2023 NBA Draft

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Marcus, Duke4life831

User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,336
And1: 17,799
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#901 » by babyjax13 » Wed Nov 30, 2022 6:59 am

clyde21 wrote:no way Ivey would go top 5 in this class, or even be in contention. if Ricky Council isn't in contention I don't know why Ivey would be, and C4 is wing sized.

I don't think Council is in the same ballpark as a prospect, but maybe I need to watch more. I had Ivey bumping between the best and third best prospect last year, I'd be surprised if he doesn't have some all-star seasons and I think there is some outlier potential for something more. That's about where I am on George/Black/Amen/Whitmore/Smith. I'm not saying I'd take him over those four guys (probably not George or Black), but I think he'd be in the convo.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
DaddyCool19
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,375
And1: 6,662
Joined: Jul 28, 2013

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#902 » by DaddyCool19 » Wed Nov 30, 2022 8:18 am

What was the reason for the Thompson twins to join overtime elite? If you are skipping college, wouldn't joining the G League make more sense? Or go to Australia
User avatar
thelead
RealGM
Posts: 46,275
And1: 29,984
Joined: Apr 08, 2008
 

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#903 » by thelead » Wed Nov 30, 2022 8:21 am

DaddyCool19 wrote:What was the reason for the Thompson twins to join overtime elite? If you are skipping college, wouldn't joining the G League make more sense? Or go to Australia

Stupidity is the only thing I can come up with
Image
The-Power
RealGM
Posts: 10,513
And1: 9,938
Joined: Jan 03, 2014
Location: Germany
   

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#904 » by The-Power » Wed Nov 30, 2022 9:38 am

babyjax13 wrote:
clyde21 wrote:no way Ivey would go top 5 in this class, or even be in contention. if Ricky Council isn't in contention I don't know why Ivey would be, and C4 is wing sized.

I don't think Council is in the same ballpark as a prospect, but maybe I need to watch more. I had Ivey bumping between the best and third best prospect last year, I'd be surprised if he doesn't have some all-star seasons and I think there is some outlier potential for something more. That's about where I am on George/Black/Amen/Whitmore/Smith. I'm not saying I'd take him over those four guys (probably not George or Black), but I think he'd be in the convo.

Agreed here. Ivey is clearly ahead of Council as a prospect, and I do like Council. Not least because Ivey would be a whole 1.5 years younger than him when we look at draft age, and has shown more CG skills in addition to being an even more ridiculous athlete.

I suppose I also don't see the supposedly strong top 5 *yet*. We were just talking about how the race for #3 is still wide open and as far as I'm concerned, Ivey would be the frontrunner if he were in this draft. I'm not saying that teams would see it the same way necessarily and there's still plenty of opportunities to even convince me that others should go ahead of Ivey. But as of now? Victor is clearly ahead. Scoot Henderson is ahead. Anyone else – not yet. For me at least.

And even just looking at it from the POV of NBA teams rather than my own (I was higher on Ivey than most): I find it hard to see at least (!) three players who have definitely shown enough at this point to push him out of the top 5. A team may have fallen in love with Anthony Black, that I could understand (although I personally still need some more time to reach that same conclusion). That's one. Who else? The Thompson twins? If I'd want to push all my eggs into the ‘elite athlete’ basket, I'd rather go with the more proven player in Ivey who is not even older than them going into the draft. Keyonte George? I don't think he has shown enough yet to be taken ahead of Ivey. Whitmore hasn't played yet and I don't see his previous play as sufficient to offset the uncertainty risk. Ditto Nick Smith (who would actually have to show A LOT for me to consider him over Ivey). Whitehead is similar. He may have had enough of a pull entering college (doubtful but not implausible) but now he has to make up some ground I believe after his poor start. Miller, Wallace or Walker? I don't think so. GG Jackson? Maybe, that's the only other one I can truly see – IF there is a team that just sees him as a ‘aim for the fences’ type of upside pick due to his age, size and skill combo (I wouldn't personally agree (yet) but I could see some team at least thinking that way).

