuPM: 2nd after Curry in 1 year, Tied 4th after Curry, KG, Robinson in 2-year
Bi. Goldstein RAPM: Last after KG, Curry, Robinson, Kobe, Jokic, Giannis, KD in 1 year, around 4/5 in 2 year
Bii. Goldstein Composite RS/PS PIPM: 4th after Curry, KG, Robinson
Additional plus minus stats: D. WOWY: Dead last even under Moses Malone
Additional plus minus stats: F. Backpicks’ CORP evaluation: Tied 7th after Curry, KG, Robinson, Walton, West, Oscar with Kobe/KD

Box score-based data
Gi. Backpicks BPM: 6th after Cury, Jokic, KD, KG, Robinson, Giannis (above Kobe, Oscar, Walton, West)
Gii. Postseason Backpicks BPM: 5th after Curry, KD, Kobe, Jokic, Giannis (above KG, Robinson, Walton, Oscar, West)

__________
A few discussion questions for people:
1. Does Giannis really have an argument over Garnett? Garnett clearly wins according to the data. I'd also argue Giannis's is no more resilient (usually Garnett's downside). Garnett's certainly the better defender in-era, he's certainly more scalable, he faced harder average opponents at his peak, he was absolutely more limited by a worse-fitting team, and he'd likely benefit more from a time machine to today.
2. It might be fun to bring back the Robinson vs Garnett discussion from a few threads ago, or introduce Walton and Jokic if we want to rank the bigs.
3. How does Oscar vs West vs Kobe vs KD vs Wade shake out?
4. How do the bigs in this tier compare to the wings/guards?
letskissbro
Rookie
Posts: 1,162
And1: 1,506
Joined: Sep 05, 2017

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #12 

Post#5 » by letskissbro » Sat Jul 23, 2022 4:04 pm

I don't see how Duncan is 6(+) places better than KG when KG was good enough to make people question whether Duncan was the best player in the league during Duncan's peak season, and then was overwhelmingly considered better the very next season.

Also 10 of the first 11 selected are now in title winning seasons.
Doctor MJ wrote:I like the analogy with Curry as Coca-Cola. And then I'd say Iverson was Lean.
Dutchball97
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,406
And1: 5,001
Joined: Mar 28, 2020
   

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #12 

Post#6 » by Dutchball97 » Sat Jul 23, 2022 4:19 pm

1. 1976 Julius Erving - Dr J had one of the most dominant years ever in North American pro basketball in the final year of the ABA. Where you rank him mostly depends on how good you think the ABA was towards its end. I'd say I'm probably somewhere in the middle. With the likes of Artis Gilmore, Dan Issel, Bobby Jones and George Gervin the ABA had become a serious competitor to the NBA but it didn't become on the same level just yet and since even the mid-70s NBA is generally considered as a relatively weak era, the mid-70s ABA isn't one of the strongest eras either. Overall though this is still a very complete season and it remains a fact you can only beat who is put in front of you. What especially helps him out here is the Nets roster besides Dr J himself wasn't particularly special, which is a huge contrast to the other guys I'm considering around this spot.

2. 1983 Moses Malone - Moses wasn't the best defender but in 83 he does look pretty impressive on that end, while his offense has always been strong. He's hurt somewhat by playing on a historically stacked team but it's hard to go against him winning MVP by a landslide and leading the 76ers to a dominant title. I might be somewhat influenced by winning bias here but we have rather incomplete advanced stats for the early 80s so I'd rather not put too much emphasis on Moses not having an overwhelmingly high BPM.

3. 2021 Giannis Antetokounmpo - It was a close call between Giannis and Steph for my #3 spot last round so it's a nobrainer to move Giannis up now. Giannis is elite on both sides of the ball and I expect him to be higher up the next time we do a peaks project. What hurts Giannis somewhat is that his title run didn't line up with his best regular season. While 2021 wasn't his best regular season and was a step down from 2019 and 2020, it was still a MVP-level campaign. Giannis missed the last 2 games of the ECF, which the Bucks both won. Despite that slight knock, his post-season run was incredible. At his worst he was still good and at his best he was absolutely demolishing the competition. Especially his performance against the Suns might be one of the best individual series in a finals ever.
DraymondGold
Senior
Posts: 587
And1: 748
Joined: May 19, 2022

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #12 

Post#7 » by DraymondGold » Sat Jul 23, 2022 4:26 pm

letskissbro wrote:I don't see how Duncan is 6(+) places better than KG when KG was good enough to make people question whether Duncan was the best player in the league during Duncan's peak season, and then was overwhelmingly considered better the very next season.

Also 10 of the first 11 selected are now in title winning seasons.
Haha, that's why I've had him on my ballot for a while! :lol: The ring bias is interesting -- if we do end up having a post-project review, that might be a fun topic to discuss!
MyUniBroDavis wrote:- DPOY + Strong offense, already made my case but mostly based on his D
AD 2020
Yeah I’ve changed my mind on this, honestly might have AD higher.

I’ve been pretty consistent with my playoffs > RS take, for AD it’s been more so his RS is so pedestrian that I don’t think him having a playoffs that’s only debatably on the same level as a top 10 peak is enough for me to vote for him

However I was thinking of ADs playoff run as a whole again and I’m starting to realize, at least in my opinion it was actually kind of absurd? Even in a vacuum, and contextually the idea that

“Oh but you see *sips tea* he had lebron james”

...

I think without applying context, in a vacuum ADs 2020 playoff run is up there with the best playoff runs ever.

...
I think as a whole, AD was an ATG scorer, near 2017 Durant in volume and effeciency, while also being a strong DPOY type player

...
HA, love the *sips tea* quote :lol: :lol: I also like that you're bringing up AD already. It was quite the playoffs! I think people who are very playoff-centric should have him in the back of their mind. Still, I suspect you may be repeating his name for a while for two reasons.

