The Knicks have won 9 in a row!

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,145
And1: 22,685
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: The Knicks have won 7 in a row 

Post#81 » by RHODEY » Mon Dec 19, 2022 9:40 pm

Exp0sed wrote:I don't get what most ppl itt are clamoring about, no1 is mistaking this win streak for the Knicks being a contender or anything
obviously they're unlikely to go very far in the postseason, what's that got do with it?

I thought the Barret extention was a mistake but be that as it may, having Randle recoup his trade value (and winning games) is an amazing outcome for the Knicks, he was untradable (without attaching Frp's) just a couple of months ago

it makes him movable and also he can be that good #3 if they did manage to land or sign a true first option

Fournier was an obvious dud, they'll move him eventually but all in all not in a bad position at all, to keep developing their guys, retooling and wait for that star :)

Randle is playing like an All-star and so is JB
Mitch killing it too and Grime's defense has been a revelation

they're in a playoff spot, competing - what's not to like?

just cause they ain't winning a ring soon? so what..that's true about almost every other team as well


That it's the Knicks doing it.
User avatar
El Turco
GOTB Fantasy Basketball Ultimate 2x Champion
Posts: 54,766
And1: 21,954
Joined: Apr 11, 2007
Location: Frisco
     

Re: The Knicks have won 7 in a row 

Post#82 » by El Turco » Mon Dec 19, 2022 9:40 pm

Capn'O wrote:
El Turco wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
Gee, you'd think a team with such wisdom and vision to let Brunson go and also Luka Doncic would have a better record than a team without "a core player for a contender... just (a) collection of role players."

;)


your words not mine. i am not giving mavs front office any awards any time soon.


And yet you are deferring to their judgment as evidence that Brunson has no value to a contender. Maybe not the best example?

although they are already more successful in luka's 4 years than knicks' past 20 years. difference between having a legit first option and bunch of nondescript role players.


This is all gobbledy gook. The Knicks lack a superstar first option. Period. But if the players they did have had no value like you say they wouldn't have the Knicks in the playoff picture.


their value is being role players, and role players dont contend without a first or in most cases a second option. in a conference where 10 out of 15 teams make the playoffs and handful of teams tank, congrats you might beat out magic's barely drinking age or pistons' bonefide g-league group.

and point keeps flying over your head, no team in the league, even a bad otherwise talentless team like mavs were desperate enough to offer him a large enough contract and keep him as a 2nd option. not that being a bad front office precludes them from making a single good decision.
TheLowlySquire wrote:Wow, Arda! Huge!


Howard Mass wrote:Arda is not a terrorist. Arda is a good person.
User avatar
Clyde Frazier
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,242
And1: 26,119
Joined: Sep 07, 2010

Re: The Knicks have won 7 in a row 

Post#83 » by Clyde Frazier » Mon Dec 19, 2022 10:17 pm

El Turco wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
El Turco wrote:
not even. being the 2nd best player on mavs is like being the smartest sorority sister at arizona state.

and even they obviously didnt see him as a capable core player in a contending team long term.


Gee, you'd think a team with such wisdom and vision to let Brunson go and also Luka Doncic would have a better record than a team without "a core player for a contender... just (a) collection of role players."

;)


your words not mine. i am not giving mavs front office any awards any time soon.

although they are already more successful in luka's 4 years than knicks' past 20 years. difference between having a legit first option and bunch of nondescript role players.


You can keep calling Brunson a role player all you want. It isn't gonna make it any less of a lie. Neither is randle with the bounce back season he's having, but the Brunson claim is laughable.
User avatar
Scalabrine
RealGM
Posts: 18,324
And1: 8,142
Joined: Jun 02, 2004
Location: NorCal
     

Re: The Knicks have won 7 in a row 

Post#84 » by Scalabrine » Mon Dec 19, 2022 10:22 pm

El Turco wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
El Turco wrote:
your words not mine. i am not giving mavs front office any awards any time soon.


And yet you are deferring to their judgment as evidence that Brunson has no value to a contender. Maybe not the best example?

although they are already more successful in luka's 4 years than knicks' past 20 years. difference between having a legit first option and bunch of nondescript role players.


