AdamTH21 wrote:Franz Wagner deserves to be in this conversation.
He isn't "flashy" enough.. Franz is averaging 20ppg 4 rebs 4 ast on 50% shooting and doesnt even crack the top 5 is laughable.
Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid
AdamTH21 wrote:Franz Wagner deserves to be in this conversation.
facothomas22 wrote:t much of a better 3pt shooter from last year. I still like Scottie Barnes ,but his lack development is starting to be a real concern.
4. Franz Wagner - He has scored almost 20 points per game. However he's doing that on 31% from the 3pt line. He's also a limited defender. Maybe he could a borderline all star if he becomes a really good 3pt shooter
jasonxxx102 wrote:Fencer reregistered wrote:jasonxxx102 wrote:
Not great
That lowers my perception of his offensive upside. In general, it speaks negatively to his awareness. In particular, it's not good for his obvious role as a roll man.
Screening is something that can be learned over time. I don’t think it has anything to do with awareness, screening is almost entirely technique.
jasonxxx102 wrote:***Idiocy redacted***
“BUT HE TAKES A LOT OF SHOTS AND JUMPS HIGH!!!”
BallerTalk wrote:jasonxxx102 wrote:***Idiocy redacted***
“BUT HE TAKES A LOT OF SHOTS AND JUMPS HIGH!!!”
We get it. You don't like JG for whatever reason but you've been repeating the same clueless commentary ad infinitum in every thread that even bothers to mention his name.
Seems personal to be so emotionally invested in denigrating a player you claim to dislike.
RELAX
BREATHE
LET IT GO
76ciology wrote:Wouldn't Edey have a better chance of winning the scoring battle against Tatum in the post after a switch than Tatum shooting over Edey's 9'6" standing reach?
big-shot-ROB wrote:1. People here are talking about JJJr like we were talking about JJ Hickson. Just go back 2 years to see some of the threads about him before claiming what Evan will become.
2. Green is definetely a scorer, but a highly inefficient at that and displays losing basketball tendencies.
3. Cade is a floor raiser, doubt he has the shooting and athleticism to be a first option on a championship team.
4. The same can be said about Evan + no one has won a championship with a 1st option as a big the last 10 years. Even if Mobley has Gobert-like defensive potential he still can't be your best player.
Then, given that none of them project to be actual 1st options to compete for a ring, we're then ranking them as possible 2nd options. Of those, only 2 display potential at fullfiling a 2A-B role (think Klay, Lowry, Middleton, Davis, Irving), and one will be better than the other one at his role-specific tasks, therefore :
1. Mobley
2. Cade
Then you're talking about 3rd bananas or elite starting role players (think Draymond, Bosh, Brook Lopez, Love, Siakam):
3a. Barnes
3b. Wagner
I can't actually rank Green cause he looks like on of those players that will never be a good 1st option but you just can't tell if he would be able to turn into a proper 2 banana; just too far into the future to see how he'll handle the ego downgrade or how much teams will try to actually pursue him as a 1st option before giving up)
Time for Change wrote:Honestly the whole top of the draft class has been a disappointment this year. Last year it looked loaded with future all-star caliber players, this year no one has taken a big leap forward, something you look for in future franchise players. Mobley still looks like he will be an all-star eventually, but the rest of the bunch have shown little to no progression since last season.
Barnes and Cade look worse than they did at the end of last season. Kuminga has been overshadowed by Wiseman’s catastrophic failure but he’s been absolutely terrible too. Suggs has shown improvement, but that’s not saying much given how bad his rookie year was. I’d probably draft Franz second after Mobley at this point.
eyeatoma wrote:You guys still dont' get it. Playoff accomplishment don't matter when you're up for your 1st MVP. When you're up for your 3rd in a row, damn straight it matters, as the only ones who done it are top 15 players of all time who have won rings.
jasonxxx102 wrote:If you have Jordan Clarkson as many shots as Green he’d average more points, let that sink in. Oh and he averages as many rebounds and more assists with a better ast/to ratio.
I don’t understand the infatuation with chuckers who don’t do anything else. Not to mention Green is one of the worst defenders in the NBA
“BUT HE TAKES A LOT OF SHOTS AND JUMPS HIGH!!!”
eyeatoma wrote:You guys still dont' get it. Playoff accomplishment don't matter when you're up for your 1st MVP. When you're up for your 3rd in a row, damn straight it matters, as the only ones who done it are top 15 players of all time who have won rings.
jasonxxx102 wrote:Fencer reregistered wrote:jasonxxx102 wrote:
Not great
That lowers my perception of his offensive upside. In general, it speaks negatively to his awareness. In particular, it's not good for his obvious role as a roll man.
Screening is something that can be learned over time. I don’t think it has anything to do with awareness, screening is almost entirely technique.
jasonxxx102 wrote:If you have Jordan Clarkson as many shots as Green he’d average more points, let that sink in. Oh and he averages as many rebounds and more assists with a better ast/to ratio.
I don’t understand the infatuation with chuckers who don’t do anything else. Not to mention Green is one of the worst defenders in the NBA
“BUT HE TAKES A LOT OF SHOTS AND JUMPS HIGH!!!”

kiwinbafan05 wrote:1. Mobley
2. Barnes
3. Cade
4. Green
