Better Defensively: Dennis Rodman 96/97/98, Draymond 2015-2017. or Giannis 2019-2022

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

Better Defensively:

Dennis Rodman 1996 - 1998
1
4%
Draymond 2015 - 2017
17
71%
Giannis 2019 - 2021
6
25%
 
Total votes: 24

70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,889
And1: 25,220
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: Better Defensively: Dennis Rodman 96/97/98, Draymond 2015-2017. or Giannis 2019-2022 

Post#21 » by 70sFan » Thu Oct 6, 2022 6:01 pm

MyUniBroDavis wrote:
70sFan wrote:
MyUniBroDavis wrote:
I’d def say it’s more knowing what to do than his hands going so fast they create afterimages or anything, it’s definately more anticipation and awareness than reflexes

I mean at the end of the day yeah he has solid measurements for a forward but it’s nothing astonishing,
he’s relatively quick and holds his ground really well for his size

He’s not like astonishingly fast for his size or anything he’s just at the right place at the right time, he’s closer to above average than anything special as an athlete if we’re talking his physical attributes

What makes it different from post-2004 Duncan though? Duncan was bigger, but he also was slower after injuries.


I mean, I think a typical sized power forward/center playing the power forward/center spot is usually better than a typical sized small forward playing the power forward/center spot lol, bigger is kinda the key thing here lol

So Green has to be smarter than Duncan because he's... smaller? I don't think that's the right reasoning.
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,032
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: Better Defensively: Dennis Rodman 96/97/98, Draymond 2015-2017. or Giannis 2019-2022 

Post#22 » by MyUniBroDavis » Thu Oct 6, 2022 6:34 pm

70sFan wrote:
MyUniBroDavis wrote:
70sFan wrote:What makes it different from post-2004 Duncan though? Duncan was bigger, but he also was slower after injuries.


I mean, I think a typical sized power forward/center playing the power forward/center spot is usually better than a typical sized small forward playing the power forward/center spot lol, bigger is kinda the key thing here lol

So Green has to be smarter than Duncan because he's... smaller? I don't think that's the right reasoning.



I mean again, I don’t think us pulling up compilations from YouTube would be particularly productive either

Like how else would one make an argument for an intangible quality then the fact that he’s pretty clearly worse overall outside of that while having a comparable level of impact?

Like it’s weird because people be hyping Draymond up all the time, so I’m suprised this seems to be a controversial take lol but like we got a comparison form Draymond having a low role on offense being comparable to transforming him from like having a good build for a fs into one of the greatest defensive physical specimens in nba history

It’s not as if the fact that he’s a defensive specialist meant he just stood in the corner on offense either, he had a lot of responsibility on that end even if he was a Curry merchant and was like second in the team in touches on offense m, first in front court touches, and fourth in distance. It’s not as if he stood in the corner lmao

Like he expended energy on the offensive end too lol

Like idk if I was looking at a guy like giannis, and someone was like

“Yo so like we’re gonna make him go from one of the greatest physical specimens in nba history to like, above average ish but we’re gonna put him in the corner on offense so it’ll probably even out” that would be a ridiculous take lol
mdonnelly1989
Head Coach
Posts: 6,462
And1: 1,808
Joined: Aug 11, 2014
       

Re: Better Defensively: Dennis Rodman 96/97/98, Draymond 2015-2017. or Giannis 2019-2022 

Post#23 » by mdonnelly1989 » Thu Oct 6, 2022 6:47 pm

homecourtloss wrote:By 1998, not sure Rodman was all that impactful on defense and was not all that impressive in 1997, either. I think Detroit Rodman would be a better comparative choice here.

Draymond in a tier by himself here.


I chose these years because supposedly this is when he became a PF as in Detroit he was a SF?


And since both Dray and Giannis are considered PFs thats why I chose those years.
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,889
And1: 25,220
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: Better Defensively: Dennis Rodman 96/97/98, Draymond 2015-2017. or Giannis 2019-2022 

Post#24 » by 70sFan » Thu Oct 6, 2022 6:50 pm

MyUniBroDavis wrote:
70sFan wrote:
MyUniBroDavis wrote:
I mean, I think a typical sized power forward/center playing the power forward/center spot is usually better than a typical sized small forward playing the power forward/center spot lol, bigger is kinda the key thing here lol

So Green has to be smarter than Duncan because he's... smaller? I don't think that's the right reasoning.



