Offensively: Current Jokic or 2016 Curry?

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

Who’s more valuable offfensively?

Jokic
21
43%
Curry
28
57%
 
Total votes: 49

Peregrine01
Head Coach
Posts: 6,675
And1: 7,613
Joined: Sep 12, 2012

Offensively: Current Jokic or 2016 Curry? 

Post#1 » by Peregrine01 » Fri Jan 20, 2023 3:21 am

I used to think it might be impossible to be more impactful than 2016 Curry was offensively but now watching Jokic, I’m just not sure. Jokic has a persistent offensive impact that Curry never did and I think it’s more valuable than the Curry explosions now and then.
Statlanta
RealGM
Posts: 13,841
And1: 10,486
Joined: Mar 06, 2016

Re: Offensively: Current Jokic or 2016 Curry? 

Post#2 » by Statlanta » Fri Jan 20, 2023 3:25 am

Curry since it is just RS vs. RS.

Unrestricted shot selection is more game-warping than half-court playmaking/efficiency in my opinion.
Modern NBA footwork

GREY wrote: He steps back into another time zone
ceiling raiser
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,531
And1: 3,754
Joined: Jan 27, 2013

Re: Offensively: Current Jokic or 2016 Curry? 

Post#3 » by ceiling raiser » Fri Jan 20, 2023 3:28 am

Give me Curry but Jokic is growing on me.
Now that's the difference between first and last place.
User avatar
The High Cyde
General Manager
Posts: 8,109
And1: 14,967
Joined: Jun 06, 2014
Location: Elbaf
 

Re: Offensively: Current Jokic or 2016 Curry? 

Post#4 » by The High Cyde » Fri Jan 20, 2023 4:12 am

Curry was incredible that year, it was pure magic when the Warriors came into the building pulling the rug under the opposing team. Damn near every game would be over by midway through the third quarter or earlier. They looked like they were playing in a different league, they were so ahead of it, and of course Steph was the juice that powered it all. It would behoove one to remember that it was also Kerr, Draymond, Klay, Iggy that made that season so prolific. And yet Jokic, by his lonesome, is doing something even more absurd. His stats barely even make sense right now. It’s still tough to pick Jokic over Steph, and I feel dirty picking anyone over 2016 Steph honestly, but player to player, I’m chillin’ with the Joker.
Image
No-more-rings
Head Coach
Posts: 7,104
And1: 3,912
Joined: Oct 04, 2018

Re: Offensively: Current Jokic or 2016 Curry? 

Post#5 » by No-more-rings » Fri Jan 20, 2023 4:43 am

I just noticed Jokic is averaging a +23 on/off, is that a record? Lol.
LukaTheGOAT
Analyst
Posts: 3,261
And1: 2,972
Joined: Dec 25, 2019
 

Re: Offensively: Current Jokic or 2016 Curry? 

Post#6 » by LukaTheGOAT » Fri Jan 20, 2023 6:09 am

I've repeatedly said before that I think Jokic is a better offensive player than Curry in a PS setting. However, if you are asking, who do you believe was more VALUABLE offensive player during the RS on offense, I believe 2016 Steph is still the gold standard.

2016 Steph
O-RAPTOR (RS Only):11.1
O-LEBRON: 6.75
O-RPM: 12.03
O-EPM: 8.8
O-BPM: 10.4

2023 Jokic
O-RAPTOR: 10.1
O-LEBRON: 5.
O-RPM: 5.51
O-EPM: 7.9
O-BPM: 8.8

I think that keeping in mind the general scoring environment and average efficiency of the era, 2016 Steph has a strong argument for the best scoring RS ever. 2016 Steph is tied with 1971, for the highest ScoreVal ever at 3.3.
rk2023
Starter
Posts: 2,266
And1: 2,272
Joined: Jul 01, 2022
   

Re: Offensively: Current Jokic or 2016 Curry? 

Post#7 » by rk2023 » Fri Jan 20, 2023 6:13 am

LukaTheGOAT wrote:I've repeatedly said before that I think Jokic is a better offensive player than Curry in a PS setting. However, if you are asking, who do you believe was more VALUABLE offensive player during the RS on offense, I believe 2016 Steph is still the gold standard.