This is all gobbledy gook. The Knicks lack a superstar first option. Period. But if the players they did have had no value like you say they wouldn't have the Knicks in the playoff picture.


their value is being role players, and role players dont contend without a first or in most cases a second option. in a conference where 10 out of 15 teams make the playoffs and handful of teams tank, congrats you might beat out magic's barely drinking age or pistons' bonefide g-league group.

and point keeps flying over your head, no team in the league, even a bad otherwise talentless team like mavs were desperate enough to offer him a large enough contract and keep him as a 2nd option. not that being a bad front office precludes them from making a single good decision.



Woah woah woah. We're not gotta call the play-in the playoffs. We're just not.

and I'm having trouble understanding the exact point youre trying to make here. Are you saying that no other team would have given Jalen Brunson the contract that the Knicks gave him? Cause if that's what youre saying then I'm pretty positive youre wrong. The Mavs are one team that definitely would have, they just never got a chance.
Go Knicks!
User avatar
MoneyTalks41890
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 32,838
And1: 25,144
Joined: Oct 13, 2009
 

Re: The Knicks have won 7 in a row 

Post#85 » by MoneyTalks41890 » Mon Dec 19, 2022 10:23 pm

Clyde Frazier wrote:
El Turco wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
Gee, you'd think a team with such wisdom and vision to let Brunson go and also Luka Doncic would have a better record than a team without "a core player for a contender... just (a) collection of role players."

;)


your words not mine. i am not giving mavs front office any awards any time soon.

although they are already more successful in luka's 4 years than knicks' past 20 years. difference between having a legit first option and bunch of nondescript role players.


You can keep calling Brunson a role player all you want. It isn't gonna make it any less of a lie. Neither is randle with the bounce back season he's having, but the Brunson claim is laughable.


I mean what is Brunson then? He’s not a star player.
User avatar
Capn'O
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 90,267
And1: 110,145
Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Location: Bone Goal
 

Re: The Knicks have won 7 in a row 

Post#86 » by Capn'O » Mon Dec 19, 2022 10:29 pm

Let's not lose the plot. The question is whether the Knicks have any "core pieces" for a contender.

2019 Raptors:

Lowry
Green
Kawhi
Siakam
Gasol

Was Leonard the only core piece?

2021 Bucks:

Holiday
Middleton
Tucker
Giannis
Lopez

Was Giannis the only core piece?

If we think of anybody else in these lineups as core pieces then the Knicks probably have some core pieces. If it's only Giannis and Leonard, which I think is ridiculous, then they don't. But Brunson's play this year is clearly on the same tier as Lowry, Holiday, Siakam, and Middleton. And you can keep working down the line from there as to what constitutes a core piece.
BAF Clippers:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION

:beer:
WargamesX
RealGM
Posts: 10,841
And1: 8,100
Joined: Apr 10, 2017
   

Re: The Knicks have won 7 in a row 

Post#87 » by WargamesX » Mon Dec 19, 2022 10:34 pm

Capn'O wrote:Let's not lose the plot. The question is whether the Knicks have any "core pieces" for a contender.

2019 Raptors:

Lowry
Green
Kawhi
Siakam
Gasol

Was Leonard the only core piece?

2021 Bucks:

Holiday
Middleton
Tucker
Giannis
Lopez

Was Giannis the only core piece?

If we think of anybody else in these lineups as core pieces then the Knicks probably have some core pieces. If it's only Giannis and Leonard, which I think is ridiculous, then they don't. But Brunson is clearly on the same tier as Lowry, Siakam, and Middleton. And you can keep working down the line from there as to what constitutes a core piece.

The question is can they make it to the playoffs?

I hate threads like this because they are Lucy with the Football status and magnets for people who want to feel good about their own stinking team.