I mean again, I don’t think us pulling up compilations from YouTube would be particularly productive either

Like how else would one make an argument for an intangible quality then the fact that he’s pretty clearly worse overall outside of that while having a comparable level of impact?

Like it’s weird because people be hyping Draymond up all the time, so I’m suprised this seems to be a controversial take lol but like we got a comparison form Draymond having a low role on offense being comparable to transforming him from like having a good build for a fs into one of the greatest defensive physical specimens in nba history

It’s not as if the fact that he’s a defensive specialist meant he just stood in the corner on offense either, he had a lot of responsibility on that end even if he was a Curry merchant and was like second in the team in touches on offense m, first in front court touches, and fourth in distance. It’s not as if he stood in the corner lmao

Like he expended energy on the offensive end too lol

Like idk if I was looking at a guy like giannis, and someone was like

“Yo so like we’re gonna make him go from one of the greatest physical specimens in nba history to like, above average ish but we’re gonna put him in the corner on offense so it’ll probably even out” that would be a ridiculous take lol

As I said, you underestimate Draymond's athleticism relative to some great defenders. I don't have anything against having Green in the conversation for the smartest defender ever, I just don't agree with the certainity you talk about it. You even said that you don't know anything about Bobby Jones for example.

If you like relatively unathletic choices, then I'm not sure he's a better choice than Dave DeBusschere for example either.
User avatar
Jaivl
Head Coach
Posts: 7,044
And1: 6,707
Joined: Jan 28, 2014
Location: A Coruña, Spain
Contact:
   

Re: Better Defensively: Dennis Rodman 96/97/98, Draymond 2015-2017. or Giannis 2019-2022 

Post#25 » by Jaivl » Thu Oct 6, 2022 7:16 pm

MyUniBroDavis wrote:I just can’t believe we’re really comparing having a lesser load on offense to going from a guy whose physical attributes were listed as a con coming out of college to a guy whose physical attributes are enough to warrant a lottery pick pick alone on defense

???

Your point was that KG-sized Green would be, by leaps and bounds, the GOAT defender.

Counterpoint is that, when shouldering a similar offensive load to Green (probably still bigger, but eh), post-prime KG clearly has (has, as in "actually happened") the most impressive defensive signals avaliable (on the databall era), being every big-sample version of RAPM, on/off, absolute defenses managed, whatever... so Green improving to the point of being clearly the GOAT and hence having the GOAT signals is... not really an advantage? As it kinda is KG's baseline. Unless you think he would be tier(s) ahead.

Moreso considering your take is certainly defensible, but also certainly disagreeable. Don't think it's a reach to claim KG is *the* best positioned defender ever as it is, with his "real" brain (lol), and ultimately the things preventing him having the GOAT defensive career are 1) era 2) offensive load 3) strength/mass to climb that tier/half-tier that separates him from the GOAT rim protectors, things KG-sized Dray also would not have in his favour.
This place is a cesspool of mindless ineptitude, mental decrepitude, and intellectual lassitude. I refuse to be sucked any deeper into this whirlpool of groupthink sewage. My opinions have been expressed. I'm going to go take a shower.
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,032
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: Better Defensively: Dennis Rodman 96/97/98, Draymond 2015-2017. or Giannis 2019-2022 

Post#26 » by MyUniBroDavis » Fri Oct 7, 2022 12:25 am

Jaivl wrote:
MyUniBroDavis wrote:I just can’t believe we’re really comparing having a lesser load on offense to going from a guy whose physical attributes were listed as a con coming out of college to a guy whose physical attributes are enough to warrant a lottery pick pick alone on defense

???

Your point was that KG-sized Green would be, by leaps and bounds, the GOAT defender.