Concern 1. Possible bias--*ahem, excuse me, sorry I had something in my throat*--preference for offensive first options over second options (or floor raisers over ceiling raisers). AD is a better fitting offensive second option and defensive first option. People are often hesitant to put players like that (Bill Russell most famously, KG, Robinson, to some extent Duncan, etc.) over players who are better offensive first options. In other terms, people might prefer floor raisers to ceiling raisers, even if the ceiling raiser might increase your chances of a championship more with a good fitting team.

Concern 2. The fear that the 2020 Playoffs was enabled by a favorable context. What really put AD over the top in value was his shooting, and the 2020 playoffs did seem a touch above any other level he hit. How much was that shooting enabled by the mid-season break or by the odd circumstances (no home court, lack of fans, etc.)? Might other players have hit that level if they played in that circumstance?

Now there are arguments against this of course. You could argue other iterations of AD are underrated (they might be!). You could argue players' can't control their context, they just have to play, and wow did AD do well when he played. You could argue we should judge players relative to their era... everyone else was in the Bubble, everyone else had a chance to get hot, but only AD got this hot, so that should be credit to him.

I personally don't really care about Concern 1. I'm open to having ceiling raisers who are fantastic Defensive 1st Options and fantastic Offensive 2nd options. But Concern 2 does give me some pause....
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,294
And1: 6,899
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #12 

Post#8 » by falcolombardi » Sat Jul 23, 2022 4:47 pm

letskissbro wrote:I don't see how Duncan is 6(+) places better than KG when KG was good enough to make people question whether Duncan was the best player in the league during Duncan's peak season, and then was overwhelmingly considered better the very next season.

Also 10 of the first 11 selected are now in title winning seasons.


In fairness this is relarively common at this level of play

people used to debate curry vs lebron circa 16-17 when lebron was still in his prime

Kareem vs walton was a serious debate too

All players in the top 20~ or so are gonna be absolute monstets with best in the league level of play, some of which just happened to coincide with even better players

The 6 spots difference doesnt mean there is a huge gap perceived between both
LukaTheGOAT
Analyst
Posts: 3,247
And1: 2,955
Joined: Dec 25, 2019
 

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #12 

Post#9 » by LukaTheGOAT » Sat Jul 23, 2022 5:06 pm

falcolombardi wrote:
letskissbro wrote:I don't see how Duncan is 6(+) places better than KG when KG was good enough to make people question whether Duncan was the best player in the league during Duncan's peak season, and then was overwhelmingly considered better the very next season.

Also 10 of the first 11 selected are now in title winning seasons.


In fairness this is relarively common at this level of play

people used to debate curry vs lebron circa 16-17 when lebron was still in his prime

Kareem vs walton was a serious debate too

All players in the top 20~ or so are gonna be absolute monstets with best in the league level of play, some of which just happened to coincide with even better players

The 6 spots difference doesnt mean there is a huge gap perceived between both


I mean, I think KG was the MVP in 03 and 04, and if you focus heavily on RS, has a great argument for being better than Duncan (where I think the chatter is coming from).

Though nonetheless, what many will blame on more poor teammates than anything, I just never saw peak Garnett have the offensive dominance of a number of prime versions of Duncan (let alone peak Duncan such as 02 and 03) come PS. I think a lot of people are simply a bit underwhelmed by his playoff scoring. Kareem's peak years are often said to be 77 or even 74...Garnett made a run to the WCF but hasn't gotten the same love because I think people just really question his aptitude as an offensive player.

According to Backpicks Top 40, KG became a MVP level play at the turn of the century. So searching RS&PS PIPM from 2000-04 provides the following results:

Kevin Garnett is #1 of all players in PIPM at 6.73. (3.64 OPIPM). Duncan is #2 at 6.53 (2.55 OPIPM). Garnett outright has the more impressive on/off offensively and defensively too.

HOWEVER, if we do just playoffs:

Duncan becomes #1 in this time frame with a 7.48 PIPM (3.16 OPIPM is 3rd in this time frame). KG falls to #6 with a 3.38 PIPM (1.77 OPIPM is #12). Duncan's offensive rating on/off and overall on/off is much better during this time as well.

Once again, this jives with the idea that Duncan simply was a much better floor-raiser and overall offensive guy come PS time. I can see why people believe KG's came is more portable and I agree (I think you can see this with KG maybe being the better FIBA Olympics player). However, I don't think KG's portability makes up for the massive gap offensively.
Dutchball97
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,406
And1: 5,001
Joined: Mar 28, 2020
   

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #12 

Post#10 » by Dutchball97 » Sat Jul 23, 2022 5:07 pm

I definitely understand the support for KG as his statistical profile is elite, not only for his peak season but consistenly so. While I get that some people come to the conclusion that KG not being voted in yet is ring bias, I don't agree with it. A purely statistical comparison is always going to be skewed more towards the regular season. Some stats don't even have play-off ratings and the ones that do have full season ratings don't weigh play-off games any heavier than regular season games, which makes these stats 80-90% reliant on the regular season.

You could say post-season success is highly dependent on teammates and the regular season gives a more even sample size for everyone and you'd be right. However, play-off basketball is where every team is locked in, where defense suddenly matters again and where every game is must win. In 2004 KG had an all-time regular season but I don't think he had an all-time play-off run. This isn't even to do with that the Timberwovles didn't end up winning a ring or even making the finals, this is just about individual performance. He never really had really bad games but about half of his outings in the 2004 post-season were decent at best. Lots of turnovers as well didn't help.
capfan33
Pro Prospect
Posts: 857
And1: 743
Joined: May 21, 2022
 

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #12 

Post#11 » by capfan33 » Sat Jul 23, 2022 5:28 pm

1. 2004 KG
Probably the greatest 2nd option ever (debatable between him and Robinson) I have to remind myself sometimes of how absurd KG was as a complete package. A 6-10+ physical freak that moved like a forward, could handle and pass the ball like the best point-forwards, but played horizontal defense better than anyone outside of Russell and maybe Walton/Olajuwon. Oh and he was an elite mid-range shooter with a beautiful array of post-moves. Just an absurd combination when you realize the full-breadth of his skills. It's hard to rank him because of how awful his teams were in his prime, and maybe with better talent around him he would be more viable as a #1 scoring option, but just based on what I've seen both watching him and statistically I have too many questions about his ability to be the #1 option on a title team to rank him any higher. However, his unrivaled versatility and portability make it hard to put him too much lower than here.