There are 52 more games to this season.e :noway:
Matthew 6:5
Luke 15:3-7
User avatar
El Turco
GOTB Fantasy Basketball Ultimate 2x Champion
Posts: 54,766
And1: 21,954
Joined: Apr 11, 2007
Location: Frisco
     

Re: The Knicks have won 7 in a row 

Post#88 » by El Turco » Mon Dec 19, 2022 10:34 pm

Scalabrine wrote:
El Turco wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
And yet you are deferring to their judgment as evidence that Brunson has no value to a contender. Maybe not the best example?



This is all gobbledy gook. The Knicks lack a superstar first option. Period. But if the players they did have had no value like you say they wouldn't have the Knicks in the playoff picture.


their value is being role players, and role players dont contend without a first or in most cases a second option. in a conference where 10 out of 15 teams make the playoffs and handful of teams tank, congrats you might beat out magic's barely drinking age or pistons' bonefide g-league group.

and point keeps flying over your head, no team in the league, even a bad otherwise talentless team like mavs were desperate enough to offer him a large enough contract and keep him as a 2nd option. not that being a bad front office precludes them from making a single good decision.



Woah woah woah. We're not gotta call the play-in the playoffs. We're just not.

and I'm having trouble understanding the exact point youre trying to make here. Are you saying that no other team would have given Jalen Brunson the contract that the Knicks gave him? Cause if that's what youre saying then I'm pretty positive youre wrong. The Mavs are one team that definitely would have, they just never got a chance.


mavs offered him 4/94? contenders pay their core players 30mil+ see murray, ingram, wiggins etc. obviously mavs didnt value him as a 2nd or 3rd option in a contending team otherwise he would have gotten a better contract from the mavs than the one he got from knicks. he wasnt going to refuse 120+ million contract from mavs to go to knicks for 100 mil. neither any other contending team would pay him 30mil.

yeah i am lying brunson is a star, he ll show me when he is a finals mvp lol
TheLowlySquire wrote:Wow, Arda! Huge!


Howard Mass wrote:Arda is not a terrorist. Arda is a good person.
WargamesX
RealGM
Posts: 10,841
And1: 8,100
Joined: Apr 10, 2017
   

Re: The Knicks have won 7 in a row 

Post#89 » by WargamesX » Mon Dec 19, 2022 10:35 pm

El Turco wrote:
Scalabrine wrote:
El Turco wrote:
their value is being role players, and role players dont contend without a first or in most cases a second option. in a conference where 10 out of 15 teams make the playoffs and handful of teams tank, congrats you might beat out magic's barely drinking age or pistons' bonefide g-league group.

and point keeps flying over your head, no team in the league, even a bad otherwise talentless team like mavs were desperate enough to offer him a large enough contract and keep him as a 2nd option. not that being a bad front office precludes them from making a single good decision.



Woah woah woah. We're not gotta call the play-in the playoffs. We're just not.

and I'm having trouble understanding the exact point youre trying to make here. Are you saying that no other team would have given Jalen Brunson the contract that the Knicks gave him? Cause if that's what youre saying then I'm pretty positive youre wrong. The Mavs are one team that definitely would have, they just never got a chance.


mavs offered him 4/94? contenders pay their core players 30mil+ see murray, ingram, wiggins etc. obviously mavs didnt value him as a 2nd or 3rd option in a contending team otherwise he would have gotten a better contract from the mavs than the one he got from knicks. he wasnt going to refuse 120+ million contract from mavs to go to knicks for 100 mil.

yeah i am lying brunson is a star, he ll show me when he is a finals mvp lol

^see look at this miserable fan
Matthew 6:5
Luke 15:3-7
User avatar
Clyde Frazier
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,242
And1: 26,119
Joined: Sep 07, 2010

Re: The Knicks have won 7 in a row 

Post#90 » by Clyde Frazier » Mon Dec 19, 2022 10:37 pm

MoneyTalks41890 wrote:
Clyde Frazier wrote:
El Turco wrote:
your words not mine. i am not giving mavs front office any awards any time soon.

although they are already more successful in luka's 4 years than knicks' past 20 years. difference between having a legit first option and bunch of nondescript role players.


You can keep calling Brunson a role player all you want. It isn't gonna make it any less of a lie. Neither is randle with the bounce back season he's having, but the Brunson claim is laughable.