Counterpoint is that, when shouldering a similar offensive load to Green (probably still bigger, but eh), post-prime KG clearly has (has, as in "actually happened") the most impressive defensive signals avaliable (on the databall era), being every big-sample version of RAPM, on/off, absolute defenses managed, whatever... so Green improving to the point of being clearly the GOAT and hence having the GOAT signals is... not really an advantage? As it kinda is KG's baseline. Unless you think he would be tier(s) ahead.

Moreso considering your take is certainly defensible, but also certainly disagreeable. Don't think it's a reach to claim KG is *the* best positioned defender ever as it is, with his "real" brain (lol), and ultimately the things preventing him having the GOAT defensive career are 1) era 2) offensive load 3) strength/mass to climb that tier/half-tier that separates him from the GOAT rim protectors, things KG-sized Dray also would not have in his favour.


In an absolute sense, I agree Celtics KG is probably the best defensive multi year stretch in nba history

2015-2017 draymond’s up there as well though in my opinion, as far as seperation from his peers go his PI DRAPM isn’t quite on the leve of Celtics KG but I think It’s probably the second best 3 year stretch over Duncan’s , altho PIRAPM is just multiyear from his Dropbox with less weight for earlier years right? I’d be curious to see how drays 2017 year stacks up vs KGs in 3 year prior multiyear RAPM, whereas in NPI RAPM he’s just slightly below Boston KG .

His playoff DRAPM is slightly higher than KGs (for a data set up to 1998-2019 to be fair) although I’d assume Boston KGs specifically would probably be higher then 2015-2019 dray , although I’d also be curious to see how their peers rank in that stretch, since it looks like most of the higher values were 2000s to early 2010s, checking it a bit 9 of the top 10 guys played almost all their playoff minutes pre 2015, although obv since it’s 1999-2019 it’s not definitive


I think garnett, and def Boston garnett, is a better defender than dray, sure, and I’m not against the argument that in an absolute sense he’s the best defender either.

At the same time, I don’t think it would be that much of a shocker if drays prime defensive years in the playoffs had similar outlier impact to Garnett’s right? At least relative to his peers

LEBRONs a bit weird for the playoffs for me, altho I guess that’s the nature of bunching multiple years together, but drays dominance there is notable there example, esp vs how it rates his regular season and given that it tends to over value high shot blocking types

Like, my overall point is, in the databall era in terms of overall seasons, as far as I know garnetts Boston years do stand alone, drays probably somewhere in that 2-5 range throughout his prime in terms of consistency and dominance over his peers, arguably 2nd.

If we’re talking about playoffs, which is where most of his defensive value shines, it’s hard to get any data on that other than he ranks very slightly above garnett in that regard, with there being at least a little bit of evidence that doing so might be a good deal harder than it was, with the obvious caveat that includes more non peak defensive kg years than dray years (like 66% vs 88% are their good defensive peak years)

Like, I think Garnett’s better, solidly, but esp in the playoffs I think it’s comparable sure.

If you give draymond Garnett’s body I do think that basically instantly becomes multiple tiers above anything we’ve ever seen on defense in terms of raw ability, that includes Boston garnett, and in an absolute sense Russell as well

Obviously it’s all hypothetical, but Idk man like dray might have a top 10 defensive peak ever with the physical tools you’d expect out of a late first round pick, it’s like one of those “give curry giannis’s body where does he rank” comparisons to me
LukaTheGOAT
Analyst
Posts: 3,263
And1: 2,972
Joined: Dec 25, 2019
 

Re: Better Defensively: Dennis Rodman 96/97/98, Draymond 2015-2017. or Giannis 2019-2022 

Post#27 » by LukaTheGOAT » Fri Oct 7, 2022 3:30 am

MyUniBroDavis wrote:
Jaivl wrote:
MyUniBroDavis wrote:I just can’t believe we’re really comparing having a lesser load on offense to going from a guy whose physical attributes were listed as a con coming out of college to a guy whose physical attributes are enough to warrant a lottery pick pick alone on defense

???

Your point was that KG-sized Green would be, by leaps and bounds, the GOAT defender.

