Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #17 - 1976-77 Bill Walton

Moderators: Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier

iggymcfrack
RealGM
Posts: 12,032
And1: 9,470
Joined: Sep 26, 2017

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #17 

Post#21 » by iggymcfrack » Sat Aug 13, 2022 6:42 am

falcolombardi wrote:There are some players i am surprised are not getting any attention at all, i actually think nobody has mentioned them yet as picks

Dirk nowitsky

Steve nash

Charles barkley ( i am not as high on him but i am surprised nobody has mentioned him yet)

Dirk in particular is surprising as he is a player i expected the board to be higher on

Any theories why? I dont think is a thingh to take for granted at all than garnett is better than dirk for examplw

Dirk has the impact metrics, the portability points, the "led a ring" points, is not fragile player. Feels like he should be more seriusly considered at least on the level of moses and julius who have got votes already

I am actually convincing myself into putting dirk above wade or walton in my top 3


I voted Dirk 3rd behind D-Rob and Kawhi. I think the lack of super impressive box score numbers and obvious non-box contribution during his championship season leads people to dismiss him, but I think that’s a mistake. His impact numbers from 2011 jump off the page, both the advanced stuff and the simple on/off. It’s not just some fluke. He had somewhat of a Curry-like gravity before Curry and was a VERY underrated defender.

When Dirk was on the bench, the Mavs had a point differential of -5.7 which would have been second worst in the West. When he missed games altogether, the Mavs went 2-7. That winning percentage again would have been second worst in the West. When he played, they went 55-18. That winning percentage would have been 2nd best in the league just barely behind Chicago.

In the playoffs, the Mavs played even worse with Dirk on the bench having a point differential of -6.6, yet they were so good with him that they SWEPT the defending champion Lakers with Kobe and Pau, beat Durant, Westbrook, and Harden 4-1 and then beat the superteam of peak LeBron and peak Wade in the Finals 4-2. It’s one of the most impressive playoff runs of all time.

It’s a really interesting comparison with Wade since Wade beat peak Dirk in 2006 to win Finals MVP in his peak season and Dirk beat peak Wade in 2011 to win Finals MVP in his peak season. Ultimately I find what Dirk did a tiny bit more impressive even though I STRONGLY considered both for the spot. If it comes down to a tiebreaker you can consider that with better officiating Dirk very well might have gone 2-0 against Wade and won Finals MVP both seasons.
iggymcfrack
RealGM
Posts: 12,032
And1: 9,470
Joined: Sep 26, 2017

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #17 

Post#22 » by iggymcfrack » Sat Aug 13, 2022 6:49 am

ardee wrote:1. 1977 Bill Walton

Has everyone forgotten about him? In 1977 and 1978, here's the Blazers' record with and without him:

1977 Walton healthy: 44-21
1977 Walton hurt: 5-12

1978 Walton healthy: 48-10
1978 Walton hurt: 10-14

74.7% win rate while he's healthy, and 36.5% while he's hurt. And that's over a pretty big sample size.

Quite honestly I see him on a similar level to Russell, whom I have at 9. Just incredible defensive impact, if you watch the Finals against the Sixers he has the defensive equivalent of a scorer having a 20 point quarter. The commentators were freaking out and screaming "they cannot find a way to score on Bill Walton!"

I think him and Steph are pretty debatable.

2. 2008 Kobe Bryant (HM: 2006)

I've spoken about Kobe's raw impact quite a bit in different threads. In this season specifically, he led the Lakers to a 7.34 SRS with just 27 games of Pau and 35 games of Bynum. Odom was the only other player on that team who could generate much of his own offense. The rest of the rotation consisting of Fisher, Vladimir Radmanovic, Farmar, Vujacic and Turiaf doesn't exactly scream a 7.3 SRS cast.

On top of that, he put together a Jordan-esque Playoff run. 32-6-6 on 60% TS against 3 50 win teams in the Western conference, including a 6.9 SRS Jazz team and a -5.7 defensively Spurs team. His Finals weren't anything to write home about but honestly were not any worse than Jordan against similarly good defensive teams (the '93 Knicks for example).

3. 2009 Dwyane Wade (HM: 2006)

Him and Kobe at their peaks are fairly close as players. I do think Kobe was more impactful though, when you look at the 2006 Lakers vs the 2009 Heat by SRS given the similar supporting casts. Wade was likely better defensively but that's canceled out by Kobe's superior portability given shooting and off-ball play.


Question for you and anyone else voting for ‘08 Kobe, why would you pick that season over ‘09? He had better box and impact stats in ‘09 plus his team actually won the championship that year. Is it just that LeBron (and IMO Wade too) were so great in 2009 that Kobe didn’t really have a case for best player in the league that year?
User avatar
CharityStripe34
General Manager
Posts: 9,688
And1: 6,507
Joined: Dec 01, 2014
     

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #17 

Post#23 » by CharityStripe34 » Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:30 am

falcolombardi wrote:Some names i think should be in everyone minds already

Mikan
Wade
Walton
Kobe
Dirk
Nash
Paul
Moses
Julius
Kawhi


No love for Pettit?
"Wes, Hill, Ibaka, Allen, Nwora, Brook, Pat, Ingles, Khris are all slow-mo, injury prone ... a sandcastle waiting for playoff wave to get wrecked. A castle with no long-range archers... is destined to fall. That is all I have to say."-- FOTIS
AEnigma
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,130
And1: 5,978
Joined: Jul 24, 2022

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #17 

Post#24 » by AEnigma » Sat Aug 13, 2022 12:01 pm

iggymcfrack wrote:
falcolombardi wrote:There are some players i am surprised are not getting any attention at all, i actually think nobody has mentioned them yet as picks

Dirk nowitsky

Steve nash

Charles barkley ( i am not as high on him but i am surprised nobody has mentioned him yet)

Dirk in particular is surprising as he is a player i expected the board to be higher on

Any theories why? I dont think is a thingh to take for granted at all than garnett is better than dirk for examplw

Dirk has the impact metrics, the portability points, the "led a ring" points, is not fragile player. Feels like he should be more seriusly considered at least on the level of moses and julius who have got votes already

I am actually convincing myself into putting dirk above wade or walton in my top 3


I voted Dirk 3rd behind D-Rob and Kawhi. I think the lack of super impressive box score numbers and obvious non-box contribution during his championship season leads people to dismiss him, but I think that’s a mistake. His impact numbers from 2011 jump off the page, both the advanced stuff and the simple on/off. It’s not just some fluke. He had somewhat of a Curry-like gravity before Curry and was a VERY underrated defender.

When Dirk was on the bench, the Mavs had a point differential of -5.7 which would have been second worst in the West. When he missed games altogether, the Mavs went 2-7. That winning percentage again would have been second worst in the West. When he played, they went 55-18. That winning percentage would have been 2nd best in the league just barely behind Chicago.

In the playoffs, the Mavs played even worse with Dirk on the bench having a point differential of -6.6, yet they were so good with him that they SWEPT the defending champion Lakers with Kobe and Pau, beat Durant, Westbrook, and Harden 4-1 and then beat the superteam of peak LeBron and peak Wade in the Finals 4-2. It’s one of the most impressive playoff runs of all time.

It’s a really interesting comparison with Wade since Wade beat peak Dirk in 2006 to win Finals MVP in his peak season and Dirk beat peak Wade in 2011 to win Finals MVP in his peak season. Ultimately I find what Dirk did a tiny bit more impressive even though I STRONGLY considered both for the spot. If it comes down to a tiebreaker you can consider that with better officiating Dirk very well might have gone 2-0 against Wade and won Finals MVP both seasons.

I mean it is kiiind-of a fluke.

Dirk had great “impact” that entire decade. If people want to use that fact — along with the sheer brilliance of that 2011 title run — to put him over Wade and Kobe (his contemporaries who in some sense he outpaced in “impact”), it makes for a fine enough argument. Per usual, I am not looking to criticise the choice of player in itself.

However, “look at his impact in 2011 specifically” is a bit myopic.

ElGee wrote:
drza wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:I look at Engelmann's single years, measure it in terms of standard deviations, and this is what I get:

'03 - 2.3 stdev
'04 - 2.5 stdev
'05 - 2.4 stdev
'06 - 2.4 stdev
'07 - 2.6 stdev
'08 - 2.5 stdev
'09 - 1.7 stdev
'10 - 1.5 stdev
'11 - 3.9 stdev
'12 - 3.7 stdev


Don't tell me that's not weird. Something changed dramatically in '11. Either it was Dirk becoming a fundamentally better player, or it was the team becoming a great fit for him, or we're seeing something weirder than that.

What do you think it is? … If he was incapable of doing that RAPM in Dallas '10, why would he be capable of hitting the high '11 RAPM on other teams?

Obviously if you're answer is that Dirk was just better in '11, that would answer those questions, but then that gets us back into why Dirk became better in '11.

The idea that a player's defensive +/- might look good because his offense allows better defensive guys on the court is something that's been around since people started talking about +/-, but it's never gotten well developed so far as I know because of lack of evidence. By that I mean, a player might seem to be showing that in one year, but it doesn't maintain in any ongoing fashion even when that player's role seems to stay the same when we used advanced metrics. So so far as I was concerned, it was noise, but I'm always open to new scenarios.

