What players who led ring winning teams wouldnt be seen as capable of it today?

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,500
And1: 7,105
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

What players who led ring winning teams wouldnt be seen as capable of it today? 

Post#1 » by falcolombardi » Wed Aug 17, 2022 5:02 am

Random thought about how guys like 2004 ben wallace/chauncey billups or 1978 wes unseld may have get the "you cannot win with him as your best player" treatment if it was not for them actually winning

These are the potential guys i thought of

-2014 kawhi/tony parker
-2004 ben wallace/billups
-89/90 isiah thomas
-1979 gus williams
-1978 wes unseld

Is there any other player you can think of that fits this ?
AEnigma
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,130
And1: 5,974
Joined: Jul 24, 2022

Re: What players who led ring winning teams wouldnt be seen as capable of it today? 

Post#2 » by AEnigma » Wed Aug 17, 2022 5:19 am

I would take Hayes and Dandridge over Unseld in 1978. But none of them could would be seen as the core guy to a title winning team.

Billups could be seen as a 2021 Chris Paul type of player. Gus and Isiah could potentially be just because that explosive scoring point guard archetype is always popular; I could see them favourably compared to Ja or something, although more negatively maybe they could be lumped in with De’Aaron Fox. :oops: Tony Parker too, I guess, although he struggled in the playoffs much more than Gus or Isiah.

Ben Wallace and 2014 Kawhi would never be valued like that, and 2014 Duncan suffers too much by comparisons with other bigs.

You did not mention them, but John Havlicek and Dave Cowens would probably not be seen that way either. Basically, you need to be a scorer to be valued as a potential title leader anymore.
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,854
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: What players who led ring winning teams wouldnt be seen as capable of it today? 

Post#3 » by Colbinii » Wed Aug 17, 2022 5:37 am

Kawhi in 2019 [Often injured since and 2020 Clippers meltdown] while he was never the clear BPA during the Duncan Era.

AD in 2020 [Often injured].
euroleague
General Manager
Posts: 8,448
And1: 1,871
Joined: Mar 26, 2014
 

Re: What players who led ring winning teams wouldnt be seen as capable of it today? 

Post#4 » by euroleague » Wed Aug 17, 2022 6:26 am

Isiah was top 5 in MVP and multiple all-nba 1st teams. I don't think he belongs on this list. Unseld, with an MVP, as well..
User avatar
Jaivl
Head Coach
Posts: 7,049
And1: 6,712
Joined: Jan 28, 2014
Location: A Coruña, Spain
Contact:
   

Re: What players who led ring winning teams wouldnt be seen as capable of it today? 

Post#5 » by Jaivl » Wed Aug 17, 2022 7:01 am

"wouldn't be seen as"? Everything that isn't a superstar scorer.

That is, Russell, Duncan, Garnett, late Wilt, Reed, Frazier, Walton, Moses Malone...
This place is a cesspool of mindless ineptitude, mental decrepitude, and intellectual lassitude. I refuse to be sucked any deeper into this whirlpool of groupthink sewage. My opinions have been expressed. I'm going to go take a shower.
SinceGatlingWasARookie
RealGM
Posts: 11,712
And1: 2,759
Joined: Aug 25, 2005
Location: Northern California

Re: What players who led ring winning teams wouldnt be seen as capable of it today? 

Post#6 » by SinceGatlingWasARookie » Wed Aug 17, 2022 7:49 am

Gus Williams was too fast to guard in 1979 and would still be too fast to guard today.

The old time offensive players score even better when surrounded by modern 3 point shooters.

The problem for the old team is that they have to defend the very good modern offenses.
Owly
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,618
And1: 3,133
Joined: Mar 12, 2010

Re: What players who led ring winning teams wouldnt be seen as capable of it today? 

Post#7 » by Owly » Wed Aug 17, 2022 8:31 am

euroleague wrote:Isiah was top 5 in MVP and multiple all-nba 1st teams. I don't think he belongs on this list. Unseld, with an MVP, as well..

