People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind?

Moderators: trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ

Stalwart
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,839
And1: 959
Joined: Jun 06, 2021

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#441 » by Stalwart » Mon Sep 26, 2022 9:44 am

OhayoKD wrote:I did:
If kevin love was such an impactful player, why couldn't he and kyrie keep the lineup above a 30 win pace when lebron wasn't there?

If kevin love was such an impactful player, why were the cavs basically unaffected by his injury in the 15 playoffs? APM would tell you it's because tristan thompson and delladova were really good defensively, and yet...


I need you to first explain why Kevin Love had to totally reinvent himself as a player and then I'll explain why he wasn't so impactful.
OhayoKD
Head Coach
Posts: 6,042
And1: 3,933
Joined: Jun 22, 2022

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#442 » by OhayoKD » Mon Sep 26, 2022 10:05 am

tsherkin wrote:
But Sampson's synergy with Hakeem was greater than anyone on Chicago's with Jordan. Sampson couldn't lead a team, but he was a quality second option to Olajuwon and that did make a large difference, which is also why they fell off when he was injured. Woolridge was the best not-Jordan player on Chicago and while a better scorer than Sampson, he was worse on the glass and a net negative on D, so he didn't line up well ALONGSIDE MJ.

So you say the 85 result was due to fit? Sure, that's plausible. Is it plausible that this is the why every time hakeem's team result - cast performance without hakeem compares favorably to Jordan's team result - jordan's cast performance without jordan? That seems unlikely.

Repitition reduces uncertainty and the extent to which noise functions as an explanation. With that in mind...



Yeah but you responded by quoting me, so it looks like you were responding to what I was saying, which you were not.


yeah, my bad.


And?

And none of jordan's seasons have seen his team play close to 2-10 basketball. Chalk that singular data point to noise if you want but when it's several data points you begin to form a pattern. Add 87 where the rockets won 2 more games despite a drug scandal, gm shaningans, a major injury to the second best player, and hakeem playing less games and now you have several examples in a variety of contexts where Hakeem is put in a similar or worse situation yet outperforms or matches his team result. Are there counter-examples for jordan here?
.
51 win with Hakeem. .500 without.

See above.
BUt also a weird concept to begin with. Of course they are going to struggle without Olajuwon.

If we agree that a player's contribution to winning is a large part of assessing how good or great they are, then looking at what a team does without a player and isolating them from their cast seems like a reasonable starting point to me.
AEnigma
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,130
And1: 5,976
Joined: Jul 24, 2022

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#443 » by AEnigma » Mon Sep 26, 2022 1:36 pm

Stalwart wrote:
tsherkin wrote:He was asked to play a role which made sense based on the other talent on the roster. Why do you make this sound like a profound thing? It was alarmingly obvious that both Lebron and Wade were better-suited to carrying the offense than Bosh, particularly come the playoffs.

Maybe you didn't read what Chris Bosh actually said so let me post it again:

"But, I’d say just getting used to being uncomfortable took… a season and a half to fit into my rolling in. Even after that I had to get used to things changing.”

"It was one of those things where I constantly had to reinvent myself."

He wasn't asked to play a role that best suited the other talent. He was asked to constantly change the role he played. And he was asked to do that in order to specifically suit Lebron James. Instead of playing to and utilizing his strengths as a basketball player he was asked to constantly reinvent himself. He had to morph. He had to be uncomfortable.

Is the goal of basketball to not adapt next to players better at your primary skills, or is it to win a championship.

Why do you think this was unique to Bosh. Lebron had to adapt immensely. Developed a post-game, developed his shooting, developed his off-ball game. Lebron changes his approach on every team for every circumstance, but you are not lamenting how “uncomfortable” that must make him.

Yeah, he had to learn to be good at defence. Everyone should.

Yeah, he had to learn to shoot threes. In the modern league, everyone should. Grant and Pippen would have needed to as well, but they played in the 1990s, not the 2010s.

He had to evolve… because that is how they won two championships. Time and time again you pretend Jordan would never force anyone to adapt. How. How do you think Jordan would have no impact on Wade or Bosh. It is completely disconnected from reality, but of course so far you have shown absolutely zero inclination to engage with that hypothetical. Grant and Pippen grew around Jordan. From the beginning, their entire games were structured around him. How did Jordan work to accommodate them. Learn the triangle? Focus more on fourth quarter scoring? Such sacrifice.