So I'd currently have it as:

1. Victor
2. Scoot
3. Ivey

Looking at it from an NBA team's perspective, I could see Black and maybe Jackson going ahead of him if we just consider what we currently know about the prospects. That would still make him a top 5 pick. And again: I do see scenarios in which other players jump ahead of him. But thus far, the college Freshman class has not been anything special and Ivey was the #5 pick last year (and probably would have been #4 if not for the Kings having that pick and trying to find a better fit and more NBA-ready player in the draft) behind three Freshmen who I would say have all had more hype than any player currently playing in college (at this point in time at least), even this early in the season.
buzzkilloton
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,858
And1: 2,442
Joined: Feb 20, 2017
Location: Bangkok
 

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#905 » by buzzkilloton » Wed Nov 30, 2022 9:52 am

Amen is the consensus 3 pick in this draft right now.

Ivey is a fine prospect but he also had warts. Combo guard who cant play off ball, shooting mechanics, and isnt good on defense. Also have to keep in mind he came back to school and improved a ton. Alot of the same warts he had coming out make me question his fit with Cade long term.

I expect by time end of season comes around a couple of these other other combo guards are preferred. Guys like GG,Ausar, and a few other guys were not seeing break out and show up higher on the boards. Ivey is going to end up being like a 8-12 guy if he came out in this class would be my guess.

Honestly Whitmore could just sit out the season and would go over Ivey just based on potential with what hes shown and measureables.

I had Ivey 4 last year and was happy to get him(I always draft BAP which i still think he was on the board) but guys like Sharpe and Math werent like super far off where Ivey was on most peoples boards. I know quite a few Pistons fans pref Math,Sharpe,or Murray he wasnt everyones choice by any means. I dont know I guess if every college prospect sucks nobody else breaks out then Ivey may hold top 5 in this draft.
EMG518
Veteran
Posts: 2,842
And1: 942
Joined: Mar 11, 2012

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#906 » by EMG518 » Wed Nov 30, 2022 10:50 am

I am going to say this is the best draft I have seen. It's deep and got amazing talent. There are so many promising freshman it's kind of crazy.
The-Power
RealGM
Posts: 10,513
And1: 9,938
Joined: Jan 03, 2014
Location: Germany
   

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#907 » by The-Power » Wed Nov 30, 2022 11:22 am

buzzkilloton wrote:Amen is the consensus 3 pick in this draft. No NBA team is taking Ivey over Amen come on.

Ivey is a fine prospect but he also had warts. Combo guard who cant play off ball, shooting mechanics, and isnt good on defense. Also have to keep in mind he came back to school and improved a ton. Alot of the same warts he had coming out make me question his fit with Cade long term.

Ivey actually played a lot off the ball with Purdue. And what makes Amen Thompson so much better? He doesn't have age going for him (same age as Ivey coming out), he has question marks about his shooting as well, and he has never proven anything at a higher level of basketball. Is it just the measurements and hope that it all translates for him? And the fact that Ivey improved a lot is actually an argument in his favor – NBA teams obviously want to see players improve from one year to the next to bank on a trajectory.

I have not looked into Amen in much detail, so I could be wrong about him. But I find it hard to take him with any kind of certainty over Ivey not least considering the huge question marks due to the lack of playing high-level competition. I also haven't seen him as a consensus pick at #3 at all. Could you back this up? Because you feeling strongly about him obviously does not indicate consensus.

buzzkilloton wrote:I expect by time end of season comes around a couple of these other other combo guards are preferred. Guys like GG,Ausar, and a few other guys were not seeing break out and show up higher on the boards. Ivey is going to end up being like a 8-12 guy if he came out in this class would be my guess.

I find that hard to imagine. For me personally that's extremely unlikely but even for NBA teams... I don't think that they would let Ivey slip into the second half of the lottery. But of course everyone's opinion on that can be different (and none of us will ever be proven right or wrong).

buzzkilloton wrote:Honestly Whitmore could just sit out the season and would go over Ivey just based on potential with what hes shown and measureables.

