Short clip, but very rare one. Including two nice plays from Wilt against his rival.
Enjoy!

Moderators: Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
tsherkin wrote:People always make a big fuss when someone gets dunked on. It is the worst when the guy is giving a good contest. Sure, enjoy the moment as a fan, but dont pretend it is an indictment of the defender. [/tangential rant]
Wilt's form on his J was so ugly. It was a long time ago, of course but BLECH. Damned hell of an athlete though.
70sFan wrote:I understand you so much, to me for guys like Mourning or Mutombo who often got dunked on, it shows their activity and willingness to contest every shot. People should appreciate defenders more in these plays.
It's not pretty, but he was 7'1 with gigantic hands. As long as it worked (and I really don't know if it did), I would be fine with that.
coastalmarker99 wrote:''If I just went out and took it to the basket every time I'd have averaged 60 to 65 points a game''.
coastalmarker99 wrote:Wilt should have dunked the ball every single possession.
The fact that he held himself back from doing so to settle for fadeaways and finger rolls just so he could show people that he was skilful was so dumb.
Wilt himself even regretted that fact.
As Here are Wilt's words
''If I just went out and took it to the basket every time I'd have averaged 60 to 65 points a game''.
And I deep down know that Wilt's being truthful when he says that.
As the only Center that I think would be seriously strong enough to stop an incredibly aggressive Wilt from going to the basket every single time for a dunk is Nate.
Everybody else including Russell would have gotten abused.
If you watch the number 2 dunk at the 2-minute mark he makes Russell look as if he is a child when he decided to play bully ball.
tsherkin wrote:coastalmarker99 wrote:''If I just went out and took it to the basket every time I'd have averaged 60 to 65 points a game''.
That is BS because that's not really how that works logistically, but yes, he could have been more aggressive and less frail-ego about how people perceived him. He wanted to be looked on as a skillful player instead of a brute. It's unfortunate that he cared so much about that. He definitely would have been a lot better. He definitely would have been even more dominant than he already was, and it would have created a large enough boost to his scoring value to overcome some of his other flaws. Wilt was a complicated dude. Incredible talent. Incredible career. Faced a lot of criticism even in his own era, being a big dude, "bullying" the little guys, racism, the evolution of the game, all of it. Big stuff. Coulda been better if he'd been more aggressive, but it does make some sense why he didn't at the time.
70sFan wrote:coastalmarker99 wrote:Wilt should have dunked the ball every single possession.
So you want Wilt to play Rudy Gobert style on offense?The fact that he held himself back from doing so to settle for fadeaways and finger rolls just so he could show people that he was skilful was so dumb.
Yeah and Shaq was also dumb to shoot so many hook shots, one handers and fadeaways?Wilt himself even regretted that fact.
As Here are Wilt's words
''If I just went out and took it to the basket every time I'd have averaged 60 to 65 points a game''.
And I deep down know that Wilt's being truthful when he says that.
That's not how it works, it's impossible to average so many points, while limiting himself to take only inside shots. These "silly" fadeaways made it possible for him, not held him back.As the only Center that I think would be seriously strong enough to stop an incredibly aggressive Wilt from going to the basket every single time for a dunk is Nate.
Everybody else including Russell would have gotten abused.
If you watch the number 2 dunk at the 2-minute mark he makes Russell look as if he is a child when he decided to play bully ball.
If you want to cherry pick plays, then we can take another player from the same game:
Wilt was extremely strong and physically gifted player, but he wasn't superhuman. Russell did tremendous job on him most of the time.
coastalmarker99 wrote:Yes, I would want Wilt to play that way.
As If Wilt didn't have that mental barrier about not fully using his strength and size his offence would have been even more impactful.
As he'd be shooting at probably over 62% FG in his career, as he'd cut down drastically all the fancy stuff (mid-range shots, finger rolls, etc) he was trying early on
1967 was a season when it was noted that Wilt didn't take his fade-away shot any longer and preferred to dunk much more often and his FG%'s skyrocketed to 68% while his team's offence was number one and they romped to a 68 and 13 record and a title.
tsherkin wrote:Oh yeah, if it worked, it worked. It was ugly, and I've seen dudes that height with faaaaar better form. But with his power and the size of his hands, I'm sure it was a challenge.
tsherkin wrote:coastalmarker99 wrote: Coulda been better if he'd been more aggressive, but it does make some sense why he didn't at the time.