89 and '90 Thomas wasn't anywhere near MVP and was last all-NBA in '87 (would have eked in as the last member of the 3rd team in '88 had it existed but that's a different implied percentile in a 23 team league). And the list is surely relating "in that year" or else it would not feature Leonard.

Regardless, if you're just talking at some point in their career Billups came fifth with a much better vote share (Thomas's "top 5" was 5th)
Leonard has been second and third.
Parker has a 5th with a better vote share.
Williams has a 5th place with marginally better vote share ...
Whether the list is accurately named or not, by that criteria he fits fairly neatly with that group.
Stalwart
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,839
And1: 959
Joined: Jun 06, 2021

Re: What players who led ring winning teams wouldnt be seen as capable of it today? 

Post#8 » by Stalwart » Wed Aug 17, 2022 9:34 am

Owly wrote:
euroleague wrote:Isiah was top 5 in MVP and multiple all-nba 1st teams. I don't think he belongs on this list. Unseld, with an MVP, as well..

89 and '90 Thomas wasn't anywhere near MVP and was last all-NBA in '87 (would have eked in as the last member of the 3rd team in '88 had it existed but that's a different implied percentile in a 23 team league). And the list is surely relating "in that year" or else it would not feature Leonard.

Regardless, if you're just talking at some point in their career Billups came fifth with a much better vote share (Thomas's "top 5" was 5th)
Leonard has been second and third.
Parker has a 5th with a better vote share.
Williams has a 5th place with marginally better vote share ...
Whether the list is accurately named or not, by that criteria he fits fairly neatly with that group.


Isiah Thomas was focused on being a leader rather than putting up raw numbers for the Bad Boy Pistons. Its not a coincidence that his teammates all praise him as the leader and best player. Its not a coincidence that the fans and players from that era considered Isiah to be the next superstar after Bird, Magic, and MJ.
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,894
And1: 25,231
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: What players who led ring winning teams wouldnt be seen as capable of it today? 

Post#9 » by 70sFan » Wed Aug 17, 2022 9:46 am

Stalwart wrote:
Owly wrote:
euroleague wrote:Isiah was top 5 in MVP and multiple all-nba 1st teams. I don't think he belongs on this list. Unseld, with an MVP, as well..

89 and '90 Thomas wasn't anywhere near MVP and was last all-NBA in '87 (would have eked in as the last member of the 3rd team in '88 had it existed but that's a different implied percentile in a 23 team league). And the list is surely relating "in that year" or else it would not feature Leonard.

Regardless, if you're just talking at some point in their career Billups came fifth with a much better vote share (Thomas's "top 5" was 5th)
Leonard has been second and third.
Parker has a 5th with a better vote share.
Williams has a 5th place with marginally better vote share ...
Whether the list is accurately named or not, by that criteria he fits fairly neatly with that group.


Isiah Thomas was focused on being a leader rather than putting up raw numbers for the Bad Boy Pistons. Its not a coincidence that his teammates all praise him as the leader and best player. Its not a coincidence that the fans and players from that era considered Isiah to be the next superstar after Bird, Magic, and MJ.

Thomas teammates opinions about him weren't nearly as one sided as you described. It's also not true that Thomas was seen as the next superstar after big three. In fact, it's completely reinterpretative to what actually happen during Pistons title years.
Stalwart
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,839
And1: 959
Joined: Jun 06, 2021

Re: What players who led ring winning teams wouldnt be seen as capable of it today? 

Post#10 » by Stalwart » Wed Aug 17, 2022 9:59 am

70sFan wrote:
Stalwart wrote:
Owly wrote:89 and '90 Thomas wasn't anywhere near MVP and was last all-NBA in '87 (would have eked in as the last member of the 3rd team in '88 had it existed but that's a different implied percentile in a 23 team league). And the list is surely relating "in that year" or else it would not feature Leonard.

Regardless, if you're just talking at some point in their career Billups came fifth with a much better vote share (Thomas's "top 5" was 5th)
Leonard has been second and third.
Parker has a 5th with a better vote share.
Williams has a 5th place with marginally better vote share ...
Whether the list is accurately named or not, by that criteria he fits fairly neatly with that group.


