ImageImageImageImage

Magic will be one of the more interesting teams to watch for the next few years

Moderators: ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass

User avatar
thelead
RealGM
Posts: 46,183
And1: 29,925
Joined: Apr 08, 2008
 

Re: Magic will be one of the more interesting teams to watch for the next few years 

Post#21 » by thelead » Wed Nov 30, 2022 4:46 am

pepe1991 wrote:
basketballRob wrote:If we went back in time and the Tatum/Brown duo was 20 and 21-years-old, I'd take the Wagner/Banchero duo over them.

Banchero and Wagner just have more size.

If healthy, the next 5-10 years will be the Banchero/Wagner era for the Magic. These players could re-write the Magic record books.


https://stathead.com/basketball/pcm_finder.cgi?request=1&sum=0&player_id1=wagnefr01&p1yrfrom=2023&player_id2=brownja02&p2yrfrom=2018


https://stathead.com/basketball/pcm_finder.cgi?request=1&sum=0&player_id1=banchpa01&p1yrfrom=2023&player_id2=tatumja01&p2yrfrom=2019


Cool, can't wait to compare their ECF stats :lol:

This comparison is everything wrong with NBA & fans nowdays.

You have sample size of 11 games of one player and 17 games of the other , team that is sitting at awful 5-12 record ( 4th worst in nba) and casually comparing numbers to guys who were key contributors on team that didn't just won 55 games but aslo played in ECF.

For comparison sake, Magic are yet to win 55 games in all games they played from 2020-21 season to this date, combined.

It's like that old 80s joke that Bulls had best guad duo ever, they combined for 50 ppg. Jordan averaged 40, Paxton 10. But hey, "tehniqually speaking". :lol:

We have more than 17 games of Franz if that is who you're referring to. Why so much hate? I guess no one can forecast anything UNTIL it happens in your book :lol:

Paolo and Franz don't have the luxury of starting their careers with a roster that featured prime Gordon Hayward, prime Al Horford, and prime Kyrie Irving. Of course they're not going to win 55 games as 1st year and 2nd year players without players like that.
Image
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 22,969
And1: 18,964
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: Magic will be one of the more interesting teams to watch for the next few years 

Post#22 » by pepe1991 » Wed Nov 30, 2022 6:22 am

thelead wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:
basketballRob wrote:If we went back in time and the Tatum/Brown duo was 20 and 21-years-old, I'd take the Wagner/Banchero duo over them.

Banchero and Wagner just have more size.

If healthy, the next 5-10 years will be the Banchero/Wagner era for the Magic. These players could re-write the Magic record books.


https://stathead.com/basketball/pcm_finder.cgi?request=1&sum=0&player_id1=wagnefr01&p1yrfrom=2023&player_id2=brownja02&p2yrfrom=2018


https://stathead.com/basketball/pcm_finder.cgi?request=1&sum=0&player_id1=banchpa01&p1yrfrom=2023&player_id2=tatumja01&p2yrfrom=2019


Cool, can't wait to compare their ECF stats :lol:

This comparison is everything wrong with NBA & fans nowdays.

You have sample size of 11 games of one player and 17 games of the other , team that is sitting at awful 5-12 record ( 4th worst in nba) and casually comparing numbers to guys who were key contributors on team that didn't just won 55 games but aslo played in ECF.

For comparison sake, Magic are yet to win 55 games in all games they played from 2020-21 season to this date, combined.

It's like that old 80s joke that Bulls had best guad duo ever, they combined for 50 ppg. Jordan averaged 40, Paxton 10. But hey, "tehniqually speaking". :lol:

We have more than 17 games of Franz if that is who you're referring to. Why so much hate? I guess no one can forecast anything UNTIL it happens in your book :lol:

Paolo and Franz don't have the luxury of starting their careers with a roster that featured prime Gordon Hayward, prime Al Horford, and prime Kyrie Irving. Of course they're not going to win 55 games as 1st year and 2nd year players without players like that.



Sports are played for victories, not personal feelings and how people looked while losing.
Celtics won what? 16 or 17 championships because they measured their sucess in throphies, not personal achivments of individuals who happend to play for them in that periods ( best viewed through lances of Wilts record vs Celtics team in 60s and Jordan's individual records before Bulls menaged to build team around him vs Celtics accomplishments in 80s ).

Reason why Celtics menaged to add and develop Tatum and Brown and stil have strong fudnamental core before them, retooled it in thair favor later is exect reason why Celtics are Celtics.
They didn't need to give Jayson Tatum 30% usage rate and have him average 20 ppg as a rookie to have validation of a pick. They actually fooled 76ers into trading down, figuring Tatum will be better pro than Fultz ( apsolute masterful trade , one of biggest robberies in modern era ).
So instad of Tatum averaging empty stats on 20 wins team ( Franz in both years so far, Banchero in rookie year), Tatum was prolific starter on elite team instad. ( 55-27 record).


And main reason why Magic and teams like OKC & few other teams CAN'T sustain level of sucess is because they want to please their simple minded fans who cry for "vets taking shots from youth" so they depleat rosters to the point where even once they DO land potential star players, they find themselfs in position where they need to waste years to actually build competitive roster around them. All that to have gratificatoin & validation of "picking right guy" through him averaging empty stats on bad teams.

Banchero and Franz have fat stats because Magic pander everything to them. But in same time that is execlly why Banchero and Franz don't compete for anything but ping pong balls . You can't have your cake and eat it too.
Tatum ( 24) is just 3 years older than Franz Wagner. Yet not a single season of his life was wasted on rotting roster. In contrast, both of Franz years are nothing but collosal waste of time on team where apsolutley nothing matter.

Sitting at 5-16 record, top 3 seed in tankathon, top 5 worst offense and defense what are we even discussing here? That i don't need to watch RJ Hampton, Okeke, Bamba , Ross, Houstan , Fultz, Isaac and majority of roster any more to know they won't be big contributor to winning ? I personally don't. Front office doesn't care tho. Their salary is tied with seasons played. That's why they don't feel rush to do anything. But what will happen if in 2 years Banchero wants out ? Who will suffer more form aimlessness of roster ? Fans or front office?
Front office being closer to 70 won't care ,they will just retire. It will be fans left with bitter feeling of yet another waste.

There is one thing in world that we all take for granted until it's too late. Time. And this front office does nothing but wasted it for each and every fan out there. Yet you clap like a tool because of "Victor & Scoot" and year after that for new Lebron, new Durant, year after that for new Giannis and cycle continues. Every year there will be somebody worth sucking for, until you break your addictive behavior and figure grass isn't always greener on other side of fense and figure what you have is enough, if you know how to use it . If you don't , it really doesn't matter who you draft next.

At the end of a day your accomplishments are your lifework. For Hammond it says " GM from 2007- 2023 ", 0 playoffs series won.
Why would i trust that person in ability to build roster when he kept failing 16 years straight?
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
User avatar
thelead
RealGM
Posts: 46,183
And1: 29,925
Joined: Apr 08, 2008
 

Re: Magic will be one of the more interesting teams to watch for the next few years 

Post#23 » by thelead » Wed Nov 30, 2022 6:37 am

pepe1991 wrote:snip


I just don’t get how you could have expected this season to be successful when you knew what the roster looked like going in. I fully expected to lose a lot. Now, what I wan’t expecting was for JI to still be out. Markelle’s injury was more of a freak accident so whatever on that one. But other than that, I was expecting the losses to pile up.

To compare us to the Celtics is hilarious. I’m sure your parent held you to the standards of becoming a world leader or billionaire too, right? Danny Ainge robbed the Nets and didn’t even have to tank because the Nets did it for him with one of the worst trades in NBA history. Sure, I would love to be in the same situation but that’s just not realistic.

Now, if you want to compare us to a team like the Pacers who are building a fairly competent team without tanking, sure go ahead. It’ll be interesting to see how they turn out for sure. They traded their all star for Hali while we trade ours for WCJ, Franz, and another pick. We’ll see how that plays out but I certainly would love Hali on our squad. Then you look at the coaching, I’ll take theirs. However, this is all a work in progress for both teams. Neither the Magic nor the Pacers will win a championship this year. Let’s see how we stack up against them in ~2 years. Why 2? Because if Mosley doesn’t win next year, we’ll have a new coach the year after IMO.

Look, I’m a patient person but I’m expecting wins next year whatever happens with the ping pong balls. I will be calling for the FO to fired if we don’t see significant progress next season just like I was calling for them to be fired while trotting out their buddy-ball playoff team.
Image
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 22,969
And1: 18,964
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: Magic will be one of the more interesting teams to watch for the next few years 

Post#24 » by pepe1991 » Wed Nov 30, 2022 7:29 am

thelead wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:snip


I just don’t get how you could have expected this season to be successful when you knew what the roster looked like going in. I fully expected to lose a lot. Now, what I wan’t expecting was for JI to still be out. Markelle’s injury was more of a freak accident so whatever on that one. But other than that, I was expecting the losses to pile up.

To compare us to the Celtics is hilarious. I’m sure your parent held you to the standards of becoming a world leader or billionaire too, right? Danny Ainge robbed the Nets and didn’t even have to tank because the Nets did it for him with one of the worst trades in NBA history. Sure, I would love to be in the same situation but that’s just not realistic.

Now, if you want to compare us to a team like the Pacers who are building a fairly competent team without tanking, sure go ahead. It’ll be interesting to see how they turn out for sure. They traded their all star for Hali while we trade ours for WCJ, Franz, and another pick. We’ll see how that plays out but I certainly would love Hali on our squad. Then you look at the coaching, and again, I’ll take theirs. However, this is all a work in progress for both teams. Neither the Magic nor the Pacers will win a championship this year. Let’s see how we stack up against them in ~2 years. Why 2? Because if Mosley doesn’t win next year, we’ll have a new coach the year after IMO.

Look, I’m a patient person but I’m expecting wins next year whatever happens with the ping pong balls. I will be calling for the FO to fired if we don’t significant progress next season just like I was calling for them to be fired while trotting out their buddy-ball playoff team.



But you won't win jack s*** with addition of two rookies. You (imo, personally) be first in line that will cry that Magic shouldn't add any more experienced players because some Ketone George and Ausar Thompson need PT.
So whole process will stale for another year ( at least).
You can't win and keep adding rookies -who need PT, usage and shots ,and learn to mistakes- and win games.

It's not just Pacers who are execllent example that you can retool without drawing into abyss.

Dallas sucked 1 years - got Luka. Retooled. NEver tanked after.
Memphis didn't even suck for Morant. Drafted 2#- Morant, stayed in playoff hunt even as him as a rookie.

And keep in mind that rebuild via sucking is way easier to Houston and San Antonio. Spurs won 4 championships in span of 1997-2014. In that period their fans experienced 19 different seasons with at least 50 wins . 19 years of execllence!!!!

Houston Rockets haven't experienced rebuild and sucked since 1983. If you are not 50 or older, Houston NEVER sucked in your lifetime up until this point.

Now look at Orlando. 2011 is last time team was relevant. 12 years ago. 0 championships. 10 years of nothing but "right way rebuilding" and what they have to show for?
This front office works here for 6 years.

Neither the Magic nor the Pacers will win a championship this year. Let’s see how we stack up against them in ~2 years

Great logic. So each and every team but Warriors, Suns and Bucks / Celtics should tank because they can't win this year? :banghead:

Winning in sports don't happen in moment when you "feel " you should win. It's a process that commands trail & errors, fails and being okey with being threadmill team for a moment. It's absolutely necessary.
Warriors were "threadmill" team once and just okey playoff team. Celtics Tatum-Brown core was splitted in media to many times to count. Even Lebron-Wade-Bosh didn't won in their first year.


There are aslo other, pratcial reasons why what Magic are doing makes no sense and is anti-productive.
They already have 9 players with guaranteed salary for next year ( Bol's option will be picked , so Fultz, Suggs, Isaac, Banchero, Houstan, Wagner, Okeke, Carter ). Addition of two rookies brings that number to 9. Addition of at least 3 free agents to 12.

Now i'm asking you to elabrate to me where and how all those players will get PT from .

PG: Suggs /Fultz/ Cole
SG: FA/ draft pick.
SF: Wagner / Okeke / pick?
PF: Banchero / Isaac / Bol
C: Wendell Carter / Bamba or FA

It's almost guaranteed that new added rookies will either: rott on bench or be forced into lineup and cause another year(s) of sucking. And ofc, another trap is right there at the corner at the end of 2023-24. It's called Franz and Suggs early exstension window. As majority of salary will be gone in designed rookie max exstension.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
User avatar
SOUL
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,728
And1: 40,763
Joined: Dec 11, 2006
Location: █████████████
     

Re: Magic will be one of the more interesting teams to watch for the next few years 

Post#25 » by SOUL » Wed Nov 30, 2022 7:36 am

I don't think there's any way in hell we bring in two rookies. One depending on where our spot is.
www.rareslums.com // please support my writing!
User avatar
thelead
RealGM
Posts: 46,183
And1: 29,925
Joined: Apr 08, 2008
 

Re: Magic will be one of the more interesting teams to watch for the next few years 

Post#26 » by thelead » Wed Nov 30, 2022 8:05 am

pepe1991 wrote:
thelead wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:snip


I just don’t get how you could have expected this season to be successful when you knew what the roster looked like going in. I fully expected to lose a lot. Now, what I wan’t expecting was for JI to still be out. Markelle’s injury was more of a freak accident so whatever on that one. But other than that, I was expecting the losses to pile up.

To compare us to the Celtics is hilarious. I’m sure your parent held you to the standards of becoming a world leader or billionaire too, right? Danny Ainge robbed the Nets and didn’t even have to tank because the Nets did it for him with one of the worst trades in NBA history. Sure, I would love to be in the same situation but that’s just not realistic.

Now, if you want to compare us to a team like the Pacers who are building a fairly competent team without tanking, sure go ahead. It’ll be interesting to see how they turn out for sure. They traded their all star for Hali while we trade ours for WCJ, Franz, and another pick. We’ll see how that plays out but I certainly would love Hali on our squad. Then you look at the coaching, and again, I’ll take theirs. However, this is all a work in progress for both teams. Neither the Magic nor the Pacers will win a championship this year. Let’s see how we stack up against them in ~2 years. Why 2? Because if Mosley doesn’t win next year, we’ll have a new coach the year after IMO.

Look, I’m a patient person but I’m expecting wins next year whatever happens with the ping pong balls. I will be calling for the FO to fired if we don’t significant progress next season just like I was calling for them to be fired while trotting out their buddy-ball playoff team.



But you won't win jack s*** with addition of two rookies. You (imo, personally) be first in line that will cry that Magic shouldn't add any more experienced players because some Ketone George and Ausar Thompson need PT.
So whole process will stale for another year ( at least).
You can't win and keep adding rookies -who need PT, usage and shots ,and learn to mistakes- and win games.

It's not just Pacers who are execllent example that you can retool without drawing into abyss.

Dallas sucked 1 years - got Luka. Retooled. NEver tanked after.
Memphis didn't even suck for Morant. Drafted 2#- Morant, stayed in playoff hunt even as him as a rookie.

And keep in mind that rebuild via sucking is way easier to Houston and San Antonio. Spurs won 4 championships in span of 1997-2014. In that period their fans experienced 19 different seasons with at least 50 wins . 19 years of execllence!!!!

Houston Rockets haven't experienced rebuild and sucked since 1983. If you are not 50 or older, Houston NEVER sucked in your lifetime up until this point.

Now look at Orlando. 2011 is last time team was relevant. 12 years ago. 0 championships. 10 years of nothing but "right way rebuilding" and what they have to show for?
This front office works here for 6 years.

Neither the Magic nor the Pacers will win a championship this year. Let’s see how we stack up against them in ~2 years

Great logic. So each and every team but Warriors, Suns and Bucks / Celtics should tank because they can't win this year? :banghead:

Winning in sports don't happen in moment when you "feel " you should win. It's a process that commands trail & errors, fails and being okey with being threadmill team for a moment. It's absolutely necessary.
Warriors were "threadmill" team once and just okey playoff team. Celtics Tatum-Brown core was splitted in media to many times to count. Even Lebron-Wade-Bosh didn't won in their first year.


There are aslo other, pratcial reasons why what Magic are doing makes no sense and is anti-productive.
They already have 9 players with guaranteed salary for next year ( Bol's option will be picked , so Fultz, Suggs, Isaac, Banchero, Houstan, Wagner, Okeke, Carter ). Addition of two rookies brings that number to 9. Addition of at least 3 free agents to 12.

Now i'm asking you to elabrate to me where and how all those players will get PT from .

PG: Suggs /Fultz/ Cole
SG: FA/ draft pick.
SF: Wagner / Okeke / pick?
PF: Banchero / Isaac / Bol
C: Wendell Carter / Bamba or FA

It's almost guaranteed that new added rookies will either: rott on bench or be forced into lineup and cause another year(s) of sucking. And ofc, another trap is right there at the corner at the end of 2023-24. It's called Franz and Suggs early exstension window. As majority of salary will be gone in designed rookie max exstension.


Personally, I’m good with the new rookies starting on the bench depending on what else happens in the offseason. Now, if we land Scoot or Wemby, I’m not sure how you bench either but that’s a different story. To turn the corner, we will need to address 3 things IMO: turnover-free playmaking (usually need a vet guard to provide this), shooting, and rebounding. Our roster moves should be made accordingly. I’m really concerned with our rebounding issues with Wagner, Paolo, and WCJ seemingly penciled in as future starters and not sure how that gets fixed unless we move Franz to SG, which I don’t love, and play Bol or Isaac at SF.

Let me ask you this, what are the top problems with the team and how would you turn it around in less than a year (2023 draft, FA, trades)?
Image
User avatar
thelead
RealGM
Posts: 46,183
And1: 29,925
Joined: Apr 08, 2008
 

Re: Magic will be one of the more interesting teams to watch for the next few years 

Post#27 » by thelead » Wed Nov 30, 2022 8:08 am

SOUL wrote:I don't think there's any way in hell we bring in two rookies. One depending on where our spot is.

If we don’t land a top 2 pick, I could see a big trade for a disgruntled star if one becomes available. Not sure it would get any better for a team needing to make a trade than a top 6 pick, another good pick in a deep draft, and a few throw-in prospects like Cole.
Image
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 22,969
And1: 18,964
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: Magic will be one of the more interesting teams to watch for the next few years 

Post#28 » by pepe1991 » Wed Nov 30, 2022 9:28 am

thelead wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:
thelead wrote:
I just don’t get how you could have expected this season to be successful when you knew what the roster looked like going in. I fully expected to lose a lot. Now, what I wan’t expecting was for JI to still be out. Markelle’s injury was more of a freak accident so whatever on that one. But other than that, I was expecting the losses to pile up.

To compare us to the Celtics is hilarious. I’m sure your parent held you to the standards of becoming a world leader or billionaire too, right? Danny Ainge robbed the Nets and didn’t even have to tank because the Nets did it for him with one of the worst trades in NBA history. Sure, I would love to be in the same situation but that’s just not realistic.

Now, if you want to compare us to a team like the Pacers who are building a fairly competent team without tanking, sure go ahead. It’ll be interesting to see how they turn out for sure. They traded their all star for Hali while we trade ours for WCJ, Franz, and another pick. We’ll see how that plays out but I certainly would love Hali on our squad. Then you look at the coaching, and again, I’ll take theirs. However, this is all a work in progress for both teams. Neither the Magic nor the Pacers will win a championship this year. Let’s see how we stack up against them in ~2 years. Why 2? Because if Mosley doesn’t win next year, we’ll have a new coach the year after IMO.

Look, I’m a patient person but I’m expecting wins next year whatever happens with the ping pong balls. I will be calling for the FO to fired if we don’t significant progress next season just like I was calling for them to be fired while trotting out their buddy-ball playoff team.



But you won't win jack s*** with addition of two rookies. You (imo, personally) be first in line that will cry that Magic shouldn't add any more experienced players because some Ketone George and Ausar Thompson need PT.
So whole process will stale for another year ( at least).
You can't win and keep adding rookies -who need PT, usage and shots ,and learn to mistakes- and win games.

It's not just Pacers who are execllent example that you can retool without drawing into abyss.

Dallas sucked 1 years - got Luka. Retooled. NEver tanked after.
Memphis didn't even suck for Morant. Drafted 2#- Morant, stayed in playoff hunt even as him as a rookie.

And keep in mind that rebuild via sucking is way easier to Houston and San Antonio. Spurs won 4 championships in span of 1997-2014. In that period their fans experienced 19 different seasons with at least 50 wins . 19 years of execllence!!!!

Houston Rockets haven't experienced rebuild and sucked since 1983. If you are not 50 or older, Houston NEVER sucked in your lifetime up until this point.

Now look at Orlando. 2011 is last time team was relevant. 12 years ago. 0 championships. 10 years of nothing but "right way rebuilding" and what they have to show for?
This front office works here for 6 years.

Neither the Magic nor the Pacers will win a championship this year. Let’s see how we stack up against them in ~2 years

Great logic. So each and every team but Warriors, Suns and Bucks / Celtics should tank because they can't win this year? :banghead:

Winning in sports don't happen in moment when you "feel " you should win. It's a process that commands trail & errors, fails and being okey with being threadmill team for a moment. It's absolutely necessary.
Warriors were "threadmill" team once and just okey playoff team. Celtics Tatum-Brown core was splitted in media to many times to count. Even Lebron-Wade-Bosh didn't won in their first year.


There are aslo other, pratcial reasons why what Magic are doing makes no sense and is anti-productive.
They already have 9 players with guaranteed salary for next year ( Bol's option will be picked , so Fultz, Suggs, Isaac, Banchero, Houstan, Wagner, Okeke, Carter ). Addition of two rookies brings that number to 9. Addition of at least 3 free agents to 12.

Now i'm asking you to elabrate to me where and how all those players will get PT from .

PG: Suggs /Fultz/ Cole
SG: FA/ draft pick.
SF: Wagner / Okeke / pick?
PF: Banchero / Isaac / Bol
C: Wendell Carter / Bamba or FA

It's almost guaranteed that new added rookies will either: rott on bench or be forced into lineup and cause another year(s) of sucking. And ofc, another trap is right there at the corner at the end of 2023-24. It's called Franz and Suggs early exstension window. As majority of salary will be gone in designed rookie max exstension.


Personally, I’m good with the new rookies starting on the bench depending on what else happens in the offseason. Now, if we land Scoot or Wemby, I’m not sure how you bench either but that’s a different story. To turn the corner, we will need to address 3 things IMO: turnover-free playmaking (usually need a vet guard to provide this), shooting, and rebounding. Our roster moves should be made accordingly. I’m really concerned with our rebounding issues with Wagner, Paolo, and WCJ seemingly penciled in as future starters and not sure how that gets fixed unless we move Franz to SG, which I don’t love, and play Bol or Isaac at SF.

Let me ask you this, what are the top problems with the team and how would you turn it around in less than a year (2023 draft, FA, trades)?


But issue is- you will have to draft first, than hit free agency.
Draft is on June 23, 2023.
Free agency starts on , probably June 30, 2023. Around week later.

And by that, everybody will be in their ultra-hype mode for rookies. And they will get their traditional- delusional -player-comparisons and how execlly you will justfy fact that your "floor Hayward- ceiling Kobe" is bench player to...Malik Beasley?

Ofc that comparison won't ever live up, but fans won't sobber up from predraft hype for half of decade.

Current biggest Magic issue is lack of context of anything that happends & very poorly constructed roster in general.

very poorly constructed roster in general:
There is bit of "agenda over substance" narrow way of thinking of front office. They are so head over heels about lenght for "defense" that they fail to realise their jumbo lineups are actually just dreadful on defense because they are too tall.

Where, in contrast, you have Raptors roster, who also have bit of "agenda" in terms of size, but their size doesn't go to ridicilous lenghts ( 6'11-7'2) but stays in some sweet range of 6'7- 6'8 where players are tall, but still mobile enough.

We passed point of deminishing returns , we just plays awkward lineups that are worthless but we keep playing them. It's like fanservice in a movie that is awful. Yea, tnx for doing something on reddit said it would be neat 3 years ago, but you know what would be even better- make a good movie.

We have more than enough evidence majority of experimented lineups don't work.
Bol and Bamba had net rating of -10. Can we NOT play them 165 min together?
Bol and Okeke had even worst - 12,6 net rating.

There are plenty of those exmaples ( Cole & Banchero play very poorly together, so do many lineups that include Bol without Wendell ).



lack of context:
Suggs, Fultz and Cole never played single game where all 3 were aveliable where we can talk how they contribute to winning and how their egos will take fact that 2 of them won't finish game ( or at least one).
Isaac never played with anybody on this roster but Okeke, Ross & Bamba i belive.

That's why i brought Tatum before. We had opportunity to watch future superstar and top 5-8 player play as a role player in rookie year. We had similar opportunity with Leonard who later turned into best player on 2 championship teams. We don't have that luxury with Banchero. We don't know contest of his contribution to winning . We just know that if we give him 30% usage rate he can score. Cool. But that does not translate into winning basketball. ( quite opposite actually).

Where you can make healthy assumpson that some Haliburton ( year older than Wagner & 3rd year player) and Mathurin (same age as Banchero) apsolutley DO contribute to wins.
But again, with Magic, there is lack of context. Because we don't know how much Banchero & Wagner contribute to winning since front office made sure team is never even in position to compete, let alone win.
We know they put up stats. But so do Green & Porter ( cumulative 40 ppg), team record is rather identical and i tend to apsolutley hate their roster construction. But again, context of contribution is rather blurred , so you are left in dark, making assumptions.


I didn't expect Magic to win 40 games this year. But i also didn't expect them to be this bad. And i don't see scenario where addition of two rookies will help avoiding situation where next year you won't be this bad again. That's why i said that at some point you have to belive that you accumulated enough talent and flip ones you don't value into actual players , via trades, FA. Because you simply can't make 10 men rotation out of lottery picks. It will cost you a fortune & probably have specacular backfire once you start paying them exstensions.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
Skybox
RealGM
Posts: 18,364
And1: 8,424
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: Magic will be one of the more interesting teams to watch for the next few years 

Post#29 » by Skybox » Wed Nov 30, 2022 12:14 pm

2 High frp's = large part of a trade pkg for a legit young backcourt star...don't know who it could be yet. I'm over kicking the "someday" can down the road for a decade. I could care less about Wemby and Scoot's 'potential', give me Jaylen Brown, SGA, etc to play with our forward tandem.

(I'm just throwing names, I know JB ain't going anywhere with the way the C's are rolling, but a few months ago...Durant to Bos, JB to Team X(us?), picks and prospects to BRK blowup...was a real picture to be discussed)
LDNMagic90
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,459
And1: 990
Joined: Apr 20, 2021
     

Re: Magic will be one of the more interesting teams to watch for the next few years 

Post#30 » by LDNMagic90 » Wed Nov 30, 2022 3:24 pm

pepe1991 wrote:I don't think average fans attention span is big enough.

Go back in 2020.
So Lakers have Lebron, winning championship. Giannis is apsolute monster and is achiving something historical.
Warriors still have 3 HOFers. Jokic is having historical season for a center.... Yet League Pass is being sold on notion that some mediocre 30-42 team will be in bubble. League is going against any logic to expend Bubble just to put them in.

Ofc i'm talking about team nobody gives a f*** today. Pelicans.
From "most exiting young team" ( who actually was very mediocre ) to team nobody cares about ( but who is actually good team) in span of 2 years.

Why? Because that hype in 2020 was sold to same people who in 2022 only care about Banchero, Victor, Smith ,Scoot or Mathurin.
I call those fans pedofans. In no other sport there is such an sick obsession with teenagers. And as soon they mature as playres
( literally turn 22,23) they move on from them in never ending obsession to find new younger players.


So by the time Magic start compete for anything, there will be some 17 years old 7'6 dude who is yet to shave but shoots 3 point shots with his foot, while blindfolded and some mediocre team that gets him will be hottest team to watch, according to media who's job is to hype living s*** out of those players.


There is some food for your toughts. Victors Wembanyama played 227 min in Euroleague last year . Good luck finding more than 13 min of footage from it, despite fact 50 Europien countries and over 500 000 000 people had somewhat free access to watching those games. Do you know why footages don't exist? I have few theories. Mainly because last year pedofans were too obsessed with making videos about Banchero, Smith, Holmgren..:But as soon as they were drafted, pedofans already found new object of desire. So now we have footages of Victor in French league that pretty much nobody, including Franch media, doesn't normally cover all that much.

NBA is masterful at selling illusion. They keep fans of bad teams engaged by hyping living piss out of draft to encurage them to daydream about draft & sucking for "new Lebron".
In same time, fact that teams are good- win, keeps current fans.
That's why there is such a hate toward "threadmill" teams. Nevermind fact that almost every single championship team was threadmill at some point, because you can't jump form 20 wins to 65 wins over span of 9 months.


While I get your point about the NBA and overhyping young players (which is a very valid point). Is this not really the same in most of the big sports in the world? I’m not sure if NBA is any worse than let’s say the premier league in overhyping young players etc.

I think it’s a problem in sports as a whole, take Man Utd. In the past 10 years how many of their young players were hyped to be the next big thing or as good as the class of 92’. When in reality there’s a handful of very good players that have come from that academy. Same with the England national team and to a lesser degree the Spanish national teams, they hype whoever is in the youth teams calling them the next Ronaldo, Xavi, Iniesta etc and they flame out and end up on a mid table team.

The problem is that social media is so integrated in our lives that people end up searching for the most viral moment instead of actually paying attention. During this WC for example, you would think Ronaldo has been Portugal’s best player because anything he does (he is one of the greatest don’t get me wrong) goes viral pretty much, but you have Bruno Fernandes who has actually been playing a lot better than him not really getting the same hype.

In a nutshell I just think social media has ruined a lot of people (especially younger peoples) perception of sport.
User avatar
Knightro
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 28,156
And1: 29,344
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
Location: Jersey
 

Re: Magic will be one of the more interesting teams to watch for the next few years 

Post#31 » by Knightro » Wed Nov 30, 2022 3:25 pm

I do think there's a very good chance the Magic will bring in both lotto picks, but I very much expect at least 4 veteran additions via free agency and trades as well.

And I don't mean crappy end of the bench veterans who don't expect or want to play. I mean guys to stick into the rotation.

I expect Ross, Hampton and Bamba to all be gone. Moe Wagner will also be gone unless he's willing to sign for the minimum again. Harris could be gone, but I'm thinking they might end up retaining him at $13M for next year.

I expect at least one of the Fultz/Suggs/Anthony guard trio to be gone.

I expect one of Isaac or Okeke will be gone as well.

The only players I can confidently say will be here next season that are here right now are Banchero, Franz, Bol and Carter. Others can and will be here, but those four are the only ones locked in IMO.
User avatar
VFX
RealGM
Posts: 18,314
And1: 16,189
Joined: May 30, 2016

Re: Magic will be one of the more interesting teams to watch for the next few years 

Post#32 » by VFX » Wed Nov 30, 2022 8:19 pm

pepe1991 wrote:
thelead wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:
Cool, can't wait to compare their ECF stats :lol:

This comparison is everything wrong with NBA & fans nowdays.

You have sample size of 11 games of one player and 17 games of the other , team that is sitting at awful 5-12 record ( 4th worst in nba) and casually comparing numbers to guys who were key contributors on team that didn't just won 55 games but aslo played in ECF.

For comparison sake, Magic are yet to win 55 games in all games they played from 2020-21 season to this date, combined.

It's like that old 80s joke that Bulls had best guad duo ever, they combined for 50 ppg. Jordan averaged 40, Paxton 10. But hey, "tehniqually speaking". :lol:

We have more than 17 games of Franz if that is who you're referring to. Why so much hate? I guess no one can forecast anything UNTIL it happens in your book :lol:

Paolo and Franz don't have the luxury of starting their careers with a roster that featured prime Gordon Hayward, prime Al Horford, and prime Kyrie Irving. Of course they're not going to win 55 games as 1st year and 2nd year players without players like that.



Spoiler:
And main reason why Magic and teams like OKC & few other teams CAN'T sustain level of sucess is because they want to please their simple minded fans who cry for "vets taking shots from youth" so they depleat rosters to the point where even once they DO land potential star players, they find themselfs in position where they need to waste years to actually build competitive roster around them. All that to have gratificatoin & validation of "picking right guy" through him averaging empty stats on bad teams.

Banchero and Franz have fat stats because Magic pander everything to them. But in same time that is execlly why Banchero and Franz don't compete for anything but ping pong balls . You can't have your cake and eat it too.
Tatum ( 24) is just 3 years older than Franz Wagner. Yet not a single season of his life was wasted on rotting roster. In contrast, both of Franz years are nothing but collosal waste of time on team where apsolutley nothing matter.

There is one thing in world that we all take for granted until it's too late. Time. And this front office does nothing but wasted it for each and every fan out there. Yet you clap like a tool because of "Victor & Scoot" and year after that for new Lebron, new Durant, year after that for new Giannis and cycle continues. Every year there will be somebody worth sucking for, until you break your addictive behavior and figure grass isn't always greener on other side of fense and figure what you have is enough, if you know how to use it . If you don't , it really doesn't matter who you draft next.

But you won't win jack s*** with addition of two rookies. You (imo, personally) be first in line that will cry that Magic shouldn't add any more experienced players because some Ketone George and Ausar Thompson need PT.
So whole process will stale for another year ( at least).
You can't win and keep adding rookies -who need PT, usage and shots ,and learn to mistakes- and win games.

It's not just Pacers who are execllent example that you can retool without drawing into abyss.

Dallas sucked 1 years - got Luka. Retooled. NEver tanked after.
Memphis didn't even suck for Morant. Drafted 2#- Morant, stayed in playoff hunt even as him as a rookie.


And keep in mind that rebuild via sucking is way easier to Houston and San Antonio. Spurs won 4 championships in span of 1997-2014. In that period their fans experienced 19 different seasons with at least 50 wins . 19 years of execllence!!!!

Houston Rockets haven't experienced rebuild and sucked since 1983. If you are not 50 or older, Houston NEVER sucked in your lifetime up until this point.

Now look at Orlando. 2011 is last time team was relevant. 12 years ago. 0 championships. 10 years of nothing but "right way rebuilding" and what they have to show for?
This front office works here for 6 years.


A few things I agree with and a few that I don't.

ORL and OKC must draft their Doncic, Tatum, Jokic, Giannis, ect. BEFORE vets are wanting to play in Oklahoma City or Orlando. Having a treadmill team in these cities is far worse than a Boston, Brooklyn, or Los Angeles. Why? Because the ceiling is capped and tied to your talent level. Kevin Durant, Kyrie Irving, Kawhi Leonard, Paul George, etc. aren't arbitrarily signing or agreeing to sign in a small market like Orlando before there is proof that they are a serious contender. Furthermore, no established veteran is signing with Milwaukee if they don't have a top 5 player capable of winning a championship. Thats just reality. It's like making the argument that placing stock in Giannis becoming who he is today didn't matter at the time he was drafted to a poverty franchise.

This conversation about "draft picks overrated" is nonsensical. Every player worth discussing was drafted. Yes, some are in far better situations to succeed, like Tatum and Brown, because they have a built in core with Horford and Irving. Orlando hasn't made trades up until Vucevic for them to have both a high draft pick like Tatum, and a top 20 player on their roster. They've never had the assets required for that. This has nothing to do with "what fans want" and more to do with maximizing your talent pool at the cost of making a draft selection.

If you want the Magic to succeed you should be praying Paolo and Wagner are the guys capable of drawing in talent in the next 2-3 seasons. If they aren't the guys, you are in luck. Why? Because Orlando either has a shot at 2 top lotto picks, 1 lotto pick and a trade, or a multi player blockbuster deal to a team wanting to blow it up. I don't see any of those scenarios as a problem and I dont know what your alternative solution would be. Have a mediocre first round exit treadmill team that doesn't utilize draft picks? Or is there some magical way I wasn't aware of that summons two top 10 players to a team not located in Los Angeles?

The NBA always overhypes young players. And? At the end of the day some wont live up to the hype, some will, and some will exceed expectations. It has happened every season and will happen again next season.

Memphis starts 4 guys under 27. Dallas is trash despite having one of the best players in the league because their starting lineup is a bunch of washed role players. Not sure why those are your two examples. Pacers aren't winning anything and their best players are still under rookie contracts. How does that fit into the narrative that spending top draft picks on guys doesn't win games?

pepe1991 wrote:
Spoiler:
Current biggest Magic issue is lack of context of anything that happends & very poorly constructed roster in general.

very poorly constructed roster in general:
There is bit of "agenda over substance" narrow way of thinking of front office. They are so head over heels about lenght for "defense" that they fail to realise their jumbo lineups are actually just dreadful on defense because they are too tall.

Where, in contrast, you have Raptors roster, who also have bit of "agenda" in terms of size, but their size doesn't go to ridicilous lenghts ( 6'11-7'2) but stays in some sweet range of 6'7- 6'8 where players are tall, but still mobile enough.

We passed point of deminishing returns , we just plays awkward lineups that are worthless but we keep playing them. It's like fanservice in a movie that is awful. Yea, tnx for doing something on reddit said it would be neat 3 years ago, but you know what would be even better- make a good movie.

We have more than enough evidence majority of experimented lineups don't work.
Bol and Bamba had net rating of -10. Can we NOT play them 165 min together?
Bol and Okeke had even worst - 12,6 net rating.

There are plenty of those exmaples ( Cole & Banchero play very poorly together, so do many lineups that include Bol without Wendell ).



lack of context:
Suggs, Fultz and Cole never played single game where all 3 were aveliable where we can talk how they contribute to winning and how their egos will take fact that 2 of them won't finish game ( or at least one).
Isaac never played with anybody on this roster but Okeke, Ross & Bamba i belive.

That's why i brought Tatum before. We had opportunity to watch future superstar and top 5-8 player play as a role player in rookie year. We had similar opportunity with Leonard who later turned into best player on 2 championship teams. We don't have that luxury with Banchero. We don't know contest of his contribution to winning . We just know that if we give him 30% usage rate he can score. Cool. But that does not translate into winning basketball. ( quite opposite actually).

Where you can make healthy assumpson that some Haliburton ( year older than Wagner & 3rd year player) and Mathurin (same age as Banchero) apsolutley DO contribute to wins.
But again, with Magic, there is lack of context. Because we don't know how much Banchero & Wagner contribute to winning since front office made sure team is never even in position to compete, let alone win.
We know they put up stats. But so do Green & Porter ( cumulative 40 ppg), team record is rather identical and i tend to apsolutley hate their roster construction. But again, context of contribution is rather blurred , so you are left in dark, making assumptions.


I didn't expect Magic to win 40 games this year. But i also didn't expect them to be this bad. And i don't see scenario where addition of two rookies will help avoiding situation where next year you won't be this bad again. That's why i said that at some point you have to belive that you accumulated enough talent and flip ones you don't value into actual players , via trades, FA. Because you simply can't make 10 men rotation out of lottery picks. It will cost you a fortune & probably have specacular backfire once you start paying them exstensions.


This I don't necessarily disagree with. The JUMBOL lineups are annoying. However, they are out of necessity due to half the roster being held out or "injured".

Like I said earlier, Paolo and Wagner have to prove they are capable winning basketball games in Orlando. They really can't do that until there is a roster constructed that can highlight their capability. You aren't winning games if your bench is G-league at best and you have no point guards & Centers. Fultz, Suggs, Wagner, Paolo, Carter, Cole, and Bol should at the very least be be playing in order for them to gauge this. If not, they need to make a trade to make sense of it. It's frustrating but I also see the value of adding more value to the roster. Outside of Paolo and Wagner I still don't think there is enough value on this roster to draw a splashy trade.

I'm hoping the FO makes significant moves this offseason. Ross will be gone. Fultz, Harris, Bamba, Chuma, Cole, and Hampton will be coming up on expiring contract negotiations. I wouldn't care if 90% of those guys were gone tomorrow.
Rainwater
RealGM
Posts: 12,144
And1: 7,314
Joined: Apr 02, 2017

Re: Magic will be one of the more interesting teams to watch for the next few years 

Post#33 » by Rainwater » Thu Dec 1, 2022 1:20 am

SOUL wrote:I don't think there's any way in hell we bring in two rookies. One depending on where our spot is.


Unless they trade both picks to move up in the draft I would be completely shocked if they don't draft two rookies. Unless the front decides to compete next year by bringing in some vets they will rebuilding next year.
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 22,969
And1: 18,964
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: Magic will be one of the more interesting teams to watch for the next few years 

Post#34 » by pepe1991 » Thu Dec 1, 2022 7:07 am

LDNMagic90 wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:I don't think average fans attention span is big enough.

Go back in 2020.
So Lakers have Lebron, winning championship. Giannis is apsolute monster and is achiving something historical.
Warriors still have 3 HOFers. Jokic is having historical season for a center.... Yet League Pass is being sold on notion that some mediocre 30-42 team will be in bubble. League is going against any logic to expend Bubble just to put them in.

Ofc i'm talking about team nobody gives a f*** today. Pelicans.
From "most exiting young team" ( who actually was very mediocre ) to team nobody cares about ( but who is actually good team) in span of 2 years.

Why? Because that hype in 2020 was sold to same people who in 2022 only care about Banchero, Victor, Smith ,Scoot or Mathurin.
I call those fans pedofans. In no other sport there is such an sick obsession with teenagers. And as soon they mature as playres
( literally turn 22,23) they move on from them in never ending obsession to find new younger players.


So by the time Magic start compete for anything, there will be some 17 years old 7'6 dude who is yet to shave but shoots 3 point shots with his foot, while blindfolded and some mediocre team that gets him will be hottest team to watch, according to media who's job is to hype living s*** out of those players.


There is some food for your toughts. Victors Wembanyama played 227 min in Euroleague last year . Good luck finding more than 13 min of footage from it, despite fact 50 Europien countries and over 500 000 000 people had somewhat free access to watching those games. Do you know why footages don't exist? I have few theories. Mainly because last year pedofans were too obsessed with making videos about Banchero, Smith, Holmgren..:But as soon as they were drafted, pedofans already found new object of desire. So now we have footages of Victor in French league that pretty much nobody, including Franch media, doesn't normally cover all that much.

NBA is masterful at selling illusion. They keep fans of bad teams engaged by hyping living piss out of draft to encurage them to daydream about draft & sucking for "new Lebron".
In same time, fact that teams are good- win, keeps current fans.
That's why there is such a hate toward "threadmill" teams. Nevermind fact that almost every single championship team was threadmill at some point, because you can't jump form 20 wins to 65 wins over span of 9 months.


While I get your point about the NBA and overhyping young players (which is a very valid point). Is this not really the same in most of the big sports in the world? I’m not sure if NBA is any worse than let’s say the premier league in overhyping young players etc.

I think it’s a problem in sports as a whole, take Man Utd. In the past 10 years how many of their young players were hyped to be the next big thing or as good as the class of 92’. When in reality there’s a handful of very good players that have come from that academy. Same with the England national team and to a lesser degree the Spanish national teams, they hype whoever is in the youth teams calling them the next Ronaldo, Xavi, Iniesta etc and they flame out and end up on a mid table team.

The problem is that social media is so integrated in our lives that people end up searching for the most viral moment instead of actually paying attention. During this WC for example, you would think Ronaldo has been Portugal’s best player because anything he does (he is one of the greatest don’t get me wrong) goes viral pretty much, but you have Bruno Fernandes who has actually been playing a lot better than him not really getting the same hype.

In a nutshell I just think social media has ruined a lot of people (especially younger peoples) perception of sport.



Yea but in soccer/football nobody will shove youth down fans throat if it becomes clear that player doesn't contribute after 1 season. Where in nba you have situations where :
1) rookie year , rookie is shielded from all the critics
2) sophmore year ,still untouchable ,but not critics bulletproof
3) third year, some sobbering up, but still " he is just like Billups" nonsense
4) year 4, at this stage good teams flush the toilet, bad teams keep wasting time ( Mo Bamba )


Soccer doesn't really operate like that. They send you on loan if they can't find better role for you. Look for example Adnan Januzaj. Guy was Man Utd massive "potential". He played a lot in one season, 18 games in premiership in second, and midway through second they were already fed up with constant mediocrity with massive hype. By age of 22 they already sent him to loan , and he never returned.

Fast forward years later, guy is deep bench player on Sevilla that is falling apart ( 2 games played this year ).

And there is massive amount of kids that big teams buy at age of 16-17 who never play for them. On my Croatian team you had : Pasalic on Chealse - 0 games played, but 5 loans, Palaversa on Man City- 0 games played, 3 loans ( guy is 22 ) and maybe most notorious example , goalkeeper Matej Delač, who Cheealse bought at age of 16. He spent literally whole his career on loans ( like, 12 years of loans) , to the point it pretty much ruined his career.

The problem is that social media is so integrated in our lives that people end up searching for the most viral moment instead of actually paying attention. During this WC for example, you would think Ronaldo has been Portugal’s best player because anything he does (he is one of the greatest don’t get me wrong) goes viral pretty much, but you have Bruno Fernandes who has actually been playing a lot better than him not really getting the same hype.


100% agree but tabloid media who are doing that are almost always, by default, American & UK media. They have titles like "Ronaldo, Portugal beat Uruguay" , where Ronaldo was meh, literally tried to steal goal from teammate, but they know his name gets clicks, and as you said, Fernandes playing phenomenal, but his name doesn't get clicks.


Difference, however, is that soccer has bit more respect when it comes to selling hype. There isn't serious media outlet that will put teenager and nitpick parts of his game to compare him to Messi. Serious media would be, in soccer world,ridiculed for ages.
But NBA lives off sellind bull***

Image

This was ESPN's front page cover in 2013. You have teenager who is yet to step foot in nba, who averages 17 ppg, 1,5 assist and 6 rebounds on some mediocre 56% TS in college- to player, who at his age ( 20, sophmore year) averaged 27-7-7 in nba.
Again, if you are tabloid media , who hires non-professional writers & will post rumors like TMZ, fine, sell your itegrity for few clicks, but how can somebody as big and important as ESPN do this ?
If you are writer you have to feel dirty while writing stuff like this, or you know nothing about sport you are payed to write about. Witch would probably be even worst.

But imo, it's just , as i've said, agenda. They are told to hype those guys before draft, follow them in rookie year, than abblenden them & find new shiny toy to write year later. Where are articles about Suggs,Barnes, Mobley, Green or Chade this year? They don't exist. Where are Lamelo Ball or Edwards this year or even last year? Gone with a wind. You are only interesting to them as long as you are rookie OR if you are in center of a drama OR potential top 10 player, so guys like SA Smith, Skip Bayless and NFL players can do their scripted performances and spit BS for clicks in front of camera.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
LDNMagic90
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,459
And1: 990
Joined: Apr 20, 2021
     

Re: Magic will be one of the more interesting teams to watch for the next few years 

Post#35 » by LDNMagic90 » Thu Dec 1, 2022 12:04 pm

pepe1991 wrote:
LDNMagic90 wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:I don't think average fans attention span is big enough.

Go back in 2020.
So Lakers have Lebron, winning championship. Giannis is apsolute monster and is achiving something historical.
Warriors still have 3 HOFers. Jokic is having historical season for a center.... Yet League Pass is being sold on notion that some mediocre 30-42 team will be in bubble. League is going against any logic to expend Bubble just to put them in.

Ofc i'm talking about team nobody gives a f*** today. Pelicans.
From "most exiting young team" ( who actually was very mediocre ) to team nobody cares about ( but who is actually good team) in span of 2 years.

Why? Because that hype in 2020 was sold to same people who in 2022 only care about Banchero, Victor, Smith ,Scoot or Mathurin.
I call those fans pedofans. In no other sport there is such an sick obsession with teenagers. And as soon they mature as playres
( literally turn 22,23) they move on from them in never ending obsession to find new younger players.


So by the time Magic start compete for anything, there will be some 17 years old 7'6 dude who is yet to shave but shoots 3 point shots with his foot, while blindfolded and some mediocre team that gets him will be hottest team to watch, according to media who's job is to hype living s*** out of those players.


There is some food for your toughts. Victors Wembanyama played 227 min in Euroleague last year . Good luck finding more than 13 min of footage from it, despite fact 50 Europien countries and over 500 000 000 people had somewhat free access to watching those games. Do you know why footages don't exist? I have few theories. Mainly because last year pedofans were too obsessed with making videos about Banchero, Smith, Holmgren..:But as soon as they were drafted, pedofans already found new object of desire. So now we have footages of Victor in French league that pretty much nobody, including Franch media, doesn't normally cover all that much.

NBA is masterful at selling illusion. They keep fans of bad teams engaged by hyping living piss out of draft to encurage them to daydream about draft & sucking for "new Lebron".
In same time, fact that teams are good- win, keeps current fans.
That's why there is such a hate toward "threadmill" teams. Nevermind fact that almost every single championship team was threadmill at some point, because you can't jump form 20 wins to 65 wins over span of 9 months.


While I get your point about the NBA and overhyping young players (which is a very valid point). Is this not really the same in most of the big sports in the world? I’m not sure if NBA is any worse than let’s say the premier league in overhyping young players etc.

I think it’s a problem in sports as a whole, take Man Utd. In the past 10 years how many of their young players were hyped to be the next big thing or as good as the class of 92’. When in reality there’s a handful of very good players that have come from that academy. Same with the England national team and to a lesser degree the Spanish national teams, they hype whoever is in the youth teams calling them the next Ronaldo, Xavi, Iniesta etc and they flame out and end up on a mid table team.

The problem is that social media is so integrated in our lives that people end up searching for the most viral moment instead of actually paying attention. During this WC for example, you would think Ronaldo has been Portugal’s best player because anything he does (he is one of the greatest don’t get me wrong) goes viral pretty much, but you have Bruno Fernandes who has actually been playing a lot better than him not really getting the same hype.

In a nutshell I just think social media has ruined a lot of people (especially younger peoples) perception of sport.



Yea but in soccer/football nobody will shove youth down fans throat if it becomes clear that player doesn't contribute after 1 season. Where in nba you have situations where :
1) rookie year , rookie is shielded from all the critics
2) sophmore year ,still untouchable ,but not critics bulletproof
3) third year, some sobbering up, but still " he is just like Billups" nonsense
4) year 4, at this stage good teams flush the toilet, bad teams keep wasting time ( Mo Bamba )


Soccer doesn't really operate like that. They send you on loan if they can't find better role for you. Look for example Adnan Januzaj. Guy was Man Utd massive "potential". He played a lot in one season, 18 games in premiership in second, and midway through second they were already fed up with constant mediocrity with massive hype. By age of 22 they already sent him to loan , and he never returned.

Fast forward years later, guy is deep bench player on Sevilla that is falling apart ( 2 games played this year ).

And there is massive amount of kids that big teams buy at age of 16-17 who never play for them. On my Croatian team you had : Pasalic on Chealse - 0 games played, but 5 loans, Palaversa on Man City- 0 games played, 3 loans ( guy is 22 ) and maybe most notorious example , goalkeeper Matej Delač, who Cheealse bought at age of 16. He spent literally whole his career on loans ( like, 12 years of loans) , to the point it pretty much ruined his career.

The problem is that social media is so integrated in our lives that people end up searching for the most viral moment instead of actually paying attention. During this WC for example, you would think Ronaldo has been Portugal’s best player because anything he does (he is one of the greatest don’t get me wrong) goes viral pretty much, but you have Bruno Fernandes who has actually been playing a lot better than him not really getting the same hype.


100% agree but tabloid media who are doing that are almost always, by default, American & UK media. They have titles like "Ronaldo, Portugal beat Uruguay" , where Ronaldo was meh, literally tried to steal goal from teammate, but they know his name gets clicks, and as you said, Fernandes playing phenomenal, but his name doesn't get clicks.


Difference, however, is that soccer has bit more respect when it comes to selling hype. There isn't serious media outlet that will put teenager and nitpick parts of his game to compare him to Messi. Serious media would be, in soccer world,ridiculed for ages.
But NBA lives off sellind bull***

Image

This was ESPN's front page cover in 2013. You have teenager who is yet to step foot in nba, who averages 17 ppg, 1,5 assist and 6 rebounds on some mediocre 56% TS in college- to player, who at his age ( 20, sophmore year) averaged 27-7-7 in nba.
Again, if you are tabloid media , who hires non-professional writers & will post rumors like TMZ, fine, sell your itegrity for few clicks, but how can somebody as big and important as ESPN do this ?
If you are writer you have to feel dirty while writing stuff like this, or you know nothing about sport you are payed to write about. Witch would probably be even worst.

But imo, it's just , as i've said, agenda. They are told to hype those guys before draft, follow them in rookie year, than abblenden them & find new shiny toy to write year later. Where are articles about Suggs,Barnes, Mobley, Green or Chade this year? They don't exist. Where are Lamelo Ball or Edwards this year or even last year? Gone with a wind. You are only interesting to them as long as you are rookie OR if you are in center of a drama OR potential top 10 player, so guys like SA Smith, Skip Bayless and NFL players can do their scripted performances and spit BS for clicks in front of camera.


Definitely agree with pretty much what you are saying, the British press (and American) are notorious for doing this. In the premier league you take a player like Anthony Gordon who is young and English, they think he’s the next beckham or someone when in reality he’s going to be a decent to good player but likely an overpriced one. Even for the England games here, for the first game England won Saka was pretty much the best player of the game (and Bellingham) yet the headline and pictures they used were of Harry Kane or Grealish who the latter scored after coming on later when the game was pretty much over lol. Those things will lead you to think oh Grealish was the best player while you are scrolling when he didn’t really contribute until the game was pretty much over.

I’ve noticed also Skysports here are slowly transitioning into the ESPN style of shows, where they speak about the big teams for 40 mins about what they can do, never about the middling to smaller teams even if they were to beat a big team it’ll be about what the team did wrong rather than proper analytics to show how the smaller team beat them with praise.

Oh and by the way good luck today in qualifying for the last 16, I reckon you guys will beat Belgium. :D
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 22,969
And1: 18,964
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: Magic will be one of the more interesting teams to watch for the next few years 

Post#36 » by pepe1991 » Thu Dec 1, 2022 1:16 pm

LDNMagic90 wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:
LDNMagic90 wrote:
While I get your point about the NBA and overhyping young players (which is a very valid point). Is this not really the same in most of the big sports in the world? I’m not sure if NBA is any worse than let’s say the premier league in overhyping young players etc.

I think it’s a problem in sports as a whole, take Man Utd. In the past 10 years how many of their young players were hyped to be the next big thing or as good as the class of 92’. When in reality there’s a handful of very good players that have come from that academy. Same with the England national team and to a lesser degree the Spanish national teams, they hype whoever is in the youth teams calling them the next Ronaldo, Xavi, Iniesta etc and they flame out and end up on a mid table team.

The problem is that social media is so integrated in our lives that people end up searching for the most viral moment instead of actually paying attention. During this WC for example, you would think Ronaldo has been Portugal’s best player because anything he does (he is one of the greatest don’t get me wrong) goes viral pretty much, but you have Bruno Fernandes who has actually been playing a lot better than him not really getting the same hype.

In a nutshell I just think social media has ruined a lot of people (especially younger peoples) perception of sport.



Yea but in soccer/football nobody will shove youth down fans throat if it becomes clear that player doesn't contribute after 1 season. Where in nba you have situations where :
1) rookie year , rookie is shielded from all the critics
2) sophmore year ,still untouchable ,but not critics bulletproof
3) third year, some sobbering up, but still " he is just like Billups" nonsense
4) year 4, at this stage good teams flush the toilet, bad teams keep wasting time ( Mo Bamba )


Soccer doesn't really operate like that. They send you on loan if they can't find better role for you. Look for example Adnan Januzaj. Guy was Man Utd massive "potential". He played a lot in one season, 18 games in premiership in second, and midway through second they were already fed up with constant mediocrity with massive hype. By age of 22 they already sent him to loan , and he never returned.

Fast forward years later, guy is deep bench player on Sevilla that is falling apart ( 2 games played this year ).

And there is massive amount of kids that big teams buy at age of 16-17 who never play for them. On my Croatian team you had : Pasalic on Chealse - 0 games played, but 5 loans, Palaversa on Man City- 0 games played, 3 loans ( guy is 22 ) and maybe most notorious example , goalkeeper Matej Delač, who Cheealse bought at age of 16. He spent literally whole his career on loans ( like, 12 years of loans) , to the point it pretty much ruined his career.

The problem is that social media is so integrated in our lives that people end up searching for the most viral moment instead of actually paying attention. During this WC for example, you would think Ronaldo has been Portugal’s best player because anything he does (he is one of the greatest don’t get me wrong) goes viral pretty much, but you have Bruno Fernandes who has actually been playing a lot better than him not really getting the same hype.


100% agree but tabloid media who are doing that are almost always, by default, American & UK media. They have titles like "Ronaldo, Portugal beat Uruguay" , where Ronaldo was meh, literally tried to steal goal from teammate, but they know his name gets clicks, and as you said, Fernandes playing phenomenal, but his name doesn't get clicks.


Difference, however, is that soccer has bit more respect when it comes to selling hype. There isn't serious media outlet that will put teenager and nitpick parts of his game to compare him to Messi. Serious media would be, in soccer world,ridiculed for ages.
But NBA lives off sellind bull***

Image

This was ESPN's front page cover in 2013. You have teenager who is yet to step foot in nba, who averages 17 ppg, 1,5 assist and 6 rebounds on some mediocre 56% TS in college- to player, who at his age ( 20, sophmore year) averaged 27-7-7 in nba.
Again, if you are tabloid media , who hires non-professional writers & will post rumors like TMZ, fine, sell your itegrity for few clicks, but how can somebody as big and important as ESPN do this ?
If you are writer you have to feel dirty while writing stuff like this, or you know nothing about sport you are payed to write about. Witch would probably be even worst.

But imo, it's just , as i've said, agenda. They are told to hype those guys before draft, follow them in rookie year, than abblenden them & find new shiny toy to write year later. Where are articles about Suggs,Barnes, Mobley, Green or Chade this year? They don't exist. Where are Lamelo Ball or Edwards this year or even last year? Gone with a wind. You are only interesting to them as long as you are rookie OR if you are in center of a drama OR potential top 10 player, so guys like SA Smith, Skip Bayless and NFL players can do their scripted performances and spit BS for clicks in front of camera.


Definitely agree with pretty much what you are saying, the British press (and American) are notorious for doing this. In the premier league you take a player like Anthony Gordon who is young and English, they think he’s the next beckham or someone when in reality he’s going to be a decent to good player but likely an overpriced one. Even for the England games here, for the first game England won Saka was pretty much the best player of the game (and Bellingham) yet the headline and pictures they used were of Harry Kane or Grealish who the latter scored after coming on later when the game was pretty much over lol. Those things will lead you to think oh Grealish was the best player while you are scrolling when he didn’t really contribute until the game was pretty much over.

I’ve noticed also Skysports here are slowly transitioning into the ESPN style of shows, where they speak about the big teams for 40 mins about what they can do, never about the middling to smaller teams even if they were to beat a big team it’ll be about what the team did wrong rather than proper analytics to show how the smaller team beat them with praise.

Oh and by the way good luck today in qualifying for the last 16, I reckon you guys will beat Belgium. :D


Aposlutley everybody , including experts, casual fans, superfans from Middle & Eastern Europe are belive that England has most overhyped & overpriced players in the world.

In pub quiz culture there is inside joke that " if he was born in London he would cost €50 M , but instand, he is bartender in Serbia/Croatia/Bosnia" . or " you would play for Arsenal if you weren't born in *insert village of 55 people* " :lol:

The thing is, football and basketball are way more situation/ system/ team concept driven than people , especially media is willing to understand ( or admit, because it hurts their agenda).
For example you watch world cup and there is pressure from Brazil & Argentina to play pretty football. But if you watch their league, they 100% DON'T play pretty football. Their leagues are made of 10 stiff chopping axes & one guy who touches ball with elegancy.
For crying out loud, i tuned in Argentina's league and there was like 45 fouls in a game, it's such an wild, wood-cutting -football that it has nothing to do with narrative of "pretty game". They are on verge of breaking each other's leg with every sliding tackle.
But media presents things in different way. Sure, Brasil will eventually produce Ronaldo, Rivaldo, Ronaldinho or Neymar, but those guys aren't product of the league. They just happend to have biggest pool of talent, despite league being anti-pretty football most of the time.


As for pumping stars to the moon. Should we go any further than Lewandowski and compare him to Germany?
So Germany is trying to play like Bayern, but without striker to finish those plays ( in past Lewa in Bayern). And they look mediocre, struggle a lot and even lost to Japan. Could have been easly already eliminated, like it happend in last WC, in 2018.

But in same time Lewa without system to get ball in right spots has been walking disaster for Poland. He is isolated, doesn't really come to help them get ball out, he doesn't use depth of field to fill empty space. He just stands and joggs from CB to CB.

And truth is always somwhere in between.
Good teams make individuals superior. Bad teams choke life out of even brightest stars.


Basketball is bit different especially NBA, because fans are trained to not look at W/L as objective criteria of sport but counting stats. For whatever reason 22-8-3 on 33-49 teams is somehow "great superstar on bad team" and 16-6-4 on 59 wins team is "good role player". ( Stephan Marbury vs Tony Parker, season 2004-05, stats are real, so are the records of their teams).

And there is small market curse, where you have Giannis, who on Lakers /Knicks/Nets would be considered on of greatest ever, playing best season of his life (cartoonish numbers , 32-11,5-5,5 -1-1 both MVP & DPOY front runner) but he is "old news"so nobody covers everything he does. Send him to Knicks and he enters' ESPN, FOX news "GOAT " debate next day.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon

Return to Orlando Magic