I mean what is Brunson then? He’s not a star player.


...In what world is 20.8 PPG/3.2 RPG/6.2 APG/1.8 SPG on 57.9% TS for a winning team not an all star caliber player?
dooki667
Junior
Posts: 380
And1: 260
Joined: Feb 26, 2019
   

Re: The Knicks have won 7 in a row 

Post#91 » by dooki667 » Mon Dec 19, 2022 10:43 pm

cgf wrote:
DarkXaero wrote:
RHODEY wrote:With role player results....
Maybe so but notice how I'm not overhyping the Nets here on GB.


We're excited by this run, but I dunno that many of us think we're going to make a lot of noise or anything...or even think we're playoff locks now. We still lack a proper #1...or a true bluechip prospect that is likely to grow into one...even a lower level #1 like Lavine; never mind a title-caliber #1 like Booker / Zion / Tatum.

But having a young team...Randle (28) & Brunson (26) as the only guys in the rotation over 24...that is +4 on FRPs and is currently playing really well is a nice place to be for this franchise. Even if that blockbuster we still need never comes & our FO ends up failing to build a contender with all of their trade bait.

as a 30 year+ knick fan I second this. I'm just glad to be able to this this much joy watching my team it's been rare here
User avatar
ibraheim718
RealGM
Posts: 41,751
And1: 15,280
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: The Knicks have won 7 in a row 

Post#92 » by ibraheim718 » Mon Dec 19, 2022 10:50 pm

The Brunson slander is laughable. He's having a great year in historically toxic atmosphere and his presence alone is the reason Randle has been able to bounce back from an last year's embarrassment. If he isn't a 'star' them wtf is?

Guys that fans would deem 'stars' avoid playing for the Knicks.. Brunson didn't.
dooki667
Junior
Posts: 380
And1: 260
Joined: Feb 26, 2019
   

Re: The Knicks have won 7 in a row 

Post#93 » by dooki667 » Mon Dec 19, 2022 10:51 pm

Scalabrine wrote:
cgf wrote:
Sane wrote:
Listen man I don't want to sit here and talk sh*t about the difficulties the fans have gone through, but at the top of this league there's no room for a mediocre offense and $68m of cap space (i.e. limited real estate) dedicated to Jalen Brunson, Julius Randle and Evan Fournier. Ask any team that has been to a conference finals recently, all of them understand that even ONE guy getting paid a lot and not contributing is a problem cause the other top teams don't waste dollars and keep throwing weapons at you.

None of the young players are star in the making except RJ. None of the vets are MVP calibre. The coach will never have a good enough offense to get to an NBA Finals.

It's a step up but it's the wrong step. I'm telling you during a big winning streak so that you understand how well I understand this: you're going to have to fire Thibs or face a lot of heartache feeling like you were close... and then you're going to have to fire Thibs.

I'm glad you're happy it took 2 years and a slump for Thibs to realize he must play the young guys rather than his old friends. You have 4 incoming picks from other teams, don't waste them on Thibs. The arguments you're making I've heard them from Chicagoans, Minnesotans and now Knicks fans. Just study the history, it will go exactly the same way and those teams had their peaks as well and those fans felt like you feel right now.


As a chicago based Knicks fan whose best friend is a huge bulls fan and adopted the TimberBulls as her second team while Thibs was there, I know Thibs has his limitations and at some point, I hope we'll be able to do better...but I've also watched Thibs coach for long enough to notice that he has changed and seems to have learned some things from his failure in Minnesota.


On top of being much more amenable to modern offensive concepts, using a softer touch with more-mercurial kids, and showing a willingness to experiment with unusual lineups in a way that the old thibs never had...like using Randle as a smallball 5 or Toppin as a Jumbo 3, to get them on the court together...Thibs has also been playing our kids consistently since he arrived in NY.

RJ & Robinson were immediate starters; Quickley and Grimes both earned significant roles as rookies, with Grimes even becoming a starter before he got hurt last year; Sims was allowed to push Thibs' bff Taj Gibson out of the NBA over the course of his rookie year despite being a raw 2nd round pick; he stuck with Toppin even when Obi looked full-deer-in-the-headlights as well as the Obi-Julius lineups he's played around with...Thibs even gave Knox & Reddish fair chances to learn on the job & show growth, trying to work with both of those airheads.

