BoatsNZones wrote:DonaldSanders wrote:W_HAMILTON wrote:
He was only favored to win 53% to 47% at the time, so, why the outrage? I mean, if her hand sucked so bad that the only explanation for her winning was that she cheated, and yet it was basically a toss-up as to which hand would win......
I played poker for a living for a few years, you play against your opponent's range of hands, you don't know what they actually have. She's way behind his pushing range here, which includes both his range of good hands and bluffs. A lot of his bluffing range will include queens, kings, or aces especially on a 10 high board. You can't assume your opponent is holding low suited connectors, that makes up a small portion of his potential range.
But... there's no reason to assume she is cheating. Just looks like she got caught with her hand in the cookie jar and made a bad call.
There's a smoking gun revelation discovered tonight. Went from "oddest hand ever but nothing to conclude cheating" to a high probability of cheating imo.
Care to share?