ImageImageImage

What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker?

Moderators: BullyKing, HartfordWhalers, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan

Kobblehead
RealGM
Posts: 40,842
And1: 19,998
Joined: Apr 15, 2010
 

What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#1 » by Kobblehead » Wed Dec 28, 2022 12:16 am

This is ridiculous. The guys is one of the least productive players in the sport. What are they thinking?
User avatar
HardenGoat
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,596
And1: 3,300
Joined: Jan 18, 2021
       

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#2 » by HardenGoat » Wed Dec 28, 2022 1:02 am

He is a leader when games count the most.
SixthStreet
Starter
Posts: 2,185
And1: 1,842
Joined: May 31, 2018
       

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#3 » by SixthStreet » Wed Dec 28, 2022 1:12 am

I'm not sure what Morey is thinking but Rivers has shown time and time again he's going down with the guy with more games played than the alternative, evidence be damned.
the_process
RealGM
Posts: 29,030
And1: 10,287
Joined: May 01, 2010

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#4 » by the_process » Wed Dec 28, 2022 1:20 am

They obviously promised him playing time. And Embiid and Harden do less defensively with him out there, which they like.

Plus, as mentioned, Glenn has a long track record of going down in flames if necessary with the vet name player.
phillynative
General Manager
Posts: 9,396
And1: 3,025
Joined: Dec 13, 2014

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#5 » by phillynative » Wed Dec 28, 2022 2:54 am

Intangibles , Toughness, Upper Body Strength, Elite Sneaker collection, Hoarse voice that Doc can relate too.
brannigan73
Rookie
Posts: 1,183
And1: 677
Joined: Apr 28, 2011

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#6 » by brannigan73 » Wed Dec 28, 2022 3:26 am

Doc loves vets and they probably made dumb promises to PJ.
youngcrev
RealGM
Posts: 28,752
And1: 9,662
Joined: Jun 12, 2005
Location: Philadelphia(ish)
   

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#7 » by youngcrev » Wed Dec 28, 2022 3:29 am

I'm guessing he won't be soon after Maxey gets back.
FireMorey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,721
And1: 4,518
Joined: Mar 19, 2018
   

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#8 » by FireMorey » Wed Dec 28, 2022 5:25 pm

This thread should say "what were they thinking when they signed PJ Tucker?" Giving him 3 years was always absolutely ridiculous.
ExplosionsInDaSky
RealGM
Posts: 21,276
And1: 5,411
Joined: Mar 17, 2004

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#9 » by ExplosionsInDaSky » Wed Dec 28, 2022 5:40 pm

I was never against adding PJ Tucker to this roster until I saw for how long and for how much. He was cooked once the postseason wrapped up against Boston last year. You could see it. He's a valuable player to have on this roster, but he shouldn't be playing 35+ MPG. He's not even getting open looks from three in this offense and that's always been his B&B. Now he's playing with a pinched nerve in his right hand and that can't be good. He hurt it last night when he fell on the floor, you could see him holding it when Jo tried to help him up. He's simply too old to be playing that many minutes and I personally have some very profound buyers remorse at this point. I didn't like the signing when it happened and I don't like it now. With all that said, who exactly on this roster is going to replace what he does? Tucker does make our defense all the more better, but that's not really saying a whole lot because this team never seems to want to defend for 48 minutes. It's a tough situation with Tucker because he does give it all he has out there when he's playing, but offensively when he gets the ball passed to him and he's forced to create even in the slightest, it's a nightmare waiting to happen. Kyle...Anderson should have been the player we signed. It doesn't matter now. Done is done, Embiid banged the table for PJ Tucker and Morey went out and got him. It would be wise of a player like Embiid to probably leave the GMing to the actual GM's. Of course they're going to try and keep their star player happy, and that's literally what they did in this situation. Tucker is toast. As bad as he's been for us, this will be his most productive season as a member of this team. I can't wait to see him at 40 on this roster. We are stuck with him.
User avatar
mjkvol
Head Coach
Posts: 6,801
And1: 6,486
Joined: Apr 13, 2019

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#10 » by mjkvol » Wed Dec 28, 2022 6:04 pm

ExplosionsInDaSky wrote:I was never against adding PJ Tucker to this roster until I saw for how long and for how much. He was cooked once the postseason wrapped up against Boston last year. You could see it. He's a valuable player to have on this roster, but he shouldn't be playing 35+ MPG.