Let me also say that although we're at this point emphasizing the defensive shift, the overall shift was more dramatic than that and included offense as well. As mentioned, Dirk doubled his deviation in one year. That's a huge leap forward to the point where I think we're a bit beyond saying "Dirk's gotten so good that they can shift lineups around him for defense".

I'll revisit what I said before, when I said, "Either Dirk got better, the team got a better fit around Dirk, or something weirder happened." To me if a player isn't getting better, but his RAPM is showing an abrupt change, I'm not sure what else to call that but "fit" in the broad sense that includes team strategy. If someone has a different way to explain it, then I'd like to hear that. Obviously "fit" is a bit of a charged word for good reason. It tends to imply that there's some baseline level that's "real", and superior fit adds a bonus to that.

As a rule, I don't subscribe to that. To my mind, the baseline is more on the high end of things regarding fit, because I often times see scenarios where a player is simply being misused. However, I do consider it a fair point that when we compare players with different degrees of "fit" on their teams, it doesn't make sense to act like their both at the baseline if we're talking about how "good" they are as opposed to the more concrete measurement of "value".

I don't contest Dirk's value to these teams, however when we are trying to judge the goodness of these players I get nervous when I point to a +/- statistics that I can't put into more concrete terms. And Dirk's numbers going through the roof so late in his career makes me think that the Mavs have hit the fit jackpot around Dirk in a way that I don't know if it's ever been done before. Can you think of another player who in his 13th year on a team, 11th year in prime, and after what seemed like a pretty graceful arch, all of a sudden saw his value explode like this?

And this is where I start feeling the need to tip my cap to the Mavs. A team who has been building around this star for most of that 11 years tinkering with different approaches, and all the while being the inventors of modern +/- analysis, if anyone was going to see shocking breakthroughs in the +/- of their star despite no glaring improvement from him, wouldn't it be the Mavs?

In the end, I suppose I think the key piece of thought is this: The +/- family of stats are the key evidence we have of Dirk's peak value, and the most sophisticated tool we have shows a 1 year jump that more than doubles the deviation that Dirk had had the previous couple years. A way to look at this is to say what New Dirk's impact is as much bigger than Old Dirk's impact as Old Dirk's impact was to an average NBA player.

If you think this is coming from Dirk all of a sudden skyrocketing in his goodness, that's amazing, and you should expound on that.

If you think this is coming from a newfound mega-fit strategy around Dirk, the you should only let that change your opinion about Dirk if you think that you have a sense of which player are capable of that mega-fit and which aren't. Any who also could have such a mega-fit that didn't get that opportunity, you need to round them up.

Consider while you're doing this that Dirk had the fortune of being the star of a single franchise for a very long time, with many different lineups, with the franchise that pretty much invented lineup analysis.

I think this is an interesting exchange, and the crux to where you guys are disagreeing. Just putting some numbers to it (ETA: I see DocMJ didn't need my numbers as he was perfectly ready to add his own :lol: ):

2003 - 2008: Every season Dirk finished with RAPM scores between +4.0 and +6.2, and every season he ended up ranked between 4th and 7th in the NBA.

2009 - 2010: His RAPM was +4.0 and +3.5 in those two seasons, for rankings of 13th and 18th.

2011 and 2012: His RAPM shoots up to career highs of +8.8 and +8.0, both #1 in the NBA.

So the quandary becomes, in this particular project, one of where you think Dirk's peak was? In 2006 and 07 he had the best box score production, but his RAPM values were "only" top 5 - 6 in the league and many have raised the question about whether his offensive game was fully complete. He had a very impressive postseason in '06 up until the Finals, but in '07 it was the postseason that most worries those that claim his offensive game was incomplete.

In 2009 therealbigthree sees Dirk having completed his offensive game while maintaining more of the rebounding/athleticism of his peak. But his box score production wasn't as strong, his RAPM had him "only" at 13th, and his postseason wasn't particularly memorable (compared to the other Dirk seasons we're looking at).

And then we have 2011, where Dirk hits a huge RAPM peak and also gains the most notoriety among more casual fans for leading a team without stars to the title. On the other hand, none of those currently advocating for Dirk see this as his peak and we have the attendant drops in rebounding that suggest he might have lost some in his all around game. And of course we have the skeptics, led by Doc MJ, that note that much of Dirk's unexpected RAPM peak seems tied to an increase in defensive value that he finds worthy of more attention.

Summary: It's an interesting situation, because if you could take the best parts of the different years of Dirk and put them together you'd have a more impressive candidate. If you could get the production level of '06 and '07 with the RAPM and team success of 2011, it would strengthen his case. Before looking I thought that's what realbigthree was doing by choosing 2009, but purely from stats/impact/team success it would seem like 2009 Dirk is actually the worst of both worlds as opposed to the best (in terms of combining '06/'07 with '11).

There's something more to be added to these numbers though...What was the claim about 2011 Dirk before Dallas won the title? It was "hey, that guys added something to his offensive game over the years." Of course, no one liked to finish the sentence as they should have with "which I didn't notice because I was busy calling him soft and a choker." But yes, everyone agreed Dirk added something to his offense. I never thought this made up for his defense/rebounding edge in 06 bc 06 Dirk was an offensive monster too. But...

If he added something to his offense, why in the world are people championing a measurement that says he got way way better on defense?

This was all written ten years ago, and to me, none of what they said has aged (I saw it argued that his post defence and defensive awareness seemed to improve in 2011, but those are pretty marginal additions). Again, I understand votes for Dirk as a player overall. You can even say 2011 is sort of a proof in concept of what Dirk can be on a perfectly structured team that wholly covers him on defence and makes full use of him on offence. None of that means we need to lose ourselves in the “impact” weeds.
AEnigma
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,130
And1: 5,978
Joined: Jul 24, 2022

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #17 

Post#25 » by AEnigma » Sat Aug 13, 2022 1:58 pm

iggymcfrack wrote:
ardee wrote:1. 1977 Bill Walton

Has everyone forgotten about him? In 1977 and 1978, here's the Blazers' record with and without him:

1977 Walton healthy: 44-21
1977 Walton hurt: 5-12

1978 Walton healthy: 48-10
1978 Walton hurt: 10-14

74.7% win rate while he's healthy, and 36.5% while he's hurt. And that's over a pretty big sample size.

Quite honestly I see him on a similar level to Russell, whom I have at 9. Just incredible defensive impact, if you watch the Finals against the Sixers he has the defensive equivalent of a scorer having a 20 point quarter. The commentators were freaking out and screaming "they cannot find a way to score on Bill Walton!"

I think him and Steph are pretty debatable.

2. 2008 Kobe Bryant (HM: 2006)

I've spoken about Kobe's raw impact quite a bit in different threads. In this season specifically, he led the Lakers to a 7.34 SRS with just 27 games of Pau and 35 games of Bynum. Odom was the only other player on that team who could generate much of his own offense. The rest of the rotation consisting of Fisher, Vladimir Radmanovic, Farmar, Vujacic and Turiaf doesn't exactly scream a 7.3 SRS cast.

On top of that, he put together a Jordan-esque Playoff run. 32-6-6 on 60% TS against 3 50 win teams in the Western conference, including a 6.9 SRS Jazz team and a -5.7 defensively Spurs team. His Finals weren't anything to write home about but honestly were not any worse than Jordan against similarly good defensive teams (the '93 Knicks for example).

3. 2009 Dwyane Wade (HM: 2006)

Him and Kobe at their peaks are fairly close as players. I do think Kobe was more impactful though, when you look at the 2006 Lakers vs the 2009 Heat by SRS given the similar supporting casts. Wade was likely better defensively but that's canceled out by Kobe's superior portability given shooting and off-ball play.

Question for you and anyone else voting for ‘08 Kobe, why would you pick that season over ‘09? He had better box and impact stats in ‘09 plus his team actually won the championship that year. Is it just that LeBron (and IMO Wade too) were so great in 2009 that Kobe didn’t really have a case for best player in the league that year?

From the prior project:

ardee wrote:2008 Lakers have a 7.4 SRS, 57 wins, no.1 seed.

The standard line-up with everyone healthy was Fisher/Kobe/Radmanovic/Odom/Pau. Pau was only healthy 27 games. Bynum was healthy for 35, and they never played together.

Player by player: Fisher had a good year. 12/23, 44% from the field and 41% from 3. He was still all right on defense. I want you to note his jump in efficiency going from the Jazz to playing with Kobe. This is something that has been seen when many players play with and then without Kobe. He draws so much attention that they see their percentages rank.

Radmanovic was also basically a shooter. He shot 41% from 3, and 44% for the first half of the '09 season. This dipped to 36% when he was traded in the second half, and further to 28 the next season. So elite shooter with Kobe, average to bad without.

Odom was phenomenal that year, no doubts about it, great player all around. The main reason was because we first had Bynum and then Pau to be the second option to Kobe, while Odom was more comfortable as no. 3. His TS% jumped 3.5% from 55 '05-'07, when he was no. 2, to 58.5 in '08, when he was no. 3. In the stretch between Bynum's injury and the Gasol trade when he had to be the no. 2 option again, he shot 42% TS.

Pau was the perfect no. 2 option for Kobe, of course he was, we won 2 titles with him. Remember 2 things though:

1. He played 27 games.
2. As the no. 1 in Memphis, his team was 13-32 before he got traded. They ended up 22-60, so they went from a .280 win pace with him to a .244 win pace without him.