Isiah Thomas was focused on being a leader rather than putting up raw numbers for the Bad Boy Pistons. Its not a coincidence that his teammates all praise him as the leader and best player. Its not a coincidence that the fans and players from that era considered Isiah to be the next superstar after Bird, Magic, and MJ.

Thomas teammates opinions about him weren't nearly as one sided as you described. It's also not true that Thomas was seen as the next superstar after big three. In fact, it's completely reinterpretative to what actually happen during Pistons title years.


Who would you say was the face of the league after the Big 3 in the mid to late 80s?
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,894
And1: 25,231
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: What players who led ring winning teams wouldnt be seen as capable of it today? 

Post#11 » by 70sFan » Wed Aug 17, 2022 9:59 am

Jaivl wrote:"wouldn't be seen as"? Everything that isn't a superstar scorer.

That is, Russell, Duncan, Garnett, late Wilt, Reed, Frazier, Walton, Moses Malone...

Moses was a superstar scorer though. Quite unconventional, but still...
Owly
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,618
And1: 3,133
Joined: Mar 12, 2010

Re: What players who led ring winning teams wouldnt be seen as capable of it today? 

Post#12 » by Owly » Wed Aug 17, 2022 11:00 am

Stalwart wrote:
Owly wrote:
euroleague wrote:Isiah was top 5 in MVP and multiple all-nba 1st teams. I don't think he belongs on this list. Unseld, with an MVP, as well..

89 and '90 Thomas wasn't anywhere near MVP and was last all-NBA in '87 (would have eked in as the last member of the 3rd team in '88 had it existed but that's a different implied percentile in a 23 team league). And the list is surely relating "in that year" or else it would not feature Leonard.

Regardless, if you're just talking at some point in their career Billups came fifth with a much better vote share (Thomas's "top 5" was 5th)
Leonard has been second and third.
Parker has a 5th with a better vote share.
Williams has a 5th place with marginally better vote share ...
Whether the list is accurately named or not, by that criteria he fits fairly neatly with that group.


Isiah Thomas was focused on being a leader rather than putting up raw numbers for the Bad Boy Pistons. Its not a coincidence that his teammates all praise him as the leader and best player. Its not a coincidence that the fans and players from that era considered Isiah to be the next superstar after Bird, Magic, and MJ.

Not sure how this relates to my post.
User avatar
RCM88x
RealGM
Posts: 15,200
And1: 19,137
Joined: May 31, 2015
Location: Lebron Ball
     

Re: What players who led ring winning teams wouldnt be seen as capable of it today? 

Post#13 » by RCM88x » Wed Aug 17, 2022 12:01 pm

Steph Curry
Dirk Nowitzki
Duncan
Image

LookToShoot wrote:Melo is the only player that makes the Rockets watchable for the basketball purists. Otherwise it would just be three point shots and pick n roll.
User avatar
Jaivl
Head Coach
Posts: 7,049
And1: 6,712
Joined: Jan 28, 2014
Location: A Coruña, Spain
Contact:
   

Re: What players who led ring winning teams wouldnt be seen as capable of it today? 

Post#14 » by Jaivl » Wed Aug 17, 2022 12:06 pm

Stalwart wrote:
Owly wrote:
euroleague wrote:Isiah was top 5 in MVP and multiple all-nba 1st teams. I don't think he belongs on this list. Unseld, with an MVP, as well..

89 and '90 Thomas wasn't anywhere near MVP and was last all-NBA in '87 (would have eked in as the last member of the 3rd team in '88 had it existed but that's a different implied percentile in a 23 team league). And the list is surely relating "in that year" or else it would not feature Leonard.

Regardless, if you're just talking at some point in their career Billups came fifth with a much better vote share (Thomas's "top 5" was 5th)
Leonard has been second and third.
Parker has a 5th with a better vote share.
Williams has a 5th place with marginally better vote share ...
Whether the list is accurately named or not, by that criteria he fits fairly neatly with that group.