2. 1994 Robinson
Similar to KG in many ways, I ultimately have him a bit below KG largely because I like KG's skillset more overall and think he's a bit more portable. I also think KG's absurd horizontal defense is the best overall skill either of them have and is a bit more of an outlier, which tips things in his direction. I also am not a huge fan of how basic Robinson's scoring game seems to be, I think it makes him more predictable and easier to gameplan against. While I have reservations about KG's playoff scoring, his superior mid-range game and passing makes me more comfortable with him in the playoffs in various situations, specifically in regards to his baseline impact level on offense. It is close however, and I can see arguments both ways.

3. 1966 West
The best scorer before Kareem and arguably one of the 5 best scorers ever if you give more weight to the postseason (which I do), West was ahead of his time to say the least. To me he still has the great pull-up jumper ever and had an incredible bag of tricks, especially relative to other players of his era. He was also an excellent passer and while his passing and scoring peak didn't coincide, he was still excellent in that regard in 66 (according to elgee's passing rating metric, he actually peaked a bit higher than Oscar). Excellent rebounding guard due to him being the same height as Kobe/MJ with a 6'9 wingspan and a reported max vertical in the neighborhood of ~36 inches, he was also an underrated athlete. Finally, from most available evidence he is one of the greatest defensive guards ever. He was a menace in the passing lanes as well as being an excellent shotblocker and man defender.

Giannis, Oscar and Walton/Jokic will probably be my next 3.
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,029
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #12 

Post#12 » by MyUniBroDavis » Sat Jul 23, 2022 6:54 pm

DraymondGold wrote:
letskissbro wrote:I don't see how Duncan is 6(+) places better than KG when KG was good enough to make people question whether Duncan was the best player in the league during Duncan's peak season, and then was overwhelmingly considered better the very next season.

Also 10 of the first 11 selected are now in title winning seasons.
Haha, that's why I've had him on my ballot for a while! :lol: The ring bias is interesting -- if we do end up having a post-project review, that might be a fun topic to discuss!
MyUniBroDavis wrote:- DPOY + Strong offense, already made my case but mostly based on his D
AD 2020
Yeah I’ve changed my mind on this, honestly might have AD higher.

I’ve been pretty consistent with my playoffs > RS take, for AD it’s been more so his RS is so pedestrian that I don’t think him having a playoffs that’s only debatably on the same level as a top 10 peak is enough for me to vote for him

However I was thinking of ADs playoff run as a whole again and I’m starting to realize, at least in my opinion it was actually kind of absurd? Even in a vacuum, and contextually the idea that

“Oh but you see *sips tea* he had lebron james”

...

I think without applying context, in a vacuum ADs 2020 playoff run is up there with the best playoff runs ever.

...
I think as a whole, AD was an ATG scorer, near 2017 Durant in volume and effeciency, while also being a strong DPOY type player

...
HA, love the *sips tea* quote :lol: :lol: I also like that you're bringing up AD already. It was quite the playoffs! I think people who are very playoff-centric should have him in the back of their mind. Still, I suspect you may be repeating his name for a while for two reasons.

Concern 1. Possible bias--*ahem, excuse me, sorry I had something in my throat*--preference for offensive first options over second options (or floor raisers over ceiling raisers). AD is a better fitting offensive second option and defensive first option. People are often hesitant to put players like that (Bill Russell most famously, KG, Robinson, to some extent Duncan, etc.) over players who are better offensive first options. In other terms, people might prefer floor raisers to ceiling raisers, even if the ceiling raiser might increase your chances of a championship more with a good fitting team.

Concern 2. The fear that the 2020 Playoffs was enabled by a favorable context. What really put AD over the top in value was his shooting, and the 2020 playoffs did seem a touch above any other level he hit. How much was that shooting enabled by the mid-season break or by the odd circumstances (no home court, lack of fans, etc.)? Might other players have hit that level if they played in that circumstance?

Now there are arguments against this of course. You could argue other iterations of AD are underrated (they might be!). You could argue players' can't control their context, they just have to play, and wow did AD do well when he played. You could argue we should judge players relative to their era... everyone else was in the Bubble, everyone else had a chance to get hot, but only AD got this hot, so that should be credit to him.

I personally don't really care about Concern 1. I'm open to having ceiling raisers who are fantastic Defensive 1st Options and fantastic Offensive 2nd options. But Concern 2 does give me some pause....


I don’t think him being off ball = him being the second option, there are a decent amount of second option PGs that could run the p and r with him pretty well, I do agree that he isn’t best served as a ball dominant big though

Concern 2 is valid, although I don’t think it’s neccessarily
The situation or the break because of his pre playoff bubble bubble stats being prety bad. That might be a sample thing but his thing about the playoff bubble was his crazy consistency

I really do think he was just hot, but I agree that the concerns over it not being sustainable is valid, in terms of peaks if someone has a full championship run going crazy I don’t mind taking it at face value, if it was a one or two series situation I might agree more but if they go through the whole way it’s kind of like someone having a miracle season imo
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,495
And1: 8,134
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #12 

Post#13 » by trex_8063 » Sat Jul 23, 2022 7:41 pm

AGAIN.......