Masigond wrote:tsherkin wrote:Oh yeah, if it worked, it worked. It was ugly, and I've seen dudes that height with faaaaar better form. But with his power and the size of his hands, I'm sure it was a challenge.
The argument that the size of one's hands can be detrimental to one's shooting ability is often mentioned but is it really valid? Jordan might not have been a good 3P-shooter but he was excellent from mid-range, Kawhi is good from any range, Yao was good (his hands were still large despite not impressive for his overall size), Dirk doesn't seem to have small hands either, and I'm quite OK with Boban taking any shot (on his rather small volume) even though he's got the biggest mittens ever in NBA history.
I often think that having too big hands to be a good shooter is rather a convenient excuse for guys like Shaq who simply lacked that talent for which there may be many different reasons (and of course sometimes lack of effort to improve).
70sFan wrote:tsherkin wrote:People always make a big fuss when someone gets dunked on. It is the worst when the guy is giving a good contest. Sure, enjoy the moment as a fan, but dont pretend it is an indictment of the defender.
I understand you so much, to me for guys like Mourning or Mutombo who often got dunked on, it shows their activity and willingness to contest every shot. People should appreciate defenders more in these plays.
God Squad wrote:The form on Wilts jumper is horrifying lol. It's actually a miracle someone like Giannis managed to somewhat figure it out.
tsherkin wrote:People always make a big fuss when someone gets dunked on. It is the worst when the guy is giving a good contest. Sure, enjoy the moment as a fan, but dont pretend it is an indictment of the defender. [/tangential rant]
coastalmarker99 wrote:
The fact that Wilt didn't play with that fire in the belly outside of some rare times in which he wanted to prove a point is such a shame.
Masigond wrote:The argument that the size of one's hands can be detrimental to one's shooting ability is often mentioned but is it really valid? Jordan might not have been a good 3P-shooter but he was excellent from mid-range, Kawhi is good from any range, Yao was good (his hands were still large despite not impressive for his overall size), Dirk doesn't seem to have small hands either, and I'm quite OK with Boban taking any shot (on his rather small volume) even though he's got the biggest mittens ever in NBA history.
I often think that having too big hands to be a good shooter is rather a convenient excuse for guys like Shaq who simply lacked that talent for which there may be many different reasons (and of course sometimes lack of effort to improve).
Myth wrote:Sports Science did an episode also showing that hand size doesn't really play into it. They put massive fake hands on Sasha Vujacic and he was still shooting well. It comes down to mechanics of the individual, not size.
hauntedcomputer wrote:
yeah but look how much people hate him (then and now) and how much more they would hate him if he'd been a monster.
cupcakesnake wrote:
I never view it as an indictment of the defender (I always appreciate a heroic contest), just as an impressive play from the offensive player. Dunking on someone is very hard, specifically when you aren't catching them flat-footed and benefitting from fortunate timing. The sheer strength and verticality is so impressive, particularly on this dunk.
tsherkin wrote:70sFan wrote:I understand you so much, to me for guys like Mourning or Mutombo who often got dunked on, it shows their activity and willingness to contest every shot. People should appreciate defenders more in these plays.
And how many plays Shaq bailed on a contest because he didn't wanna get dunked on, right? Yeah, man. Zo, Deke, Dream, D-Rob, Eaton... loads and loads of guys making good contests and the superficial not respecting that. Grumble.It's not pretty, but he was 7'1 with gigantic hands. As long as it worked (and I really don't know if it did), I would be fine with that.
Oh yeah, if it worked, it worked. It was ugly, and I've seen dudes that height with faaaaar better form. But with his power and the size of his hands, I'm sure it was a challenge.
Pennebaker wrote:And Bird did it while being a defensive liability. But he also made All-Defensive teams, which was another controversial issue regarding Bird and votes.