Bynum was also good, however, he wasn't as good as Pau, the numbers spell it out. He played 35 games, and would likely get injured quicker if he

Kobe took this cast to a 7.4 SRS and 57 wins.

I want you to imagine this team with no Kobe.

You'd be starting Fisher/Vujacic/Radmanovic/Odom/27 games of Pau + 35 games of Bynum + 16 games of Turiaf.

The best team would be the one with Pau. Consider, however, like I said, how Pau did on a Memphis team that was poorly built but still had some talent. Their lead scorer was Rudy Gay, who is a flawed player but can at least provide some kind of offense when needed. They had a lights out shooter at the 2 in Mike Miller.

This hypothetical Lakers team built around Pau would have Odom as their second option. Scoring wise, he is worse than Gay for this role. I have already shown he struggles to be consistent in that role. He struggles like that with KOBE as his first option. Pau is a far inferior first option to Kobe and that would put a ton more pressure on Odom. Fisher and Radmanovic can't create, neither can Sasha, and their efficiency dropped heavily when not playing with Kobe.

You can make the argument that this efficiency was due to the triangle partially, and not all Kobe, but the triangle only WORKS when you have an elite perimeter creator like Kobe. So therefore, you can rest assured their efficiency would drop a good bit, if not all the way down to what it was when they didn't play for the Lakers.

So, Pau, inconsistent in the 2nd option role Odom now with the added pressure of playing with a worse no. 1 option than Kobe, and Sasha, Fisher and Radmanovic offering little. I honestly don't see more than .500 in those 27 games and that's being VERY optimstic. In fact, it's more likely to be like 10-11 wins out of 27. The Blazers were a .500 team and they had 2 legit scoring options in Roy and Aldridge surrounded by fitting role players. The Lakers without Kobe are worse then that, even with Pau. Let's call it a push at 12-13 wins in those 27 games.

Bynum's 35 games. Bynum was worse than Pau at everything. He doesn't offer Pau's high-post playmaking. He can still be the main scorer but now Odom has to be the primary creator. More pressure on him. Bynum might get injured from the extra strain. I don't see more than 12-14 wins out of 35. Again, optimstically.

16 games of Turiaf. Odom in the no. 1 role. The team completely falls apart. Maybe 1-2 wins in 16 games.

So essentially, that team in a full season without Kobe wins 25-29 games. They won 57. Kobe was providing roughly ~30 wins of lift.

With this knowledge, it is hard for me to rank Kobe lower than 12 on the all-time peaks. I have Walton at 11, and this is equivalent to the kind of lift we know him to provide.

This was not a good supporting cast. If he had a full season of Pau it would be different, I think the '09 Lakers were great, but 27 games means he was working with a lot less for the rest of the season. It was a good-fitting supporting cast but aside from Pau all the players were supremely dependant on Kobe to do well in their roles.

He took an otherwise lottery team to elite status and put up a historical ORtg for the team when he had Pau.

Through the first 3 rounds of the Playoffs, the Lakers played 3 50 win teams and Kobe averaged 32-6-6 on 60% TS. That is peak Jordan level production against elite opposition. People forget the Jazz were a 7 SRS team and Kobe averaged 33-7-7 against them. People forget he dropped 30 ppg on 53% from the field against the defending champ Spurs while no other star in the series got anything going on that end.

Ardee’s position has probably not changed lol, and I find this line of reasoning convincing. I also care little about Kobe performing better against the Magic than he did against the Celtics.

That said, I think they are basically the same player, so I will edit my vote to accommodate 2009 as well for anyone looking to vote for the more “complete” season.

The questions giving me the most pause:
1) How does Kobe, or how do the Lakers, fare in a Finals matchup with the Pistons or Cavaliers?
2) Is there some demonstrable improvement in Kobe’s game in 2009 that would help him see more success against any of those defensively tougher eastern conference teams?
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,708
And1: 8,347
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #17 

Post#26 » by trex_8063 » Sat Aug 13, 2022 3:36 pm

1. '95 David Robinson ('94 DRob, '96 DRob)
Not sure the best year to go with; each has a slightly differing selling point, and honestly I think he was near the same level in all three years.
He might be the last two-way giant on the table.
I think people sometimes fail to acknowledge how extraordinary an OFFENSIVE player Robinson was in the regular season.......they just focus on the playoff decline.
I've made this [only slightly hyperbolic] statement before: Robinson was essentially asked/expected to be Bill Russell on defense AND Michael Jordan on offense for those early-mid 90s Spurs teams.

And the crazy as **** part is: he was mostly successful during the rs.

Frankly if he HAD been able to maintain that in the post-season, he'd have more than a puncher's chance of taking the #1 greatest peak of all-time.

In addition to his off-the-chart box-derived metrics [in the rs], look at his rs impact metrics over this same three-year span:
'94 Top 5 APM (from colts18)
1. David Robinson: +7.31
2. Kevin Willis: +5.44
3. Karl Malone: +5.37
4. Hakeem Olajuwon: +5.10
5. Nate McMillan: +4.85
(NOTE: the separation between Robinson [at #1] and #2 is greater than the separation between #2 and #11).

'94 Top 5 AuPM (Backpicks)
1. David Robinson: +6.7
2. Karl Malone: +5.2
3. Nate McMillan: +4.8
4. Hakeem Olajuwon: +4.5
5. Kevin Willis: +4.3
(NOTE: the separation between Robinson [at #1] and #2 is greater than the separation between #2 and #6).


'95 Top 5 APM
1. David Robinson: +7.42
2. Shaquille O'Neal: +5.80
3. Karl Malone: +4.93
4. Anfernee Hardaway: +4.68
5. Scottie Pippen: +4.63
(NOTE: the separation between Robinson [at #1] and #2 is greater than the separation between #2 and #6).

'95 Top 5 AuPM
1. David Robinson: +8.7
2. Scottie Pippen: +5.9
3. Shaquille O'Neal: +5.6
4. Anfernee Hardaway: +5.6
5. Karl Malone: +5.3
(NOTE: the separation between Robinson [at #1] and #2 is equal to the separation between #2 and #24).


'96 Top 5 APM
1. Michael Jordan: +6.67
2. David Robinson: +5.89
3. Anfernee Hardaway: +5.26
4. Scottie Pippen: +4.99
5. Karl Malone: +4.89

'96 Top 5 AuPM
1. David Robinson: +6.7
2. Michael Jordan: +6.5
3. Scottie Pippen: +5.8
4. Anfernee Hardaway: +5.7
5. Karl Malone: +5.2


I mean, holy cow. You look at these three years, and he's not just outperforming the competition......he's obliterating it! Except for a prime Michael Jordan [in '96], there's no one remotely close to him in the rs.
And these are almost exclusively all-timers he's obliterating.
In the playoffs, he comes back to Earth: down to maybe being only maybe like the 2nd or 3rd-best player in the league. Oh dear.

So how much deduction should he get for going from GOAT-candidate in rs to circa-2nd best in any given year in the playoffs?
idk.....decide for yourself. But don't sleep on how friggin' unearthly he was in the rs.
For myself, he's near the region of Duncan/Hakeem/Garnett; usually just behind, but really really close.


**Noticeable gap to anyone else for me, considering nearly everyone else I maybe considered sort of close have already been voted in. Overdue on DRob, imo.



2. '77 Bill Walton
A few other names I'd consider for this last spot: Dr. J, Durant, Nowitzki, maybe Wade. Can see dark-horse candidacies for other guys, too (Barkley, Paul, Kobe, Kawhi, McGrady, Moses).
But I'll tentatively go with Walton. Part of what makes it tentative is his marginally limited availability: missed 20% the rs, and played <35 mpg [in an era when most stars played >36 (even ~40 in some cases)]; definitely made himself more available in the playoffs, though you could see it was pushing what his body was capable of (I recall him on the bench with giant bags of ice taped to his knees).
The other thing that gives me pause is turnover economy: granted we don't have turnovers for '77, but we have it for the rest of his career, and it shows a big who is actually a fair bit turnover-prone (all-around economy similar to that of Shawn Kemp). My impression is that a number of Walton's turnovers came while attempting the high risk/high reward pass.......which is something I'd use as a positive factor when considering his turnovers (because when the gamble works, it produces a VERY high scoring opportunity. That said, this could be a mistaken assumption by me [about where his turnovers are occurring].

Walton's a fantastic defensive anchor at his peak, though (roughly a Rudy Gobert-tier, imo, except with slightly lesser rebounding I guess). Fantastic outlet passer (best of the era, outside of maybe Unseld??), and terrific half-court passer from post or high-post: his vision and touch facilitated a lot of back-cut and give-and-go scoring opportunities for teammates within Ramsay's system.

And he's a viable scoring option if needed [even in isolation]. His scoring did take a bit of a dip in the playoffs, but it's hard to argue with the result of that post-season run.
His WOWY, WOWYR, and similar figures are consistently bonkers [even later in his career, as with his '86 campaign], leaving one with the impression of a lot of "intangible" value.

Again, I'm not 100% sold on this being my best option for third ballot, so I might have a change of heart ['76 Erving in particular is bonkers]; but for now this is my pick.