1. '04 Kevin Garnett
I'll for the FOURTH time point to the #8 spot taken by Bill Russell.......because I feel Kevin Garnett is one of just a few who is probably very near him in his defensive chops. No one ever achieved the level of defensive impact that Bill Russell did.......but to be fair, players like Garnett, Duncan, Mutombo, Hakeem, big Ben, etc never had the opportunity to be a defensive anchor in an era where the floor was so condensed (fully potentiating the impact of a rim-protecting big).
I don't know if any player could have matched Russell's impact in his own time......but I think Garnett [and perhaps Duncan] are the guys who'd have a shot. Both of them appear to be the top of their era in defensive IQ [Draymond Green is the only other defensive big of the last 25 years I can think of who perhaps can match them in this]; and they have Russell's length (and Garnett has at least really close to his athleticism, too).

On the flip-side, I'm skeptical Russell could do appreciably better in the modern(ish) era than Garnett did.

Short-version: I think Garnett is pretty close to Russell as a defensive juggernaut; but whereas Russell was merely fair-to-decent offensively, Garnett is actually REALLY good [though perhaps short of "great"] on that end too. I simply have a helluva hard time seeing Russell having much of a relevant edge overall.

imo, such two-way dynamos at least marginally out-shine the more one-sided player peaks. So I personally feel he peaked slightly higher than Russell [or Magic Johnson, for example].
fwiw, this is not a purely retrospective viewpoint fueled by analytics. I distinctly remember composing an "NBA update" email to my dad in early 2004, and thinking fairly definitively at the time that Kevin Garnett was the best player in the world (which was perhaps striking in my mind, considering the league contained prime [if not peak] Tim Duncan, Shaquille O'Neal, and Kobe Bryant).

imo, we're now WELL past due for Garnett's peak.
And I strongly suspect that if Cassell hadn't got injured and the TWolves had won the title that year [with Garnett playing NO BETTER in the playoffs than what he did], he would already be off the table at least 2-3 places ago.
This is the subtle unintentional [largely unconscious] ring-bias in effect, imo.


2. '95 David Robinson ('96 DRob, '94 DRob)
Not sure the best year to go with; each has a slightly differing selling point, and honestly I think he was near the same level in all three years.
I imagine this will be a contraversial pick, but it sort of follows in the same vein as my Kevin Garnett pick: two-way dynamos.
I think people sometimes fail to acknowledge how extraordinary an OFFENSIVE player Robinson was in the regular season.......they just focus on the playoff decline.
I've made this [only slightly hyperbolic] statement before: Robinson was essentially asked/expected to be Bill Russell on defense AND Michael Jordan on offense for those early-mid 90s Spurs teams.

And the crazy as **** part is: he was mostly successful during the rs.

Frankly if he HAD been able to maintain that in the post-season, he'd have more than a puncher's chance of taking the #1 greatest peak of all-time.

In addition to his off-the-chart box-derived metrics [in the rs], look at his rs impact metrics over this same three-year span:
'94 Top 5 APM (from colts18)
1. David Robinson: +7.31
2. Kevin Willis: +5.44
3. Karl Malone: +5.37
4. Hakeem Olajuwon: +5.10
5. Nate McMillan: +4.85
(NOTE: the separation between Robinson [at #1] and #2 is greater than the separation between #2 and #11).

'94 Top 5 AuPM (Backpicks)
1. David Robinson: +6.7
2. Karl Malone: +5.2
3. Nate McMillan: +4.8
4. Hakeem Olajuwon: +4.5
5. Kevin Willis: +4.3
(NOTE: the separation between Robinson [at #1] and #2 is greater than the separation between #2 and #6).


'95 Top 5 APM
1. David Robinson: +7.42
2. Shaquille O'Neal: +5.80
3. Karl Malone: +4.93
4. Anfernee Hardaway: +4.68
5. Scottie Pippen: +4.63
(NOTE: the separation between Robinson [at #1] and #2 is greater than the separation between #2 and #6).

'95 Top 5 AuPM
1. David Robinson: +8.7
2. Scottie Pippen: +5.9
3. Shaquille O'Neal: +5.6
4. Anfernee Hardaway: +5.6
5. Karl Malone: +5.3
(NOTE: the separation between Robinson [at #1] and #2 is equal to the separation between #2 and #24).


'96 Top 5 APM
1. Michael Jordan: +6.67
2. David Robinson: +5.89
3. Anfernee Hardaway: +5.26
4. Scottie Pippen: +4.99
5. Karl Malone: +4.89

'96 Top 5 AuPM
1. David Robinson: +6.7
2. Michael Jordan: +6.5
3. Scottie Pippen: +5.8
4. Anfernee Hardaway: +5.7
5. Karl Malone: +5.2


I mean, holy cow. You look at these three years, and he's not just outperforming the competition......he's obliterating it! Except for a prime Michael Jordan [in '96], there's no one remotely close to him in the rs.
And these are almost exclusively all-timers he's obliterating.
In the playoffs, he comes back to Earth: down to maybe being only maybe like the 2nd or 3rd-best player in the league. Oh dear.

So how much deduction should he get for going from GOAT-candidate in rs to circa-2nd best in any given year in the playoffs?
idk.....decide for yourself. But don't sleep on how friggin' unearthly he was in the rs.
For myself, he's near the region of Duncan/Hakeem/Garnett; usually just behind, but really really close.


3. '21??? Giannis Antetokounmpo ('20, '22)
Continuing with the two-way juggernauts: Giannis is definitely that. And because in some ways they're similar players, it feels appropriate to have Giannis somewhere within 1-2 places of David Robinson [even if it's Giannis you have ahead].
I reserve the right to switch my last pick to one of my HM's below, but for now I'll go this route.

Other top consideration I'd be perfectly happy with at this stage is Nikola Jokic.
Bill Walton crossed my mind, but health/missed games is just enough of an issue to me that I back him out of consideration; he'd maybe be next though.

tbh, Jokic/Giannis/DRob are all very very close to me. So I may end up changing my 2nd and 3rd picks.
All three are overdue, imo.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
capfan33
Pro Prospect
Posts: 857
And1: 743
Joined: May 21, 2022
 

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #12 

Post#14 » by capfan33 » Sat Jul 23, 2022 7:50 pm

letskissbro wrote:I don't see how Duncan is 6(+) places better than KG when KG was good enough to make people question whether Duncan was the best player in the league during Duncan's peak season, and then was overwhelmingly considered better the very next season.

