ImageImageImage

AJ Lawson Thread

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,073
And1: 22,604
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: AJ Lawson Thread 

Post#41 » by Klomp » Thu Oct 20, 2022 11:40 pm

winforlose wrote:
BlacJacMac wrote:
wolves_89 wrote:
I'm curious to see if Lawson gets re-signed to a two-way deal or if the team goes in a different direction. At the moment I believe the Wolves are the only team left with an open two-way spot.


Read on Twitter


What the hell good does an open 2 way spot do? You can always release the player without impact on the cap. The player not only can play for Iowa (immediate improvement to G league team,) but also for the main roster (emergency depth.) Finally, you get to use the guy in practice and get him used to your system more quickly so he can contribute.

The first Iowa game isn't until Nov. 5, there's time.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,100
And1: 5,721
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: AJ Lawson Thread 

Post#42 » by winforlose » Fri Oct 21, 2022 1:12 am

Klomp wrote:
winforlose wrote:
BlacJacMac wrote:
Read on Twitter


What the hell good does an open 2 way spot do? You can always release the player without impact on the cap. The player not only can play for Iowa (immediate improvement to G league team,) but also for the main roster (emergency depth.) Finally, you get to use the guy in practice and get him used to your system more quickly so he can contribute.

The first Iowa game isn't until Nov. 5, there's time.


True, but the Timberwolves are practicing now, and Iowa will probably start practicing soon.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,353
And1: 19,385
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: AJ Lawson Thread 

Post#43 » by shrink » Fri Oct 21, 2022 3:49 am

winforlose wrote:What the hell good does an open 2 way spot do? You can always release the player without impact on the cap. The player not only can play for Iowa (immediate improvement to G league team,) but also for the main roster (emergency depth.) Finally, you get to use the guy in practice and get him used to your system more quickly so he can contribute.


Perhaps it’s incentive? We have rewarded players like Naz and Minott for strong summer league play by having the ability to give them a contract. They rewarded Garza for a strong pre-season by upping his status to a two-way deal. Maybe having an open two-way will give incentive to all the players on the Iowa Wolves?

Also, unlike most years, we don’t need production from our two-way players. We have plenty of decent bench players to fill all our minutes.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,100
And1: 5,721
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: AJ Lawson Thread 

Post#44 » by winforlose » Fri Oct 21, 2022 4:11 am

shrink wrote:
winforlose wrote:What the hell good does an open 2 way spot do? You can always release the player without impact on the cap. The player not only can play for Iowa (immediate improvement to G league team,) but also for the main roster (emergency depth.) Finally, you get to use the guy in practice and get him used to your system more quickly so he can contribute.


Perhaps it’s incentive? We have rewarded players like Naz and Minott for strong summer league play by having the ability to give them a contract. They rewarded Garza for a strong pre-season by upping his status to a two-way deal. Maybe having an open two-way will give incentive to all the players on the Iowa Wolves?

Also, unlike most years, we don’t need production from our two-way players. We have plenty of decent bench players to fill all our minutes.


True, but not having someone new in there is missing the chance to discover the next Garza or Reid or Minott. Without picks we need to develop young talent.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,666
And1: 5,173
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: AJ Lawson Thread 

Post#45 » by minimus » Fri Oct 21, 2022 12:22 pm

shrink wrote:Perhaps it’s incentive? We have rewarded players like Naz and Minott for strong summer league play by having the ability to give them a contract. They rewarded Garza for a strong pre-season by upping his status to a two-way deal. Maybe having an open two-way will give incentive to all the players on the Iowa Wolves?

Also, unlike most years, we don’t need production from our two-way players. We have plenty of decent bench players to fill all our minutes.


I never thought about it, but you are right, at some point we can gamble on players who for instance are recovering from injuries, such as PJ Dozier.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,100
And1: 5,721
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: AJ Lawson Thread 

Post#46 » by winforlose » Fri Oct 21, 2022 12:25 pm

minimus wrote:
shrink wrote:Perhaps it’s incentive? We have rewarded players like Naz and Minott for strong summer league play by having the ability to give them a contract. They rewarded Garza for a strong pre-season by upping his status to a two-way deal. Maybe having an open two-way will give incentive to all the players on the Iowa Wolves?

Also, unlike most years, we don’t need production from our two-way players. We have plenty of decent bench players to fill all our minutes.


