Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #32 - 1997-98 Karl Malone

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,606
And1: 7,199
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #32 

Post#21 » by falcolombardi » Sat Sep 24, 2022 1:37 am

AEnigma wrote:Will quickly add McGrady’s defence was undersold a little in that write-up. It was not amazing that year or anything, but his boxscore defensive numbers were still better than you would see from most players in that role (if not Wade or obviously Lebron), and I feel that his history before 2003 (i.e. without a historically high offensive load) evidences good to respectable defensive value, and that shows up in the 2005 postseason against Dirk too.


I am going off a couple games i recently watched of him to analizehere, so i easily could be underating McGrady. For a lot of these players i am trying to analize 1-2 games in depth which is what i can manage time-wise

I will mention somethingh i disagree with you here tho.

All players can do more in defense (unless they are inept in that area) the lower their offensive load is. But we cannot take Rockets McGrady Defense and combine it with Orlando McGrady offense because those two thinghs cannot happen at the same time (due to offensive load)

Could McGrady have been even more valuable in 2003 with a smaller load offenseively and more energy to spend in defense? Is a possibility. But not one we can necesarrily assume

Now, back to Mcgrady i dont think he was bad from what i watched. But was not a significant positive in my view

The mistakes off ball were not that many but also not as few as the best off ball defenders i have noticed. The individual defense was solid and pistons didnt target him which is a plus. But i think there is only so much value a wing who is guarding a static shooter in most possesions can provide even if he himself doesnt get exploited

Roamers who guard few possesions but dont provide much in help defense of some kind are slight positives at best in my view (which is the impression i got from Tmac). Not a weakness for the defense but not a needle mover either which

That is why i made the comparision to lebron who may not guard all that many possesions but adds a lot of value in rim protection as a help defender. Not all athletic tall wings can be effective rim helpers which is why the ones that can are so valuable

So while l think defense is an advantage for tmac in comparision to luka and westbrook specifically i dont think he was what i would call a "impactful defender" or clearly above average

I have McGrady defense ahead of luka precisely because he didnt get targeted by pistons the way teams succesfully target luka (and ahead of westbrook who makes too many mistakes off ball on top of his man defense being just meh)
User avatar
Proxy
Sophomore
Posts: 237
And1: 192
Joined: Jun 30, 2021
       

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #32 

Post#22 » by Proxy » Sat Sep 24, 2022 1:51 am

Is it about his offensive load being too high here or is it about the defensive team around him? How would you peg the 03 Magic as a supporting cast there? I think that should be factored in too.
AEnigma wrote:Arf arf.
Image

trex_8063 wrote:Calling someone a stinky turd is not acceptable.
PLEASE stop doing that.

One_and_Done wrote:I mean, how would you feel if the NBA traced it's origins to an 1821 league of 3 foot dwarves who performed in circuses?
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,606
And1: 7,199
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #32 

Post#23 » by falcolombardi » Sat Sep 24, 2022 1:52 am

Proxy wrote:
falcolombardi wrote:In the playoffs tatum was a deer caught in the headlights against warriors defense and even against bucks he was meh in most games (his game 6 made people overrate his series imo) butler instead took on celtics great defense and dominated there


Saying Jimmy dominated that series overall despite his performances games 3-5 is a massive reach, that series was also not really all that close either(in the Celtics favor) despite going to 7. Tatum was better than him in that series overall going up against a fine Heat defense.

Yes I could agree on Tatum being somewhat underwhelming against the Bucks and Warriors(he was also playing injured in the Warriors series and Smart was in the Bucks series, and was still certainly the best Celtics player in both fwiw), but Jimmy also did not play either team that year and if he was getting similar attention I don't really see why he'd have performed all that well either. I would say my biggest problem with Tatum right now preventing me from placing him in the upper echelon of players in the league rn is balancing his scoring and passing abilities together.

I don't agree that either of these runs really went that far "well beyond" anything JT showed in the playoffs but i'm fine with the conclusion they were better ig. Also I don't even know if I would agree Tatum is more portable than Jimmy despite the shooting(I think Jimmy is still a much better off ball player and better passer whilr JT has some chucking tendencies), but i'd need to think on that one.