That's the whole thing right there. The Tucker signing was all about the playoffs, but Glenn being Glenn he's going to run the guy into the ground before we even get to 2023. The hand injury might be a blessing in disguise, as hopefully Tucker will be shut down for a while and will get less minutes once he returns with Maxey about to be activated.
"Most people do not really want freedom, because freedom involves responsibility, and most people are frightened of responsibility." - Sigmund Freud
Jailblazers7
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,344
And1: 6,077
Joined: Oct 23, 2017
     

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#11 » by Jailblazers7 » Wed Dec 28, 2022 6:25 pm

I actually don’t get the “promised minutes” thing. Wouldn’t a 37 year old vet prefer to coast through the reg season and play big minutes in the playoffs similar to Iggy with the Warriors?
User avatar
Arsenal
RealGM
Posts: 17,060
And1: 11,960
Joined: Jun 05, 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
 

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#12 » by Arsenal » Wed Dec 28, 2022 6:30 pm

Yeah why should Tucker care about his mins? He got his final bag w/that 3 year contract. He should be fine w/limited reg season minutes to save himself for the playoffs.

Now we need Glenn to figure it out.
ExplosionsInDaSky
RealGM
Posts: 21,276
And1: 5,411
Joined: Mar 17, 2004

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#13 » by ExplosionsInDaSky » Wed Dec 28, 2022 6:32 pm

mjkvol wrote:
ExplosionsInDaSky wrote:I was never against adding PJ Tucker to this roster until I saw for how long and for how much. He was cooked once the postseason wrapped up against Boston last year. You could see it. He's a valuable player to have on this roster, but he shouldn't be playing 35+ MPG.


That's the whole thing right there. The Tucker signing was all about the playoffs, but Glenn being Glenn he's going to run the guy into the ground before we even get to 2023. The hand injury might be a blessing in disguise, as hopefully Tucker will be shut down for a while and will get less minutes once he returns with Maxey about to be activated.


That was my understanding as well. Or at least my "expected" understanding. I thought that the House signing was for depth, We had Thybulle in the mix. I know some on here aren't the biggest fan of his, but he does have two all NBA defense awards to his resume. If we weren't going to use him, then the logical thing would have been to trade him with his value at it's highest. Thybulle is all but an afterthought right now and the value just wont be there. Not sure that it would have anyway because he still hasn't been able to hit open threes with any kind of consistency....Not gonna get into that right now. Yes...I agree, Doc is playing Tucker way too many minutes, but this entire season thus far has felt like a dog fight. Every game...Opposing teams are competing, they aren't giving us anything. We got beat by Washington last night. IF any good has come out of this season so far, it's the parity in this league. Every team is trying to win. Even Orlando has gotten their act together. That in turn...I guess in Doc's mind means that he has to roll with the starters more than he'd like to? IDK, but yeah...Tucker has been run into the ground thus far and it seems pointless when we have House and Thybulle there in need of minutes. Neither House or Thybulle are the answer at the SF position, but to be fair, neither one of them have been able to find any kind of rhythm within the structure of the team. Doc should absolutely shelf Tucker for the time being, let him get his hand right and pivot to House and Thybulle the same way he did with Shake when Harden and Maxey went down.
Jay555
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,722
And1: 904
Joined: May 30, 2021
   

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#14 » by Jay555 » Wed Dec 28, 2022 7:56 pm

I think PJ should be fine come playoffs. He was garbage in the regular season last year with the Heat and did his thing when it counted most. Yes he’s older, but his playing style/physicality is made for playoffs when refs swallow their whistles.

We do need to rest him as much as we can and keep him fresh for the playoffs. Let him get healthy now and play him 20 minutes a game when he’s recovered from his hand injury.