3rd ballot: '76 Julius Erving
A hard one to place, given it's hard to gauge the strength of the ABA at that stage. But '76 Dr J is statistically bonkers, and appears to be doing EVERYTHING for this team [that wins the ABA title]. They're the #1 defense in the ABA, leading the league in opp TOV% (with Erving leading in spg and total steals [handily]), 3rd-best opp eFG% and 2pt% (with Erving leading the team in blocks), and he's team leader in DRebs [close 2nd in ORebs, too]. Leads team in ppg and apg, too, 2nd [to a low-volume scorer] in eFG%, while getting to the line more than twice as often as anyone else on the team [making >80%, too].
The one [or two?] games from this season I've seen, he looks like he's everywhere, doing everything. Given he was an NBA MVP in the early 80's, too [marginally past his physical peak], it's easy to believe he was as legit as his numbers suggest.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
f4p
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,961
And1: 1,974
Joined: Sep 19, 2021
 

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #17 

Post#27 » by f4p » Sat Aug 13, 2022 4:15 pm

trelos6 wrote:17. David Robinson. 1994. Not his defensive best, but pretty close to it. And definitely his offensive peak. 29.4 pp75 at +4.9rTS%

18. Kawhi Leonard. 2016-17. He took a big step up to the offensive machine he is today. And his defence took a small step back from its stratospheric levels, but it was still there on key possessions. 29 pp75 at +5.7 rTS%

19. Kevin Durant. 2017. 28 pp75 at +10 rTS%. I know Curry was grabbing the attention, giving KD easier looks, but we don’t dock Magic for playing with Kareem, Jordan for playing with Scottie and Rodman (offensive rebounds), or Kobe for playing with Shaq.


Next 2 for tiebreakers are Kobe, Wade


2017 is by far steph's highest TS% in a playoffs as well. and KD's 2nd, 3rd, and 4th best marks are ahead of steph's 2nd. the warriors started a lot of possessions with PnR's with steph and a non-shooter where they know a trap will come and help steph rack up double teams, but that doesn't necessarily mean defenses were paying any less attention to KD.
f4p
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,961
And1: 1,974
Joined: Sep 19, 2021
 

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #17 

Post#28 » by f4p » Sat Aug 13, 2022 4:24 pm

falcolombardi wrote:There are some players i am surprised are not getting any attention at all, i actually think nobody has mentioned them yet as picks

Dirk nowitsky

Steve nash

Charles barkley ( i am not as high on him but i am surprised nobody has mentioned him yet)

Dirk in particular is surprising as he is a player i expected the board to be higher on

Any theories why? I dont think is a thingh to take for granted at all than garnett is better than dirk for examplw

Dirk has the impact metrics, the portability points, the "led a ring" points, is not fragile player. Feels like he should be more seriusly considered at least on the level of moses and julius who have got votes already

I am actually convincing myself into putting dirk above wade or walton in my top 3


this seems early for dirk and nash. dirk's problem is his best regular seasons end in disappointing playoffs and his 2011 regular season isn't that amazing. and it doesn't really feel like a hakeem/duncan O1/D1 type playoff run, even though it was amazing.

nash seems like he should be quite a bit lower than this. his mvp's are amongst the more debatable ever and he didn't finish with a title. not sure how he would be over someone like harden, who i assume this board won't be voting for for quite a few more rounds.
User avatar
CharityStripe34
General Manager
Posts: 9,688
And1: 6,507
Joined: Dec 01, 2014
     

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #17 

Post#29 » by CharityStripe34 » Sat Aug 13, 2022 4:34 pm

I'm a big Barkley fan and he's coming up close for me.
"Wes, Hill, Ibaka, Allen, Nwora, Brook, Pat, Ingles, Khris are all slow-mo, injury prone ... a sandcastle waiting for playoff wave to get wrecked. A castle with no long-range archers... is destined to fall. That is all I have to say."-- FOTIS
SickMother
Senior
Posts: 677
And1: 634
Joined: Jul 10, 2010

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #17 

Post#30 » by SickMother » Sat Aug 13, 2022 4:44 pm

falcolombardi wrote:A more general question

When do you guys feel comfortable picking mikan?

He arguably has the 5th longest reign as nba best player (after kareem,russel,jordan and lebron) and is arguably the last "best in the world at a point" player left


50 & 51 Mikan have gotten some votes already.

Mikan 49-50: --- PER | .487 TS% | 119 TS+ | 21.1 WS | --- WS/48
Mikan 49-59 Playoffs?!?: --- PER | .481 TS% | 3.7 WS | --- WS/48

Mikan 50-51: --- PER | .509 TS% | 119 TS+ | 23.4 WS | --- WS/48
Mikan 50-51 Playoffs?!?: --- PER | .477 TS% | 1.1 WS | --- WS/48

For an All Time list I'd have him ranked higher based on being the OG GOAT, but as far as peak goes I don't have him in consideration until the back end of the list for a few reasons. The league was just bad. A .487 TS% shaking out to a 119 TS+ tells you all you need to know. The league average FG% was .340. This season you needed a TS% in the .670s to be 19% above league average.

Now I get it, people can't control when they are born, all one can do is dominate whatever competition is put in front of them, and Mikan most certainly did that. At the same time someone like Comnie Hawkins dominated a much higher level of competition than Mikan, in a more thorough & measurable way, while also having far superior athleticism, leading to fewer questions about how his game would translate across eras, so for me it's pretty clear whose peak was more impressive.

Connie 67-68: 28.8 PER | .597 TS% | 124 TS+ | 17.5 WS | .273 WS/48
Connie 67-68 Playoffs?!?: 30.0 PER | .651 TS% | 4.0 WS | .310 WS/48
SickMother
Senior
Posts: 677
And1: 634
Joined: Jul 10, 2010

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #17 

Post#31 » by SickMother » Sat Aug 13, 2022 5:09 pm

falcolombardi wrote:There are some players i am surprised are not getting any attention at all, i actually think nobody has mentioned them yet as picks

Dirk nowitsky

Steve nash

Charles barkley ( i am not as high on him but i am surprised nobody has mentioned him yet)


Dirk has gotten a few votes so far. Think he'll be next on my ballot once one of 75-76 Erving or 16-17 Kawhi finally comes off the board. Here's my current pref list for the six guys left in my #14 to #25 tier, plus the splits for Barkley & Nash who I have in my #26 & beyond tier...

Nowitzki 05-06: 28.1 PER | .589 TS% | 110 TS+ | 17.7 WS | .275 WS/48
Nowitzki 05-06 Playoffs?!?: 26.8 PER | .596 TS% | 5.4 WS | .263 WS/48

Wade 05-06: 27.6 PER | .577 TS% | 108 TS+ | 14.4 WS | .239 WS/48
Wade 05-06 Playoffs?!?: 26.9 PER | .593 TS% | 4.8 WS | .240 WS/48

Kobe 08-09: 24.4 PER | .561 TS% | 103 TS+ | 12.7 WS | .206 WS /48
Kobe 08-09 Playoffs?!?: 26.8 PER | .564 TS% | 4.7 WS | .238 WS/48

Durant 16-17: 27.6 PER | .651 TS% | 118 TS+ | 12.0 WS | .278 WS/48
Durant 16-17 Playoffs?!?: 27.5 PER | .683 TS% | 3.1 WS | .280 WS/48

Moses 82-83: 25.1 PER | .578 TS% | 109 TS+ | 15.1 WS | .248 WS/48
Moses 82-83 Playoffs?!?: 25.7 PER | .587 TS% | 2.8 WS | .260 WS/48

Admiral 94-95: 29.1 PER | .602 TS% | 111 TS+ | 17.5 WS | .273 WS/48
Admiral 94-95 Playoffs?!?: 22.6 PER | .536 TS% | 2.3 WS | .176 WS/48

Barkley 92-93: 25.9 PER | .596 TS% | 111 TS+ | 14.4 WS | .242 WS/48
Barkley 92-93 Playoffs?!?: 24.9 PER | .552 TS% | 4.6 WS | .215 WS/48

Nash 05-06: 23.3 PER | .632 TS% | 118 TS+ | 12.4 WS | .212 WS/48
Nash 05-06 Playoffs?!?: 21.3 PER | .615 TS% | 2.6 WS | .153 WS/48
capfan33
Pro Prospect
Posts: 876
And1: 757
Joined: May 21, 2022
 

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #17 

Post#32 » by capfan33 » Sat Aug 13, 2022 5:13 pm

AEnigma wrote:
iggymcfrack wrote:
falcolombardi wrote:There are some players i am surprised are not getting any attention at all, i actually think nobody has mentioned them yet as picks

Dirk nowitsky

Steve nash

Charles barkley ( i am not as high on him but i am surprised nobody has mentioned him yet)

Dirk in particular is surprising as he is a player i expected the board to be higher on

Any theories why? I dont think is a thingh to take for granted at all than garnett is better than dirk for examplw

Dirk has the impact metrics, the portability points, the "led a ring" points, is not fragile player. Feels like he should be more seriusly considered at least on the level of moses and julius who have got votes already

I am actually convincing myself into putting dirk above wade or walton in my top 3


I voted Dirk 3rd behind D-Rob and Kawhi. I think the lack of super impressive box score numbers and obvious non-box contribution during his championship season leads people to dismiss him, but I think that’s a mistake. His impact numbers from 2011 jump off the page, both the advanced stuff and the simple on/off. It’s not just some fluke. He had somewhat of a Curry-like gravity before Curry and was a VERY underrated defender.

When Dirk was on the bench, the Mavs had a point differential of -5.7 which would have been second worst in the West. When he missed games altogether, the Mavs went 2-7. That winning percentage again would have been second worst in the West. When he played, they went 55-18. That winning percentage would have been 2nd best in the league just barely behind Chicago.