Anyways, like Enigma mentioned his name, i'd rather have 2019 PG over either of these two and I doubt he gets in top 40 so I don't think this matters that much for now. 2022 Jimmy as the best creator though? Not sure on that one, i'll give him the best passing out of the bunch, but that definitely wasn't the impression I got these playoffs.


I mean, look at a bigger sample

Butler was really good to outright fantastic against most strong defenses he played 2020-2022. Wit

Against the 2020 celtics he was really good,againsy the 2020 bucks he was really good and against the 2020 lakers he was outright fantastic,

against the 2022 sixers he was excellent again and against the 22 celtics he was really good for the most part

His black mark in that stretch is 2021 series vs milwaukee but in general he "passes" most of this tests woth great marks

In other words he thrives against though teams much more often than he struggles (at least in miami).

I dont have that sample size of more often than not doing great against great defenses from tatum
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,606
And1: 7,199
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #32 

Post#24 » by falcolombardi » Sat Sep 24, 2022 2:03 am

Proxy wrote:Is it about his offensive load being too high here or is it about the defensive team around him? How would you peg the 03 Magic as a supporting cast there? I think that should be factored in too.


Doesnt seem to be a great cast, but point remains that just like with kawhi, we cannot combine his highest offensive effort version and his highest defensive effort versions as if they could happem sinultaneously

As for his teammates not being great defensive players? I am unsure tbh as i am not as familiarized with them (and watched focusing on McGrady)

But it wouldnt change my point that T-mac didnt do all that much to lift the defense. He seemed a player who can fit on a team and not be a weak link but not one who will move the needle on them

Being the guy who "is not a weakness" (t-mac) is obviously better than being the guy who "is the weakness" (luka) so i would still take t-mac Defense over luka. But i dont think t-mac looked like a clear plus or above average defender (which i expected from his athletism/size)

He mostly conserved his energy defensively (understandable) and was not a target to exploit or commited too many mistakes. Which is why i see him as neutral to slight positive

He was not the one hurting his team defensively but neither was he doing much to movr the needle (on-ball defense, help defense, etc)
User avatar
Proxy
Sophomore
Posts: 237
And1: 192
Joined: Jun 30, 2021
       

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #32 

Post#25 » by Proxy » Sat Sep 24, 2022 2:08 am

Hmm I have another question now

Is the problem with Kawhi at this point even really just levels of effort he could provide related? He's looked more impressive than his average when locked in but i'm really not sure if Kawhi could permanently lock in and get into his 2014-2016 levels just from giving similar levels of effort, especially after some of the injuries and aging. 2017 Kawhi is more interesting though and i'd have to think on that one - maybe for a different time though cuz he's already in
AEnigma wrote:Arf arf.
Image

trex_8063 wrote:Calling someone a stinky turd is not acceptable.
PLEASE stop doing that.

One_and_Done wrote:I mean, how would you feel if the NBA traced it's origins to an 1821 league of 3 foot dwarves who performed in circuses?
User avatar
Proxy
Sophomore
Posts: 237
And1: 192
Joined: Jun 30, 2021
       

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #32 

Post#26 » by Proxy » Sat Sep 24, 2022 2:13 am

Maybe I misunderstood what you meant though, i'm tired and will probably reread everything tomorrow
AEnigma wrote:Arf arf.
Image

trex_8063 wrote:Calling someone a stinky turd is not acceptable.
PLEASE stop doing that.

One_and_Done wrote:I mean, how would you feel if the NBA traced it's origins to an 1821 league of 3 foot dwarves who performed in circuses?
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,701
And1: 8,340
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #32 

Post#27 » by trex_8063 » Sat Sep 24, 2022 2:26 am

Based on some of the discussions regarding TMac's defense, and general SG vs PF [where defense is concerned], I was starting to think I'd overrated Barkley in recent threads. Was thinking of bumping him back to 2nd or even 3rd-4th on my ballot; but then the thread ended and he was in. Oh well.....looking at the H2H totals, I'm not sure if that would have flipped result to TMac; maybe if I'd bumped him all the way to third or lower.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,701
And1: 8,340
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #32 

