ImageImageImageImageImage

The Washington Football Team Thread

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,549
And1: 1,988
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: The Washington Football Team Thread 

Post#1701 » by gambitx777 » Thu Jan 5, 2023 4:16 am

Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:Earliest reports on ESPN said Heineke would start and Howell would finish. Later on the ticker said Howell will start.

I wonder if Rivera waffled or he was directly ordered to start Howell?
I have no idea but I really believe in this kid. He really reminds me of Joe theismann honestly. Not tall, but accurate, smart, can move and extend plays, thick enough to take a hit.

Sent from my SM-G991U1 using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,472
And1: 2,127
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: The Washington Football Team Thread 

Post#1702 » by Dark Faze » Thu Jan 5, 2023 1:37 pm

The question is if there's anything he can really do to prevent us from targeting a QB in the draft. It'd be nice to have enough confidence in him to go after a left tackle, but the pressure has to be there to potentially move up for a QB.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,549
And1: 1,988
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: The Washington Football Team Thread 

Post#1703 » by gambitx777 » Thu Jan 5, 2023 1:53 pm

Dude! If this kid walks into Dallas, on his first start, takes a team that's eliminated, and ruins Dallas's chances of winning the division, playa well and wins the game. It's almost garunteed that he earns some confidence. Plus I personally think he's better than anyone we can get out side of the top 10 picks.

Sent from my SM-G991U1 using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,549
And1: 1,988
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: The Washington Football Team Thread 

Post#1704 » by gambitx777 » Thu Jan 5, 2023 2:16 pm

Where we will be drafting
You're looking at guys like Tanner McKee or CJ Stroud. In the first round and honestly I think Howell is better than them.

So I would just wait and see who falls around the 3-4 the rounds.

Sent from my SM-G991U1 using RealGM mobile app
Endless Loop
Sophomore
Posts: 247
And1: 223
Joined: Jun 29, 2016

Re: The Washington Football Team Thread 

Post#1705 » by Endless Loop » Sun Jan 8, 2023 8:45 pm

So McVay might "step away" from the Rams.

And the sale of the Commanders might well be further along than we know...

Wouldn't McVay back to DC be awesome!?

Just wild speculation...
User avatar
TGW
RealGM
Posts: 13,349
And1: 6,721
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: The Washington Football Team Thread 

Post#1706 » by TGW » Sun Jan 8, 2023 11:03 pm

My initial reaction of this game is that I’m not seeing anything from Howell that would change my mind on the quarterback situation. They need to put whatever assets they have into getting one. If any of the current qbs on the roster are day one starters next season, Ron and his staff need to be replaced.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,549
And1: 1,988
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: The Washington Football Team Thread 

Post#1707 » by gambitx777 » Mon Jan 9, 2023 12:31 am

Finished with a QBR of 84 not bad for his first start.

Sent from my SM-G991U1 using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
long suffrin' boulez fan
General Manager
Posts: 7,863
And1: 3,644
Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Location: Just above Ted's double bottom line
       

Re: The Washington Football Team Thread 

Post#1708 » by long suffrin' boulez fan » Mon Jan 9, 2023 1:43 am

TGW wrote:My initial reaction of this game is that I’m not seeing anything from Howell that would change my mind on the quarterback situation. They need to put whatever assets they have into getting one. If any of the current qbs on the roster are day one starters next season, Ron and his staff need to be replaced.


Please elaborate. I totally agree that this one shouldn’t have anyone of us proclaiming him the starter, but, apart from that terrible INT, he was pretty good… and he got jobbed by two no PI calls - the deep ball to Dotson and the slant to McLaurin.

His legs and arm are legit.
In Rizzo we trust
User avatar
TGW
RealGM
Posts: 13,349
And1: 6,721
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: The Washington Football Team Thread 

Post#1709 » by TGW » Mon Jan 9, 2023 1:58 am

long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:
TGW wrote:My initial reaction of this game is that I’m not seeing anything from Howell that would change my mind on the quarterback situation. They need to put whatever assets they have into getting one. If any of the current qbs on the roster are day one starters next season, Ron and his staff need to be replaced.


Please elaborate. I totally agree that this one shouldn’t have anyone of us proclaiming him the starter, but, apart from that terrible INT, he was pretty good… and he got jobbed by two no PI calls - the deep ball to Dotson and the slant to McLaurin.

His legs and arm are legit.


I’ll rewatch the game, but my initial impression was that he didn’t “kill it.” I think the film will show he had high highs and low lows. Basically what you expect from a rookie. I didn’t see anything that changed my mind on them prioritizing the quarterback position in the offseason, even though admittedly I still wouldn’t have changed my mind if he had killed it.

