Pachinko_ wrote:Luka looks fat again
We had two fatties last season (Harden and Doncic). One put in a lot of work into get in shape, other....
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Pachinko_ wrote:Luka looks fat again
Pachinko_ wrote:Ruma85 wrote:The commentary in Europe for any sport is so much better then in a America.
Everything is better, except for the players.
Rules and refs make more sense, you don't have to wait for 1,000 regular season games to finish before you can see all the teams and players actively trying their best to win, crowds are interested in the game instead of eating nachos and taking selfies, there are not so many ads and breaks in the game, coaches are actually allowed to coach and say what they think, etc etc
Only reason I bother to follow the NBA is because all the good players have left Europe. For me, other than having the best players in the world, the NBA is a crappy league.
wco81 wrote:Reason why the NBA has the best players is money.
Reason why NBA Has tHe most money is the best players and play so many regular season games. And the US has the fan base to support all these games which means a lot of casual fans, a lot of families bringing even little children to games, making them fans from a very
young age.
A lot of the best players in the NBA were fans as little kids.
I haven’t watch Euro or FIBA much buT there’s no way European coaches have some strategic advantage over the NBA. For one thing, a lot of Euro coaches are in the NBA as assistants or apprentice under coaches like Popovich.
And if you tHink the NBA is only about athletic freaks and individual ability with little tactical innovation, then you really underestimate
the NBA.
wco81 wrote:For one thing, a lot of Euro coaches are in the NBA as assistants or apprentice under coaches like Popovich.
wco81 wrote:Sure some fans hAte tHe pace and space game their team is lousy at it or they have nostalgia for the ‘90s
djw wrote:lambchop wrote:Swuul wrote:Germany doubled and at times even tripled Luka, and rest of Team Slovenia seemed to be unable to adjust to the fact they had lots and lots of free space (seemingly they thought Luka will handle it anyway, putting their hands in the pockets and waiting Luka to do some magic). It didn't help Luka very clearly got frustrated at the refs, at his team-mates, at the opposing players, etc.
I wouldn't really call that double and triple teaming. They had Luka's man essentially overplay him at the three point line while the help defenders sagged off their men and made sure to crowd the paint at all times, similar to what the Tom Tibadough (yea too lazy to look up the spelling) Bulls used to do against LBJ, but of course without the defensive three seconds rule. It worked really well for them, as you said, cause the other Slovenians weren't making shots.
Yeah. You just don't win at this level when through 3 quarters Jonas Wolfahrt-Bottermann had more points than Goran and Zoran Dragic combined. There was zero support for Luka except for a pick and roll play with Tobey here and there.
And with the emergence of Dennis Schröder in the second half (was scoreless at halftime) the game was over.
Man that assist from richarlison was just pure beautyUcanUwill wrote:Welp, these games are over... Now hoping Nothinham forest scores against Tottenham (OT)
Swuul wrote:wco81 wrote:For one thing, a lot of Euro coaches are in the NBA as assistants or apprentice under coaches like Popovich.
That, however just proves the xenophobia in USA pro-sports. For years in ice-hockey the best coaches have come from Europe, but how many European head-coaches have we seen in the NHL? I wouldn't say the quality of European coaches in basketball is comparable to the ice-hockey situation, but there sure are in Europe coaches who are better than the barrel-bottom american coaches in some of the NBA teams.
wco81 wrote:Swuul wrote:wco81 wrote:For one thing, a lot of Euro coaches are in the NBA as assistants or apprentice under coaches like Popovich.
That, however just proves the xenophobia in USA pro-sports. For years in ice-hockey the best coaches have come from Europe, but how many European head-coaches have we seen in the NHL? I wouldn't say the quality of European coaches in basketball is comparable to the ice-hockey situation, but there sure are in Europe coaches who are better than the barrel-bottom american coaches in some of the NBA teams.
They may be better but how are they with English?
And communicating with black players, something that even some American coaches struggle with?
It's not like England hiring Fabio Cappello as manager of the English National Team because of his knowledge of the game made up for the fact that he didn't speak English. That experiment failed and one of the reasons was that he couldn't communicate with the UK media or maybe with the players well enough.
In any event, why should an NBA team hire a coach without any NBA experience? You can say the European game is good but NBA head coaches now get about 5-year $25 million deals. So the inclination is going to be to hire someone with NBA experience.
Ruma85 wrote:wco81 wrote:Swuul wrote:That, however just proves the xenophobia in USA pro-sports. For years in ice-hockey the best coaches have come from Europe, but how many European head-coaches have we seen in the NHL? I wouldn't say the quality of European coaches in basketball is comparable to the ice-hockey situation, but there sure are in Europe coaches who are better than the barrel-bottom american coaches in some of the NBA teams.
They may be better but how are they with English?
And communicating with black players, something that even some American coaches struggle with?
It's not like England hiring Fabio Cappello as manager of the English National Team because of his knowledge of the game made up for the fact that he didn't speak English. That experiment failed and one of the reasons was that he couldn't communicate with the UK media or maybe with the players well enough.