Post#28 » by trex_8063 » Sat Sep 24, 2022 2:31 am

1st ballot: '22 Joel Embiid (> '21)
Honestly, on a per-minute basis, I think Embiid is a bit better/more valuable than anyone left on the table (and perhaps has been for a few threads now). We're talking about a top 3 defensive center who also led the league in scoring [on good efficiency]; and a decent passing big. That's crazy.
It's simply the missed games/durability concerns (in BOTH rs and playoffs) combined with relatively restricted minutes that held him back from top 20(ish) status for me.


2nd ballot: '03 Tracy McGrady
Not sure how much of a ceiling raiser he can be, but this was perhaps an all-time tier floor-raising carry-job. I'm going to quote portions of posts of other posters [from the TMac vs Drexler thread] for argumentation...

tsherkin wrote:He was a +4.5% rTS guy (109 TS+) in that 02-03 season. Led the league in usage at 35.2%, led the league in OWS (13.2) on a 42-win team. 30.3 PER, led the league. .262 WS/48, league-high. +9.8 OBPM, league-high. Second in the league in oRAPM behind Dirk.

I'm about to focus on OBPM, but obviously it is just one stat, and one which has its own pros and cons. But I do want to examine the achievement, since we're speaking specifically of offense and specifically of peak.

Keep in mind, there are 3 seasons in league history of 2,000+ minutes and 9.5+ OBPM. McGrady's 9.8 is second-highest on that list, ahead of 09 Lebron's 9.5, and behind 2016 Steph's 10.3. There are 9 player-seasons of +9.0 or better with those 2,000 minutes, just to open it up to a slightly less arbitrary range. Lebron's on it 3 times, and Jokic is on it twice. No one else is on it more than once.

2016 Steph
03 McGrady
09 Lebron
19 Harden
13 Lebron
22 Jokic
21 Jokic
90 MJ
10 Lebron

Just for reference.

Drexler's career-high is +6.8 OBPM, from the 92 season when his Blazers lost to MJ in the Finals. It was part of a stretch of 5-straight seasons of +5.0 or better, and six seasons in eight. Never managed double-digit OWS. Never exceeded 24.1 PER. rTS a little lower in his peak seasons than McGrady. Never exceeded 27.2 ppg. Never exceeded 28.7 USG. Topped out at 29.9% AST and 12.4% TOV, against 03 McGrady's 30.0% USG and 8.4% TOV.


rk2023 wrote:https://thedyspatch.com/2022/05/31/how-good-all-time-was-2021-22-luka-doncic-on-offense-for-his-age/?preview_id=7677&preview_nonce=9b2a701c1c&preview=true&_thumbnail_id=7735

In an article I previously wrote, I described TMac's offensive game and value before.

Some stats:

33.4 Adjusted Points (leading the league) on +4.5 relative-to-league average true shooting
5.4 Assists, along with a 9.9 Offensive Box Creation and 7.6 Passer Rating
6.4 Rebounds (1.6 coming on the offensive end)
5.8 BackPicks Box Plus-Minus, 4.4 Augmented Plus-Minus / Game (4th and 5th in the league)

Posting one of the highest possessional scoring rates in NBA history, McGrady demonstrated a versatile scoring arsenal – leveraging his size and quickness for a long mid-range and 3-Point driven shot diet (57.7% of his total field-goal attempts, shooting 43.1 and 38.6 % on these level shots respectively) with stellar low post play and basket drives in addition. In a situation with relatively poor spacing and offensive support, McGrady was often responsible for creating possessions. His volume scoring gave him significant attention through doubles – where he showed a solid ability to pass out of them – dishing assists over the heads of defenders (the hyperlinked clip shows career highlights, including his 2002-03 season). How much McGrady was responsible directly impacted his team’s situation. With a 105.2 rated team offensive (good for 10th in the league), 74% of this production came with McGrady on – where the team posted a 109.3 offense (5.7 points above league average). In the other 26%, the Magic posted only a 91.8 offensive rating.

