Apz wrote:JMAC3 wrote:The question I have is when does Gordon turn from a negative contract to a neutral contract?
Westbrook is 3rd highest paid player in league and his contract at 47 million seems pretty movable at times.
Hayward will be the 40th highest paid player in league next year with an expiring of 31.5 million.
So lets say for a team like Dallas...
They can acquire Hayward at deadline, pay him half his salary for second half of this year (15 million) try him out in the playoffs for a year. If he fails and Dallas hates it.... how hard is it move an expiring contract his size next year? You could make argument that his contract becomes one of Dallas better assets if they truly were willing to attach picks and go star hunting...
For Hornets, I just don't see them rushing to move him if it will cost them significantly less to move him this summer as an expiring. We aren't winning anyways, so moving him now doesn't really push the needle.
Well, i wouldnt taken wb contract from lakers without 2 unp 1sts last summer, and wouldnt do it without 1 at the deadline this year. So guess answer is his best tradevalue is next tradeline when he is about to expire, but they still would have to pay in some way, like taking back longer bad salary. Unlrss u find a team that are desperate to get capspace for 24 summer. But only 5 teams are tanking and most of the teams are operating over the cap since its the only way to stay relevant
The biggest difference in Hayward is useful when he plays and WB isn’t. Hayward if healthy plays winning basketball and helps make others better.