Dirk wrote:ben10simmons wrote:Dirk wrote:What a special night for the Nuggets. Season high 38 assists. 16 dunks.
Murray triple double and Pacers destroyed. Looks like they had a lot of fun out there.
The Nuggets have won the last 3 games Jokic missed (3-2) overall. Mavs are 0-5 without Luka.
Not sure how rational it is to prop up a candidate because his team finishes #1 or #2 and downgrade someone else for his team finishing #5 or #6, when there's an obvious gap in talent in the roster around them.
But throughout NBA history we've rarely seen a player win MVP if their team isn't Top 4.
If I am not mistaken, the Nuggets last year finished #6 seed and the 10th best record in the league.
Yes, and Jokic was the most deserving candidate, had the best statistical season in history by some advanced stats, was 1st in all other advanced stats, achieved something no other player in history did (2000/1000/500), and in the process won more games than Giannis, Embiid, Luka. Only Tatum and Booker won more. So again what is the argument for anybody over him last year?
This season he is also doing some historical ****, the best stats. His team is really good this season, unlike last year and as expected when he has great team, not only he, but his team is dominating. Lifting everybody else around him to best seasons (AG, KCP, Brown), because he is the best playmaker and offensive player in the league. What is there not to understand?