In the playoffs, the Mavs played even worse with Dirk on the bench having a point differential of -6.6, yet they were so good with him that they SWEPT the defending champion Lakers with Kobe and Pau, beat Durant, Westbrook, and Harden 4-1 and then beat the superteam of peak LeBron and peak Wade in the Finals 4-2. It’s one of the most impressive playoff runs of all time.

It’s a really interesting comparison with Wade since Wade beat peak Dirk in 2006 to win Finals MVP in his peak season and Dirk beat peak Wade in 2011 to win Finals MVP in his peak season. Ultimately I find what Dirk did a tiny bit more impressive even though I STRONGLY considered both for the spot. If it comes down to a tiebreaker you can consider that with better officiating Dirk very well might have gone 2-0 against Wade and won Finals MVP both seasons.

I mean it is kiiind-of a fluke.

Dirk had great “impact” that entire decade. If people want to use that fact — along with the sheer brilliance of that 2011 title run — to put him over Wade and Kobe (his contemporaries who in some sense he outpaced in “impact”), it makes for a fine enough argument. Per usual, I am not looking to criticise the choice of player in itself.

However, “look at his impact in 2011 specifically” is a bit myopic.

ElGee wrote:
drza wrote:I think this is an interesting exchange, and the crux to where you guys are disagreeing. Just putting some numbers to it (ETA: I see DocMJ didn't need my numbers as he was perfectly ready to add his own :lol: ):

2003 - 2008: Every season Dirk finished with RAPM scores between +4.0 and +6.2, and every season he ended up ranked between 4th and 7th in the NBA.

2009 - 2010: His RAPM was +4.0 and +3.5 in those two seasons, for rankings of 13th and 18th.

2011 and 2012: His RAPM shoots up to career highs of +8.8 and +8.0, both #1 in the NBA.

So the quandary becomes, in this particular project, one of where you think Dirk's peak was? In 2006 and 07 he had the best box score production, but his RAPM values were "only" top 5 - 6 in the league and many have raised the question about whether his offensive game was fully complete. He had a very impressive postseason in '06 up until the Finals, but in '07 it was the postseason that most worries those that claim his offensive game was incomplete.

In 2009 therealbigthree sees Dirk having completed his offensive game while maintaining more of the rebounding/athleticism of his peak. But his box score production wasn't as strong, his RAPM had him "only" at 13th, and his postseason wasn't particularly memorable (compared to the other Dirk seasons we're looking at).

And then we have 2011, where Dirk hits a huge RAPM peak and also gains the most notoriety among more casual fans for leading a team without stars to the title. On the other hand, none of those currently advocating for Dirk see this as his peak and we have the attendant drops in rebounding that suggest he might have lost some in his all around game. And of course we have the skeptics, led by Doc MJ, that note that much of Dirk's unexpected RAPM peak seems tied to an increase in defensive value that he finds worthy of more attention.

Summary: It's an interesting situation, because if you could take the best parts of the different years of Dirk and put them together you'd have a more impressive candidate. If you could get the production level of '06 and '07 with the RAPM and team success of 2011, it would strengthen his case. Before looking I thought that's what realbigthree was doing by choosing 2009, but purely from stats/impact/team success it would seem like 2009 Dirk is actually the worst of both worlds as opposed to the best (in terms of combining '06/'07 with '11).

There's something more to be added to these numbers though...What was the claim about 2011 Dirk before Dallas won the title? It was "hey, that guys added something to his offensive game over the years." Of course, no one liked to finish the sentence as they should have with "which I didn't notice because I was busy calling him soft and a choker." But yes, everyone agreed Dirk added something to his offense. I never thought this made up for his defense/rebounding edge in 06 bc 06 Dirk was an offensive monster too. But...

If he added something to his offense, why in the world are people championing a measurement that says he got way way better on defense?

This was all written ten years ago, and to me, none of what they said has aged (I saw it argued that his post defence and defensive awareness seemed to improve in 2011, but those are pretty marginal additions). Again, I understand votes for Dirk as a player overall. You can even say 2011 is sort of a proof in concept of what Dirk can be on a perfectly structured team that wholly covers him on defence and makes full use of him on offence. None of that means we need to lose ourselves in the “impact” weeds.


I'm a big Dirk fan and I've always thought that the narrative surrounding 2011 was pretty absurd, people make it seem like Dirk was just 1v5 in taking down the Lakers, Thunder and Heat. In reality, that Mavs team was really well constructed and deep even though they didn't really have a 2nd clear star and more importantly they finally paired Dirk with the exact type of center he needed to break through.
f4p
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,961
And1: 1,974
Joined: Sep 19, 2021
 

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #17 

Post#33 » by f4p » Sat Aug 13, 2022 6:15 pm

1. 2017 Kawhi (alternate 2019)

Multi-series playoff ranks:
PER = 8th
WS48 = 6th
BPM = 3rd (actually I can't look this up but '09 Lebron at 17.5 and '91 Jordan at 14.6 are the only ones I know ahead of Kawhi's 14.2)
TS% = 6th

Like I really don't get the David Robinson arguments over Kawhi. One guy threw down a playoffs for the ages, so good the most talented roster ever had to put a hit out on him to protect their legacy, and the other dropped off massively (-8.7 PER, -10.5 TS%, -65% WS48) while losing to a "meh" team in the 1st round (1994) or got worked by his rival in the WCF (1995). Your life is on the line, is anyone really comfortable saying they'll take Robinson to win a title in 1994/1995 over Kawhi 2017?

This is an excellent regular season with a monster playoffs where he showed that his playoff resilience didn't even care about facing the greatest roster ever, only to be taken out on one of the more famous cheap shots in recent memory. A full WCF would make people like this season more and I can't blame him for a cheap shot injury. 2017 Kawhi wins on lots of teams that had guys who will be listed above him here:

Kawhi's 31.5 PER is 13th all time based on 100 MP and 8th all time for multi-series playoffs. His WS/48 of .314 is 9th all time based on 100 MP and 6th all time for multi-series playoffs. And that's with 1954 mikan included above him. Even with very generous 100 MP and 20 PPG limits, his TS% of 67.2% is 24th all-time. For 200 MP and 24 PPG, it jumps to 6th, and one of the people ahead of him is himself.

If this was a one year phenomenom, I might understand the hesitancy. But "Kawhi puts up huge playoff performance" is not a one year phenomenom. If we are truly talking about peaks, there aren't many higher than 2017 playoffs Kawhi.

2. 1983 Moses Malone (alternate 1982)

Moses may not be this board's cup of tea (apparently he was just an Andre Drummond with a little more post game). He doesn't play an aesthetically pleasing type of basketball. He doesn't always find the open man or protect the rim. He doesn't do the things impact metrics love. Just give him the ball and get out of the way. Get out of his way even more if a rebound was to be had. I tend to think of the NBA as much simpler and more primitive the further back you go. You guard your guy, he guards you. Possessions weren't valued like now. People weren't breaking down film and doing analytics on their team strategy. Sometimes an ass-kicker like Moses was what you needed (and sometimes you still do).
I just watched a highlight from Game 2 in 1981 against the Lakers, which the Lakers actually won. Kareem played well but he never looked like he wanted to guard Moses. Malone would get the ball against whoever in the post and, even if a double came, he just got to the basket. They didn't show a lot of rebounds, but Moses did get a few impressive blocks. There's nothing pretty about his game except the result. Anyway, back to the regularly scheduled copy and paste...

Fo' Fo' Fo'. Led the league in regular season PER and WS48 while putting up 24.5 ppg and 15.3 rpg and winning MVP. Then led the playoffs in PER (25.7) and WS48 (0.260) while putting up 26 ppg and 15.8 rpg on 58.7 TS%. In the Finals, he demolished (35 year old) Kareem with 25.8 ppg and 18.0 rpg in a sweep. I was actually just looking at this season to see where I might put it and then convinced myself when I looked at the rest of the Sixers in the playoffs. After Moses at 25.7 PER and 0.260 WS48, the next highest was Maurice Cheeks at 17.3 PER and Bobby Jones at 0.164 WS48 (Dr J really fell off in the playoffs). That puts Moses as far and away the best player in arguably the most dominant playoff run ever. One that he called before it happened just to make it more impressive. This isn't Shaq with Kobe or KD/Steph all having each other's backs in dominant 1-loss runs (and as far as I know, Moses didn't have Dr. J injure anybody to keep his team from losing more than once in the playoffs). Here are 6 dominant title runs I could think of off the top of my head and the separation between the #1 and #2 player on those teams, sorted by WS48 differential:

Image


We can see that for the 2001 Lakers, 2017 Warriors, and 1999 Spurs, the #1 and #2 were practically identical. Except for BPM, Moses ends up there with MJ as being easily the best player on his team. And for what it's worth, BPM had Moses as the 4th best Sixer in the regular season, almost 3 behind the team leader, so that shows how much more it liked him in the postseason that he led the team. This may have been a guy who joined a stacked team, but it ended up a one man wrecking crew.

Also, 1982 Moses averaged 31.1/14.7 playing on the second slowest paced team in the league, with only a 97 pace.

Moses gets disrespected enough on all-time lists, a 3-time MVP with a side hustle of smacking Kareem around in the playoffs shouldn't get the same on peak lists.

