SkyBill40 wrote:But would we really want Russell? He's not that great but I guess he could play the point in place of Paul once he's gone. I just don't want to see us overreach and get burned by sacrificing FRP's that we're going to need for more than just bargaining chips.Ghost of Kleine wrote:Also IF we traded for Russell at the deadline, wouldn't we also get his full bird rights since he has three seasons with Minnesota?? So we could pay him up to 175% of his 31 million (not that we'd want to of course) and I do think he'd resign for less to not only play here but to play with Book and have a more legitimate chance to compete.
Sent from my [Samsung Z4 Fold] using RealGM mobile app
We'd want Russell in a swap for Paul. And no picks would be necessary as he's expiring and they've been looking to offload him. AND ALSO, They're pretty desperate to compete at a higher level in order to validate the Gobert trade (made it look successful and not such a dreadful failure) and also with a deeper postseason run with Paul, They'd be able to somewhat minimize the value they surrendered (picks) for Gobert. So the incentive is absolutely there and the interest too (after talking to a great many Wolves fans on the premise of exchanging Paul for Russell). They eagerly accepted!
As for him not being very good, He is averaging:
https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/r/russeda01.html
17 points/2 rebounds/ 6+ assists on 46% FG/ 37% 3 PT/ 86%FT/ 55% EFG/ 59% TS. But his per 36#s are:
19 points/ 3 reb / 7 assists/ 1 steal. I'm absolutely positive he'd just need a change of environment and he'd primed to break out! Also he's closer to 6'5 than 6'4. But most importantly, Even his current production is better than what Paul is offering the team at the same 30 million contractual cost. So in a swap for Paul (Without picks involved) I'd be happy to take Russell back. And the beauty of this trade would be that we can give Russell some significant run alongside Booker for the rest of the season. And IF he shows out (as I would expect him to) we'd have his full bird rights to resign him if we choose. But IF he doesn't impress for whatever reason, we're not contractually obligated to him and we can use that money saved towards absorbing Johnson's extension at less of a tax penalty than IF we still had Paul or had to eat his 15 million partial guarantee!
Maybe we get really clever and trade Paul for Russell in a swap. And then also trade Saric/ Shamet/Craig/ future lotto protected 1st for Rozier or maybe even Van Vleet. And run one of those two at the backup SG spot (as an insurance policy) in case we decide to not resign Russell? Then his 30 million expiring salary would still count towards our Luxury tax penalties reduction and we'd just slot one of those two guards into Paul's role instead. an additional deal for Rozier could look like:
Crowder/Shamet/Saric/craig/future (lotto protected) 1st for Rozier/Oubre/Jones.
OR maybe
Crowder/Shamet/Saric/ Craig/ future (lotto protected) 1st for Rozier/ Washington/Richards.
(The Russell/ Rozier version)
(Russell/Van Vleet/Kuzma version 1).
OR
(Russell/ Van Vleet version 2)
Van Vleet/Kuzma version)



