In any event, why should an NBA team hire a coach without any NBA experience? You can say the European game is good but NBA head coaches now get about 5-year $25 million deals. So the inclination is going to be to hire someone with NBA experience.
Fair point, but you cannot get nba experience if you don’t get a chance to coach, The communicating with players or per se black players as you say that even American coaches struggle with, that’s also on the players, they need to be willing to buy in, otherwise it would never work.
wco81 wrote:Swuul wrote:wco81 wrote:For one thing, a lot of Euro coaches are in the NBA as assistants or apprentice under coaches like Popovich.
That, however just proves the xenophobia in USA pro-sports. For years in ice-hockey the best coaches have come from Europe, but how many European head-coaches have we seen in the NHL? I wouldn't say the quality of European coaches in basketball is comparable to the ice-hockey situation, but there sure are in Europe coaches who are better than the barrel-bottom american coaches in some of the NBA teams.
They may be better but how are they with English?
And communicating with black players, something that even some American coaches struggle with?
It's not like England hiring Fabio Cappello as manager of the English National Team because of his knowledge of the game made up for the fact that he didn't speak English. That experiment failed and one of the reasons was that he couldn't communicate with the UK media or maybe with the players well enough.
In any event, why should an NBA team hire a coach without any NBA experience? You can say the European game is good but NBA head coaches now get about 5-year $25 million deals. So the inclination is going to be to hire someone with NBA experience.
Pachinko_ wrote:wco81 wrote:Swuul wrote:That, however just proves the xenophobia in USA pro-sports. For years in ice-hockey the best coaches have come from Europe, but how many European head-coaches have we seen in the NHL? I wouldn't say the quality of European coaches in basketball is comparable to the ice-hockey situation, but there sure are in Europe coaches who are better than the barrel-bottom american coaches in some of the NBA teams.
They may be better but how are they with English?
And communicating with black players, something that even some American coaches struggle with?
It's not like England hiring Fabio Cappello as manager of the English National Team because of his knowledge of the game made up for the fact that he didn't speak English. That experiment failed and one of the reasons was that he couldn't communicate with the UK media or maybe with the players well enough.
In any event, why should an NBA team hire a coach without any NBA experience? You can say the European game is good but NBA head coaches now get about 5-year $25 million deals. So the inclination is going to be to hire someone with NBA experience.
I don't know, how easy is it for a teenager from Slovenia or Serbia with crap English to communicate with black players in the NBA?
Why should an NBA team hire a teenager like Doncic or Jokic from Europe without any NBA experience?
Why did a professional basketball team in Moscow hire a Greek coach to communicate with Russian players?
The answer is always the same: talent. It's the only thing that matters and everybody knows it, the NBA knows it better than anybody. For every Fabo Capello that failed there's a dozen others that didn't.
Please explain to me how is it that the best players in the world are international, but the NBA believes only Americans coaches are talented. It's BS my man, the NBA is run by friends of friends, that's all, the rest is excuses.
Michael Jackson wrote:In fairness to your argument, the top player doesn't have to communicate as much with the team, FO, staff etc as the coach does. It is a different job. While I understand the bias is not awesome and it surely isn't a easy comparison but there is a few reasons, some of it being old boys club for sure, that the coaching pool is taken from the ones knowing the NBA game. It is more top to bottom, from players, media, staff, agents etc... It isn't about who the best X/O's while that is important and has to be top notch it is a bigger package. Harder to break into that old boys club for various reasons but I personally would like to see more FIBA influence in the NBA for sure. Problem is every NBA team is worth billions, and they want businessmen first and foremost.
Pachinko_ wrote:Michael Jackson wrote:In fairness to your argument, the top player doesn't have to communicate as much with the team, FO, staff etc as the coach does. It is a different job. While I understand the bias is not awesome and it surely isn't a easy comparison but there is a few reasons, some of it being old boys club for sure, that the coaching pool is taken from the ones knowing the NBA game. It is more top to bottom, from players, media, staff, agents etc... It isn't about who the best X/O's while that is important and has to be top notch it is a bigger package. Harder to break into that old boys club for various reasons but I personally would like to see more FIBA influence in the NBA for sure. Problem is every NBA team is worth billions, and they want businessmen first and foremost.
I get what you're saying, but keep in mind all that has been happening just fine for decades now in European football, with clubs and superstars that are bigger and more important than James Harden. People jump from Russian to English to Italian leagues all the time, and the differences between them are chalk and cheese.
Don't buy it that NBA is something too special to deal with and you need a horse whisperer to get anywhere near an American superstar. That's all excuses. And even if it wasn't excuses, you can always start from a team where the superstar is a European guy who's English is crap anyway and is used to be coached. Jokic, Giannis, Doncic.
Ruma85 wrote:The AAU made things this way with American players, It's not a good way to develop young players.
Swuul wrote:Ruma85 wrote:The AAU made things this way with American players, It's not a good way to develop young players.
It would indeed be horrible if the system would produce american players in the mold of Luka, Jokic or Giannis...