I really like Whitmore and think he could end up being a top 3 prospects in this draft. BUT: there are a lot of risks with him as well. So far, he's just a super strong and explosive wing who could be a menace around the rim. But whether he can defend, create on the ball consistently, and shoot it well remains to be seen. Those are all swing skills that will greatly impact his value as a prospect. If he's just looking like an elite slasher and that's it... it's probably not enough to be a top-tier prospect.

buzzkilloton wrote:I had Ivey 4 last year but guys like Sharpe and Math werent like super far off where Ivey was on most peoples boards. I know quite a few Pistons fans pref Math,Sharpe,or Murray he wasnt everyones choice by any means. I dont know I guess if every college prospect sucks nobody else breaksout then Ivey may hold top 5 in this draft.

Sure, there are always disagreements about who to pick. But people overwhelmingly looked at Ivey as a top 5 player.

On the Pistons board, 47% of people wanted Ivey pre-draft compared to 26% Sharpe, 11% Murray, and 11% Mathurin.
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=2195572

On this board here, our consensus mock draft overwhelmingly voted for Ivey as the #4 pick (53% Ivey, 19% Murray, 13% Sharpe).
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2197039

I also don't remember anyone in the media seriously thinking that Ivey would fall out of the top 5. It was just a question of whether the Kings would pick him at #4 or the Pistons at #5 – unless my memory completely fails me (happy to be proven wrong). Obviously anyone's personal preferences may have been different.
buzzkilloton
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,858
And1: 2,442
Joined: Feb 20, 2017
Location: Bangkok
 

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#908 » by buzzkilloton » Wed Nov 30, 2022 12:25 pm

@The Power

Amen is a more versatile player then Ivey. Hes bigger and a better athlete. I know better athlete sounds crazy because Ivey is such a good athlete like top % ITL but Amen is like a generational NBA athlete.

The biggest way Amen gaps Ivey as a prospect is the defensive upside. Go watch some tape on youtube hes all over the court hes a monster. I see a potential ALL NBA defensive player on that end with Amen. Hes going to be able to guard multiple positions. Ivey cant guard anyone hes 4th worst rookie in defensive Raptor ITL.

Off topic but most say his brother projects as a better defender. That may be true but that doesnt not mean he isnt a potential elite defender as well.

If I'm the Pistons and I can choose Ivey or Amen to go with Cade its always going to be Amen. The only advantage Ivey brings is 3pt shooting but Ivey is pretty meh on that anyways. Amen 3pt shot does seem pretty bad but hes shooting like 80+% from the line so far so were not talking Ben Simmons here,

As far as the league concern I think it adds a bit more variance to the pick then taking a guy of NCAA or leagues we have more data from. That said its less variance then taking a guy straight out of highschool or taking Sharpe off of workouts and tape.

I feel like the age is baked in. Like say Amen just turn 18 with this type of athletic ability,basketball IQ and size I dont even know if he would be considered under Scoot as prospect. Thats saying alot too because Scoot is a awesome prospect.

I would for sure go check out some game film and scouting reports on youtube. I think hes a very tantalizing prospect.
The-Power
RealGM
Posts: 10,513
And1: 9,938
Joined: Jan 03, 2014
Location: Germany
   

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#909 » by The-Power » Wed Nov 30, 2022 12:53 pm

buzzkilloton wrote:I would for sure go check out some game film and scouting reports on youtube. I think hes a very tantalizing prospect.

I'll surely do that (although I'd prefer to watch full games instead).

One thing on the defense, though: it's sometimes easy to look great defensively against inferior competition, especially when you're a great athlete with a solid motor. I'm not saying the twins are or are not potentially elite defenders. They may very well be. But when I watched Ivey on Team USA, for instance, he looked like a really good defensive prospect at Guard (iirc). However, you then watch him in college and stark to think ‘we'll probably have to be okay with him just being average down the road and everything more than that would be gravy’.
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 64,033
And1: 70,228
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#910 » by clyde21 » Wed Nov 30, 2022 2:50 pm

Ivey going #3 in this draft is insane to me I'm sorry lol
jezzerinho
Analyst
Posts: 3,117
And1: 2,187
Joined: Jul 08, 2019
     

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#911 » by jezzerinho » Wed Nov 30, 2022 4:12 pm

buzzkilloton wrote:@The Power

Amen is a more versatile player then Ivey. Hes bigger and a better athlete. I know better athlete sounds crazy because Ivey is such a good athlete like top % ITL but Amen is like a generational NBA athlete.

