Zonkerbl wrote:dckingsfan wrote:Zonkerbl wrote:
I genuinely wonder what the press is supposed to do about it. It used to be, you exposed the truth that some politician was lying Nazi scum and he would never win an election again. The press didn't have to editorialize at all - we were smart enough to figure it out ourselves. Now that's no longer true.
Too me it is worse than that - it is now the Democrats problem for poor messaging on issue(s) that should be obvious - and that boomerangs back to a "both sides" argument.
Climate change is a perfect example. One side can't get their agenda through (although it looks like that just changed) and the other side is actively pushing the opposition direction... and yet...
Dems are a political party. They don't face the same limits journalists do. They are as well financed as the gop. Incompetence is the only explanation.
I might not be with you there on this one. I don't put it on journalists either though. The Rs broke through with the irrational barrier which is now placed on the Ds to fix (Rs break it and Ds are criticized for not fixing it). The paradigm is a little unwinnable.
Example: Rs are the party of being fiscally conservative. That has totally flipped but the Ds are now being asked about how they are going to fix the budget.
Rs are the party of making sure they evil immigrants don't come in - D's are labeled as soft on immigration. Republican businesses and farmers pushed hard for cheap immigration labor and by and large have kept the illegal immigrants employed. But the Ds are now being asked how they are going to fix immigration.
You get my drift.

