3. 2006 Dwyane Wade (alternate 2009)

I'm a floor raising kind of guy I guess, which doesn't seem typical on this board. People who have everything put on them and come up big in the biggest moments with little to no margin of error impress me more than ceiling raisers putting the finishing touches on an already great team. It just seems like a more common problem to solve throughout NBA history than what to do with all this extra talent. Wade had a very good 27/7/6 regular season as a 3rd year player but obviously this is about the playoffs. On one of the jankiest looking title rosters you'll ever see, on a team where Antoine Walker played the 2nd most playoff minutes and White Chocolate played the 4th most, and Shaq was often getting outplayed by Zo, Wade saved his best moments for the biggest series.

Shot 61.7% in the ECF (68.4 TS%!!) against a still very good Detroit team that had just held Lebron to 81 ppg in the previous series. 26.7/5.5/5.2 looks even better when you realize the pace was 83.8. And then of course there are the Finals. Did he shoot 2 to 3 to 40 more free throws than he should have? Sure, but free throw totals were pretty elevated that year so his totals are only sort of absurd. Put up 34.7 ppg, 7.8 rpg, and 2.7 spg on 57.2 TS% while maybe leading the best overall Finals comeback ever. Weirdly, the only team that has probably come closer to losing the Finals before winning is also a team with Wade in the 2013 Finals (with 3rd probably also including Wade in the 2011 Finals). The Heat were down 2-0 and down 13 in the 4th quarter of Game 3. That's dangerously close to "1, 2, 3 Cancun!" time and instead Wade just went crazy and put up 42, 36, 43, and 36 in the next 4 games. In a series with a pace of 90! With 3 of the games decided by 1, 2, and 3. In other words, turn those 42/43 games into just 39 point games and the Mavs are celebrating. Efficiency may not be crazy but on that volume with such a weird, offensively limited roster around him against a very solid defense, this is perhaps the best Finals performance ever by anybody not named Lebron or Jordan. It's a title snatched out of thin air that very few players can say they would have been able to pull off. This is a peaks project and it's hard to peak much higher.




I also don't really get putting any David Robinson seasons over Jokic 2022. Jokic has conventional and impact advanced stats on lock in the regular season and, if playoff results concern you, then DRob was seemingly worse!
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,610
And1: 7,207
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #17 

Post#34 » by falcolombardi » Sat Aug 13, 2022 6:20 pm

CharityStripe34 wrote:
falcolombardi wrote:Some names i think should be in everyone minds already

Mikan
Wade
Walton
Kobe
Dirk
Nash
Paul
Moses
Julius
Kawhi


No love for Pettit?


Not knowledgeable enough on him tbh
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,610
And1: 7,207
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #17 

Post#35 » by falcolombardi » Sat Aug 13, 2022 6:34 pm

Completely unrelated but is kind of funny wade has the most votes but 7/9 of them are for 3rd place lol. If this was the olympics he would have the most medals but be in like 8th place for the threas

Just as a fun exercise. If this was like the olympics with gold/silver/bronze medals where one first/gold is better than 20 silvers this would be the thread rankings

1-robinson
2-walton/julius
4-mikan
5-kawhi
6-kobe
7-wade
8-pettit
9-moses
10-connie hawkins
11-dirk

If we gave 1 point to "gold", half to "silver", 0.25 to "bronze"

1-robinson
2-walton/julius
4-wade
5-kawhi
6-mikan
7-kobe
8-moses
9-pettit
10-hawkins
11-dirk
LukaTheGOAT
Analyst
Posts: 3,275
And1: 2,992
Joined: Dec 25, 2019
 

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #17 

Post#36 » by LukaTheGOAT » Sat Aug 13, 2022 7:03 pm

iggymcfrack wrote:
ardee wrote:1. 1977 Bill Walton

Has everyone forgotten about him? In 1977 and 1978, here's the Blazers' record with and without him:

1977 Walton healthy: 44-21
1977 Walton hurt: 5-12

1978 Walton healthy: 48-10
1978 Walton hurt: 10-14

74.7% win rate while he's healthy, and 36.5% while he's hurt. And that's over a pretty big sample size.

Quite honestly I see him on a similar level to Russell, whom I have at 9. Just incredible defensive impact, if you watch the Finals against the Sixers he has the defensive equivalent of a scorer having a 20 point quarter. The commentators were freaking out and screaming "they cannot find a way to score on Bill Walton!"

I think him and Steph are pretty debatable.

2. 2008 Kobe Bryant (HM: 2006)

I've spoken about Kobe's raw impact quite a bit in different threads. In this season specifically, he led the Lakers to a 7.34 SRS with just 27 games of Pau and 35 games of Bynum. Odom was the only other player on that team who could generate much of his own offense. The rest of the rotation consisting of Fisher, Vladimir Radmanovic, Farmar, Vujacic and Turiaf doesn't exactly scream a 7.3 SRS cast.

On top of that, he put together a Jordan-esque Playoff run. 32-6-6 on 60% TS against 3 50 win teams in the Western conference, including a 6.9 SRS Jazz team and a -5.7 defensively Spurs team. His Finals weren't anything to write home about but honestly were not any worse than Jordan against similarly good defensive teams (the '93 Knicks for example).

3. 2009 Dwyane Wade (HM: 2006)

Him and Kobe at their peaks are fairly close as players. I do think Kobe was more impactful though, when you look at the 2006 Lakers vs the 2009 Heat by SRS given the similar supporting casts. Wade was likely better defensively but that's canceled out by Kobe's superior portability given shooting and off-ball play.


Question for you and anyone else voting for ‘08 Kobe, why would you pick that season over ‘09? He had better box and impact stats in ‘09 plus his team actually won the championship that year. Is it just that LeBron (and IMO Wade too) were so great in 2009 that Kobe didn’t really have a case for best player in the league that year?


Kobe's defense was probably better in 08 than 09. Also, if it is full-season impact metrics, then I would argue that Kobe ran into a more favorable slate of teams in the 09 PS than 08, and that what Kobe showed in 08 up until the Boston Series was more impressive.
AEnigma
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,130
And1: 5,978
Joined: Jul 24, 2022

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #17 

Post#37 » by AEnigma » Sat Aug 13, 2022 11:31 pm

Proxy wrote:16. 1977 Bill Walton (Explained in previous threads).
17. 2020 Anthony Davis??? I'd say I've been pretty convinced by UnibrowDavis' explanations in previous threads(could link if needed), I still think alot of his conclusions are pretty extreme like the KD offensive value comparison but upon revisiting his playoff run I I think not only was he not really optimized offensively(honestly he may not have been all that much for full seasons since like 2015, and his value wasn't optimized in the 2020 RS defensively and you could see the massive difference in Lakers' scheme from the RS vs the PS), but also the majority of things that made it great were pretty replicable to me(so much reasons for his dominance besides shooting luck honestly where he underperformed from true mid range if anything - the interior scoring, some of the self creation, the off ball stuff and relentless opportunity hunting where is truly all-time in that regard have all been pretty consistent things to me and why he looks like a general PS riser in his prime in the small sample). Offers so much value even with his secondary skills and allows for so much scheme versatility.

HMs: Drob, Jokić, Kobe, Wade, KD, Erving, Dirk(i've expressed some of my concerns with pretty much all of them in much earlier threads, less on Dirk though and don't have much time rn i'd probably go 08 Kobe, 17 KD, or 22 Jokić for 4th on my ballot though) - i'm not super confident in arguing for Mikan or Hawkins based on what I know about them right now.

Other players i've brought up: If I viewed players like Kobe or KD comfortably as all-defense type players at their peak I would probably vote them higher, but for right now I think Jokić's offensive value has lapped both of theirs and I don't see either as being more than a pretty marginal positive defensively in their peak seasons. Wade and Erving have a lot more scalability and portability concerns for me(looking absurd in some circumstances and having pretty predestrian value signals in others) and i'm not *entirely* sure they added more value in general either, I could definitely buy arguments for either to be voted in already though. Drob's offense against elite defenses(not just in a PS setting - it was a trend in the RS as well) is still pretty concerning to me and on the very low end of resilience for players considered this tier, his scoring drops off tremendously and it's not like he has the flexibility of someone like KG whose offense I believe is still so additive even when his scoring value gets blunted. We know he boasts insane value signals in his post-peak in the PS but i've talked about why I look at those with a grain of salt when thinking about his actual value in much earlier threads(collinearity), i'm not entirely how sure how resilient his defense was relative to his contemporaries but in the games i've studied he seemed pretty fine there. Dirk's argument at this point kinda feels like a worse version of Jokić's, I think his era allowed him to still be better defensively and keeps them in a similar tier for me as players, but the offensive gap is more distinct to me right now.