Jordan never needed to adapt to playing next to legitimately high volume scorers. He never needed to adapt to playing with bad defenders. He never needed to adapt to deal with terrible spacing relative to other teams. The only marginally valid point here is that he does take less away from lead creators… because he is an underwhelming lead creator. What other player gets coddled like this and then praised for that coddling.

Is it any wonder why a player like Chris Bosh and Kevin Love eventually lost the ability to produce consistently and reliably on the offensive end? And by "offensive end" Im not referring to raw PPG. Im talking about being able to produce points, rebounds, and finish plays on a consistent and reliable basis independent of Lebron. Like when he goes to the bench or gets leg cramps.

Any real numbers here, or just more invented narrative.

Wade also had to adapt to Lebron in order to make him feel comfortable:

“Taking a step back to ‘Bron, that was the toughest part for me at the time,” Wade told Michael Lee of The Athletic. “Obviously, before my injuries, I was a bad boy. It was my city, my team. (If) we win the Finals that year (in 2011), I’m arguably Finals MVP. I didn’t need to… but we got two out of the next three championships and I’d still do it all over again.”

“I just felt, sitting back, watching the way he played and playing against him for so long, he wasn’t as comfortable as he needed to be,” Wade continued. “And it was too much of him looking over his shoulder or looking at me. He wasn’t just playing. It wasn’t clear mind. He was always thinking about me or looking for me and I just wanted him to be play and allow him to be great.”

The only reason Wade had to take a step back was because Lebron was uncomfortable and flamed out in the 2011 Finals. Why does everyone have to change, adapt, and reinvent themselves when playing next to Lebron?

Because it cost them a title, and then with a declining Wade they won the next two titles. Such a mystery!

Players don't have to do that when they play next to Kobe.

Based on what.

Or Jordan.

Based on what, he played with the same co-star his entire career and only had specialists past that.

Or Wade.

:rofl:

Bruh. Wade was the reason the Heat struggled so badly to fit. Which two of the trio had to learn to shoot? Which two had to learn to fundamentally change their off-ball game? It was not Wade!

If it were not already obvious that you were incapable of any honest assessment on these players, this would make it undeniable. Wade’s “sacrifice” was recognising Lebron needed to lead the team by virtue of being a better player. Imagine if Pippen complained about Jordan taking away his primacy after returning from retirement.

Or Steph.

Again, Steph’s team collapses without him, so by your own standards, he is actually bad for teammates.

Or KD.

Lol everyone in Golden State worked to accommodate him. In Brooklyn, Harden scaled back his scoring to accommodate him — and oh wow, it seems he has since become a worse player, what did Durant do to him. :angry:

Again, when it comes to Lebron James its high floor, low ceiling(relatively speaking).

Relative to what. Kobe winning three titles next to Shaq? You sincerely think that would be an issue for Lebron? Do you think Lebron would have a hard time winning with Klay and Durant?

The reason his teams have a low ceiling is because his all star teammates have to adjust, change, and reinvent themselves.

Because that is what usually happens when you pair up random scoring stars. Which, again, Jordan never had to do.

Jordan has a lower floor than Lebron James but he has a much higher ceiling due to his diverse skillset, adaptability, and portability as a player. And its that higher ceiling that brings you championships.

Ceiling to what? Jordan had a top ten player next to him for a decade, a top three coach, an elite supporting cast, a worse league, and consistently worse opposition. Yeah, he won more titles — when Lebron had anything close to the same, so did he.

Why do we continue to praise Jordan for having the perfect set-up? Imagine if the Cavaliers had drafted clones of Manu and Al Horford in 2006, and then hired Popovich — oh, and ensured they never encountered any team with an 8 SRS or higher. That is as a base analogy for the situation in which Jordan won his six.
User avatar
prolific passer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,149
And1: 1,459
Joined: Mar 11, 2009
     

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#444 » by prolific passer » Mon Sep 26, 2022 1:51 pm

Jordan had a worse league and opposition?

I don't get it.
User avatar
Jaivl
Head Coach
Posts: 7,106
And1: 6,757
Joined: Jan 28, 2014
Location: A Coruña, Spain
Contact:
   

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#445 » by Jaivl » Mon Sep 26, 2022 2:11 pm

AEnigma wrote:
The reason his teams have a low ceiling is because his all star teammates have to adjust, change, and reinvent themselves.

Because that is what usually happens when you pair up random scoring stars. Which, again, Jordan never had to do.