Counterpoint is that, when shouldering a similar offensive load to Green (probably still bigger, but eh), post-prime KG clearly has (has, as in "actually happened") the most impressive defensive signals avaliable (on the databall era), being every big-sample version of RAPM, on/off, absolute defenses managed, whatever... so Green improving to the point of being clearly the GOAT and hence having the GOAT signals is... not really an advantage? As it kinda is KG's baseline. Unless you think he would be tier(s) ahead.

Moreso considering your take is certainly defensible, but also certainly disagreeable. Don't think it's a reach to claim KG is *the* best positioned defender ever as it is, with his "real" brain (lol), and ultimately the things preventing him having the GOAT defensive career are 1) era 2) offensive load 3) strength/mass to climb that tier/half-tier that separates him from the GOAT rim protectors, things KG-sized Dray also would not have in his favour.


In an absolute sense, I agree Celtics KG is probably the best defensive multi year stretch in nba history

2015-2017 draymond’s up there as well though in my opinion, as far as seperation from his peers go his PI DRAPM isn’t quite on the leve of Celtics KG but I think It’s probably the second best 3 year stretch over Duncan’s , altho PIRAPM is just multiyear from his Dropbox with less weight for earlier years right? I’d be curious to see how drays 2017 year stacks up vs KGs in 3 year prior multiyear RAPM, whereas in NPI RAPM he’s just slightly below Boston KG .

His playoff DRAPM is slightly higher than KGs (for a data set up to 1998-2019 to be fair) although I’d assume Boston KGs specifically would probably be higher then 2015-2019 dray , although I’d also be curious to see how their peers rank in that stretch, since it looks like most of the higher values were 2000s to early 2010s, checking it a bit 9 of the top 10 guys played almost all their playoff minutes pre 2015, although obv since it’s 1999-2019 it’s not definitive


I think garnett, and def Boston garnett, is a better defender than dray, sure, and I’m not against the argument that in an absolute sense he’s the best defender either.

At the same time, I don’t think it would be that much of a shocker if drays prime defensive years in the playoffs had similar outlier impact to Garnett’s right? At least relative to his peers

LEBRONs a bit weird for the playoffs for me, altho I guess that’s the nature of bunching multiple years together, but drays dominance there is notable there example, esp vs how it rates his regular season and given that it tends to over value high shot blocking types

Like, my overall point is, in the databall era in terms of overall seasons, as far as I know garnetts Boston years do stand alone, drays probably somewhere in that 2-5 range throughout his prime in terms of consistency and dominance over his peers, arguably 2nd.

If we’re talking about playoffs, which is where most of his defensive value shines, it’s hard to get any data on that other than he ranks very slightly above garnett in that regard, with there being at least a little bit of evidence that doing so might be a good deal harder than it was, with the obvious caveat that includes more non peak defensive kg years than dray years (like 66% vs 88% are their good defensive peak years)

Like, I think Garnett’s better, solidly, but esp in the playoffs I think it’s comparable sure.

If you give draymond Garnett’s body I do think that basically instantly becomes multiple tiers above anything we’ve ever seen on defense in terms of raw ability, that includes Boston garnett, and in an absolute sense Russell as well

Obviously it’s all hypothetical, but Idk man like dray might have a top 10 defensive peak ever with the physical tools you’d expect out of a late first round pick, it’s like one of those “give curry giannis’s body where does he rank” comparisons to me


To each their own. I guess, the thinking is that Dray with KG Physical Tools is still less athletic, arguably still isn't as smart/well-positioned as a defender. I think if Dray got proportionally stronger with his new size, he might be a better post defender due to a lower center of gravity. But more than anything, I just think the era is the least advantageous for the true GOAT value defender. It is just too easy to run actions away from defensive center pieces, which is taking value away from them.
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,032
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: Better Defensively: Dennis Rodman 96/97/98, Draymond 2015-2017. or Giannis 2019-2022 

Post#28 » by MyUniBroDavis » Fri Oct 7, 2022 3:37 am

LukaTheGOAT wrote:
MyUniBroDavis wrote:
Jaivl wrote:???

Your point was that KG-sized Green would be, by leaps and bounds, the GOAT defender.

