BPM from 1952-1973

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

User avatar
Narigo
Veteran
Posts: 2,791
And1: 877
Joined: Sep 20, 2010
     

BPM from 1952-1973 

Post#1 » by Narigo » Tue Dec 6, 2022 6:06 am

Narigo's Fantasy Team

PG: Damian Lillard
SG: Sidney Moncrief
SF:
PF: James Worthy
C: Tim Duncan

BE: Robert Horry
BE:
BE:
LukaTheGOAT
Analyst
Posts: 3,261
And1: 2,972
Joined: Dec 25, 2019
 

Re: BPM from 1952-1973 

Post#2 » by LukaTheGOAT » Tue Dec 6, 2022 6:29 am

I like it. It looks similar to Player Impact, that went from 1952-2014 (no longer around seemingly). I don't know if I am recalling correctly, but I think Bill looks a bit better than Wilt generally in Player Impact, however with BPM, it seems as if Wilt gets favored more often. Overall, I think this looks pretty darn good. Thanks, for starting a dialogue on this.

Will just say, that this stat was based off BPM 1.0.
User avatar
wojoaderge
Analyst
Posts: 3,094
And1: 1,678
Joined: Jul 27, 2015

Re: BPM from 1952-1973 

Post#3 » by wojoaderge » Tue Dec 6, 2022 4:39 pm

Tom Boerwinkle was not that good of a defensive player
"Coach, why don't you just relax? We're not good enough to beat the Lakers. We've had a great year, why don't you just relax and cool down?"
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,868
And1: 25,189
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: BPM from 1952-1973 

Post#4 » by 70sFan » Tue Dec 6, 2022 4:56 pm

wojoaderge wrote:Tom Boerwinkle was not that good of a defensive player

He was an amazing rebounder though, which is pretty much all this stat measure.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,310
And1: 9,873
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: BPM from 1952-1973 

Post#5 » by penbeast0 » Tue Dec 6, 2022 4:58 pm

Really enjoyed looking at this, will probably come back to it several times. Agree that Boerwinkle was not very mobile nor a strong man defender generally but he was long, blocked shots, and held position well. He was also a surprisingly good passer and hit enough midrange shots to keep his man honest in Motta's high post offense. His defensive rating may be helped by playing with 4 very good man defenders that would use him as a backstop on defense; curious whether Cliff Ray's Drtgs in Chicago were equally good per minutes, haven't checked yet.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
Cavsfansince84
RealGM
Posts: 14,909
And1: 11,409
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
   

Re: BPM from 1952-1973 

Post#6 » by Cavsfansince84 » Tue Dec 6, 2022 7:26 pm

The main issue I'd have with the pre 74 stuff would be lack of steals and blocks data and Wilt's vorp being that low from 1960-64 seems a bit off given how many minutes he was playing. Which obviously may be impacted by blocks/steals not being fully represented.
rk2023
Starter
Posts: 2,266
And1: 2,270
Joined: Jul 01, 2022
   

Re: BPM from 1952-1973 

Post#7 » by rk2023 » Tue Dec 6, 2022 10:10 pm

Thanks for sharing, I definitely see the correlation with box stats in the case of Chamberlain and Oscar. Regardless of BPM interpretation, cool work and initiative
Mogspan wrote:I think they see the super rare combo of high IQ with freakish athleticism and overrate the former a bit, kind of like a hot girl who is rather articulate being thought of as “super smart.” I don’t know kind of a weird analogy, but you catch my drift.
SpreeS
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,758
And1: 4,122
Joined: Jul 26, 2012
 

Re: BPM from 1952-1973 

Post#8 » by SpreeS » Wed Dec 7, 2022 7:13 am

Nice done. Is it difficult to conculate careers BPM and VORP with this data?

Return to Player Comparisons