B8RcDeMktfxC wrote:bearadonisdna wrote:B8RcDeMktfxC wrote:Chef's kiss.
Sorry dude I didn’t make my user name like you by having my dog step on the keyboard .
Hey. I got my user name at random.org. Just as you get your "opinions" there.

Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
B8RcDeMktfxC wrote:bearadonisdna wrote:B8RcDeMktfxC wrote:Chef's kiss.
Sorry dude I didn’t make my user name like you by having my dog step on the keyboard .
Hey. I got my user name at random.org. Just as you get your "opinions" there.

?
HarthorneWingo wrote:DE FENSE wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:
KP says “Hi!”
RJ has been out for a year with a torn ACL?
That's not what the trade was about. KP's putting up monster numbers in the tournament. KP impacts the game much more than RJ has or will.
Chanel Bomber wrote:bearadonisdna wrote:Wait so grimes is older than RJ but less productive and less efficient .
Interesting debate that bears no merit.
Rj 40.8 fg%
Grimes 40.4 fg%
Rj 20.9 points per 36
Grimes 12.6 points per 36
Grimes was far more efficient than RJ last year, albeit on lower volume.
FG% doesn't measure efficiency, TS% does. Come on now, this is pretty basic.
3toheadmelo wrote:Bob Ross wrote:They've gotta be just waiting for the sixth. Too much smoke about Lakers getting involved. Gun to my head, it's more or less agreed upon but they've gotta wait till the 6th to include Beasley
Wasn’t this date already debunked since Bev got traded
DE FENSE wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:DE FENSE wrote:
RJ has been out for a year with a torn ACL?
That's not what the trade was about. KP's putting up monster numbers in the tournament. KP impacts the game much more than RJ has or will.
Such totally different situations that I'm not even sure why you'd bring it up.
bearadonisdna wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:bearadonisdna wrote:Wait so grimes is older than RJ but less productive and less efficient .
Interesting debate that bears no merit.
Rj 40.8 fg%
Grimes 40.4 fg%
Rj 20.9 points per 36
Grimes 12.6 points per 36
Grimes was far more efficient than RJ last year, albeit on lower volume.
FG% doesn't measure efficiency, TS% does. Come on now, this is pretty basic.
We can basically harp on any metric we want because that’s the standard you appear to be setting.
It’s just so ironic that these efficiency players you champion all have worse fg% than RJ and on putrid volume
Deeeez Knicks wrote:Travis Garlick sounds legit....just waiting from confirmation from Freddy Basil then we may have enough for a good sauce to cook
?
HarthorneWingo wrote:DE FENSE wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:
That's not what the trade was about. KP's putting up monster numbers in the tournament. KP impacts the game much more than RJ has or will.
Such totally different situations that I'm not even sure why you'd bring it up.
Because he was the 3rd pick in the draft and we traded him, just we're going to do with RJ. You know he's included in the trade right now, right?
Leon's last offer today was: RJ, Fournier, 2 UP, 3 PP.
Jerry West spoke with someone in the Knicks FO and told them that Grimes is going to better than RJ. And I agree.
Monk1718 wrote:Tried to get into Big Knick energy show but service on the train was ass. I’m guessing he said nothing right?
DowNY wrote:TheGreenArrow wrote:I’m a extremely hard person to convince but this bke guy in the spaces sounds legit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
He sounds like a bad car salesman

Monk1718 wrote:Tried to get into Big Knick energy show but service on the train was ass. I’m guessing he said nothing right?
Are We Ther Yet wrote::lol: I totally enjoyed this thread today!

B8RcDeMktfxC wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Bob Ross wrote:They've gotta be just waiting for the sixth. Too much smoke about Lakers getting involved. Gun to my head, it's more or less agreed upon but they've gotta wait till the 6th to include Beasley
Wasn’t this date already debunked since Bev got traded
The point with the Bev trade is that he wasn't "aggregated" with other salary - he went out on his own. So the two months delay didn't apply. (Contra what I posted in reply to thebuzzardman a few days ago. Meu culpa, thebuzzardman.)
Chanel Bomber wrote:bearadonisdna wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:Grimes was far more efficient than RJ last year, albeit on lower volume.
FG% doesn't measure efficiency, TS% does. Come on now, this is pretty basic.
We can basically harp on any metric we want because that’s the standard you appear to be setting.
It’s just so ironic that these efficiency players you champion all have worse fg% than RJ and on putrid volume
Not really though, TS% is pretty much universally recognized as the standard statistic to measure scoring efficiency.
Nobody credibly uses FG% to measure efficiency. That was done in the old days, before more accurate metrics that integrate 3s and free throws (like TS%) were created.
You're just not using this stat (FG%) correctly tbh.
Clyde_Style wrote:Are We Ther Yet wrote::lol: I totally enjoyed this thread today!
Are We Ther Yet wrote:Monk1718 wrote:Tried to get into Big Knick energy show but service on the train was ass. I’m guessing he said nothing right?
Not much else. Woulda coulda blah blah blah. The only new info was RJ extension is on the table and they may be far apart. That's why he could either be extended or traded in the next 24 hours. A person connected to ownership texted him this. The rest was him trying to say he isn't an insider and he does not care about clout. Which would contradict his whole purpose of posting such news.
3toheadmelo wrote:Monk1718 wrote:Tried to get into Big Knick energy show but service on the train was ass. I’m guessing he said nothing right?
Who do you believe? green satan or downyDowNY wrote:TheGreenArrow wrote:I’m a extremely hard person to convince but this bke guy in the spaces sounds legit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
He sounds like a bad car salesman