Counterpoint is that, when shouldering a similar offensive load to Green (probably still bigger, but eh), post-prime KG clearly has (has, as in "actually happened") the most impressive defensive signals avaliable (on the databall era), being every big-sample version of RAPM, on/off, absolute defenses managed, whatever... so Green improving to the point of being clearly the GOAT and hence having the GOAT signals is... not really an advantage? As it kinda is KG's baseline. Unless you think he would be tier(s) ahead.

Moreso considering your take is certainly defensible, but also certainly disagreeable. Don't think it's a reach to claim KG is *the* best positioned defender ever as it is, with his "real" brain (lol), and ultimately the things preventing him having the GOAT defensive career are 1) era 2) offensive load 3) strength/mass to climb that tier/half-tier that separates him from the GOAT rim protectors, things KG-sized Dray also would not have in his favour.


In an absolute sense, I agree Celtics KG is probably the best defensive multi year stretch in nba history

2015-2017 draymond’s up there as well though in my opinion, as far as seperation from his peers go his PI DRAPM isn’t quite on the leve of Celtics KG but I think It’s probably the second best 3 year stretch over Duncan’s , altho PIRAPM is just multiyear from his Dropbox with less weight for earlier years right? I’d be curious to see how drays 2017 year stacks up vs KGs in 3 year prior multiyear RAPM, whereas in NPI RAPM he’s just slightly below Boston KG .

His playoff DRAPM is slightly higher than KGs (for a data set up to 1998-2019 to be fair) although I’d assume Boston KGs specifically would probably be higher then 2015-2019 dray , although I’d also be curious to see how their peers rank in that stretch, since it looks like most of the higher values were 2000s to early 2010s, checking it a bit 9 of the top 10 guys played almost all their playoff minutes pre 2015, although obv since it’s 1999-2019 it’s not definitive


I think garnett, and def Boston garnett, is a better defender than dray, sure, and I’m not against the argument that in an absolute sense he’s the best defender either.

At the same time, I don’t think it would be that much of a shocker if drays prime defensive years in the playoffs had similar outlier impact to Garnett’s right? At least relative to his peers

LEBRONs a bit weird for the playoffs for me, altho I guess that’s the nature of bunching multiple years together, but drays dominance there is notable there example, esp vs how it rates his regular season and given that it tends to over value high shot blocking types

Like, my overall point is, in the databall era in terms of overall seasons, as far as I know garnetts Boston years do stand alone, drays probably somewhere in that 2-5 range throughout his prime in terms of consistency and dominance over his peers, arguably 2nd.

If we’re talking about playoffs, which is where most of his defensive value shines, it’s hard to get any data on that other than he ranks very slightly above garnett in that regard, with there being at least a little bit of evidence that doing so might be a good deal harder than it was, with the obvious caveat that includes more non peak defensive kg years than dray years (like 66% vs 88% are their good defensive peak years)

Like, I think Garnett’s better, solidly, but esp in the playoffs I think it’s comparable sure.

If you give draymond Garnett’s body I do think that basically instantly becomes multiple tiers above anything we’ve ever seen on defense in terms of raw ability, that includes Boston garnett, and in an absolute sense Russell as well

Obviously it’s all hypothetical, but Idk man like dray might have a top 10 defensive peak ever with the physical tools you’d expect out of a late first round pick, it’s like one of those “give curry giannis’s body where does he rank” comparisons to me


To each their own. I guess, the thinking is that Dray with KG Physical Tools is still less athletic, arguably still isn't as smart/well-positioned as a defender. I think if Dray got proportionally stronger with his new size, he might be a better post defender due to a lower center of gravity. But more than anything, I just think the era is the least advantageous for the true GOAT value defender. It is just too easy to run actions away from defensive center pieces, which is taking value away from them.


how would dray in KG's body be less athletic he literally has that body lol
LukaTheGOAT
Analyst
Posts: 3,263
And1: 2,972
Joined: Dec 25, 2019
 

Re: Better Defensively: Dennis Rodman 96/97/98, Draymond 2015-2017. or Giannis 2019-2022 