I think one of the announcers said he’s Heineke with better arm talent, and I agreed with the comp.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
User avatar
long suffrin' boulez fan
General Manager
Posts: 7,863
And1: 3,644
Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Location: Just above Ted's double bottom line
       

Re: The Washington Football Team Thread 

Post#1710 » by long suffrin' boulez fan » Mon Jan 9, 2023 3:11 am

TGW wrote:
long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:
TGW wrote:My initial reaction of this game is that I’m not seeing anything from Howell that would change my mind on the quarterback situation. They need to put whatever assets they have into getting one. If any of the current qbs on the roster are day one starters next season, Ron and his staff need to be replaced.


Please elaborate. I totally agree that this one shouldn’t have anyone of us proclaiming him the starter, but, apart from that terrible INT, he was pretty good… and he got jobbed by two no PI calls - the deep ball to Dotson and the slant to McLaurin.

His legs and arm are legit.


I’ll rewatch the game, but my initial impression was that he didn’t “kill it.” I think the film will show he had high highs and low lows. Basically what you expect from a rookie. I didn’t see anything that changed my mind on them prioritizing the quarterback position in the offseason, even though admittedly I still wouldn’t have changed my mind if he had killed it.

I think one of the announcers said he’s Heineke with better arm talent, and I agreed with the comp.


Yep. I’d agree with that. He’s Heineke with a much better arm and a much better ability to run for yardage. And he’s young, so he might develop. Heineke seems better in the pocket buying time and of course going through his progressions.

It’s so hard to know. I could imagine Howell with and OC who is willing to game plan upon his strengths… RPO game, downfield shots, etc.
In Rizzo we trust
User avatar
TGW
RealGM
Posts: 13,349
And1: 6,721
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: The Washington Football Team Thread 

Post#1711 » by TGW » Mon Jan 9, 2023 3:30 am

Yea I have no problem with Howell being one of the quarterbacks next year. Hypothetically, lets say we bring in a vet like Jimmy G, and another draft pick. Have an open competition in camp and let the best man win. I just want the talent at the position to be improved. If they carry three QBs, I want all three to have strong arms and some mobility. I don’t want statues and I don’t want short guys (Howell’s main issue).
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
BearlyBallin
Starter
Posts: 2,301
And1: 1,005
Joined: Mar 27, 2017
     

Re: The Washington Football Team Thread 

Post#1712 » by BearlyBallin » Mon Jan 9, 2023 8:15 am

Read on Twitter
?s=20&t=qLyD6oFdx_iIIvDkUI_qqA

Read on Twitter
?s=20&t=tPidhBQi2x5lVBsW3BPmgA

Yes his interception in the end zone was bad, but he showed some mobility and accuracy hitting receivers in stride. His numbers would have been better without a couple of drops. Definitely want to see more, but I too want a vet brought in and a mid round draft pick QB to compete next season.
Tsze-Kung asked, "Is there one word which may serve as a rule of practice for all one's life?"

The Master said, "Is not Reciprocity such a word? What you do not want done to yourself, do not do to others."
~ Confucius about 500 BC
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,143
And1: 4,990
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: The Washington Football Team Thread 

Post#1713 » by DCZards » Mon Jan 9, 2023 2:14 pm

TGW wrote:Yea I have no problem with Howell being one of the quarterbacks next year. Hypothetically, let’s say we bring in a vet like Jimmy G, and another draft pick. Have an open competition in camp and let the best man win. I just want the talent at the position to be improved. If they carry three QBs, I want all three to have strong arms and some mobility. I don’t want statues and I don’t want short guys (Howell’s main issue).

I don’t see size as an issue. Howell is 6-1. Just like Jalen Hurts. He’s an inch smaller than Patrick Mahomes and Jimmy G., and two inches taller than Russell Wilson.
User avatar
Rafael122
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,823
And1: 3,553
Joined: Oct 11, 2004
       

Re: The Washington Football Team Thread 

Post#1714 » by Rafael122 » Mon Jan 9, 2023 5:02 pm

Whatever Howell was going to do in last night's game wasn't going to change my view that our long term QB is not on the team right now. Howell, even though its 1 game, at least proved he can probably be a capable backup. He's like TH but with better arm strength.

We have the 16th pick, so that takes us out of Stroud, Levis and Bryce Young. Anthony Richardson, Florida QB is a huge risk that I don't see Rivera taking. At 16, you're probably looking at tackle or corner (Joey Porter Jr).

