SOUL wrote:
Ummm i dont wanna sound like an old man here but whats the context on why he is doing that with a poke.on card?
Moderators: ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass
SOUL wrote:
RookieStar wrote:SOUL wrote:
Ummm i dont wanna sound like an old man here but whats the context on why he is doing that with a poke.on card?
pepe1991 wrote:God damn it Cole's favorite pokemon is same as mine
It would have been cool if he brought some trap card from yugioh
BadMofoPimp wrote:Durant thinks Vooch is one of the Best Centers in the NBA. I will take his word over a couch-GM yelling at a TV.
pepe1991 wrote:NavalAviator94 wrote:pepe1991 wrote:There was lot of energy from Magic going into this game, first Isaac's game in near 3 years.
Celtics couldn't match it. Especially without 3 key rotation peaces that includes two guards and only serious rotation big they have.
Celtics in general have bad teams problem. 7 out of 13 losses are against teams with negative record, including epic a**whooping vs Oklahoma where they allowed 150 points. ( hello Xat)
But imo, they are clear cut favorites for title this year.
Magic 100% aren't bottom of the league no more. And that's a good thing, despite crying for tanking.
Isaac is back,that's whole theme of a night. Won't talk about player based on 10 min and 2 and half years out.
This game kind a confirms my feeling about Magic guards. Whenever Cole Anthony is playing great, Magic are winning
Even just looking at his splits in wins vs losses shows difference.
Magic are 6-2 in games when Cole scores at least 15 points.
I thought they said on the broadcast we were 9-2 when Cole scores atleast 13.
It’s clear we go as Cole goes.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
Because , when he is hot, he brings things "normal" above average guards today bring.
He shoots, clashes, scores, runs transition.
ofc when he is bad, it's really bad. But yea, Cole is good reminder that Magic need high quality guard and that guard will determinate Magic future ceiling.
His impact on winning vs production is polar opposite to Fultz .Fultz has more : points, assists, rebounds and higher usage in losses.
tooler wrote:pepe1991 wrote:NavalAviator94 wrote:I thought they said on the broadcast we were 9-2 when Cole scores atleast 13.
It’s clear we go as Cole goes.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
Because , when he is hot, he brings things "normal" above average guards today bring.
He shoots, clashes, scores, runs transition.
ofc when he is bad, it's really bad. But yea, Cole is good reminder that Magic need high quality guard and that guard will determinate Magic future ceiling.
His impact on winning vs production is polar opposite to Fultz .Fultz has more : points, assists, rebounds and higher usage in losses.
What I don’t understand is how the team is so good that 13 points from a 6’3” guard is enough to put them over the top. It doesn’t “feel” like the rest of the team is that dominant or doing anything unusual. I guess the length is unique and they play hard at times, which might catch lazy teams off guard.
KillMonger wrote:it still doesn't feel real lol....there were legit posters that thought he would never play again....i'm sure the posts are still there...too lazy to look up the receipts
tooler wrote:pepe1991 wrote:NavalAviator94 wrote:I thought they said on the broadcast we were 9-2 when Cole scores atleast 13.
It’s clear we go as Cole goes.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
Because , when he is hot, he brings things "normal" above average guards today bring.
He shoots, clashes, scores, runs transition.
ofc when he is bad, it's really bad. But yea, Cole is good reminder that Magic need high quality guard and that guard will determinate Magic future ceiling.
His impact on winning vs production is polar opposite to Fultz .Fultz has more : points, assists, rebounds and higher usage in losses.
What I don’t understand is how the team is so good that 13 points from a 6’3” guard is enough to put them over the top. It doesn’t “feel” like the rest of the team is that dominant or doing anything unusual. I guess the length is unique and they play hard at times, which might catch lazy teams off guard.
KillMonger wrote:
Bergmaniac wrote:For me this is a more impressive win than the two in Boston. Yes, we were at home and had a better injury situation, but the two wins in Boston were largely because they shot terribly from 3 on mostly good looks. This time they shot well from 3 and we still won comfortably. The defense was really good for most of the game, especially the second half, and the Celtics couldn't keep up. Losing the big first half win didn't faze our players which is one of the most impressive things about this team, stuff like this don't bother them. Cole was huge, he even played well on defense for a change. Paolo looked great, when his 3 is falling he is just a nightmare to guard, Franz with his usual all around display, Suggs's defence really set the tone for the second unit. WCJ with a very good game on both ends. Harris didn't score or shoot much, but his defense was very good too. And, of course, Isaac looked really good in his minutes, which is great to see.
BTW, I watched this with Eddie House's commentary, it was pretty hilarious towards the end.
https://youtu.be/4uIuJU745RsOptimus_Steel wrote:Bergmaniac wrote:For me this is a more impressive win than the two in Boston. Yes, we were at home and had a better injury situation, but the two wins in Boston were largely because they shot terribly from 3 on mostly good looks. This time they shot well from 3 and we still won comfortably. The defense was really good for most of the game, especially the second half, and the Celtics couldn't keep up. Losing the big first half win didn't faze our players which is one of the most impressive things about this team, stuff like this don't bother them. Cole was huge, he even played well on defense for a change. Paolo looked great, when his 3 is falling he is just a nightmare to guard, Franz with his usual all around display, Suggs's defence really set the tone for the second unit. WCJ with a very good game on both ends. Harris didn't score or shoot much, but his defense was very good too. And, of course, Isaac looked really good in his minutes, which is great to see.
BTW, I watched this with Eddie House's commentary, it was pretty hilarious towards the end.
LOL what did House say?
Optimus_Steel wrote:Bergmaniac wrote:For me this is a more impressive win than the two in Boston. Yes, we were at home and had a better injury situation, but the two wins in Boston were largely because they shot terribly from 3 on mostly good looks. This time they shot well from 3 and we still won comfortably. The defense was really good for most of the game, especially the second half, and the Celtics couldn't keep up. Losing the big first half win didn't faze our players which is one of the most impressive things about this team, stuff like this don't bother them. Cole was huge, he even played well on defense for a change. Paolo looked great, when his 3 is falling he is just a nightmare to guard, Franz with his usual all around display, Suggs's defence really set the tone for the second unit. WCJ with a very good game on both ends. Harris didn't score or shoot much, but his defense was very good too. And, of course, Isaac looked really good in his minutes, which is great to see.
BTW, I watched this with Eddie House's commentary, it was pretty hilarious towards the end.
LOL what did House say?
California Gold wrote:This is extra because people hate the Lakers and their brand so much.
This trade wasn't some conspiracy - it was just a GM wanting AD bad enough where in most people's eyes he overpaid by a long shot to get him.