The biggest way Amen gaps Ivey as a prospect is the defensive upside. Go watch some tape on youtube hes all over the court hes a monster. I see a potential ALL NBA defensive player on that end with Amen. Hes going to be able to guard multiple positions. Ivey cant guard anyone hes 4th worst rookie in defensive Raptor ITL.

Off topic but most say his brother projects as a better defender. That may be true but that doesnt not mean he isnt a potential elite defender as well.

If I'm the Pistons and I can choose Ivey or Amen to go with Cade its always going to be Amen. The only advantage Ivey brings is 3pt shooting but Ivey is pretty meh on that anyways. Amen 3pt shot does seem pretty bad but hes shooting like 80+% from the line so far so were not talking Ben Simmons here,

As far as the league concern I think it adds a bit more variance to the pick then taking a guy of NCAA or leagues we have more data from. That said its less variance then taking a guy straight out of highschool or taking Sharpe off of workouts and tape.

I feel like the age is baked in. Like say Amen just turn 18 with this type of athletic ability,basketball IQ and size I dont even know if he would be considered under Scoot as prospect. Thats saying alot too because Scoot is a awesome prospect.

I would for sure go check out some game film and scouting reports on youtube. I think hes a very tantalizing prospect.


Totally agree. Amen also has this laser focus and an inspiring level of intensity that can only bring good things to a team. He manages to combine this without playing tight, in fact he's a markedly loose and fluid player. Nor does his serious approach to the game make him a diva or ässhole, he's notoriously humble and hardworking..

Ausar is a better shooter. But in all other respects i think Amen has the edge, including D.

So far, I'd have Amen in my tier 1 in this draft, along with Scoot. Haven't made my mind up about Victor yet. Whitmore and Jarace Walker are also up there but maybe just a tier below.
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 64,033
And1: 70,228
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#912 » by clyde21 » Wed Nov 30, 2022 4:35 pm

DaddyCool19 wrote:What was the reason for the Thompson twins to join overtime elite? If you are skipping college, wouldn't joining the G League make more sense? Or go to Australia


anyone that joins OE at this point over the GL should be docked 2 points for stupidity
CP War Hawks
Analyst
Posts: 3,414
And1: 1,556
Joined: Nov 28, 2017
     

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#913 » by CP War Hawks » Wed Nov 30, 2022 9:18 pm

Howard looks like a top ten pick to me. Being that his pops knows how to succeed in the NBA and will be parting that knowledge to him only solidifies my stance on his stock.
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 64,033
And1: 70,228
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#914 » by clyde21 » Thu Dec 1, 2022 12:40 am

Btw Proctor, Roach, Grandison, and touches for bigs like Flip and Mitchell, DWH gets like 0 real touches to actually make something happen, dude's being relegated to just spotting up, pretty much the same thing that happened to AJ Griffin last year, and his off ball chops are not developed enough to actually make a difference there.

just continues to amaze me why all these top guys all decide to go to the same school. go fkn sign somewhere else that'll feature you bro. sink or swim.
Duke4life831
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 36,722
And1: 67,384
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#915 » by Duke4life831 » Thu Dec 1, 2022 12:59 am

Just want to say I’m 100% off the Whitehead train
The-Power
RealGM
Posts: 10,513
And1: 9,938
Joined: Jan 03, 2014
Location: Germany
   

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#916 » by The-Power » Thu Dec 1, 2022 1:35 am

So, I now watched 3 full Overtime Elite games from the past couple weeks (Amen played in all 3, his brother only in 1) and honestly, I'd be scared to death to draft them in the top 5 if I were a decision-maker on an NBA team.