Hi. First, I saw you were reacting to this thread, but you have not voted yet, so partially using this as a reminder. :wink:

The main subject of this comment though is asking about Kawhi. We agree on Walton, we generally agree on Davis (I am not voting for him quite yet but I have him on the same level as the Post-Walton guys for whom I am voting), and we seem to generally agree on Kobe and Erving. So I am surprised to see you mention Durant as potentially the next name for you, and then several other contenders, but then not Kawhi. For me they peaked in the same year, and I was more impressed by what I saw from Kawhi in 2017, 2019, and 2021 (the last three years they both played). Is it the postseason injury in 2017? If so, where would you consider 2019? I know his passing gets criticised a bit, so if injuries are not an issue, is 2021 more of an option for you? Mostly just curious. When people have similar votes to me, I find it more interesting on which players the disparities start to appear.
User avatar
Proxy
Sophomore
Posts: 237
And1: 192
Joined: Jun 30, 2021
       

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #17 

Post#38 » by Proxy » Sun Aug 14, 2022 2:21 am

AEnigma wrote:
Proxy wrote:16. 1977 Bill Walton (Explained in previous threads).
17. 2020 Anthony Davis??? I'd say I've been pretty convinced by UnibrowDavis' explanations in previous threads(could link if needed), I still think alot of his conclusions are pretty extreme like the KD offensive value comparison but upon revisiting his playoff run I I think not only was he not really optimized offensively(honestly he may not have been all that much for full seasons since like 2015, and his value wasn't optimized in the 2020 RS defensively and you could see the massive difference in Lakers' scheme from the RS vs the PS), but also the majority of things that made it great were pretty replicable to me(so much reasons for his dominance besides shooting luck honestly where he underperformed from true mid range if anything - the interior scoring, some of the self creation, the off ball stuff and relentless opportunity hunting where is truly all-time in that regard have all been pretty consistent things to me and why he looks like a general PS riser in his prime in the small sample). Offers so much value even with his secondary skills and allows for so much scheme versatility.

HMs: Drob, Jokić, Kobe, Wade, KD, Erving, Dirk(i've expressed some of my concerns with pretty much all of them in much earlier threads, less on Dirk though and don't have much time rn i'd probably go 08 Kobe, 17 KD, or 22 Jokić for 4th on my ballot though) - i'm not super confident in arguing for Mikan or Hawkins based on what I know about them right now.

Other players i've brought up: If I viewed players like Kobe or KD comfortably as all-defense type players at their peak I would probably vote them higher, but for right now I think Jokić's offensive value has lapped both of theirs and I don't see either as being more than a pretty marginal positive defensively in their peak seasons. Wade and Erving have a lot more scalability and portability concerns for me(looking absurd in some circumstances and having pretty predestrian value signals in others) and i'm not *entirely* sure they added more value in general either, I could definitely buy arguments for either to be voted in already though. Drob's offense against elite defenses(not just in a PS setting - it was a trend in the RS as well) is still pretty concerning to me and on the very low end of resilience for players considered this tier, his scoring drops off tremendously and it's not like he has the flexibility of someone like KG whose offense I believe is still so additive even when his scoring value gets blunted. We know he boasts insane value signals in his post-peak in the PS but i've talked about why I look at those with a grain of salt when thinking about his actual value in much earlier threads(collinearity), i'm not entirely how sure how resilient his defense was relative to his contemporaries but in the games i've studied he seemed pretty fine there. Dirk's argument at this point kinda feels like a worse version of Jokić's, I think his era allowed him to still be better defensively and keeps them in a similar tier for me as players, but the offensive gap is more distinct to me right now.

Hi. First, I saw you were reacting to this thread, but you have not voted yet, so partially using this as a reminder. :wink:

The main subject of this comment though is asking about Kawhi. We agree on Walton, we generally agree on Davis (I am not voting for him quite yet but I have him on the same level as the Post-Walton guys for whom I am voting), and we seem to generally agree on Kobe and Erving. So I am surprised to see you mention Durant as potentially the next name for you, and then several other contenders, but then not Kawhi. For me they peaked in the same year, and I was more impressed by what I saw from Kawhi in 2017, 2019, and 2021 (the last three years they both played). Is it the postseason injury in 2017? If so, where would you consider 2019? I know his passing gets criticised a bit, so if injuries are not an issue, is 2021 more of an option for you? Mostly just curious. When people have similar votes to me, I find it more interesting on which players the disparities start to appear.


Kawhi is a really weird player to me in that I feel there are essentially four very different versions that could all realistically get taken right now and that i'd all have somewhat comfortably in my top 30 peaks.

I think the only other wing that has *this* much weirdness in his prime that has been discussed is probably Kobe(or Erving), and if you combined all these versions into one he might even be looking at a top 10, maybe nearing top 5 peak ever even, but they all have a few things holding them a little back from me voting them in already(though on further inspection the last few days there are some versions I would actually consider to be in the tier of players I listed but I just didn't have much time to mention him)

2016: Possibly the best non-big defensive peak ever(IMO right there with Scottie and Bobby as my top 3 choices). Still a pretty superb scorer in this season albeit lower volume than proceeding years, and without the self creation or passing abilities we see from him later. I don't really regard this Kawhi as being much more than all-star/low all-nba ish level value offensively but the defense keeps him in these convos.

2017: Still a clear all-defense level defender in a playoffs setting, but also a very clear, large step down to me from 2016 and not a player I would really consider to be in the very upper echelon of wing defenders anymore based on his performance(maybe partially due to offensive load/motor reasons?? But then there's probably some trade-off there because I don't think he could max out on both ends at once). I found myself less impressed by his off-ball defense mainly but he still had his reputation and warped the way offenses played to avoid him. Still, way better self creation and what i'd call potentially a top 10-15 scoring peak OAT(also his turnover economy is so underdiscussed).

The playoffs sample size does give me a bit of concern - He eviscerated the Grizzlies(they weren't 100% healthy but how much that would affect anything isn't known), came back down to earth against Houston, and went back to smoking the Warriors through game 1.  Beyond scoring though, i'm just not a very big fan of this version as a passer still, and don't think his leveraged his scoring gravity as well to create for others as I believe some of his contemporaries were able to. He did add some value by being such an efficient late clock bailout option when things fizzled out for the Spurs though(with expected points lower). I'd say this version probably ranked 2nd defensively and 3rd offensively still.

2019: I think this version was a bit less balanced than 2019 was(offense/defense wise), he does have his largest playoff sample yet of prime play and was very impressive facing a multitude of strong defenses. Otoh I also feel this year was the sign of a trend of his body beginning to wear down in deeper playoff runs, maybe because of that injury in 2017. I'm not sure how to balance this season with the load management and perceived decline in performance in deeper runs, by the end of the playoffs Kawhi gained my respect as a passer/playmaker and did a phenomenal job floor raising for the Raptors offensively, but his defense at this point was also pretty questionable from my recollection in the finals, while his hot scoring trailed off a bit as well by that point. I don't really believe this version to be a worse scorer than before, and probably adds more value as a playmaker, but his defense at this point didn't strike me as really exceptional like before. Still probably his best offensive version and worst defensive year up to this point.

2021: This year continued on with the improvements as a passer starting in 2019 and probably would be my preferred year for him overall.

Like, this version of Kawhi's handle was TIGHT - watching him in the playoffs all I could think of was that I was watching Kobe, his rim pressure might have trailed off a little bit but I thought he could basically get where ever he wanted in the half court and his scoring against the Mavs and against the Jazz early on were absurd with the Clippers offense was basically STEAMROLLING them. With him and PG on the court in the RS they had like a +17 net rating as well and they were my pick to come out the West. Otoh I also wouldn't call his defense all *that* exceptional anymore only because of consistency, but all-defense level. Still the clear best version of him offensively and maybe his 2nd worst defensive year out of these(which is still a bit better of a defensive player than any wing/forward i'm considering besides maybe Erving and 06 Wade) but I do wonder how much the spacing played a factor seeing they were probably the best spaced team ever.

The offensive improvements are valuable to me and I tend to value them over the defense waning off because it allows other players to give a bit more on defense than i'd say vice versa. Though when watching any version of Kawhi compared to these other wings I still just don't get the impression he is

1. As good of a passer as these other wings(I think he's distinctly worse, actually, even compared to Durant though the gap shrinks the further you go, mainly after 2019). There is still so much value in hyper efficient scoring even without this(like Amare was mentioned before as a mega scorer not adding too much creation value or passing), especially when you're someone like him that could be argued as a t10 scoring peak ever based on his production, maybe even the best of this group, but I think it's very difficult to reach the very upper echelon of offensive playmakers without combining it with higher levels as a playmaker and I think Kobe, Wade, and KD maybe have(my biggest problem with 2017 Kawhi mainly), not sure on Erving.

2. That he has the same level of scoring gravity(at least to Kobe and Durant), I don't think he really demands the same attention quite at all, - rim pressure is probably biggest thing to me when comparing him to Erving/Wade and I don't think he had the same attention pretty much everywhere like Kobe(and Durant) basically did to where they got constantly swarmed throughout their primes in the playoffs.

3. That he leveraged his scoring gravity as well as any of these players to create advantages for others. I have criticized Durant for this in earlier threads and one of the biggest problems I have with him alongside is poor processing speed is his seemingly inability to find a consistent balance in scoring and playmaking(I think this is a problem with Kawhi, and Kobe to a lesser degree as well fwiw), but even in his case with the other things i've observed above, he has the ability of more frequently being able to play the 4/5. Alot of the value in that is what made Dirk such a potent offensive player despite his passing warts, and someone I wouldn't rule Durant as being clearly better than despite them having some similarities in their arguments(KD still primarily a 3/4, not a 4/5).

^I'm not sure all this satisfied your question but I wanted some time to briefly touch up on Kawhi cuz I never really did before.

Again, he is now someone i'd consider to be somewhere up here but he also still just isn't someone that immediately comes to mind for me for players i'd say are just outside of the top 12 or so peaks like the ones I mentioned before were.