This goes to show how much of a load McGrady shouldered, where he ultimately brought the Magic to the first round of the playoffs in an 8 vs. 1 seed matchup against the 2002-03 Pistons (whom were anchored by a 99.9 rated team defense). While McGrady had some struggles down the stretch, he still performed well in totality. His averages in the series, listed below, show a somewhat decline in creation, but this can certainly be explored further when considering an inferior (for star standards) supporting cast and the opponent faced. In a better situation, there would certainly be a chance McGrady could engine a championship level offense.

32.5 Points on +5.5 relative-to-opponent average true shooting
4.4 Assists, with an 8.1 Offensive Box Creation and 5.8 Passer Rating
6.2 Rebounds (1.4 coming on the offensive end)
5.0 BackPicks Box Plus-Minus

Looking at all of that, it is clear McGrady has posted a season that is more impactful than any variant of Drexler. Even with such a high offensive load and responsibility, I believe McGrady didn't quite have scoring blindness --- nor was he a slouch off ball. As a matter of fact, he was a very good playmaker off of his scoring gravity and I believe him to be the best offensive player in the league in 2003 (with Shaq declining and Kobe not quite reaching his apex then).

.



3rd ballot: '97 Karl Malone (> '92 > '98)
I think his peak is slept on a bit, in fact, I opted to push it ahead of Ewing: excellent elbow/high-post passing from the PF spot, a certain amount of floor-spacing effect, OUTSTANDING rs scorer (like outstanding in an all-time sense; and still notably better than average in the post-season as a scorer), and solid defender.
Utter ironman, too.
More I think about it, I could see bumping him higher. Maybe depends on just HOW effective a defender you think he is. I suppose if I were marginally more bullish on his defensive prowess, I could see bumping him up further. We'll stay here for now.


4th: '90 Patrick Ewing (> '94 Ewing)
5th: '11 Dwight Howard (> '09 Howard)
6th: '61 Elgin Baylor (> '62)
7th: '75 Artis Gilmore
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
LukaTheGOAT
Analyst
Posts: 3,274
And1: 2,987
Joined: Dec 25, 2019
 

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #32 

Post#29 » by LukaTheGOAT » Sat Sep 24, 2022 6:40 am

I gotta be honest, I think people are really overthinking the idea of if Luka is inclusion worthy here.

Luka will have to come into the season in shape if he wants to have the full-season dominance that Jokic have touched.

However, in terms of playoff dominance you could argue that Luka has been comparable to Jokic in overall offensive performance

Luka and Jokic offensive performance against similar opponents in the PS.


Luka's averages vs Clippers in 2020 PS (Clippers had a rDRTG of -3.1)

31 points, 9.8 rebs, 8.7 assists, 5.2 turnovers (rTS% of 5.6%) in 35.8 MPG. Luka is estimated to have created about 16.2 shots per 100 possessions.

Backpicks BPM-6.2

GameScore-23.4

Net On/Off-3.1

Dallas had a 111.1 ORTG, and 120.9 DRTG with Luka on.


Jokic's averages vs Clippers in 2020 PS (Clippers had a rDRTG of -3.1)

24.4 points, 13.4 rebounds, 6.6 assists, 4.7 turnovers (rTS% of 5.4%) in 37.7 MPG. Jokic is estimated to have created about 10.4 shots per 100 possessions.

Backpicks BPM-6.1

GameScore-19.9

Net On/Off-18.1

Denver had a 113.1 ORTG, and 110.6 defensive rating with Jokic on.



Luka's averages vs Clippers in 2021 PS (Clippers had a rDRTG of -1.3)

35.7 pts, 7.9 rebounds, 10.3 assists, 4.6 turnovers (rTS% of 0.90%) in 40.2 MPG. Luka is estimated to have created about 19.5 shots per 100 possessions.

Backpicks BPM-6.8

GameScore-26.1

Net On/Off-43.2

Dallas had a 119.8 ORTG and 120.9 DRTG with Luka on.



Jokic's averages vs Suns in 2021 PS (Suns had a rDRTG of -1.1)

25 points, 13.3 rebounds, 5.8 assists, 2 turnovers (rTS% of -3.5%) in 33.5 MPG. Jokic is estimated to have created about 7.7 shots per 100 possessions.