The level of play is just so bad compared to college and G-League. Little talent, no structure, no value of possessions, almost no size. Essentially, they dominate a competition of teenagers playing pick-up basketball. Tough to take too much away from that.

Now, that being said, they are clearly exciting prospects in some aspects and you obviously draft them (and not too low either), but the question to which extent their games translate to the NBA level has to scare teams off at least to some degree.

But just looking at them at prospects, here's what we're looking at (based on my observations, and based mostly Amen Thompson's play) – from good to bad:

– Athleticism: They absolutely are ridiculous quick-twitch athletes. Great first step, great speed and agility, finish easily above the rim. They will be high-level NBA athletes without a doubt, and a menace in transition. One note of caution, though: they lack physical strength compared to other players who are primarily paint-finishers. That could be an issue, and it'll be relevant to see how much they can catch up in this area.

– Defense: Yes, I can see them being awesome on-ball defenders. Super quick, long, some good screen navigation (although the NBA is an entirely different beast in that regard) and for the level of play, they do play with a good motor (although the shot contests on jump shots are often weak, but that could just be because players in that league for the most part can't really shoot well). Off-ball defense remains to be seen. They just haven't had to focus on that in that competition, so it doesn't always look great but since it's rarely punished it's hard to fault them too much for it.

– Playmaking: I've seen Amen make a bunch of good reads. BUT: those are mostly easy reads because defenses leave players wide open and do not have the length or organization, and in some cases athleticism, to recover and disrupt those passes. So the reads may look advanced until you notice that the player who receives the ball is often wide open and open for a long time. Still a good foundation to have that, but it remains to be seen if they can also make faster and less obvious reads at the next level. The passes themselves are nothing to write home about. Not many passes are right in the pocket, I've seen lots of passes that went too low, high, left or right, and that's a problem in the NBA. The question is whether that will improve once they play more serious competition when stuff like this actually matters. At this point, they'll have to rely on making relatively easy reads and passes off of defensive rotations they set in motion with their driving threat. That's fine, though – IF they can break down NBA defenses consistently, which remains to be seen.

– Ballhandling: They are creative and fairly fluid, so that's a plus. That being said, I wonder how functional the handles really are. For instance, in three games I've seen Amen get picked and turn it over at least 5 or 6 times on just his spin move! And that's against defenders that are nowhere near as disruptive as players on good college teams, not to mention the NBA. I could also see a lot of carrying violations in their future if the NBA continues to call them tight. So while I do believe they have the foundation to operate off the dribble in the NBA – at least to some degree – I do have concerns about their flash-over-substance style of dribbling.

– Shooting: This is the real issue. Because if opponents can just dare you to shoot and you either refuse to take the shot or just brick too many, you'll have a lot problems in the NBA as a wing. For starters, there's zero chance that you can be a consistent on-ball initiator. So even if you are a great athlete with a functional handle who can pass the ball, that's still not enough if you can't at least hit open shots somewhat reliably. And when you're off the ball, you hurt your team's spacing and coaches don't like that. I wouldn't say they are hopeless cases as shooters BUT: they can get every open shot they want in that league, and yet there are still a bunch of unbelievable bricks among them. It's definitely going to be an uphill battle for them I fear.

And one last note on finishing: when they can load up, they are tough to stop. Give them a driving lane or an open court and they are gone. I've also seen some finishes with solid touch. But I've also seen some really poor finishing attempts around the rim when contested and an NBA (or even college) paint is an entirely different animal. This is also where the physicality question comes in. It doesn't matter how quick and explosive you are: if you can't move defenders in the paint and you don't have a ridiculous lay-up package either, you're going to end up with a lot of ugly shot attempts when contested.