For Durant specifically when comparing him to what i'd call the best version of Kawhi I feel there is still a a pretty distinct overall offensive gap, as I consider them similar enough as scorers(I prefer Durant probably for being more efficient in more areas). As well as that the defensive gap isn't as pronounced as it would be when picking Kawhi years like 2016 or 2017(still also a *very* distinct gap in value, but smaller with KD's positional versatility letting him play more interior defense oriented positions and not bleeding TOO much there at the height of his powers IMO). A combined peaks Kawhi would honestly blow him out the water though, I feel we'll prpbably disagree on the Kawhi Vs KD stance in the end but anyways let me know any disagreements you have with anything i've said.

I haven't voted yet tbh because i'm struggling to rank my top 8 next players to put someone last on my ballot(probably between Erving, Robinson, Kobe, Dirk, Wade, Paul, Durant, and Kawhi - Moses, Charles, Karl, Ewing, Nash, and Tmac probably after them if I don't fold them in by the time they're up) :-?
AEnigma wrote:Arf arf.
Image

trex_8063 wrote:Calling someone a stinky turd is not acceptable.
PLEASE stop doing that.

One_and_Done wrote:I mean, how would you feel if the NBA traced it's origins to an 1821 league of 3 foot dwarves who performed in circuses?
AEnigma
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,130
And1: 5,978
Joined: Jul 24, 2022

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #17 

Post#39 » by AEnigma » Sun Aug 14, 2022 3:00 am

Proxy wrote:I'm not sure all this satisfied your question but I wanted some time to briefly touch up on Kawhi cuz I never really did before.

Again, he is now someone i'd consider to be somewhere up here but he also still just isn't someone that immediately comes to mind for me for players i'd say are just outside of the top 12 or so peaks like the ones I mentioned before were.

For Durant specifically when comparing him to what i'd call the best version of Kawhi I feel there is still a a pretty distinct overall offensive gap, as I consider them similar enough as scorers(I prefer Durant probably for being more efficient in more areas). As well as that the defensive gap isn't as pronounced as it would be when picking Kawhi years like 2016 or 2017(still also a *very* distinct gap in value, but smaller with KD's positional versatility letting him play more interior defense oriented positions and not bleeding TOO much there at the height of his powers IMO). A combined peaks Kawhi would honestly blow him out the water though, I feel we'll prpbably disagree on the Kawhi Vs KD stance in the end but anyways let me know any disagreements you have with anything i've said.

I haven't voted yet tbh because i'm struggling to rank my top 8 next players to put someone last on my ballot(probably between Erving, Robinson, Kobe, Dirk, Wade, Paul, Durant, and Kawhi - Moses, Charles, Karl, Ewing, Nash, and Tmac probably after them if I don't fold them in by the time they're up) :-?

Thanks for the thorough response! Definitely gave me some points to consider… if not so much for Durant, perhaps more relative to Davis, who more validly did combine elite defensive impact with elite postseason scoring, and to be honest did so with some amount of consistency... Certainly a worthwhile observation that for Durant’s more disappointing postseasons, they were due at least in part to a holistic defensive focus that I cannot exactly say Kawhi ever faced outside of a few specific games rather than series… I had not thought as much about his relative scoring gravity to Durant, so that sparks some feeling of intuitive truth, even if an accompanying feeling is that Kawhi is more resilient regardless…

I do hope you decide to vote before tomorrow morning’s deadline, though, with how close these votes have been! :oops:
DraymondGold
Senior
Posts: 707
And1: 905
Joined: May 19, 2022

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #17 

Post#40 » by DraymondGold » Sun Aug 14, 2022 6:38 am

1. 94 David Robinson
1b. 95 David Robinson
2. 1977 Walton
3. 98 Kobe (edit: whoops, typo! 08, not 98 obviously :lol: )
Hm: KD. Then Wade/Dirk.

Another shorter ballot from me. Hopefully I'll have time to expand this post or the next soon.

DraymondGold wrote:Reasoning:
Don't particularly feel like a long post. In short:

A) Robinson clearly has the best impact data, and despite others' disagreement, I don't feel like the impact metrics are biased enough by era/teammates/fit/etc. to put him lower. Defensively, he's the only remaining person in Tier 1/2 of my GOAT defenders (along with Russell obviously, Hakeem, Duncan, KG, Wilt not in order). I love his rim protection, big man man defense, and help defense. His ability to raise regular season defenses is like a rich-man's Gobert, but I see his perimeter mobility as less of an liability (at least in that era). The fact that he was the center on the GOAT Defensive Dynasty of the modern NBA (both statistically and by the eye test) also says a lot, and while credit goes to Tim Duncan for that, I'm not sure there's anybody left who could do this well defensively in that era (e.g. Giannis' rim protection isn't on the same level).
Offensively, he's a great scorer (though not the same level as others in this tier), and great off-ball player. He's a great first option in the regular season (trex_8063 joked that he was basically asked to be Russell and Jordan in the regular season haha), and while this scheme alongside his poor fitting/low-value teammates did become more vulnerable in the playoffs, I see this as an issue of fit/situation, not an inherent limit to Robinson. He performed much better and showed more resilience as a defensive 1 and offensive 1b/2, which is a fairly common archetype in history on championship teams (Thinking Basketball estimates ~50% of championship teams have this archetype). He basically never got to play with an all-star guard, despite having one of the best big-man off-ball games. That lob threat would be legendary.

Edit: I recently saw one stat that further supports the idea that Robinson's atrocious teammates were pulling his value down in the playoffs, and that he would have far better impact if he had a better team around him: from 98-01, with a better team / offensive fit, despite clearly not being at his peak, Robinson had the highest multi-year playoff on/off of any high-minute player. Ever.
98-01 Robinson's at +25.1 on/off (per 48), while 00-04 Shaq is second all the way dow at +21. [source: thinking basketball's latest Jordan +/- video]

As for 94 vs 95, I'm open to discussion. There's a trend of all-time players having a better regular season early on in their career (with their more athletic motor), and then losing athleticism but gaining enough experience/skill/BBIQ to offset their lost motor and have a better playoff performance when they're older. This trend isn't universal, but it does raise a question of whether this is the case for Robinson in 94 (clearly best regular season) vs 95/96 (likely better postseason). I see 96 as enough of a drop in athleticism to put it below 94. In the film I've seen, I haven't been convinced yet that 95 showed sufficient skill/experience improvement (compared to say 09 vs 13 LeBron's visible growth in skillset, with his off-ball game, shooting, post-game, and improved passing). Not for certain, just the way I'm leaning now. If anyone wants to do any film analysis of 95 vs 94, that would probably be the way to convince me otherwise.

We've already debated Robinson vs Giannis too much, so no need to re-sour the discussion with that.
The similarities with Walton are highly interesting, and not lost on me. Walton's one of the few players ever to have a comparable defensive impact, his passing is clearly better, and his shooting was (odd but) ahead of its time. Like with all players, each comes with some uncertainty, but I have higher uncertainty for Walton, given how short his healthy peak was. Probably the single greatest loss in basketball history in terms of greatness we didn't get to see due to injury.
One poster mentioned that Walton's peak has the best single-season WOWY on record. Wow! That does raise an eyebrow, but I'm not (yet) convinced for two reasons. 1) WOWY Biases. WOWY tends to like offensive quarterbacks (i.e. playmakers who run the offense > finishers who make the last shot) and defensive centerpieces (i.e. high volume defensive rim protectors). Walton's basically the perfect archetype to be highly rated in this stat. Is there some truth to this? I'd say so... I do personally value offensive playmaking > finishing more than the average RealGM person, and WOWY does support this. But this may also be a slight systematic overrating by WOWY... it can be harder to replace a playmaker who runs the offense or a defensive rim protector for just a few games without totally changing your offensive/defensive scheme. 2) Robinson is still Tier 1 in WOWY, even if his best season is a hair behind Walton's.



B/C Walton/Kobe.
Previous post discussing the comparison with others in this tier: https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=100727032#p100727032.
Among the remaining older players, Walton’s impact metrics clearly stand out. He has the highest 1-year WOWY ever (and the gap is absolutely massive over Wade). After Robinson, he’s the best defender remaining, and his passing is miles ahead of the other big men like Dirk and Moses. Overall a fantastic, high-impact, highly scalable player whose career was far too short.

Kobe and KD are quite close for me, per previous post. Their impact metrics overall are quite similar (particularly if you’re more skeptical of outlier box metrics in the warriors system). KD does have the scalability advantage, but Kobe’s no slouch there if you can convince him to play in a team concept. Kobe’s 08 Olympic performance and his 01 playoffs with Shaq do a lot of work here. His shooting is great, as is his off ball movement. I do worry about his declining defense in 08 vs his defensive peak, but plenty of other perimeter players in this tier don’t align their defensive and offensive peak (eg Kawhi, per the previous posts), and I think Kobe has the overall scoring/playmaking advantage over many of them.

I’m also a bit more comfortable with Kobe’s resilience. KD is incredibly resilient… if you can place him as a finisher playing with someone who draws more defensive attention then he does. If not, you get series like KD vs the 22 Celtics, 16 Warriors, 13 Grizzlies. Kobe meanwhile has some of the most resilient shotmaking in NBA history. Check out Ty and 70sFan’s project on players’ performance against different defense levels for a bit more on this.

Return to Player Comparisons