But he had to.

Woolridge was a +26 pp36 superstar scorer in Denver, and Jordan MARGINALIZED him to less than 23 pp36. Caldwell Jones had to cut his touches by half. Dave Corzine had to abandon a promising 15/9 per36 career and settle into barely breaking double digits per36. Quintin Dailey was a future all-star and Jordan egoistically took his mantle.

Nevermind how BJ Armstrong, Horace Grant and Scottie Pippen exploded without Diva MJ monopolizing their touches.

or something
This place is a cesspool of mindless ineptitude, mental decrepitude, and intellectual lassitude. I refuse to be sucked any deeper into this whirlpool of groupthink sewage. My opinions have been expressed. I'm going to go take a shower.
Mazter
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,699
And1: 854
Joined: Nov 04, 2012
       

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#446 » by Mazter » Mon Sep 26, 2022 2:17 pm

tsherkin wrote:
Stalwart wrote:So yeah. It's like I said. Chris Bosh had to completely 'reinvent' and 'morph' his game to fit in next to Lebron. He didn't have to do it just once but over and over again. Some nights he'd be asked to score and other nights he'd just be setting a bunch of screens. A guy who was capable of carrying a playoff level offense was never given a consistent role in Lebron's offense. He was asked to play in different areas of the floor than where he truly excels at.

He was asked to play a role which made sense based on the other talent on the roster. Why do you make this sound like a profound thing? It was alarmingly obvious that both Lebron and Wade were better-suited to carrying the offense than Bosh, particularly come the playoffs.

I mean, it's not like Harper (a career 19 ppg at the time) joined the Bulls, focussed mainly on D and averaged 7.5 ppg alongside Jordan and Pippen.
Homer38
RealGM
Posts: 12,170
And1: 13,700
Joined: Dec 04, 2013

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#447 » by Homer38 » Mon Sep 26, 2022 2:18 pm

prolific passer wrote:Jordan had a worse league and opposition?

I don't get it.


He would have been less successful in the 1980s with the Celtics, Pistons, Lakers, etc as strong competition or in the late 2010s with the Warriors
User avatar
prolific passer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,149
And1: 1,459
Joined: Mar 11, 2009
     

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#448 » by prolific passer » Mon Sep 26, 2022 2:23 pm

Homer38 wrote:
prolific passer wrote:Jordan had a worse league and opposition?

I don't get it.


He would have been less successful in the 1980s with the Celtics, Pistons, Lakers, etc as strong competition or in the late 2010s with the Warriors

I mean Jordan took a 47 win team to the ecf and was up 2-1 on the eventual champions.
AEnigma
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,130
And1: 5,976
Joined: Jul 24, 2022

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#449 » by AEnigma » Mon Sep 26, 2022 2:26 pm

prolific passer wrote:Jordan had a worse league and opposition?

I don't get it.

League talent has improved over time, and Jordan consistently faced worse teams than Lebron did; where is the confusion?
Homer38
RealGM
Posts: 12,170
And1: 13,700
Joined: Dec 04, 2013

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#450 » by Homer38 » Mon Sep 26, 2022 2:30 pm

prolific passer wrote:
Homer38 wrote:
prolific passer wrote:Jordan had a worse league and opposition?

I don't get it.


He would have been less successful in the 1980s with the Celtics, Pistons, Lakers, etc as strong competition or in the late 2010s with the Warriors

I mean Jordan took a 47 win team to the ecf and was up 2-1 on the eventual champions.


Of course he would have had his moments, but I don't think 6 rings would have been possible in the 1980s for the 1990s Bulls
User avatar
prolific passer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,149
And1: 1,459
Joined: Mar 11, 2009
     

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#451 » by prolific passer » Mon Sep 26, 2022 2:30 pm

AEnigma wrote:
prolific passer wrote:Jordan had a worse league and opposition?

I don't get it.

League talent has improved over time, and Jordan consistently faced worse teams than Lebron did; where is the confusion?

You could make the argument that in the 90s or up until 98 at least that both conferences were closer to equal then any other era in the NBA's history.
AEnigma
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,130
And1: 5,976
Joined: Jul 24, 2022

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#452 » by AEnigma » Mon Sep 26, 2022 2:32 pm

prolific passer wrote:
Homer38 wrote:
prolific passer wrote:Jordan had a worse league and opposition?

I don't get it.


