minimus wrote:shrink wrote:minimus wrote:One CBA related question: both Reid and Nowell are RFA. Does it mean that we cant use them in sign-and-trade scenarios?
For instance, Naz Reid signs 27/3 contract with us and will be traded to CHI for Caruso.
Trade them now with an extension? Poison pill makes it difficult. Probably better to trade them without an extension, and let the other team decide whether to extend or offer a new contract next summer with the Bird rights they inherited.
Trade them next summer? Yes, but the team that we trade them to would have to offer the biggest salary so they’d agree to sign, and since they aren’t getting paid much (Naz for sure), most teams would just sign the UFA’s themselves. Not much trade value.
Thank you! My idea is since I dont want to trade neither Anderson and Prince, we dont have other contracts that can be thrown as salary filler 10-13mil. So I wondered whether we can sign either Nowell and Reid and trade them
I agree! Both Anderson and Prince have specific value in MIN, so I wouldn’t want to use them just as salary filler either.
I would hope MIN is talking with them right now about signing a reasonable extension, so that they remain attractive trade pieces this summer, and like you say, could be used as minor trade assets or sweeteners in salary matches. It might be impossible to get Nowell to sign - he may bet on himself to get more in free agency than we can legally offer him in an extension right now. But an extension offers either poorly paid player the security of life-changing money, protecting them from a career-ending injury they could pick up over he rest of the year.
EDIT: In order to avoid the poison pill problem, it’s possible that Naz has a handshake deal on an extension right now that the Wolves won’t make official until a few days after the deadline, which by now is only two months away.