Also 10 of the first 11 selected are now in title winning seasons.


While I don't care about rings at all, my list would still mostly be title seasons albeit less than the current list. If I could choose the year for each of the above players, 8 out of 11 would be title years, could maybe get that down to 6 depending on Ducan/Curry.
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 52,775
And1: 21,707
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #12 

Post#15 » by Doctor MJ » Sat Jul 23, 2022 7:54 pm

letskissbro wrote:I don't see how Duncan is 6(+) places better than KG when KG was good enough to make people question whether Duncan was the best player in the league during Duncan's peak season, and then was overwhelmingly considered better the very next season.

Also 10 of the first 11 selected are now in title winning seasons.


Important points to consider definitely.

Let's first note that part of the answer here surely is that not everyone at this time questions whether Duncan was better than KG back then. People should try to understand how things were perceived at the time and make sure they ask themselves why they diverge from those who observed the event first hand, but I applaud people coming to their own conclusions as they do this.

I do think it's interesting to point out how Duncan vs KG has gone in these Peak projects.

2012: Duncan 9, Garnett 11 (LeBron in between)

2015: Duncan 7, Garnett 8

2019: Duncan 6, Garnett 11 (Bird, Russell, Hakeem, Magic in between)

2022: Duncan 6, Garnett ? (Hakeem, Russell, Bird, Magic & Curry at least in between)

So what I'd say to this point there isn't anything definitively saying things have changed since the 2019 project, but we saw the gap between them emerge between the 2015 & 2019 project.

The general trends I see here track with my recollection, but I'll some of the prologue to it:

Circa 2003/2004, Garnett was seen as in clear debate with Duncan. In fact I remember playing NBA Live at that time and Garnett having the highest ratings of anyone in the league, which didn't strike me as strange at all despite the fact that this was before I started approaching basketball more analytically (on RealGM).

Then Minny fell apart and the Spurs won two more titles, and the gap between was wide.

Then Boston had their shocking success and it closed the gap - less so outside of places like here, but it did close the gap some for everyone, and I felt this narrowing continued basically through the time Garnett left Boston.

Additionally, at least around these parts, more respect was given to both guys relative to older greats. While for most of their career it was taken as a given that neither were up there with Bird & Magic, the understanding of big men's capacity for 2-way impact along with our access to +/- type stats made people feel that this was a legit debate.

And then the Spurs broke through with a finals run followed by a championship, and Duncan started gaining more traction from there, while Garnett became more of an afterthought. Duncan hasn't risen dramatically by ranking since, but of course, but passing Hakeem was no small thing. Meanwhile Garnett seems to be kinda floating back down, probably settling somewhere more similar to where the greater basketball world sees him (ESPN's last such list - not Peaks, but telling - put Garnett at 20th).

There's one obvious eye-brow raising thing about this I feel compelled to say, and one not-so-obvious thing:

Obvious thing: We're talking about Peaks, and peaks of retired players at that. If there was a known, objective correct answer to the question, these players shouldn't be seen the gap between them wax and wane like this. We are thus talking about a drift that's occurring at least in part based on how people are taking in information about these old seasons a decade plus after the seasons occurred, and it's worth asking: How is that changing?

Not-so-obvious thing: There's an irony in the fact that in the time frame since 2015, when Duncan has gained a bigger perceived lead on Garnett, the game's strategy has progressed rapidly in a way that strongly favors Garnett.

Now, as I've said, I'm not ranking Garnett here based on how he could have been used at the time, I'm ranking the season based on how he actually played. Hence, I'm specifically not suggesting that Garnett's Peak season should necessarily be gaining ground simply because of things we now know about the game, and I don't necessarily think Garnett's been underrated so far - I'd have him higher than 12, but I'm lower on other guys and theoretically that could explain the difference - within the criteria of the project as I see it.

I think there's a clear logic to expect that when a sport bends more toward toward Player A than Player B after their careers end, we'd either see that favoring Player A for the future, or at least for Player A to remain apace with Player B...and that's not what's happening.

In an era where we watch the game evolve into something that favors a Garnett over a Duncan more and more, we're seeing Duncan add to his perceived lead in Peak (and probably Career) over Garnett.

And once again, worth asking: What force is causing that?


I've got thoughts on these questions, but I'll just leave them for folks to chew on because to me that rumination process is probably more beneficial than any epiphany I believe I've come upon.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
ardee
RealGM
Posts: 15,320
And1: 5,397
Joined: Nov 16, 2011

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #12 

Post#16 » by ardee » Sat Jul 23, 2022 8:50 pm

1. 1977 Bill Walton

Has everyone forgotten about him? In 1977 and 1978, here's the Blazers' record with and without him:

1977 Walton healthy: 44-21
1977 Walton hurt: 5-12

1978 Walton healthy: 48-10
1978 Walton hurt: 10-14

74.7% win rate while he's healthy, and 36.5% while he's hurt. And that's over a pretty big sample size.

Quite honestly I see him on a similar level to Russell, whom I have at 9. Just incredible defensive impact, if you watch the Finals against the Sixers he has the defensive equivalent of a scorer having a 20 point quarter. The commentators were freaking out and screaming "they cannot find a way to score on Bill Walton!"

I think him and Steph are pretty debatable.

2. 2008 Kobe Bryant (HM: 2006)

I've spoken about Kobe's raw impact quite a bit in different threads. In this season specifically, he led the Lakers to a 7.34 SRS with just 27 games of Pau and 35 games of Bynum. Odom was the only other player on that team who could generate much of his own offense. The rest of the rotation consisting of Fisher, Vladimir Radmanovic, Farmar, Vujacic and Turiaf doesn't exactly scream a 7.3 SRS cast.