He doesn't rush kids into roles that they're not ready to succeed in and only started regularly playing Deuce McBride after the recent rotation shake-up, but if we're going to crucify Thibs for not rushing to give a 2nd-year SRP minutes ahead of Rose, Reddish, & Fournier; then we're holding Thibs to some pretty unrealistic standards.


The offense is still not very cutting-edge, despite his increased focus on 3pters & transition buckets, the defensive gives up too many 3s, and he still plays Randle & Barrett too much...but that doesn't mean that he hasn't changed or learned from his previous stops and that all of the old criticisms of him are still applicable.


Thank you. This guy acts like we have had such better experiences over the past 20 years. He's easily the best coach we've had and the results speak for themselves at this point.

Do y'all rank him higher than Mike Dantoni?
WargamesX
RealGM
Posts: 10,841
And1: 8,100
Joined: Apr 10, 2017
   

Re: The Knicks have won 7 in a row 

Post#94 » by WargamesX » Mon Dec 19, 2022 10:51 pm

ibraheim718 wrote:The Brunson slander is laughable. He's having a great year in historically toxic atmosphere and his presence alone is the reason Randle has been able to bounce back from an last year's embarrassment. If he isn't a 'star' them wtf is?

Guys that fans would deem 'stars' avoid playing for the Knicks.. Brunson didn't.


Let's get him into the all star game first before we crown him a star. It's a long season but if this holds up he and Randle could both have a shot.
Matthew 6:5
Luke 15:3-7
cgf
RealGM
Posts: 35,092
And1: 14,458
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
   

Re: The Knicks have won 7 in a row 

Post#95 » by cgf » Mon Dec 19, 2022 10:56 pm

dooki667 wrote:
Scalabrine wrote:
cgf wrote:
As a chicago based Knicks fan whose best friend is a huge bulls fan and adopted the TimberBulls as her second team while Thibs was there, I know Thibs has his limitations and at some point, I hope we'll be able to do better...but I've also watched Thibs coach for long enough to notice that he has changed and seems to have learned some things from his failure in Minnesota.


On top of being much more amenable to modern offensive concepts, using a softer touch with more-mercurial kids, and showing a willingness to experiment with unusual lineups in a way that the old thibs never had...like using Randle as a smallball 5 or Toppin as a Jumbo 3, to get them on the court together...Thibs has also been playing our kids consistently since he arrived in NY.

RJ & Robinson were immediate starters; Quickley and Grimes both earned significant roles as rookies, with Grimes even becoming a starter before he got hurt last year; Sims was allowed to push Thibs' bff Taj Gibson out of the NBA over the course of his rookie year despite being a raw 2nd round pick; he stuck with Toppin even when Obi looked full-deer-in-the-headlights as well as the Obi-Julius lineups he's played around with...Thibs even gave Knox & Reddish fair chances to learn on the job & show growth, trying to work with both of those airheads.

He doesn't rush kids into roles that they're not ready to succeed in and only started regularly playing Deuce McBride after the recent rotation shake-up, but if we're going to crucify Thibs for not rushing to give a 2nd-year SRP minutes ahead of Rose, Reddish, & Fournier; then we're holding Thibs to some pretty unrealistic standards.


The offense is still not very cutting-edge, despite his increased focus on 3pters & transition buckets, the defensive gives up too many 3s, and he still plays Randle & Barrett too much...but that doesn't mean that he hasn't changed or learned from his previous stops and that all of the old criticisms of him are still applicable.


Thank you. This guy acts like we have had such better experiences over the past 20 years. He's easily the best coach we've had and the results speak for themselves at this point.

Do y'all rank him higher than Mike Dantoni?


In a vacuum or just judging them by their Knicks tenure? Mike D's a better coach in general, but I think Thibs' stint has been more successful/impressive.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.

Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
User avatar
ibraheim718
RealGM
Posts: 41,751
And1: 15,280
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: The Knicks have won 7 in a row 

Post#96 » by ibraheim718 » Mon Dec 19, 2022 10:57 pm

WargamesX wrote:
ibraheim718 wrote:The Brunson slander is laughable. He's having a great year in historically toxic atmosphere and his presence alone is the reason Randle has been able to bounce back from an last year's embarrassment. If he isn't a 'star' them wtf is?

Guys that fans would deem 'stars' avoid playing for the Knicks.. Brunson didn't.


Let's get him into the all star game first before we crown him a star. It's a long season but if this holds up he and Randle could both have a shot.


I predicted on the Knicks board he'd make the all star team. I'm not worried at all. He'll make team. Whose been better at that position in the east? Mitchell has been playing the 2 and Irving has a black cloud hanging over his head and Young's hawks have been a huge disappointment.
User avatar
El Turco
GOTB Fantasy Basketball Ultimate 2x Champion
Posts: 54,766
And1: 21,954
Joined: Apr 11, 2007
Location: Frisco
     

Re: The Knicks have won 7 in a row 

Post#97 » by El Turco » Mon Dec 19, 2022 10:57 pm

lowry was a 5 times all star in 2019, middleton was a multi year allstar, jrue was 3 time all defensive player in 2021, even past his prime DPOY gasol played elite defense that championship year. we are comparing them to brunson and knicks lol.
TheLowlySquire wrote:Wow, Arda! Huge!


Howard Mass wrote:Arda is not a terrorist. Arda is a good person.
WargamesX
RealGM
Posts: 10,841
And1: 8,100
Joined: Apr 10, 2017
   

Re: The Knicks have won 7 in a row 

Post#98 » by WargamesX » Mon Dec 19, 2022 11:00 pm

ibraheim718 wrote:
WargamesX wrote:
ibraheim718 wrote:The Brunson slander is laughable. He's having a great year in historically toxic atmosphere and his presence alone is the reason Randle has been able to bounce back from an last year's embarrassment. If he isn't a 'star' them wtf is?

Guys that fans would deem 'stars' avoid playing for the Knicks.. Brunson didn't.


Let's get him into the all star game first before we crown him a star. It's a long season but if this holds up he and Randle could both have a shot.


I predicted on the Knicks board he'd make the all star team. I'm not worried at all. He'll make team. Whose been better at that position in the east? Mitchell has been playing the 2 and Irving has a black cloud hanging over his head and Young's hawks have been a huge disappointment.


it's too early to tell. Brunson should be in the early conversation. Everything has to continue to trend up though.
Matthew 6:5
Luke 15:3-7
User avatar
DaGawd
RealGM
Posts: 38,780
And1: 51,787
Joined: Mar 11, 2014
Location: Queens, NY
     

Re: The Knicks have won 7 in a row 

Post#99 » by DaGawd » Mon Dec 19, 2022 11:02 pm

El Turco wrote:lowry was a 5 times all star in 2019, middleton was a multi year allstar, jrue was 3 time all defensive player in 2021, even past his prime DPOY gasol played elite defense that championship year. we are comparing them to brunson and knicks lol.

and brunson is about the same age as lowry was when he got traded to the raptors and became the kyle lowry we remember him as
BaF
Washington Wizards
User avatar
El Turco
GOTB Fantasy Basketball Ultimate 2x Champion
Posts: 54,766
And1: 21,954
Joined: Apr 11, 2007
Location: Frisco
     

Re: The Knicks have won 7 in a row 

Post#100 » by El Turco » Mon Dec 19, 2022 11:10 pm

DaGawd wrote:
El Turco wrote:lowry was a 5 times all star in 2019, middleton was a multi year allstar, jrue was 3 time all defensive player in 2021, even past his prime DPOY gasol played elite defense that championship year. we are comparing them to brunson and knicks lol.

and brunson is about the same age as lowry was when he got traded to the raptors and became the kyle lowry we remember him as


so is garrison mathews :)
TheLowlySquire wrote:Wow, Arda! Huge!


Howard Mass wrote:Arda is not a terrorist. Arda is a good person.

Return to The General Board