Samurai wrote:thesack12 wrote:Samurai wrote:Well of course if you are trying to downgrade then there are a wide range of options you could go at RT; downgrades are easy. The poster had stated that we needed to upgrade the OL, which makes sense. Upgrading the OL is a completely different scenario than downgrading it. Even a small downgrade is still a downgrade.
Who's trying to downgrade? We'd all love to upgrade every position group on the roster, and of course the team would as well.
Cost is one of the biggest factors in the equation of team building. It must be considered when making roster decisions.
We also aren't talking about Jonathan Ogden here. Replacing or even upgrading on Mike McGlinchey isn't a daunting task. Spencer Burford might be able to do both of those things. Maybe kicking Burford over slightly downgrades RT but using the money saved on letting McGlinchey walk allows them to bring in a solid Center to replace Brendel. All of which results in a net upgrade to the O-line and perhaps even cheaper to boot.
Maybe, maybe not but there are several layers to be considered here.
The downgrade comment was in response to the bolded part. As bad as McGlinchey has been at times, his PFF grade this season was 71.5 compared to Compton's 46.6, so yeah you are looking at a significant downgrade there.
Assuming we go with Purdy and Lance as our QB's (obviously a huge question mark at this point since we don't know yet if Purdy will need Tommy John yet), we would have one of the least expensive QB tandems in football. McGlinchey had a decent year but highly unlikely that he will command anything close to the $13M deal that Laken Tomlinson got. McGlinchey's current contract was paying him an average of $4.6M/year and I am skeptical that another team is going to offer him twice as much as that.
If there is a way to significantly upgrade RT for around the same money, then I'm all for that. I just don't see many/any realistic options to upgrade there given our lack of top draft picks. And since Brunskill and Brendel are both FA's as well, the need to address RG and C become needs that are as big (or bigger) as RT since we have no one to slide in at C, Burford (49.6 PFF grade) is unproven and Brunskill himself is better suited as a generalist insurance policy than the starting RG for a Super Bowl team. Bottom line is I am not convinced we can find a better RT for less money than what we currently have. It is typically easier to find a solid G than a T.
I'm not sure how Compton's rating this season while playing for a different team (on only 30 snaps) is a compelling piece of evidence.
Last season's ratings of Compton (86.5) and McGlinchey's (69.8) are much more relevant, seeing as how Compton directly replaced McGlinchey's role.
PFF ratings are far from the end all be all and should be taken with a grain of salt, but if we are going to use them to build our cases here Compton was actually a sizable UPGRADE on McGlinchey, not a downgrade.
Moving on to your larger points, I agree with you. Tackles aren't super easy to find, and aren't cheap. So when you have one that you aren't sold on hitting free agency, you have a tough decision to make. There also isn't a lot of RT talent hitting the market this offseason, so that might inflate the demand/price for Mike as well.
McGlinchey also showed some improvement this season, perhaps because he came into the season with more mass than he's had previously. While his pass protection was better than season's past, he still gets consistently beaten and misses assignments. Sometimes when he gets beat, its ugly as he gets beaten badly. Also, overall his run blocking declined this season. Run blocking was supposed to be where he hung his hat. On top of this Mike committed the 8th most penalties among O-Lineman. That's definitely not good. You know O-lineman are playing well when they are more or less invisible on the field and their name doesn't get talked about. Yet, #69 is frequently quite noticeable out there on the field, and usually not in a good way.
All this being taken into consideration, I just have a hard time wrapping my head around giving McGlinchey a raise and realistically hoping the O-line play improves. McGlinchey would be locked into like a 4 year extension moving forward and most likely continuing his up and down ho-hum type of play. As a ripple effect of having a mediocre RT locked in to an expensive contract for several seasons, it definitely makes you have some pause with finding potential upgrades down the line. I.E. in the 2024 draft when the 9ers will have premium picks again. Its unlikely they would look at taking a high end RT prospect at the top of the draft, as that would mean they either have the prospect ride the bench for awhile or bench the vet with the high cap hit (McGlinchey.)
As I was typing that above paragraph, slapping the non-exclusive franchise tag on McGlinchey started making more and more sense in my head. Would allow them to fill the RT position next season with a guy who obviously knows the system, but not commit long term to a guy that has not played consistently good football since he arrived. Which allows them to kick the can down the road, until they have more flexibility and options (i.e. restocked draft pick cupboard) to re-evaluate in 2024. The picture on what to do with McGlinchey/RT position would look a lot different in 2024 when the 9ers have all of their draft picks. Alos, Burford getting more experience might give the team confidence that they can reliably plug him into RT in 2024. More time would certainly alleviate some of the "we don't have any other options" type of pressure to bring him back.
I kind of liken it to the Armstead decision and eventual extension. Armstead was highly underwhelming until his contract year, in which he was flanked by both Bosa and Buckner so he was able to get a lot of winnable matchups in that contract year. I said it at the time, that they shouldn't trust that contract year production and slap him with the franchise tag and create a "prove it" type of year. Well they didn't and gave him a HUGE extension, and he was a big disappointment immediately after signing the extension with the talent along the D-Line getting watered down , and he's continued to be very underwhelming ever since.
Don't commit expensive long term resources to mediocre players that you aren't sold on, when you don't have to. There are things available (like franchise tags) that afford you that option while keeping some team continuity. As for McGlinchey specifically using the Non Exclusive franchise tag on him makes a lot of sense. Not only does it carry a cheaper cost on the 1 year contract, but it allows the player to negotiate with other teams. So if some dumb team loves McGlinchey for some crazy reason and offers him a big contract the 9ers can decline to match it and they will get 2 first round picks from the other team. Of course, that is not going to happen for a guy like Mike McGlinchey but using the non-exclusive tag would lower the 1 year rate tag rate on the cap as opposed to the exclusive tag.