I never thought about it, but you are right, at some point we can gamble on players who for instance are recovering from injuries, such as PJ Dozier.


1. Like PJ yes, actually PJ no. PJ has too many years of service to qualify.

2. My understanding is that two way contracts don’t impact the salary cap at all. We could sign someone today, try them out for a week, and drop them. It is real money out of ownerships pockets, but even that isn’t that high. The reason people don’t do this is credibility. If we try to poach another teams G league talent, we want them to know we are serious about them. But, so many guys were cut recently there must be someone we want a closer look at (without a promise of it working out.)
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,353
And1: 19,385
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: AJ Lawson Thread 

Post#47 » by shrink » Fri Oct 21, 2022 2:08 pm

I see most of the Iowa roster as the “try out” guys.

EDIT: in fact, I can see it as a selling point to some of these guys that were roster cuts. If I was the GM of the Iowa Wolves, I’d approach these players and say

“Sorry that you didn’t make your last team. We see you as a potential NBA talent, and we think joining the Iowa Wolves is the best team to help your career and your dream of making the NBA. As you know, we have an additional two-way slot open, unlike most teams, so there is an immediate pathway back to the NBA if you play well. We also have a history of developing players in the G-League, and they have become important parts of the Timberwolves (Nowell, McLaughlin, Naz, etc). Finally, we are likely a playoff team where you’d have a chance to showcase your talent on a bigger stage. And next year, several vet players are expiring, so there is opportunity with us down the road. I think your best choice is to sign with Iowa over other G-League teams to help your career.”
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,100
And1: 5,721
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: AJ Lawson Thread 

Post#48 » by winforlose » Fri Oct 21, 2022 3:26 pm

shrink wrote:I see most of the Iowa roster as the “try out” guys.

EDIT: in fact, I can see it as a selling point to some of these guys that were roster cuts. If I was the GM of the Iowa Wolves, I’d approach these players and say

“Sorry that you didn’t make your last team. We see you as a potential NBA talent, and we think joining the Iowa Wolves is the best team to help your career and your dream of making the NBA. As you know, we have an additional two-way slot open, unlike most teams, so there is an immediate pathway back to the NBA if you play well. We also have a history of developing players in the G-League, and they have become important parts of the Timberwolves (Nowell, McLaughlin, Naz, etc). Finally, we are likely a playoff team where you’d have a chance to showcase your talent on a bigger stage. And next year, several vet players are expiring, so there is opportunity with us down the road. I think your best choice is to sign with Iowa over other G-League teams to help your career.”


Are there still G league free agents at this point? Haven’t they been getting scooped up and signed these past few weeks. I mean in theory we could tell some random dude to sign with Iowa on the hope of getting a two way. On the other hand we could poach a legit talent from another G league team and give him a two way. Now both rosters are better and Iowa weakens an opponent. Just a thought.
BlacJacMac
Analyst
Posts: 3,704
And1: 3,398
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: AJ Lawson Thread 

Post#49 » by BlacJacMac » Fri Oct 21, 2022 4:09 pm

winforlose wrote:
shrink wrote:I see most of the Iowa roster as the “try out” guys.

EDIT: in fact, I can see it as a selling point to some of these guys that were roster cuts. If I was the GM of the Iowa Wolves, I’d approach these players and say

“Sorry that you didn’t make your last team. We see you as a potential NBA talent, and we think joining the Iowa Wolves is the best team to help your career and your dream of making the NBA. As you know, we have an additional two-way slot open, unlike most teams, so there is an immediate pathway back to the NBA if you play well. We also have a history of developing players in the G-League, and they have become important parts of the Timberwolves (Nowell, McLaughlin, Naz, etc). Finally, we are likely a playoff team where you’d have a chance to showcase your talent on a bigger stage. And next year, several vet players are expiring, so there is opportunity with us down the road. I think your best choice is to sign with Iowa over other G-League teams to help your career.”


Are there still G league free agents at this point? Haven’t they been getting scooped up and signed these past few weeks. I mean in theory we could tell some random dude to sign with Iowa on the hope of getting a two way. On the other hand we could poach a legit talent from another G league team and give him a two way. Now both rosters are better and Iowa weakens an opponent. Just a thought.


That's my thinking.