On top of that, he put together a Jordan-esque Playoff run. 32-6-6 on 60% TS against 3 50 win teams in the Western conference, including a 6.9 SRS Jazz team and a -5.7 defensively Spurs team. His Finals weren't anything to write home about but honestly were not any worse than Jordan against similarly good defensive teams (the '93 Knicks for example).

3. 2009 Dwyane Wade (HM: 2006)

Him and Kobe at their peaks are fairly close as players. I do think Kobe was more impactful though, when you look at the 2006 Lakers vs the 2009 Heat by SRS given the similar supporting casts. Wade was likely better defensively but that's canceled out by Kobe's superior portability given shooting and off-ball play.

Next would be Dirk, KG and Robinson for me, then we get into Oscar and West.
trelos6
Senior
Posts: 508
And1: 204
Joined: Jun 17, 2022
Location: Sydney

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #12 

Post#17 » by trelos6 » Sat Jul 23, 2022 10:54 pm

12. Kevin Garnett 2004. Big impact, dominant defensively. Beat Duncan in MVP after a close race in 2003 where Duncan has already been selected.

13. Jerry West. Hard to pick a season. So many great ones. Maybe 1968. He was 21 pp75 and +9rTS%. Team offence was good and he was his usual demon self in the playoffs.

14. David Robinson. 1994. Not his defensive best, but pretty close to it. And definitely his offensive peak. 29.4 pp75 at +4.9rTS%
Dutchball97
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,406
And1: 5,001
Joined: Mar 28, 2020
   

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #12 

Post#18 » by Dutchball97 » Sun Jul 24, 2022 8:31 am

Looking at the voring trends I might just be voting for Dr J and Moses for the next 10-15 spots or so but that's completely fine. The top 10 peaks are our top 10 careers in a slightly shuffled order but now it's going to get really interesting. When opinions are this far apart you're going to get some of the most interesting discussions after all, although most of the difference in approach seems to be based on the definition of a peak season.

I've briefly touched upon Doctor MJ's point before a while ago but it's probably a good thing to bring it up again. No disrespect to the people who voted in the earliest peaks and top 100 projects but it's clear to me the process has evolved since then. There were no explanations required, which makes it hard for anyone to convince others and makes people default to their initial assumptions. The voting system itself has also been greatly improved to give more people a say instead of just counting first place votes. The most important factor for seemingly random changes in rankings of retired players is because we're not a monolith. Just because a majority of people 20 years ago held a certain opinion or even if that opinion was present in the previous project that doesn't mean we should all hold that opinion now. What is kind of overlooked in this is voter turnover. Some people who participated in older projects no longer do so, while there are also new people with different perspectives joining (this is my first peaks project as well). That's why I think while it's interesting to compare results to previous projects, this 2022 ranking should be seen first and foremost as it's own thing. Unless we'd have a large voter pool that remained consistent throughout the years, there will always be fluctuations of rankings due to some players having more champions or detractors participate than in other years.
User avatar
cupcakesnake
Senior Mod- WNBA
Senior Mod- WNBA
Posts: 14,999
And1: 31,002
Joined: Jul 21, 2016
 

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #12 

Post#19 » by cupcakesnake » Sun Jul 24, 2022 1:29 pm

1. 2004 KG
A little surprised to see KG still not on the board. I mean obviously not that surprised. He was 11th last time, and any list of greatest single seasons ever is insanely difficult competition. I do think people are treating KG's relatively not-that-great playoff scoring as way too much of a bugaboo. With how often people bring it up as a significant detractor, you think it would be some outlier awful thing that none of the other stars have. I'm not seeing specific arguments for why KG's scoring (as a relative weakness) has more weight than the weaknesses of other stars (Bird's lack of rim pressure, Magic's defense, Curry's size, Hakeem's passing, Russell's scoring efficiency, Shaq's defense). Does anyone think that KG's scoring stands out, especially on that list I just put in parentheses? If we made a list of weaknesses amongst all-time greats, where would KG's scoring rank? The way people talk about it, it sounds like one of the bigger weaknesses that any star has ever had. I almost get talked into it, and then I remember we're talking about a guy who, in his prime, was regularly posting over 30pp100 on over 100 TS Add. Not all-time great scoring seasons but kind of silly to talk about quite that much as a weakness.

Now, scoring aside, we're talking about one of the best defenders ever (a real post-Russell defensive GOAT candidate), one of the biggest statistical marvels of a peak ever (in terms of most of the +/- derived stats), a run to the Western Conference Finals with a team that heavily featured a 33-year-old Latrell Sprewell but was arguably a Sam Cassell non-injury away from making the finals (where they would have lost. No way the T-Wolves offense holds up against the Pistons imo).

I think that season was a big instructor for me because it taught me that even scoring (especially the heroic tough shot making that we lauded MJ and Kobe for back then) can be a role player skill if you have the right personnel. Latrell Sprewell sucked so bad that year, by any measurement of sucking at basketball. But on a team with KG, adding a player who can barf up tons long 2s at 40%fg becomes an acceptable asset. That version of Sprewell would have been laughably bad on most teams and might have been getting benched in the playoffs. But with KG providing all that defense, passing, spacing, helped Sprewell basically a "scoring resiliency role player". That team was hilariously reliant on long 2s, ranking 27th in 3PAr and FTAr, and dead last (by a specific margin) in terms of % of FGA at the rim. Yes: a top 5 offense that almost went to the finals was bottom 3 in threes, free throws, and rim scoring. And there was no source of that magic outside of KG. Sam Cassell did beautiful work with KG (offensively) but wasn't propping up bench lineups (-4 in 300+ minutes without KG). Cassell deserves credit for his offensive brilliance, but it should be mentioned that he actively damaged the T-wolves defense while out there (the tradeoff was still a big plus overall).