He would have been less successful in the 1980s with the Celtics, Pistons, Lakers, etc as strong competition or in the late 2010s with the Warriors

I mean Jordan took a 47 win team to the ecf and was up 2-1 on the eventual champions.

Lebron went up 2-1 on the 2015 Warriors with a bad back, no Kevin Love, and one game of Kyrie, in what is commonly recognised as one of his worst prime years. He also outscored the 2008 Celtics over the course of their series before taking that 2008 offseason leap.

This is not difficult. Jordan never beat teams as good as the 2008 Celtics, 2007/14 Spurs, or 2015-18 Warriors, and that is before considering league quality and potential SRS inflation of the top teams in the wake of league expansion.
User avatar
prolific passer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,149
And1: 1,459
Joined: Mar 11, 2009
     

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#453 » by prolific passer » Mon Sep 26, 2022 2:32 pm

Homer38 wrote:
prolific passer wrote:
Homer38 wrote:
He would have been less successful in the 1980s with the Celtics, Pistons, Lakers, etc as strong competition or in the late 2010s with the Warriors

I mean Jordan took a 47 win team to the ecf and was up 2-1 on the eventual champions.


Of course he would have had his moments, but I don't think 6 rings would have been possible in the 1980s for the 1990s Bulls


Probably but it's not like Jordan cruised and blew out all those teams during his 6 nba championships.
AEnigma
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,130
And1: 5,976
Joined: Jul 24, 2022

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#454 » by AEnigma » Mon Sep 26, 2022 2:33 pm

prolific passer wrote:
AEnigma wrote:
prolific passer wrote:Jordan had a worse league and opposition?

I don't get it.

League talent has improved over time, and Jordan consistently faced worse teams than Lebron did; where is the confusion?

You could make the argument that in the 90s or up until 98 at least that both conferences were closer to equal then any other era in the NBA's history.

How is that relevant? Jordan beat more decent teams, but he never faced the elite teams Lebron has (outside of the 1986 Celtics I suppose).
User avatar
prolific passer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,149
And1: 1,459
Joined: Mar 11, 2009
     

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#455 » by prolific passer » Mon Sep 26, 2022 2:36 pm

AEnigma wrote:
prolific passer wrote:
AEnigma wrote:League talent has improved over time, and Jordan consistently faced worse teams than Lebron did; where is the confusion?

You could make the argument that in the 90s or up until 98 at least that both conferences were closer to equal then any other era in the NBA's history.

How is that relevant? Jordan beat more decent teams. He also never faced the elite teams Lebron has.

We will never know how Jordan and the teams he faced would do in todays era and vice versa with Lebron and the teams he faced in his era.
It's just all opinionated.
AEnigma
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,130
And1: 5,976
Joined: Jul 24, 2022

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#456 » by AEnigma » Mon Sep 26, 2022 2:37 pm

I did not say we know how he would fare; I said he had weaker opposition.
User avatar
prolific passer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,149
And1: 1,459
Joined: Mar 11, 2009
     

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#457 » by prolific passer » Mon Sep 26, 2022 2:40 pm

AEnigma wrote:I did not say we know how he would fare; I said he had weaker opposition.

But how do you know you he had weaker opposition?
AEnigma
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,130
And1: 5,976
Joined: Jul 24, 2022

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#458 » by AEnigma » Mon Sep 26, 2022 2:42 pm

prolific passer wrote:
AEnigma wrote:I did not say we know how he would fare; I said he had weaker opposition.

But how do you know you he had weaker opposition?

By his opposition performing worse against a worse league. :blank:
User avatar
prolific passer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,149
And1: 1,459
Joined: Mar 11, 2009
     

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#459 » by prolific passer » Mon Sep 26, 2022 2:45 pm

AEnigma wrote:
prolific passer wrote:
AEnigma wrote:I did not say we know how he would fare; I said he had weaker opposition.

But how do you know you he had weaker opposition?

By his opposition performing worse against a worse league. :blank:

How was the league worse?
AEnigma
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,130
And1: 5,976
Joined: Jul 24, 2022

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#460 » by AEnigma » Mon Sep 26, 2022 2:49 pm

prolific passer wrote:
AEnigma wrote:
prolific passer wrote:But how do you know you he had weaker opposition?

By his opposition performing worse against a worse league. :blank:

How was the league worse?

By having less talent and worse schematic (and institutional) approaches to the sport.

These are not tricky concepts.

Return to Player Comparisons