Isiah Thomas was focused on being a leader rather than putting up raw numbers for the Bad Boy Pistons. Its not a coincidence that his teammates all praise him as the leader and best player. Its not a coincidence that the fans and players from that era considered Isiah to be the next superstar after Bird, Magic, and MJ.

Lmao the double standards


70sFan wrote:
Jaivl wrote:"wouldn't be seen as"? Everything that isn't a superstar scorer.

That is, Russell, Duncan, Garnett, late Wilt, Reed, Frazier, Walton, Moses Malone...

Moses was a superstar scorer though. Quite unconventional, but still...

But, you see, he doesn't have the SWISH on his shot or the ZING on his handles. He's a boring boring rebounder.
This place is a cesspool of mindless ineptitude, mental decrepitude, and intellectual lassitude. I refuse to be sucked any deeper into this whirlpool of groupthink sewage. My opinions have been expressed. I'm going to go take a shower.
Stalwart
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,839
And1: 959
Joined: Jun 06, 2021

Re: What players who led ring winning teams wouldnt be seen as capable of it today? 

Post#15 » by Stalwart » Wed Aug 17, 2022 12:13 pm

Owly wrote:
Stalwart wrote:
Owly wrote:89 and '90 Thomas wasn't anywhere near MVP and was last all-NBA in '87 (would have eked in as the last member of the 3rd team in '88 had it existed but that's a different implied percentile in a 23 team league). And the list is surely relating "in that year" or else it would not feature Leonard.

Regardless, if you're just talking at some point in their career Billups came fifth with a much better vote share (Thomas's "top 5" was 5th)
Leonard has been second and third.
Parker has a 5th with a better vote share.
Williams has a 5th place with marginally better vote share ...
Whether the list is accurately named or not, by that criteria he fits fairly neatly with that group.


Isiah Thomas was focused on being a leader rather than putting up raw numbers for the Bad Boy Pistons. Its not a coincidence that his teammates all praise him as the leader and best player. Its not a coincidence that the fans and players from that era considered Isiah to be the next superstar after Bird, Magic, and MJ.

Not sure how this relates to my post.


I feel like its pretty obvious...
Owly
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,618
And1: 3,133
Joined: Mar 12, 2010

Re: What players who led ring winning teams wouldnt be seen as capable of it today? 

Post#16 » by Owly » Wed Aug 17, 2022 12:56 pm

Stalwart wrote:
Owly wrote:
Stalwart wrote:
Isiah Thomas was focused on being a leader rather than putting up raw numbers for the Bad Boy Pistons. Its not a coincidence that his teammates all praise him as the leader and best player. Its not a coincidence that the fans and players from that era considered Isiah to be the next superstar after Bird, Magic, and MJ.

Not sure how this relates to my post.


I feel like its pretty obvious...

If I had to guess it's moving it on from accolades in the year of titles or at peak to a general level of play in and imply that despite not being near the elite by numbers or accolades in the title year (though "that era" and invoking Bird [injured and then post prime] suggests your not talking titles years and you later speak of "mid to late 80s").

But
1) that wasn't the debate that was occurring. Someone thought that Thomas was in another league due to a 5th place MVP finish (and 3 first team all NBAs) and mentioned Unseld had an MVP too. I noted that he ranks low in the group in terms of best annual MVP shares (more gently than that). That was the argument. If you need a general Thomas thread suggest you start one.

2) Unless you've got any new compelling evidence/stuff, invoking MJ, Bird and Magic for a guy who never finished as high as 4th on the MVP ballot seems, prima facie absurd, so I'll be unlikely to engage further (especially, per the above, here). Fwiw, assertions as to what "all" teammates do, and "fans and players from that era" do without any supporting evidence ... do what you want debating it ... for me "what people thought" (with some greater credibility for scouts/professionals willing to put their name to stuff and no likely ulterior motives) is pretty weak (and very indirect), as evidence goes for assessing player quality but you're not even supporting the assertions with evidence.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,314
And1: 9,877
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: What players who led ring winning teams wouldnt be seen as capable of it today? 