Edit: I saw a tweet that basically had the Commanders as the 3rd ranked defense in the league. It's incredibly deflating to have that good of a defense, a) knowing we have weaknesses at linebacker and the secondary and b) knowing that if we even had a semi-decent QB, we would probably be in the playoffs. Like, if Jared Goff were our QB, or IDK....Carr let's say, would we we have 10 or 11 wins right now?
Bickerstaff: who's up for kickball?!!
Ed Wood: Only if it's the no-pants variety.
User avatar
pancakes3
General Manager
Posts: 9,585
And1: 3,014
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: The Washington Football Team Thread 

Post#1715 » by pancakes3 » Mon Jan 9, 2023 8:00 pm

i think we can have success as an old-school run-first team + good defense. not every team has to be an offensive juggernaut to have success.

short qb's have a disadvantage seeing over the interior line, and makes over-the-middle plays difficult, but can have just as much success if not more doing RPOs and rollouts, which ties into the strong run game part of the offense. Wilson and the Seahawks had a decade of success off that exact blueprint. it's when you start forcing square pegs into round holes like Wilson on the Broncos now that you run into issues.
Bullets -> Wizards
User avatar
TGW
RealGM
Posts: 13,349
And1: 6,721
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: The Washington Football Team Thread 

Post#1716 » by TGW » Mon Jan 9, 2023 8:34 pm

pancakes3 wrote:i think we can have success as an old-school run-first team + good defense. not every team has to be an offensive juggernaut to have success.

short qb's have a disadvantage seeing over the interior line, and makes over-the-middle plays difficult, but can have just as much success if not more doing RPOs and rollouts, which ties into the strong run game part of the offense. Wilson and the Seahawks had a decade of success off that exact blueprint. it's when you start forcing square pegs into round holes like Wilson on the Broncos now that you run into issues.


Winning a SB nowadays almost requires a top 10-ish quarterback. There are some exceptions every now and then, but I don't think we've see a true run first/defensive oriented team win a SB since the Ravens in 2001.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
User avatar
pancakes3
General Manager
Posts: 9,585
And1: 3,014
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: The Washington Football Team Thread 

Post#1717 » by pancakes3 » Mon Jan 9, 2023 9:22 pm

You don't even need to go as far back as Ravens 2001; Buccs 2003 was actually a lower ranked offense that rode a #1 defense to the SB.

And ok, you can't go 3 downs in a cloud of dust any more, but with the advent of RPO, the "run" game has changed too. I'm not saying we recreate the 85 bears out there, but you also don't need to pray for a Mahomes to have a shot.

Eagles 2017 was a sub-4000 yard passing team with a top 5 defense.
Broncos 2015 was a sub-4000 yard passing team with a top 5 defense.
Seahawks 2013 (and almost in 2014) were sub-4000 yard passing teams with top 1 defenses
Ravens 2012 started Flacco
Steelers 2009 only threw for 3300 yards and had a top 1 defense.

Edit to add:

Even this year, the Eagles are again getting it done with jalen hurts under C. The team has 4100 yards passing (but would be sub-4000 if playing a 16 game season, and 14th in the league as far as TDs thrown, 23rd in passes attempted) but 2500 yards rushing and an elite defense. Hurts is an MVP candidate but has zero 400 yard passing games, and the same number of 300-yard games as he has 100-yard games (4).
Bullets -> Wizards
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,549
And1: 1,988
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: The Washington Football Team Thread 

Post#1718 » by gambitx777 » Tue Jan 10, 2023 1:10 am

Kurt Warner was 6'2 and drew Breeze was 6'0
I this Sam Howell has a lot of Kurt Warner in him. I think we have other holes we need to fill over reaching for a QB.

Sent from my SM-G991U1 using RealGM mobile app
Wizardspride
RealGM
Posts: 17,340
And1: 11,535
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: Olney, MD/Kailua/Kaneohe, HI
       

Re: The Washington Football Team Thread 

Post#1719 » by Wizardspride » Tue Jan 10, 2023 9:42 pm

Read on Twitter
?t=PmbTT5W_tB9_W6rI5WVdJw&s=19

President Donald Trump referred to African countries, Haiti and El Salvador as "shithole" nations during a meeting Thursday and asked why the U.S. can't have more immigrants from Norway.
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 54,676
And1: 10,357
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: The Washington Football Team Thread 

Post#1720 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Tue Jan 10, 2023 10:25 pm

They need to fire Rivera as well.
Tre Johnson is the future of the Wizards.

Return to Washington Wizards