Backpicks BPM-5

GameScore-22.2

Net On/Off: (-3.8)

Denver had a 111.6 ORTG, and 125.7 DRTG with Jokic on.


Luka's averages vs Suns in 2022 PS (Suns had a rDRTG of -4.6)

32.6 points, 9.9 rebounds, and 7 assists, 4 turnovers (rTS% of 3.9%) in 36.1 MPG. Luka is estimated to have created about 17.6 shots per 100 possessions.

Backpicks BPM-9.7

GameScore-24.8

Net On/Off-16.6

Dallas had a 120.7 ORTG and a 113.6 DRTG with Luka on.


Jokic's averages vs Warriors in 2022 PS (Warriors have a rDRTG of -4.9)

31 pts, 13.2 rebs, and 5.8 assists, 4.8 turnovers (rTS% of 8.9%) in 34.2 MPG. Jokic is estimated to have created about 12.5 shots per 100 possessions.

Backpicks BPM-8.6

GameScore-25.9

Net On/Off: (-15.8)

Denver had a 111.6 ORTG and a 125.7 DRTG with Jokic on.


Luka's averages vs Warriors in 2022 PS (Warriors have a rDRTG of -4.9)

32 pts, 9.2 rebs, and 6 assists, 3.8 turnovers (rTS% of 0.60%) in 38.2 MPG. Luka is estimated to have created about 12.5 shots per 100 possessions.

Backpicks BPM-5

GameScore-22.9

Net On/Off: (-33.3)

Mavs had a 110.5 ORTG and a 126.3 DRTG with Luka on.


All in all

Luka's PS runs measured

Bball Ref BPM
20-7.9
21-11.8
22-9.3

AuPM/g
20-2.5
21-3.9
22-3.2

RAPTOR
20-9.2
21-11.3
22-3.5

Jokic's measurements in recent PS runs


Bball Ref BPM
20-7.4
21-9
22-10.7

AuPM/g
20-3.4
21-2.7
22-4.4

RAPTOR
20-4.8
21-7
22-10.3

Luka would do himself some good to continue improving his conditioning and become the plus defender I think he can become. He should continue to improve his shooting, and his shot-selection could be a bit better. Overall, I think he could boost his efficiency, and perhaps work on coming off screens and doing a bit more off-ball.

Maybe's it Luka's unspoken rizz, but I think Luka is worthy of a top 40 peak based on Jokic's placement, especially when we consider there are defensive questions around both of them. I really think in a decade when we look back at this project to see how people though, we will probably come to the conclusion that Luka was too low.
iggymcfrack
RealGM
Posts: 12,016
And1: 9,463
Joined: Sep 26, 2017

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #32 

Post#30 » by iggymcfrack » Sat Sep 24, 2022 8:19 am

1. 2017 Westbrook- Was MVP over the seasons from the #11, #21, and #24 peaks in this project and then maintained his numbers in the playoffs with an on/off of +62. This season gets poisoned by the ones around it, but Westbrook literally had an all-time season in 2017.

2. 1998 Karl Malone- Finished 2nd in MVP voting after winning the award from Jordan the year before, leading the NBA in both WS and VORP. His playoff numbers held up much better than you might imagine with his 7.1 BPM being the 2nd-best playoff mark of his career. The last 2 games of the Finals, he went for 39/9/5 and 31/11/7 while shooting over 60% from the field. One of those games, the Jazz won 83-81. The other, the Jazz led 86-85 with 6 seconds left before the refs swallowed their whistles on one of the most egregious pushoffs in NBA history to give Jordan an uncontested look for the win.

3. 2022 Joel Embiid- Had a better PER than all but 6 players all-time while also playing defense at an all-NBA level. That's a pretty undeniable combo.
AEnigma
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,130
And1: 5,978
Joined: Jul 24, 2022

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #32 

Post#31 » by AEnigma » Sat Sep 24, 2022 2:19 pm

LukaTheGOAT wrote:I gotta be honest, I think people are really overthinking the idea of if Luka is inclusion worthy here.