If there isn't a guy that you are sure you want on a 2-way, it's OK to hang onto it and see if someone around the league emerges.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,100
And1: 5,721
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: AJ Lawson Thread 

Post#50 » by winforlose » Sat Nov 5, 2022 10:36 pm

Lawson is once again signed with the college park Skyhawks as of November 3rd.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,666
And1: 5,173
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: AJ Lawson Thread 

Post#51 » by minimus » Tue Nov 8, 2022 7:12 am

I know that Forbes looked good in preseason, but I wish we kept AJ Lawson not Forbes. Our atrocious shooting is not Forbes fault, but AJ looked better as scorer and defender
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,100
And1: 5,721
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: AJ Lawson Thread 

Post#52 » by winforlose » Tue Nov 8, 2022 7:24 am

minimus wrote:I know that Forbes looked good in preseason, but I wish we kept AJ Lawson not Forbes. Our atrocious shooting is not Forbes fault, but AJ looked better as scorer and defender


Lawson is a variable. He has very little track record, and very little experience at this level. Forbes is much closer to a constant. He has a clear track record, well defined skill set, and he experience with multiple schemes at the NBA level.

Our terrible shooting is a function of not maximizing our shooters. For example, Ant was awesome in the catch and shoot last year. This year he mostly shoots pull 3s. Might not make much difference, but if it increases his shooting by even 3% that is the difference between average and well above average. One of many examples. That and the conditioning of being back in the NBA pace. Gotta get your legs under you before you shoot the long ball.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,666
And1: 5,173
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: AJ Lawson Thread 

Post#53 » by minimus » Tue Nov 8, 2022 7:57 am

winforlose wrote:
minimus wrote:I know that Forbes looked good in preseason, but I wish we kept AJ Lawson not Forbes. Our atrocious shooting is not Forbes fault, but AJ looked better as scorer and defender


Lawson is a variable. He has very little track record, and very little experience at this level. Forbes is much closer to a constant. He has a clear track record, well defined skill set, and he experience with multiple schemes at the NBA level.

Our terrible shooting is a function of not maximizing our shooters. For example, Ant was awesome in the catch and shoot last year. This year he mostly shoots pull 3s. Might not make much difference, but if it increases his shooting by even 3% that is the difference between average and well above average. One of many examples. That and the conditioning of being back in the NBA pace. Gotta get your legs under you before you shoot the long ball.


Thats correct. But as I said Forbes is one trick pony. When his shot is not falling he is a minus player. IMO AJ Lawson has potential to develop into special player. But I agree that he would not resolve our shooting issues.
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,368
And1: 30,690
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: AJ Lawson Thread 

Post#54 » by Domejandro » Tue Nov 15, 2022 2:16 am

Read on Twitter
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,073
And1: 22,604
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: AJ Lawson Thread 

Post#55 » by Klomp » Tue Nov 15, 2022 2:38 am

Nice reunion!
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,073
And1: 22,604
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: AJ Lawson Thread 

Post#56 » by Klomp » Tue Nov 15, 2022 3:03 am

Read on Twitter
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
theGreatRC
RealGM
Posts: 18,530
And1: 4,992
Joined: Oct 12, 2006
Location: California
 

Re: AJ Lawson Thread 

Post#57 » by theGreatRC » Tue Nov 15, 2022 3:12 am

Need guys like him to be something and pan out. Doesn't have to be him specifically, but if we can get one of Garza, Lawson, Wendell or Minott to pan out, it lessens the blow of not having a pick next year if we can have young guys on the roster with potential.

I actually thought he was gonna make the final roster, glad to see him back after a month.
Dysfunctional Wolves fan
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,666
And1: 5,173
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: AJ Lawson Thread 

Post#58 » by minimus » Tue Nov 15, 2022 6:04 am

Thank you Connelly!
Calinks
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 50,264
And1: 17,184
Joined: Mar 29, 2006
   

Re: AJ Lawson Thread 

Post#59 » by Calinks » Tue Nov 15, 2022 6:20 am

We need all the guard help we can get right now.
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,100
And1: 5,721
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: AJ Lawson Thread 

Post#60 » by winforlose » Tue Nov 15, 2022 7:04 am

Calinks wrote:We need all the guard help we can get right now.


Or we need Ant to wake up and remember who he is. This guy who has been playing in his jersey just doesn’t seem like Ant.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves