buzzkilloton wrote:Sharpe had shooting to fall back on and Amen has generational athleticism. Sharpe is a good athlete esp vertically but Amen is like a WTF is this guy from the planet of earth type athlete.
How many wings with elite athleticism who cannot shoot reasonably well do you see in the current NBA who are more than specialists? How many of them have the ball in their hands on good teams?
Shooters who pass the size and athleticism thresholds for their position find important roles in the NBA. When you can't shoot well enough to justify having the ball in your hands, and you don't have to be guarded out on the perimeter when you don't have the ball, it's insanely difficult for perimeter players to start on playoff teams. Again, I'm not saying this is where the Thompson twins will end up – but it's a risk still.
Also, I'm not sure I agree with your claim of ‘generational athleticism’. In terms of quickness, explosion, and perhaps agility? I can see it (even though ‘generational’ as in ‘once in a generation’ might be stretching it a bit – there are lots of freak athletes in the NBA). But once you factor in strength or size, it becomes a lot less obvious. When we look at athleticism also from that point of view, are they even the best athletes in this class or is that Cam Whitmore? If we disregard length, then how far behind is Scoot? And if we factor in length, then where does that leave Victor with his insane combination of height, length, and fluidity?
The point is: them being top-tier athletes is not enough to leave a mark in the NBA without the required ancillary skills (which they can hone and develop, yes). We're not talking about Zion or Giannis here, where even without the ability to shoot or create on the ball, they'd still be very good NBA players just because they are that dominant in the paint and in transition.