Bolts wrote:John Murdoch wrote:
Following up the Mcmeniman report
Ah yes. One of the yearly “Lakers get the best players and everyone else gets crap” trade ideas. True, LeBron has never been able to develop a team around him to be successful and needs the help but it’s time for the league to quit gifting his teams good players for bad players and bad draft choices.
Ah no. Not another blind lakers and/or lebron hate post.
Step into Indiana’s shoes for example. Indiana has shown they aren’t going anywhere in the near future. In this situation the best thing to do is trust the process, and acquire picks and cap space and get rid of ppl that might mess with the tank, and that’s only from basketball perspective. While I’m not sure of the exact financial ramifications of the trade from a business point of view, any sort of rebuild effort will save $ in salary cap in the next few years or enable flexibility to sign a big fish.
But business aside, The trade scenario above clears almost 30 million in cap space for 2023/2024. It provides a first draft pick for lakers which coukd be anyones guess as to what range it will be in but it Has upside. They give up 2 guys in McConnell and hield who will turn 31 and 30 and, again, are taking the pacers nowhere. McConnell obviously has value to a contender imo but to Indiana he doesn’t **** their timeline.
Don’t get me wrong, I respect competitive bball and culture but in this scenario why not clear up cap space to position yourself as a free agent player and get a first round pick for a couple of aging guys that will mess with your 2023 draft,?? Westbrook should get bought out in this scenario.
It makes all the sense in the world for Indiana for the above reasons and is undoubtedly a net positive trade. Not to say they shouldn’t shop that pair around to see if there’s a better deal, but the lakers one would be good for the pacers franchise and just because it helps the lakers too that doesn’t change that.
By the way, the type of trade scenarios you refer to happen closer to daily than “yearly,” but please open up your eyes and realize the one posted above isn’t that.