Luka will have to come into the season in shape if he wants to have the full-season dominance that Jokic have touched.

However, in terms of playoff dominance you could argue that Luka has been comparable to Jokic in overall offensive performance

Luka and Jokic offensive performance against similar opponents in the PS.



Luka's PS runs measured

Bball Ref BPM
20-7.9
21-11.8
22-9.3

AuPM/g
20-2.5
21-3.9
22-3.2

RAPTOR
20-9.2
21-11.3
22-3.5

Jokic's measurements in recent PS runs

Bball Ref BPM
20-7.4
21-9
22-10.7

AuPM/g
20-3.4
21-2.7
22-4.4

RAPTOR
20-4.8
21-7
22-10.3

Luka would do himself some good to continue improving his conditioning and become the plus defender I think he can become. He should continue to improve his shooting, and his shot-selection could be a bit better. Overall, I think he could boost his efficiency, and perhaps work on coming off screens and doing a bit more off-ball.

Maybe's it Luka's unspoken rizz, but I think Luka is worthy of a top 40 peak based on Jokic's placement, especially when we consider there are defensive questions around both of them. I really think in a decade when we look back at this project to see how people though, we will probably come to the conclusion that Luka was too low.

This is a great argument for Jokic being voted in too high. 8-)

I think players like Luka and Jokic definitely give you a little more variance, for good and bad. Not sure whether that inherently is worth more over large samples than what we see from players like Butler or George or Tatum, but when all you really need is a small streak of success to win, maybe it is.

I agree Luka’s placement is likely to age poorly. Same will probably be true of Tatum too though. Not a bad consideration, but that to me is just another reason for people to stay invested long enough to push the project to fifty. ;-) There is really no shortage of peak options if people want to stick with it and truly try to give all the top guys their due. Seem to be five consensus names right now for the current group, then you have five current players who have been discussed, the Penny/Pippen/Mourning group from the 1990s, Frazier and Barry as the title winning lead creators, and legitimately like eight pre-merger bigs or forwards who all have been heavily considered in the past… Pretty easy to get right around fifty even without looking at atypical peak options like Reggie or Manu or Drexler or Moncrief or Marques Johnson or Grant Hill or D-Will or Lillard or Isiah.
LukaTheGOAT
Analyst
Posts: 3,274
And1: 2,987
Joined: Dec 25, 2019
 

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #32 

Post#32 » by LukaTheGOAT » Sat Sep 24, 2022 6:50 pm

LukaTheGOAT wrote:I gotta be honest, I think people are really overthinking the idea of if Luka is inclusion worthy here.

Luka will have to come into the season in shape if he wants to have the full-season dominance that Jokic have touched.

However, in terms of playoff dominance you could argue that Luka has been comparable to Jokic in overall offensive performance

Luka and Jokic offensive performance against similar opponents in the PS.


Luka's averages vs Clippers in 2020 PS (Clippers had a rDRTG of -3.1)

31 points, 9.8 rebs, 8.7 assists, 5.2 turnovers (rTS% of 5.6%) in 35.8 MPG. Luka is estimated to have created about 16.2 shots per 100 possessions.

Backpicks BPM-6.2

GameScore-23.4

Net On/Off-3.1

Dallas had a 111.1 ORTG, and 120.9 DRTG with Luka on.


Jokic's averages vs Clippers in 2020 PS (Clippers had a rDRTG of -3.1)

24.4 points, 13.4 rebounds, 6.6 assists, 4.7 turnovers (rTS% of 5.4%) in 37.7 MPG. Jokic is estimated to have created about 10.4 shots per 100 possessions.

Backpicks BPM-6.1

GameScore-19.9

Net On/Off-18.1

Denver had a 113.1 ORTG, and 110.6 defensive rating with Jokic on.



Luka's averages vs Clippers in 2021 PS (Clippers had a rDRTG of -1.3)

35.7 pts, 7.9 rebounds, 10.3 assists, 4.6 turnovers (rTS% of 0.90%) in 40.2 MPG. Luka is estimated to have created about 19.5 shots per 100 possessions.