Similarly, can doc stop playing Harden 40+ mins a game? What a disaster. The team still needs a couple more trades to bolster the 3/4/5 positions. A 3 & D wing would be sweet although unlikely. And a backup C like Andre Drummond who can fill the rebounding holes of this team?
Bum Adebayo
General Manager
Posts: 7,711
And1: 4,075
Joined: Apr 28, 2016

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#15 » by Bum Adebayo » Wed Dec 28, 2022 8:44 pm

One of the worst player in the league indeed, only Sixers would give good amount of money to such trash player.
User avatar
mjkvol
Head Coach
Posts: 6,801
And1: 6,486
Joined: Apr 13, 2019

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#16 » by mjkvol » Wed Dec 28, 2022 10:57 pm

ExplosionsInDaSky wrote:
mjkvol wrote:
ExplosionsInDaSky wrote:I was never against adding PJ Tucker to this roster until I saw for how long and for how much. He was cooked once the postseason wrapped up against Boston last year. You could see it. He's a valuable player to have on this roster, but he shouldn't be playing 35+ MPG.


That's the whole thing right there. The Tucker signing was all about the playoffs, but Glenn being Glenn he's going to run the guy into the ground before we even get to 2023. The hand injury might be a blessing in disguise, as hopefully Tucker will be shut down for a while and will get less minutes once he returns with Maxey about to be activated.


That was my understanding as well. Or at least my "expected" understanding. I thought that the House signing was for depth, We had Thybulle in the mix. I know some on here aren't the biggest fan of his, but he does have two all NBA defense awards to his resume. If we weren't going to use him, then the logical thing would have been to trade him with his value at it's highest. Thybulle is all but an afterthought right now and the value just wont be there. Not sure that it would have anyway because he still hasn't been able to hit open threes with any kind of consistency....Not gonna get into that right now. Yes...I agree, Doc is playing Tucker way too many minutes, but this entire season thus far has felt like a dog fight. Every game...Opposing teams are competing, they aren't giving us anything. We got beat by Washington last night. IF any good has come out of this season so far, it's the parity in this league. Every team is trying to win. Even Orlando has gotten their act together. That in turn...I guess in Doc's mind means that he has to roll with the starters more than he'd like to? IDK, but yeah...Tucker has been run into the ground thus far and it seems pointless when we have House and Thybulle there in need of minutes. Neither House or Thybulle are the answer at the SF position, but to be fair, neither one of them have been able to find any kind of rhythm within the structure of the team. Doc should absolutely shelf Tucker for the time being, let him get his hand right and pivot to House and Thybulle the same way he did with Shake when Harden and Maxey went down.


Thybulle and Korkmaz should both have been moved before the season started, and to me it's essential that Thybulle is out of here before the deadline. I don't care what awards he's won, he's useless on the offensive end even after four years of college and three here he hasn't figured out a way to be useful on that end. And I don't want him on the court in big spots, as he is prone to the stupid foul, and I'm not gambling that he's past that. Thybulle is the classic example of the bad pick that good organizations cash in but bad ones hold onto hoping will come around. There has to be a team that thinks they can get that 'potential' out of him - find that team.
"Most people do not really want freedom, because freedom involves responsibility, and most people are frightened of responsibility." - Sigmund Freud
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 65,756
And1: 26,794
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#17 » by 76ciology » Thu Dec 29, 2022 2:13 am

So play double big? Because the alternative is less size.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
Jailblazers7
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,344
And1: 6,077
Joined: Oct 23, 2017
     

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#18 » by Jailblazers7 » Thu Dec 29, 2022 2:54 am

76ciology wrote:So play double big? Because the alternative is less size.


I hope we play double big at some point just to appease you. I worry you’ll have too many regrets about what could have been lol
ExplosionsInDaSky
RealGM
Posts: 21,276
And1: 5,411
Joined: Mar 17, 2004

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#19 » by ExplosionsInDaSky » Thu Dec 29, 2022 3:28 am

Double big with who? Reed? We already tried this with a much better big in Al Horford. Morey is going to have to take a look at who he can get in a trade. As of right now Shake and Thybulle are his best available trade chips.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 65,756
And1: 26,794
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#20 » by 76ciology » Thu Dec 29, 2022 3:35 am

Jailblazers7 wrote:
76ciology wrote:So play double big? Because the alternative is less size.


I hope we play double big at some point just to appease you. I worry you’ll have too many regrets about what could have been lol


The only alternative I see is either that, or having Melton or house (not a fan of him) to play with Harden over Maxey.

If we continue our starting unit with Maxey, we better play ATG level offense. But how do you do that without pushing the pace with Embiid
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.

Return to Philadelphia 76ers