NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
Looks like the trade debate has resolved itself.
Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, HerSports85, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, dakomish23, mpharris36, Jeff Van Gully

thebuzzardman wrote:spree2kawhi wrote:omerome wrote:I mean...I'm good with it if we can be the 5th or 6th seed. I don't want us to have a homecourt (dis)advantage or be in the play-in.
That was going to happen. Fans would always give in and buy the BS product.
However, people should really get their heads around the fact that it is a positive outcome if you compete in the league. The fifth or sixth seed in the East means you’re between tenth and twentieth in the league. It is also a success if you get the chance to draft a franchise player. So in fact the only successful seasons are the ones where you finish top 10 or bottom 10, which we don’t. Either top 10 or bottom 10. Both results mean you’re actually going somewhere.
Being content with the fifth seed and a first round exit means that you (not personally you but everybody) don’t get it. I’m sorry to put it that way, but the writing has been on the wall all season. Mediocre roster, some meaningless addition at guard, not good, not bad, not noteworthy, not a team to watch or… and that’s most important… develop. Just good enough that people will shut up and watch. As always.
Knicks had the 10th best record in the NBA after the win.
spree2kawhi wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:spree2kawhi wrote:That was going to happen. Fans would always give in and buy the BS product.
However, people should really get their heads around the fact that it is a positive outcome if you compete in the league. The fifth or sixth seed in the East means you’re between tenth and twentieth in the league. It is also a success if you get the chance to draft a franchise player. So in fact the only successful seasons are the ones where you finish top 10 or bottom 10, which we don’t. Either top 10 or bottom 10. Both results mean you’re actually going somewhere.
Being content with the fifth seed and a first round exit means that you (not personally you but everybody) don’t get it. I’m sorry to put it that way, but the writing has been on the wall all season. Mediocre roster, some meaningless addition at guard, not good, not bad, not noteworthy, not a team to watch or… and that’s most important… develop. Just good enough that people will shut up and watch. As always.
Knicks had the 10th best record in the NBA after the win.
I’m confident this team will finish with exactly the 15th best record in the league.

Fat Kat wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
Looks like the trade debate has resolved itself.
Hes_On_Fire wrote:If any GM trades even one first rounder that’s not top 29 protected for Alex Caruso they should fired on the spot.
?s=46&t=KB33Rz97jg41fCDtZdSp2A
Richard4444 wrote:Fat Kat wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
Looks like the trade debate has resolved itself.
Yes, we are definitely trading for him. We love injured players. And the price has dropped.
spree2kawhi wrote:RHODEY wrote:robillionaire wrote:
i'm staying up for it
We stayed up for nothing...
They only showed the Celtic's reaction to the loss. The hidden message. The Celtics lost the game, the Knicks didn't win it. They also ignored the results of the pregame prediction regarding who would score more....the Randle and Brunson duo versus Brown and Tatum.
They are so damn predictably lame. The broadcast is just one commercial to fawn over the same 6 or 7 players,. When the script gets flipped they just go into ignore mode. Thank god there are alternatives like this forum and Internet broadcasts like KnickfanTV.
I have long distanced myself from the Knicks emotionally, basically since the Sprewell days because this franchise never gets it done and always lost momentum when it was time for change. From that view, Boston actually lost the game and New York didn’t win it. In the big picture, that’s just the way things are. Boston has been a true contender and the Knicks aren’t at all. Nobody cares about the Knicks until some real changes are made to the roster. It’s simply the way it is. Who wants to watch Julius Randle play? He isn’t that type of talent.

MrDollarBills wrote:Any reason why Frankie Isola is going off on James Dolan this morning on twitter? Sh*t seems personal
8516knicks wrote:spree2kawhi wrote:RHODEY wrote:We stayed up for nothing...
They only showed the Celtic's reaction to the loss. The hidden message. The Celtics lost the game, the Knicks didn't win it. They also ignored the results of the pregame prediction regarding who would score more....the Randle and Brunson duo versus Brown and Tatum.
They are so damn predictably lame. The broadcast is just one commercial to fawn over the same 6 or 7 players,. When the script gets flipped they just go into ignore mode. Thank god there are alternatives like this forum and Internet broadcasts like KnickfanTV.
I have long distanced myself from the Knicks emotionally, basically since the Sprewell days because this franchise never gets it done and always lost momentum when it was time for change. From that view, Boston actually lost the game and New York didn’t win it. In the big picture, that’s just the way things are. Boston has been a true contender and the Knicks aren’t at all. Nobody cares about the Knicks until some real changes are made to the roster. It’s simply the way it is. Who wants to watch Julius Randle play? He isn’t that type of talent.
***
While u have a point about Randle, how many 'ships did Sprewell win with the Knicks, I forgot? His stats look like a poor man's RJ. This is your gold standard for the Knicks?

MrDollarBills wrote:Any reason why Frankie Isola is going off on James Dolan this morning on twitter? Sh*t seems personal
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
spree2kawhi wrote:Nurkic has become available … we should go get him and OG.
Brunson
Grimes
OG
Randle
Nurkic

spree2kawhi wrote:8516knicks wrote:spree2kawhi wrote:I have long distanced myself from the Knicks emotionally, basically since the Sprewell days because this franchise never gets it done and always lost momentum when it was time for change. From that view, Boston actually lost the game and New York didn’t win it. In the big picture, that’s just the way things are. Boston has been a true contender and the Knicks aren’t at all. Nobody cares about the Knicks until some real changes are made to the roster. It’s simply the way it is. Who wants to watch Julius Randle play? He isn’t that type of talent.
***
While u have a point about Randle, how many 'ships did Sprewell win with the Knicks, I forgot? His stats look like a poor man's RJ. This is your gold standard for the Knicks?
Well he took them to the NBA Finals. Went to the WCF with Minnesota too. Twice the player RJ is ever going to be. How old are you to talk about his stats lol