2016 Steph
O-RAPTOR (RS Only):11.1
O-LEBRON: 6.75
O-RPM: 12.03
O-EPM: 8.8
O-BPM: 10.4

2023 Jokic
O-RAPTOR: 10.1
O-LEBRON: 5.
O-RPM: 5.51
O-EPM: 7.9
O-BPM: 8.8

I think that keeping in mind the general scoring environment and average efficiency of the era, 2016 Steph has a strong argument for the best scoring RS ever. 2016 Steph is tied with 1971, for the highest ScoreVal ever at 3.3.


Thanks for the share, am curious how Kareem's and Steph's best years stack up historically in ScoreVal - both for RS/PS.
Mogspan wrote:I think they see the super rare combo of high IQ with freakish athleticism and overrate the former a bit, kind of like a hot girl who is rather articulate being thought of as “super smart.” I don’t know kind of a weird analogy, but you catch my drift.
LukaTheGOAT
Analyst
Posts: 3,261
And1: 2,972
Joined: Dec 25, 2019
 

Re: Offensively: Current Jokic or 2016 Curry? 

Post#8 » by LukaTheGOAT » Fri Jan 20, 2023 6:23 am

rk2023 wrote:
LukaTheGOAT wrote:I've repeatedly said before that I think Jokic is a better offensive player than Curry in a PS setting. However, if you are asking, who do you believe was more VALUABLE offensive player during the RS on offense, I believe 2016 Steph is still the gold standard.

2016 Steph
O-RAPTOR (RS Only):11.1
O-LEBRON: 6.75
O-RPM: 12.03
O-EPM: 8.8
O-BPM: 10.4

2023 Jokic
O-RAPTOR: 10.1
O-LEBRON: 5.
O-RPM: 5.51
O-EPM: 7.9
O-BPM: 8.8

I think that keeping in mind the general scoring environment and average efficiency of the era, 2016 Steph has a strong argument for the best scoring RS ever. 2016 Steph is tied with 1971, for the highest ScoreVal ever at 3.3.


Thanks for the share, am curious how Kareem's and Steph's best years stack up historically in ScoreVal - both for RS/PS.


Could you elaborate on what you are looking for? What I posted were single year RS peaks.

Kareem's PS Peak in 77, was a 4.4, which is #1 all-time for people who have played at least 200 mins.

Steph's peak was in 17 at 2.6.
rk2023
Starter
Posts: 2,266
And1: 2,272
Joined: Jul 01, 2022
   

Re: Offensively: Current Jokic or 2016 Curry? 

Post#9 » by rk2023 » Fri Jan 20, 2023 6:25 am

LukaTheGOAT wrote:
rk2023 wrote:
LukaTheGOAT wrote:I've repeatedly said before that I think Jokic is a better offensive player than Curry in a PS setting. However, if you are asking, who do you believe was more VALUABLE offensive player during the RS on offense, I believe 2016 Steph is still the gold standard.

2016 Steph
O-RAPTOR (RS Only):11.1
O-LEBRON: 6.75
O-RPM: 12.03
O-EPM: 8.8
O-BPM: 10.4

2023 Jokic
O-RAPTOR: 10.1
O-LEBRON: 5.
O-RPM: 5.51
O-EPM: 7.9
O-BPM: 8.8

I think that keeping in mind the general scoring environment and average efficiency of the era, 2016 Steph has a strong argument for the best scoring RS ever. 2016 Steph is tied with 1971, for the highest ScoreVal ever at 3.3.


Thanks for the share, am curious how Kareem's and Steph's best years stack up historically in ScoreVal - both for RS/PS.


Could you elaborate on what you are looking for? What I posted were single year RS peaks.

Kareem's PS Peak in 77, was a 4.4, which is #1 all-time for people who have played at least 200 mins.

Steph's peak was in 17 at 2.6.


Oh I was wondering if you knew (say like) how their best 5 RS and PS runs look?
Mogspan wrote:I think they see the super rare combo of high IQ with freakish athleticism and overrate the former a bit, kind of like a hot girl who is rather articulate being thought of as “super smart.” I don’t know kind of a weird analogy, but you catch my drift.
HeartBreakKid
RealGM
Posts: 22,395
And1: 18,827
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
     

Re: Offensively: Current Jokic or 2016 Curry? 