Backpicks BPM-6.8

GameScore-26.1

Net On/Off-43.2

Dallas had a 119.8 ORTG and 120.9 DRTG with Luka on.



Jokic's averages vs Suns in 2021 PS (Suns had a rDRTG of -1.1)

25 points, 13.3 rebounds, 5.8 assists, 2 turnovers (rTS% of -3.5%) in 33.5 MPG. Jokic is estimated to have created about 7.7 shots per 100 possessions.

Backpicks BPM-5

GameScore-22.2

Net On/Off: (-3.8)

Denver had a 111.6 ORTG, and 125.7 DRTG with Jokic on.


Luka's averages vs Suns in 2022 PS (Suns had a rDRTG of -4.6)

32.6 points, 9.9 rebounds, and 7 assists, 4 turnovers (rTS% of 3.9%) in 36.1 MPG. Luka is estimated to have created about 17.6 shots per 100 possessions.

Backpicks BPM-9.7

GameScore-24.8

Net On/Off-16.6

Dallas had a 120.7 ORTG and a 113.6 DRTG with Luka on.


Jokic's averages vs Warriors in 2022 PS (Warriors have a rDRTG of -4.9)

31 pts, 13.2 rebs, and 5.8 assists, 4.8 turnovers (rTS% of 8.9%) in 34.2 MPG. Jokic is estimated to have created about 12.5 shots per 100 possessions.

Backpicks BPM-8.6

GameScore-25.9

Net On/Off: (-15.8)

Denver had a 111.6 ORTG and a 125.7 DRTG with Jokic on.


Luka's averages vs Warriors in 2022 PS (Warriors have a rDRTG of -4.9)

32 pts, 9.2 rebs, and 6 assists, 3.8 turnovers (rTS% of 0.60%) in 38.2 MPG. Luka is estimated to have created about 12.5 shots per 100 possessions.

Backpicks BPM-5

GameScore-22.9

Net On/Off: (-33.3)

Mavs had a 110.5 ORTG and a 126.3 DRTG with Luka on.


All in all

Luka's PS runs measured

Bball Ref BPM
20-7.9
21-11.8
22-9.3

AuPM/g
20-2.5
21-3.9
22-3.2

RAPTOR
20-9.2
21-11.3
22-3.5

Jokic's measurements in recent PS runs


Bball Ref BPM
20-7.4
21-9
22-10.7

AuPM/g
20-3.4
21-2.7
22-4.4

RAPTOR
20-4.8
21-7
22-10.3

Luka would do himself some good to continue improving his conditioning and become the plus defender I think he can become. He should continue to improve his shooting, and his shot-selection could be a bit better. Overall, I think he could boost his efficiency, and perhaps work on coming off screens and doing a bit more off-ball.

Maybe's it Luka's unspoken rizz, but I think Luka is worthy of a top 40 peak based on Jokic's placement, especially when we consider there are defensive questions around both of them. I really think in a decade when we look back at this project to see how people though, we will probably come to the conclusion that Luka was too low.


Also in PS LEBRON

Luka
2020-2022 LEBRON-4.32

Jokic
2020-2022 LEBRON-1.96
trelos6
Senior
Posts: 620
And1: 277
Joined: Jun 17, 2022
Location: Sydney

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #32 

Post#33 » by trelos6 » Sat Sep 24, 2022 9:16 pm

I have no doubt that a Luka or Tatum 22-23 or 23-24 will one day appear on this list.
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,606
And1: 7,199
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #32 

Post#34 » by falcolombardi » Sat Sep 24, 2022 9:21 pm

trelos6 wrote:I have no doubt that a Luka or Tatum 22-23 or 23-24 will one day appear on this list.


What makes tatum any better or with more potential than paul george at the same age (who has got zero consideration so far in the project)?
trelos6
Senior
Posts: 620
And1: 277
Joined: Jun 17, 2022
Location: Sydney

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #32 

Post#35 » by trelos6 » Sun Sep 25, 2022 12:18 am

I had Paul George in the low 40’s.