One thing that's funny to me is that I don't think KG was any worse in 2005 (or 2003 or 2006) but we're only going to mention 2004 because that was the only season he had any semblance of helpful personnel and it was the only season the team won playoff series. We try to account for winning bias as much as possible, we know KG is a player that has a massive impact on winning, but I think our brains can't quite close the gap there. He is a strange outlier among great players in terms of personnel he played with in his young career and prime (I also think the 2009 injury caused a sneaky amount of legacy damage. There's a reasonably possible world where the Celtics 3-peat and we're like woah what is KG).

2. 1977 Bill Walton

This list loves defensive anchors who do enough offensively, so it's time to enshrine the remaining members of that club. I think it's noteworthy that KG and Walton, the 2 biggest weirdos of this group (KG for terrible team and Walton for injuries) are the ones remaining off the list as we get out of the top 10. How much is career bias affecting how we view peaks? Should we be trying to view these peaks and temporarily blinding ourselves to the rest of their careers? I'm not calling people out, I know how smart voters are here. I'm quite sure anyone can and has argued for Duncan>Walton or Russell>KG in terms of purely peak. Also, Anthony Davis has started picking up some stray votes, imo mostly on the back of an outlier shooting performance in the playoffs, indicating voters clearly can black out the rest of someone's career a bit and focus on a single season performance. But one would think we'd see someone like Walton (or KG to a lesser extent), players who did not have great careers relative to other all-time greats, really pop on this list. I sort of want to see a peaks project where Walton and KG are top 5, if only because it would flex how single-season we can be. That being said, I'm not specifically arguing that Walton in 1977 was better than peak Shaq/Kareem/Wilt. But I'm also someone who hasn't voted much in this project because I have a way harder time than y'all separating these peaks.

3. 2017 Kawhi Leonard

Yeahh **** it. I've seen his name pop up once or twice and I want to add my voice to this. I think we overcorrect for Kawhi in some analysis as a push back on the hoards of drooling fans who see the heroic shot-making in the playoffs and know his defensive reputation and create an illusion of MJ to believe in. I'll see cooler-headed analysis about Kawhi's defensive impact numbers or someone point out how much more the numbers liked Curry over Kawhi in the 2019 finals (often ignoring completely that Kawhi was injured in that series). I know he stopped playing ATG perimeter defense after 2017. I know he stopped being healthy enough to rely on after 2017. But what's the argument against 2017 Kawhi? Elite shooter (48/38/88 in the regular season and then 52/45/93 in the playoffs), +180 TS Add, elite free-throw getter, and then absolutely mauled everyone in the playoffs. People point to some on/off Kawhi metrics as evidence that Kawhi's defense started dropping off in 2017, but digging deeper into the lineup data (or watching it in real-time) I think those numbers are a bit corrupted by the Tony Parker/Pau Gasol duo (played almost 700 minutes with Kawhi). That duo boosted offense significantly but was routinely targeted on defense in the pick & roll. It became a popular strategy that year to try to isolate Kawhi away from the ball (teams would even put their best scorer in the corner sometimes) to attack other parts of the defense. I don't think I'd ever seen a defensive perimeter player avoided in that manner before.

Maybe part of me is overly-mystified by the what-if created by 1 half of Kawhi straight up ruining the Warriors. Another bias is maybe me seeing 2017 as the last of Kawhi before his knee became one of the more garbage body parts in the NBA, post-Zazagate. But I did see what I thought was the most devastating 2-way wing of all-time. He always seemed to have a scary size and strength advantage that could muscle even elite defenses. At that point in time Kawhi was an elite shooter over 2 seasons (we don't talk about post-injury Kawhi's shot being noticeably flatter) and a 2 time DPOY.

(2021 Giannis, 1969 Jerry West, 2022 Jokic are the other names I want to vote for somewhere around here.)
"Being in my home. I was watching pokemon for 5 hours."

Co-hosting with Harry Garris at The Underhand Freethrow Podcast
User avatar
homecourtloss
RealGM
Posts: 11,280
And1: 18,689
Joined: Dec 29, 2012

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #12 

Post#20 » by homecourtloss » Sun Jul 24, 2022 5:03 pm

trex_8063 wrote:AGAIN.......

1. '04 Kevin Garnett
I'll for the FOURTH time point to the #8 spot taken by Bill Russell.......because I feel Kevin Garnett is one of just a few who is probably very near him in his defensive chops. No one ever achieved the level of defensive impact that Bill Russell did.......but to be fair, players like Garnett, Duncan, Mutombo, Hakeem, big Ben, etc never had the opportunity to be a defensive anchor in an era where the floor was so condensed (fully potentiating the impact of a rim-protecting big).
I don't know if any player could have matched Russell's impact in his own time......but I think Garnett [and perhaps Duncan] are the guys who'd have a shot. Both of them appear to be the top of their era in defensive IQ [Draymond Green is the only other defensive big of the last 25 years I can think of who perhaps can match them in this]; and they have Russell's length (and Garnett has at least really close to his athleticism, too).

On the flip-side, I'm skeptical Russell could do appreciably better in the modern(ish) era than Garnett did.

Short-version: I think Garnett is pretty close to Russell as a defensive juggernaut; but whereas Russell was merely fair-to-decent offensively, Garnett is actually REALLY good [though perhaps short of "great"] on that end too. I simply have a helluva hard time seeing Russell having much of a relevant edge overall.

imo, such two-way dynamos at least marginally out-shine the more one-sided player peaks. So I personally feel he peaked slightly higher than Russell [or Magic Johnson, for example].
fwiw, this is not a purely retrospective viewpoint fueled by analytics. I distinctly remember composing an "NBA update" email to my dad in early 2004, and thinking fairly definitively at the time that Kevin Garnett was the best player in the world (which was perhaps striking in my mind, considering the league contained prime [if not peak] Tim Duncan, Shaquille O'Neal, and Kobe Bryant).

imo, we're now WELL past due for Garnett's peak.
And I strongly suspect that if Cassell hadn't got injured and the TWolves had won the title that year [with Garnett playing NO BETTER in the playoffs than what he did], he would already be off the table at least 2-3 places ago.
This is the subtle unintentional [largely unconscious] ring-bias in effect, imo.