Post#10 » by HeartBreakKid » Fri Jan 20, 2023 6:49 am

Jokic eats Curry for breakfast. Curry is like a 60% shooter in the post season which is great and elite, maybe Jokic won't be much better than that this year (I think he will be, his game seems harder to stop than Curry's) - but the passing chasm is really big.

The fact that Jokic is putting up 70 TS% in the RS is just a cherry on top. But realistically, Curry was nowhere near as good in the PS as he is in the RS.
LukaTheGOAT
Analyst
Posts: 3,261
And1: 2,972
Joined: Dec 25, 2019
 

Re: Offensively: Current Jokic or 2016 Curry? 

Post#11 » by LukaTheGOAT » Fri Jan 20, 2023 8:41 am

rk2023 wrote:
LukaTheGOAT wrote:
rk2023 wrote:
Thanks for the share, am curious how Kareem's and Steph's best years stack up historically in ScoreVal - both for RS/PS.


Could you elaborate on what you are looking for? What I posted were single year RS peaks.

Kareem's PS Peak in 77, was a 4.4, which is #1 all-time for people who have played at least 200 mins.

Steph's peak was in 17 at 2.6.


Oh I was wondering if you knew (say like) how their best 5 RS and PS runs look?



Kareem

RS
71-3.3
72-3.2
73-2.5
77-2.5
83-2.4

PS
77-4.4
70-3.5
80-3.1
74-2.9
79-2.6

Steph

RS
16-3.3
18-2.4
21-2.1
15-2
19-1.8

PS
17-2.6
15-1.8
19-1.5
16-1.3
18-1.1
User avatar
RCM88x
RealGM
Posts: 15,200
And1: 19,137
Joined: May 31, 2015
Location: Lebron Ball
     

Re: Offensively: Current Jokic or 2016 Curry? 

Post#12 » by RCM88x » Fri Jan 20, 2023 2:11 pm

Relative to league average Curry was better by a clear margin to me.
Image

LookToShoot wrote:Melo is the only player that makes the Rockets watchable for the basketball purists. Otherwise it would just be three point shots and pick n roll.
User avatar
Clyde Frazier
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,228
And1: 26,109
Joined: Sep 07, 2010

Re: Offensively: Current Jokic or 2016 Curry? 

Post#13 » by Clyde Frazier » Fri Jan 20, 2023 5:38 pm

I know it sounds hyperbolic, but I'm still not sure I've seen another player bend the defense the way Curry did in 2016. It could admittedly be partially due to the evolution of the game at the time. At the least I'll call it a toss up. For the record I'm answering this for regular season only since jokic hasn't played in the playoffs yet.
No-more-rings
Head Coach
Posts: 7,104
And1: 3,912
Joined: Oct 04, 2018

Re: Offensively: Current Jokic or 2016 Curry? 

Post#14 » by No-more-rings » Fri Jan 20, 2023 6:03 pm

I feel like Jokic is just a better player at this point. We can talk about defense, but Jokic hasn’t had the luxury of being surrounded by a loaded defensive cast like Curry had most or all of his prime.
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,854
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: Offensively: Current Jokic or 2016 Curry? 

Post#15 » by Colbinii » Fri Jan 20, 2023 6:18 pm

No-more-rings wrote:I just noticed Jokic is averaging a +23 on/off, is that a record? Lol.


Garnett was +23.6 on 2003
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,879
And1: 25,201
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: Offensively: Current Jokic or 2016 Curry? 

Post#16 » by 70sFan » Fri Jan 20, 2023 6:19 pm

No-more-rings wrote:I feel like Jokic is just a better player at this point. We can talk about defense, but Jokic hasn’t had the luxury of being surrounded by a loaded defensive cast like Curry had most or all of his prime.

I'd love to see Jokic surrounded by great defensive players.
parsnips33
Head Coach
Posts: 7,408
And1: 3,383
Joined: Sep 01, 2014
 

Re: Offensively: Current Jokic or 2016 Curry? 

