Another good opportunity to for a quality loss.
Keep in mind, the Wolves look like they are getting their act together so their pick might end up outside the lottery.
Game 42: Utah Jazz (20-21) @ Chicago Bulls (18-21)
Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS
Game 42: Utah Jazz (20-21) @ Chicago Bulls (18-21)
- Inigo Montoya
- Forum Mod - Jazz

- Posts: 17,180
- And1: 8,452
- Joined: May 31, 2012
Game 42: Utah Jazz (20-21) @ Chicago Bulls (18-21)
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED

Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED

KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?
The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
Re: Game 42: Utah Jazz (20-21) @ Chicago Bulls (18-21)
- FJS
- Senior Mod - Jazz

- Posts: 18,810
- And1: 2,180
- Joined: Sep 19, 2002
- Location: Barcelona, Spain
-
Re: Game 42: Utah Jazz (20-21) @ Chicago Bulls (18-21)
I think wolves streak is a fluke. And i think our losing streak was a fluke too.
I expect a win tonight
I expect a win tonight

Re: Game 42: Utah Jazz (20-21) @ Chicago Bulls (18-21)
- FranchisePlayer
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,763
- And1: 598
- Joined: Oct 25, 2019
-
Re: Game 42: Utah Jazz (20-21) @ Chicago Bulls (18-21)
God, I'd love to see Markkanen punish his old team real good! Really rub it in their face รก la "this what you had and what you decided to give away" practically for free.
The Bulls have been lately like a town bicycle. Beat the Nets but let the Wolves score 150 on them.
Interesting to see who they think can guard Lauri? Williams was so out the last time the teams met, Derozan can't even in his best days. I guess they'll double down every time Lauri is in the paint? Your guess.
The Bulls have been lately like a town bicycle. Beat the Nets but let the Wolves score 150 on them.
Interesting to see who they think can guard Lauri? Williams was so out the last time the teams met, Derozan can't even in his best days. I guess they'll double down every time Lauri is in the paint? Your guess.
MrSparkle wrote:I don't see a scenario here or there where Lauri becomes the "7-pick we thought he could be." If you remove his 3P ability, he's worse than Felicio by a mile.
12/2/2022
I like the quote- it makes me chuckle. And it was/is pretty much true.
Re: Game 42: Utah Jazz (20-21) @ Chicago Bulls (18-21)
-
TNJazz
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,120
- And1: 491
- Joined: Jan 07, 2017
-
Re: Game 42: Utah Jazz (20-21) @ Chicago Bulls (18-21)
Let's ride that bicycle! Since they are in town, they might a well 
Re: Game 42: Utah Jazz (20-21) @ Chicago Bulls (18-21)
-
red4hf
- Jazz Forum GTS Champion 2019-2020
- Posts: 10,833
- And1: 1,097
- Joined: Jul 04, 2002
Re: Game 42: Utah Jazz (20-21) @ Chicago Bulls (18-21)
If Agbaji keeps playing like this, the Mitchell trade might turn out better than the Gobert one.......
Re: Game 42: Utah Jazz (20-21) @ Chicago Bulls (18-21)
- Inigo Montoya
- Forum Mod - Jazz

- Posts: 17,180
- And1: 8,452
- Joined: May 31, 2012
Re: Game 42: Utah Jazz (20-21) @ Chicago Bulls (18-21)
red4hf wrote:If Agbaji keeps playing like this, the Mitchell trade might turn out better than the Gobert one.......
Yeah, it took Agbaji one game (his first one in this stretch) to get into things but in the last two he's been straight up balling.
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED

Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED

KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?
The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
Re: Game 42: Utah Jazz (20-21) @ Chicago Bulls (18-21)
- FJS
- Senior Mod - Jazz

- Posts: 18,810
- And1: 2,180
- Joined: Sep 19, 2002
- Location: Barcelona, Spain
-
Re: Game 42: Utah Jazz (20-21) @ Chicago Bulls (18-21)
Frankly... i think we are tanking. This was a winnable game. We trhow it.