Post#29 » by LukaTheGOAT » Fri Oct 7, 2022 3:43 am

MyUniBroDavis wrote:
LukaTheGOAT wrote:
MyUniBroDavis wrote:
In an absolute sense, I agree Celtics KG is probably the best defensive multi year stretch in nba history

2015-2017 draymond’s up there as well though in my opinion, as far as seperation from his peers go his PI DRAPM isn’t quite on the leve of Celtics KG but I think It’s probably the second best 3 year stretch over Duncan’s , altho PIRAPM is just multiyear from his Dropbox with less weight for earlier years right? I’d be curious to see how drays 2017 year stacks up vs KGs in 3 year prior multiyear RAPM, whereas in NPI RAPM he’s just slightly below Boston KG .

His playoff DRAPM is slightly higher than KGs (for a data set up to 1998-2019 to be fair) although I’d assume Boston KGs specifically would probably be higher then 2015-2019 dray , although I’d also be curious to see how their peers rank in that stretch, since it looks like most of the higher values were 2000s to early 2010s, checking it a bit 9 of the top 10 guys played almost all their playoff minutes pre 2015, although obv since it’s 1999-2019 it’s not definitive


I think garnett, and def Boston garnett, is a better defender than dray, sure, and I’m not against the argument that in an absolute sense he’s the best defender either.

At the same time, I don’t think it would be that much of a shocker if drays prime defensive years in the playoffs had similar outlier impact to Garnett’s right? At least relative to his peers

LEBRONs a bit weird for the playoffs for me, altho I guess that’s the nature of bunching multiple years together, but drays dominance there is notable there example, esp vs how it rates his regular season and given that it tends to over value high shot blocking types

Like, my overall point is, in the databall era in terms of overall seasons, as far as I know garnetts Boston years do stand alone, drays probably somewhere in that 2-5 range throughout his prime in terms of consistency and dominance over his peers, arguably 2nd.

If we’re talking about playoffs, which is where most of his defensive value shines, it’s hard to get any data on that other than he ranks very slightly above garnett in that regard, with there being at least a little bit of evidence that doing so might be a good deal harder than it was, with the obvious caveat that includes more non peak defensive kg years than dray years (like 66% vs 88% are their good defensive peak years)

Like, I think Garnett’s better, solidly, but esp in the playoffs I think it’s comparable sure.

If you give draymond Garnett’s body I do think that basically instantly becomes multiple tiers above anything we’ve ever seen on defense in terms of raw ability, that includes Boston garnett, and in an absolute sense Russell as well

Obviously it’s all hypothetical, but Idk man like dray might have a top 10 defensive peak ever with the physical tools you’d expect out of a late first round pick, it’s like one of those “give curry giannis’s body where does he rank” comparisons to me


To each their own. I guess, the thinking is that Dray with KG Physical Tools is still less athletic, arguably still isn't as smart/well-positioned as a defender. I think if Dray got proportionally stronger with his new size, he might be a better post defender due to a lower center of gravity. But more than anything, I just think the era is the least advantageous for the true GOAT value defender. It is just too easy to run actions away from defensive center pieces, which is taking value away from them.


how would dray in KG's body be less athletic he literally has that body lol


I assumed you were just talking about Dray's size and length is added onto, not that he becomes the same exact athlete as KG.
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,032
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: Better Defensively: Dennis Rodman 96/97/98, Draymond 2015-2017. or Giannis 2019-2022 

Post#30 » by MyUniBroDavis » Fri Oct 7, 2022 4:02 am

LukaTheGOAT wrote:
MyUniBroDavis wrote:
LukaTheGOAT wrote:
To each their own. I guess, the thinking is that Dray with KG Physical Tools is still less athletic, arguably still isn't as smart/well-positioned as a defender. I think if Dray got proportionally stronger with his new size, he might be a better post defender due to a lower center of gravity. But more than anything, I just think the era is the least advantageous for the true GOAT value defender. It is just too easy to run actions away from defensive center pieces, which is taking value away from them.


how would dray in KG's body be less athletic he literally has that body lol


I assumed you were just talking about Dray's size and length is added onto, not that he becomes the same exact athlete as KG.


Nah we going Frankenstein

Return to Player Comparisons