Tatum has the potential to get there. His last season was spent learning how to become a facilitator, and we saw that even though his shot wasn’t falling, he became a very good distributor.

Pair that with some of his shooting from prior years, if he can put it all together in one season, he has a chance as a spot.
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 92,981
And1: 32,424
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #32 

Post#36 » by tsherkin » Sun Sep 25, 2022 12:22 am

falcolombardi wrote:McGrady is a 2 dimension ballhandler who moves on straight lines, luka can move in 3 dimensions with his more fluid footwork and tighter handle


I'm curious what you mean by this. There are only two dimensions in which to move, but are you trying to add a timing dimension to discuss Luka's use of hesitation moves and reversals?
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,606
And1: 7,199
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #32 

Post#37 » by falcolombardi » Sun Sep 25, 2022 1:10 am

tsherkin wrote:
falcolombardi wrote:McGrady is a 2 dimension ballhandler who moves on straight lines, luka can move in 3 dimensions with his more fluid footwork and tighter handle


I'm curious what you mean by this. There are only two dimensions in which to move, but are you trying to add a timing dimension to discuss Luka's use of hesitation moves and reversals?


Is a loose analogy but it means the diferrence between a player who has a simplified amount of options out of his dribble vs one that has a much more ample set of options due to more creativity/quick improvisation and a more fluid handle

T-mac will run basic pick and rolls well where he can attack the hoop/take the 3 or pass from his high release point over the defense.

Luka could do all of that too or he could get more creative and look to put the defender on his back, throw 1 or 2 small hesitations middrible, spin while keeping the dribble alive, put the defender in jail behind his back.

T-mac can drive by his defender or step back for a jumper (the 2 dimension straight line i mean). Luka can go for the same options (a bit less effectively) or he could do a cross over, work the defender with a bunch of hesitation moves, and many more

Luka just has a more ample repertory of moves while t-mac mostly does fewer thinghs (but does them very well) so this is not a damning criticism on tracy, in some situations luka approach may be faulted for his higher amount of turnovers and ill advised hero ball shots
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 92,981
And1: 32,424
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #32 

Post#38 » by tsherkin » Sun Sep 25, 2022 1:30 am

falcolombardi wrote:Is a loose analogy but it means the diferrence between a player who has a simplified amount of options out of his dribble vs one that has a much more ample set of options due to more creativity/quick improvisation and a more fluid handle

T-mac will run basic pick and rolls well where he can attack the hoop/take the 3 or pass from his high release point over the defense.

Luka could do all of that too or he could get more creative and look to put the defender on his back, throw 1 or 2 small hesitations middrible, spin while keeping the dribble alive, put the defender in jail behind his back.

T-mac can drive by his defender or step back for a jumper (the 2 dimension straight line i mean). Luka can go for the same options (a bit less effectively) or he could do a cross over, work the defender with a bunch of hesitation moves, and many more

Luka just has a more ample repertory of moves while t-mac mostly does fewer thinghs (but does them very well) so this is not a damning criticism on tracy, in some situations luka approach may be faulted for his higher amount of turnovers and ill advised hero ball shots


Luka is certainly a dynamic ball-handler, for sure.
User avatar
Proxy
Sophomore
Posts: 237
And1: 192
Joined: Jun 30, 2021
       

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #32 

Post#39 » by Proxy » Sun Sep 25, 2022 7:16 am

1. 2003 Tracy McGrady
2. 1997 Karl Malone(1998, 1992)
3. 1990 Patrick Ewing

Same stuff as before
AEnigma wrote:Arf arf.
Image

trex_8063 wrote:Calling someone a stinky turd is not acceptable.
PLEASE stop doing that.

One_and_Done wrote:I mean, how would you feel if the NBA traced it's origins to an 1821 league of 3 foot dwarves who performed in circuses?
AEnigma
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,130
And1: 5,978
Joined: Jul 24, 2022

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #32 

Post#40 » by AEnigma » Sun Sep 25, 2022 5:26 pm

Was swayed back to Malone over McGrady and edited accordingly. These are slight differences, but further review of analogous players helped me decide (in addition to everything I mentioned in the edit).

Return to Player Comparisons