To sum it up: I do see the appeal of two players with good size who are that athletic and show some on-ball creativity. But there are some serious concerns that would make me seriously hesitate to pick them over more proven players. The twins are clearly players who look A LOT better on highlight mixtapes because you see all the ridiculously explosive plays on both ends, the creative finishes and passes, some breakdowns of defenders with a flashy move, and the shots that go in. But what you don't see are the numerous bricks, how defenses give them all the shots they want without being punished, the ugly turnovers and passes that are way off, all the times that the finishes around the rim don't work. It's essentially a highlight mixtape from HS pick-up basketball – and there have been way too many players who have had awesome mixtapes in HS but never amounted to much. And while I'm not saying that's the case here necessarily, it's definitely not something we can rule out yet and that has to be taken into account when we talk about the NBA draft where franchises have A TON riding on their rare high lottery picks.
buzzkilloton
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,858
And1: 2,442
Joined: Feb 20, 2017
Location: Bangkok
 

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#917 » by buzzkilloton » Thu Dec 1, 2022 3:30 am

I dont think the league is going to impact the draft stock very much at all. We just seen Sharpe sit out the entire season and not play and still end up pick 7. Amen is way more tantalizing of a prospect then Sharpe and NBA teams will have more to go on.

Barlowe on a recent pod said he was talking to a NBA agent who was speculating Whitmore is going to sit the entire season. Whitmore doesnt need to step onto a court at all he could lock in a high lotto pick just on potential. Now Barlowe did say this is a agent talking and he thinks like a agent its speculation so dont take it as gospel. He said its not something he heard anywhere but that agent fwiw.

The point is some of these guys are already so high on NBA teams boards they dont even need to play anymore to stay high picks and really only have things to lose by playing. The Thompsons can play the league that suits them and then go kill some personal workouts and their good to go for the NBA. Of course it raises their bust risk if we cant see them in Gleague or the NCAA but for the players themselves sitting out or playing in the league like this makes alot of sense.
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 64,033
And1: 70,228
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#918 » by clyde21 » Thu Dec 1, 2022 3:50 am

Whitmore shouldn't play at this point, neither should Smith Jr....and if I was DWH and was only getting 5 mins despite being the #1 recruit I'd gtfo and start training for the draft.
WargamesX
RealGM
Posts: 10,841
And1: 8,099
Joined: Apr 10, 2017
   

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#919 » by WargamesX » Thu Dec 1, 2022 4:11 am

After Victor and Scott I think the top 3 conversation is between Brandon Miller and Amen. It’s early so things can change, but those 4 look NBA ready and have very good upside.

I did a quick dive on Anthony Black and I think he is a late lottery draft pick right now who is trending down (it is early though).

Between his 3 pt shot form and lack of mid range game he would have to show more game before I could see him going top 10. I can’t think of a guy to compare his current game too because the vision could be elite. Maybe a bigger Ty Jerome. Now if he just gets a reliable 3 pt shot he is a much better prospect. If he add a mid range to that he’s Cade Cunningham :lol:

It’s early (I keep saying that because it really is) but built as is, he would really benefit from adding to his game.
Matthew 6:5
Luke 15:3-7
User avatar
CptCrunch
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,674
And1: 4,697
Joined: Jun 30, 2016
   

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#920 » by CptCrunch » Thu Dec 1, 2022 4:20 am

The-Power wrote:So, I now watched 3 full Overtime Elite games from the past couple weeks (Amen played in all 3, his brother only in 1) and honestly, I'd be scared to death to draft them in the top 5 if I were a decision-maker on an NBA team.


Thanks for the actually watching their games.

For me, The Twins are playing high school basketball one month away from 20 years of age.

Amen is at 15.0/6.3/6.5

Ausar is at 18.5/5.0/4.3

https://overtimeelite.com/seasons/current#points_per_game

They aren't putting up any better stats than a bunch of 4 stars in their league. Most of these 4 starts in their leagues won't reach the NBA this year or will be at best second rounders.

On a different note while looking at OTE stats, Bryce Griggs is leading the league in assists. Why does this 3 star on On3, 4 star on Rival, 3 star ESPN have offers from Duke, Kansas, Houston, Baylor, LSU, OSU, Texas, Texas Tech?

Return to NBA Draft