Post#17 » by parsnips33 » Fri Jan 20, 2023 6:31 pm

No-more-rings wrote:I feel like Jokic is just a better player at this point. We can talk about defense, but Jokic hasn’t had the luxury of being surrounded by a loaded defensive cast like Curry had most or all of his prime.


Why is this relevant?
OhayoKD
Head Coach
Posts: 6,042
And1: 3,932
Joined: Jun 22, 2022

Re: Offensively: Current Jokic or 2016 Curry? 

Post#18 » by OhayoKD » Fri Jan 20, 2023 7:13 pm

Peregrine01 wrote:I used to think it might be impossible to be more impactful than 2016 Curry was offensively but now watching Jokic, I’m just not sure. Jokic has a persistent offensive impact that Curry never did and I think it’s more valuable than the Curry explosions now and then.

Curry might be competitive(or better) from a pure impact perspective(probably aided by the league never seeing anything like that before), but I feel Jokic may actually be a better offensive player in the absolute(at least if we kept era-tranposition to the 10's and 20's). I don't think it's crazy to think of him as the best passer ever and even in league absolutely juiced with talented playmaking helios, Jokic is somehow lapping the field in "fg% boost from passing" and basically riding offense to take a very, very limited team to a 60 win pace. He can score really every way and I don't know I've seen anyone match his combination of creativity, manipulation, and accuracy. Honestly feel his velocity is underrated even if he can't quite generate the power a Lebron can.

That being said, I'm not sure I can get over the defensive part of this. I think Curry was actually quite decent defensively in 2015 and at least a positive from 16-19. His ability to rack up steals is probably boosting his metrics a little, but Curry actually doesn't gamble much, and as a guard, the lack of paint protection really isn't an issue. I think he's actually a decent man defender position to position(does seem to hold most opposing pg's below their usual averages going off playoff data) and he knows how to funnel bigger players to better defenders(did this vs Lebron in 2015 and Harden in 2018).

Jokic might just be the smartest player in the league(honestly think his iq might be better than Lebron tbh), and so that means he's also able to replicate Curry's ability to pick up steals without gambling, but the lack of paint protection presents a real issue when you're a center and as one might expect, he really isn't doing much when he faces big man. Granted in certain situations he can do some work vs teams with relatively undersized interior threats(see game 7 defense vs kawhi and paul george), but I haven't seen that replicated nearly enough to see his defense(at least in these recent) eras as a big big concern. I also think the positional scarcity add from being a stretch/playmaking 5, is relatively muted when you have unprecedented mobility from today's defensive big men. Giannis and AD are Garnett-level switchable with paint-protection to match, and Draymond pairs similar versatility/mobility with maybe being the smartest defender ever. I think we saw this in the series between the Nuggets and the Lakers where AD basically left lebron in the paint and it was Murray, not Jokic who went off. Off course Jokic did pretty well facing a smaller assignment in draymond, but I think Davis, Giannis, Bam could do well. Even something like SImmons/Embid should be quite effective.

All considered, while I think Jokic might be a better regular season player or at least a better regular season offensive player in the modern game, and potentially league breaking at earlier points(though curry also has this in his club), I think I'd still trust Curry if I was trying to win a championsihp
OhayoKD
Head Coach
Posts: 6,042
And1: 3,932
Joined: Jun 22, 2022

Re: Offensively: Current Jokic or 2016 Curry? 

Post#19 » by OhayoKD » Fri Jan 20, 2023 7:16 pm

Colbinii wrote:
No-more-rings wrote:I just noticed Jokic is averaging a +23 on/off, is that a record? Lol.


Garnett was +23.6 on 2003

Would have expected this from 04
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,854
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: Offensively: Current Jokic or 2016 Curry? 

Post#20 » by Colbinii » Fri Jan 20, 2023 8:30 pm

70sFan wrote:
No-more-rings wrote:I feel like Jokic is just a better player at this point. We can talk about defense, but Jokic hasn’t had the luxury of being surrounded by a loaded defensive cast like Curry had most or all of his prime.

I'd love to see Jokic surrounded by great defensive players.


We are seeing Jokic surrounded by good-to-very-good defensive players this season and I expect the playoffs to be different than the previous 2 seasons.

Very few Offensive Stars in NBA History were ever surrounded by a Draymond-tier defender though.

Return to Player Comparisons