Bigmagicfan82 wrote:I think ultimately the Magic will have to go to a more traditional lineup.
I’m not so sure. Maybe if Mosley has full control over the lineup. If Weltham are calling the shots, I think they’re having way too much fun with this.
Moderators: Howard Mass, UCF, Knightro, Def Swami, ChosenSavior, UCFJayBird
Bigmagicfan82 wrote:I think ultimately the Magic will have to go to a more traditional lineup.
tooler wrote:Bigmagicfan82 wrote:I think ultimately the Magic will have to go to a more traditional lineup.
I’m not so sure. Maybe if Mosley has full control over the lineup. If Weltham are calling the shots, I think they’re having way too much fun with this.

but this year is the first time he's really been able to have the chance to start to figure it all out and put it together. Because of that, his ideal role right now would be as a reserve playing 22-25 mpg.

tleikheen wrote:but this year is the first time he's really been able to have the chance to start to figure it all out and put it together. Because of that, his ideal role right now would be as a reserve playing 22-25 mpg.
and coming off the bench and he figures it out maybe he can get his shooting percentage up to 46 /27/72 like the star of the team Paolo Banchero.......

Trolling (or disparaging) Wagner and Banchero like I've seen you do the past few days is certainly a bold take.

tleikheen wrote:Trolling (or disparaging) Wagner and Banchero like I've seen you do the past few days is certainly a bold take.
You get butthurt on their statistics ,because nothing is made up ,you can easily fact check their shooting statistics yourself


tleikheen wrote:Trolling (or disparaging) Wagner and Banchero like I've seen you do the past few days is certainly a bold take.
You get butthurt on their statistics ,because nothing is made up ,you can easily fact check their shooting statistics yourself

Optimus_Steel wrote:I don't see why Bol Bol would not be able to be a starter. He looks capable, however he certainly is not a guard, that was pretty clear in the Philly game and really depends on what WeHam decides to do with this roster going forward. If they intend on having Wendell, Paolo, and Franz as starters then its hard to see Bol Bol starting, but is not because he is not capable. If that is the case then Bol Bol looks like a great 6th man which is a good problem.
SOUL wrote:tleikheen wrote:Trolling (or disparaging) Wagner and Banchero like I've seen you do the past few days is certainly a bold take.
You get butthurt on their statistics ,because nothing is made up ,you can easily fact check their shooting statistics yourself
Wagner is a 20 ppg sophomore shooting 50/32/86.
Banchero is a rookie averaging 23 ppg.
They are not imperfect players. Wagner's three point percentage will need to get better, and Banchero's efficiency will get better as he learns the NBA. He's a rookie.
But yes, I am extremely "butthurt" about these two people having the ball when all of our guards are out.![]()
![]()
Knightro wrote:Optimus_Steel wrote:I don't see why Bol Bol would not be able to be a starter. He looks capable, however he certainly is not a guard, that was pretty clear in the Philly game and really depends on what WeHam decides to do with this roster going forward. If they intend on having Wendell, Paolo, and Franz as starters then its hard to see Bol Bol starting, but is not because he is not capable. If that is the case then Bol Bol looks like a great 6th man which is a good problem.
Right like....
There's 240 minutes to be had in every game. Even if Bol doesn't start, there's still plenty of opportunities for him to play a lot.

davey_wavy wrote:Here is how you know if youre all in on BOL.
If he were traded, would you be upset?