2. '95 David Robinson ('96 DRob, '94 DRob)
Not sure the best year to go with; each has a slightly differing selling point, and honestly I think he was near the same level in all three years.
I imagine this will be a contraversial pick, but it sort of follows in the same vein as my Kevin Garnett pick: two-way dynamos.
I think people sometimes fail to acknowledge how extraordinary an OFFENSIVE player Robinson was in the regular season.......they just focus on the playoff decline.
I've made this [only slightly hyperbolic] statement before: Robinson was essentially asked/expected to be Bill Russell on defense AND Michael Jordan on offense for those early-mid 90s Spurs teams.

And the crazy as **** part is: he was mostly successful during the rs.

Frankly if he HAD been able to maintain that in the post-season, he'd have more than a puncher's chance of taking the #1 greatest peak of all-time.

In addition to his off-the-chart box-derived metrics [in the rs], look at his rs impact metrics over this same three-year span:
'94 Top 5 APM (from colts18)
1. David Robinson: +7.31
2. Kevin Willis: +5.44
3. Karl Malone: +5.37
4. Hakeem Olajuwon: +5.10
5. Nate McMillan: +4.85
(NOTE: the separation between Robinson [at #1] and #2 is greater than the separation between #2 and #11).

'94 Top 5 AuPM (Backpicks)
1. David Robinson: +6.7
2. Karl Malone: +5.2
3. Nate McMillan: +4.8
4. Hakeem Olajuwon: +4.5
5. Kevin Willis: +4.3
(NOTE: the separation between Robinson [at #1] and #2 is greater than the separation between #2 and #6).


'95 Top 5 APM
1. David Robinson: +7.42
2. Shaquille O'Neal: +5.80
3. Karl Malone: +4.93
4. Anfernee Hardaway: +4.68
5. Scottie Pippen: +4.63
(NOTE: the separation between Robinson [at #1] and #2 is greater than the separation between #2 and #6).

'95 Top 5 AuPM
1. David Robinson: +8.7
2. Scottie Pippen: +5.9
3. Shaquille O'Neal: +5.6
4. Anfernee Hardaway: +5.6
5. Karl Malone: +5.3
(NOTE: the separation between Robinson [at #1] and #2 is equal to the separation between #2 and #24).


'96 Top 5 APM
1. Michael Jordan: +6.67
2. David Robinson: +5.89
3. Anfernee Hardaway: +5.26
4. Scottie Pippen: +4.99
5. Karl Malone: +4.89

'96 Top 5 AuPM
1. David Robinson: +6.7
2. Michael Jordan: +6.5
3. Scottie Pippen: +5.8
4. Anfernee Hardaway: +5.7
5. Karl Malone: +5.2


I mean, holy cow. You look at these three years, and he's not just outperforming the competition......he's obliterating it! Except for a prime Michael Jordan [in '96], there's no one remotely close to him in the rs.
And these are almost exclusively all-timers he's obliterating.
In the playoffs, he comes back to Earth: down to maybe being only maybe like the 2nd or 3rd-best player in the league. Oh dear.

So how much deduction should he get for going from GOAT-candidate in rs to circa-2nd best in any given year in the playoffs?
idk.....decide for yourself. But don't sleep on how friggin' unearthly he was in the rs.
For myself, he's near the region of Duncan/Hakeem/Garnett; usually just behind, but really really close.


3. '21??? Giannis Antetokounmpo ('20, '22)
Continuing with the two-way juggernauts: Giannis is definitely that. And because in some ways they're similar players, it feels appropriate to have Giannis somewhere within 1-2 places of David Robinson [even if it's Giannis you have ahead].
I reserve the right to switch my last pick to one of my HM's below, but for now I'll go this route.

Other top consideration I'd be perfectly happy with at this stage is Nikola Jokic.
Bill Walton crossed my mind, but health/missed games is just enough of an issue to me that I back him out of consideration; he'd maybe be next though.

tbh, Jokic/Giannis/DRob are all very very close to me. So I may end up changing my 2nd and 3rd picks.
All three are overdue, imo.


I had this exact same order.

2004 KG — One of the greatest floor raising seasons in NBA history, one of the highest player impact seasons in history (perhaps the most by some some measures), leading a team bereft of defensive talent to a top 5-top 6 defense, leading a team with little offensive talent [Sam C. had a good offensive season] to a top 5 offense. He was +9.8 per 100 possessions estimate on court with that roster, played 3,200+ minutes, lifted essentially every lineup he was in offensively and defensively…just a remarkable cog. We saw how dominant he can be when talent was placed around him as it was in Boston. I don’t think there’s any era of basketball in which he wouldn’t be a top impact player.

When you look at the top RAPM seasons and their many variations, you see KG seasons (out of thousands of seasons) clustered at the top. The statistical unlikeliness of this cannot be understated enough. KG should likely be higher.

1995 DRob
(1994 DRob)

The two-way impact numbers, the production, the consistency and low variance from game-to-game of his impact places his peak here. Obviously the playoff scoring drop-off drops him, but this 1994–1996 stretch and then seeing how older DRob still provided top-tier impact makes one consider just how high his peak was.

2021 Giannis
(2020 Giannis)
(2022 Giannis)

Another two-way monster impact player whose production per game seems an inevitability, perhaps moreso than anyone’s. Questions of post season scoring efficacy resilience lower him, but honestly, he could be much higher than this and I would have no quibbles with it.

I would have Walton here, but it’s hard to put a <70 games played as a top peak. I still cannot believe that his 80 games played in Boston was the most games he Played.

Jokic next.

Then I haven’t figured out how I evaluate Mikan but he should probably already be here.
lessthanjake wrote:Kyrie was extremely impactful without LeBron, and basically had zero impact whatsoever if LeBron was on the court.

lessthanjake wrote: By playing in a way that prevents Kyrie from getting much impact, LeBron ensures that controlling for Kyrie has limited effect…

Return to Player Comparisons