Post#17 » by penbeast0 » Wed Aug 17, 2022 1:44 pm

Stalwart wrote:
70sFan wrote:
Stalwart wrote:
Isiah Thomas was focused on being a leader rather than putting up raw numbers for the Bad Boy Pistons. Its not a coincidence that his teammates all praise him as the leader and best player. Its not a coincidence that the fans and players from that era considered Isiah to be the next superstar after Bird, Magic, and MJ.

Thomas teammates opinions about him weren't nearly as one sided as you described. It's also not true that Thomas was seen as the next superstar after big three. In fact, it's completely reinterpretative to what actually happen during Pistons title years.


Who would you say was the face of the league after the Big 3 in the mid to late 80s?


Here are the guys other than Bird, Magic, and MJ who were top 5 in MVP voting from 86-90:

In 86 Nique, Hakeem, Kareem
In 87 McHale, Nique
In 88 Barley Drexler
In 89 K.Malone, Ewing, Hakeem
In 90, Barkley, K.Malone, Ewing

So, by this very simplistic measure, probably Nique, Hakeem, Barkley, Karl Malone, and Ewing
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,894
And1: 25,231
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: What players who led ring winning teams wouldnt be seen as capable of it today? 

Post#18 » by 70sFan » Wed Aug 17, 2022 1:49 pm

Stalwart wrote:
70sFan wrote:
Stalwart wrote:
Isiah Thomas was focused on being a leader rather than putting up raw numbers for the Bad Boy Pistons. Its not a coincidence that his teammates all praise him as the leader and best player. Its not a coincidence that the fans and players from that era considered Isiah to be the next superstar after Bird, Magic, and MJ.

Thomas teammates opinions about him weren't nearly as one sided as you described. It's also not true that Thomas was seen as the next superstar after big three. In fact, it's completely reinterpretative to what actually happen during Pistons title years.


Who would you say was the face of the league after the Big 3 in the mid to late 80s?

Probably Barkley or Hakeem. Nique has a case as well, he was extremely popular - though I don't think he was as good as Thomas to be honest.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,314
And1: 9,877
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: What players who led ring winning teams wouldnt be seen as capable of it today? 

Post#19 » by penbeast0 » Wed Aug 17, 2022 1:53 pm

I'd like to say Bill Laimbeer; but he said face rather than mug shot.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
euroleague
General Manager
Posts: 8,448
And1: 1,871
Joined: Mar 26, 2014
 

Re: What players who led ring winning teams wouldnt be seen as capable of it today? 

Post#20 » by euroleague » Wed Aug 17, 2022 4:06 pm

Owly wrote:
euroleague wrote:Isiah was top 5 in MVP and multiple all-nba 1st teams. I don't think he belongs on this list. Unseld, with an MVP, as well..

89 and '90 Thomas wasn't anywhere near MVP and was last all-NBA in '87 (would have eked in as the last member of the 3rd team in '88 had it existed but that's a different implied percentile in a 23 team league). And the list is surely relating "in that year" or else it would not feature Leonard.

Regardless, if you're just talking at some point in their career Billups came fifth with a much better vote share (Thomas's "top 5" was 5th)
Leonard has been second and third.
Parker has a 5th with a better vote share.
Williams has a 5th place with marginally better vote share ...
Whether the list is accurately named or not, by that criteria he fits fairly neatly with that group.


Billups was never first team all-nba. Nor were any of those others. Isiah was 3x. Isiah was also top 5 on a terrible team… those players were carried.

You can’t isolate only one criteria when it’s used as a combination. Why not try naming someone with both? Ah, because they’re all superstars.

Furthermore, MVP involves being popular with media. Everyone hated the Pistons. Celtics, Bulls, Lakers, etc. had beat-writers and announcers voting for MVP and all-nba.

IT was a far better candidate for MVP in 88, 89… but, too hated by the media.

Return to Player Comparisons